The Qui Tam Case of Dr. JudyWood 9/11

[Serpo]

(http://www.scribd.com/doc/196414196/090617-9-11CaseToHaveItsDay)2 Congressmen Viewed Shocking 9-11 Report – Saudi Arabia & Israel May Be Connected To Use of Directed Energy Weapon on 9-11
Monday, January 6, 2014 1:04













(Before It's News) (http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/2-congressmen-viewed-shocking-9-11-report-saudi-arabia-israel-may-may-be-connected-to-directed-energy-weapons-use-on-9-11-2866478.html)
by Pete Santilli , The Pete Santilli Show (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://gmn.is) & The Guerilla Media Network (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://guerillamedianetwork.com)
Since 9-11, the U.S. Government has always known about who was involved in perpetrating 9-11. An investigation has reportedly revealed that Saudi Arabia and Israel may have been directly involved.
Additionally, since 2007, the federal government has in their possession a forensic investigation detailing critical evidence which confirmed the existence of free energy technology, as well as proof of it’s use on 9-11. In April 2007, Dr. Judy Wood with the help of Attorney Jerry Leaphart filed a case against contractors employed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) for fraud and deception in covering up 9-11 evidence.
Based on Dr. Judy Wood’s extensive and conclusive investigation, we now have irrefutable evidence that a directed energy weapon was used to turn 1.5 million tons of WTC towers into dust in mid air.
What has not been revealed or known until now is who may be responsible. This recent revelation that 2 Congressman have read the 28 pages of the 9-11 report are shocked by what they have read.
If the Congressman have their way, the world will discover that Saudi Arabia and Israel may be reponsible for the use of a directed energy weapon on 9-11.
Dr. Judy Wood – Qui Tam Case (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://www.scribd.com/doc/196405102/Dr-Judy-Wood-Qui-Tam-Case)
090617_9-11CaseToHaveItsDay (http://beforeitsnews.com/r2/?url=http://www.scribd.com/doc/196414196/090617-9-11CaseToHaveItsDay)


http://www.scribd.com/doc/196414196/090617-9-11CaseToHaveItsDay (http://www.scribd.com/doc/196414196/090617-9-11CaseToHaveItsDay)

[aeondaze]

Additionally, since 2007, the federal government has in their possession a forensic investigation detailing critical evidence which confirmed the existence of free energy technology, as well as proof of it’s use on 9-11. In April 2007, Dr. Judy Wood with the help of Attorney Jerry Leaphart filed a case against contractors employed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) for fraud and deception in covering up 9-11 evidence.
Based on Dr. Judy Wood’s extensive and conclusive investigation, we now have irrefutable evidence that a directed energy weapon was used to turn 1.5 million tons of WTC towers into dust in mid air.
What has not been revealed or known until now is who may be responsible. This recent revelation that 2 Congressman have read the 28 pages of the 9-11 report are shocked by what they have read.
If the Congressman have their way, the world will discover that Saudi Arabia and Israel may be reponsible for the use of a directed energy weapon on 9-11. ]

As soon as Israel gets a mention all the cackpot theories get a run so they can deliberately poison the well.

It's one thing to say the towers came down by controlled demolition, it's another to say it was fictitious "free energy" weapons. That's sure to alienate and discredit the proponents of Israel's involvement with the events that day.

This is a classic technique, thanks for discrediting the "Israel did 911" message serpo by peddling this utter bullshit.

[vacuum]

As soon as Israel gets a mention all the cackpot theories get a run so they can deliberately poison the well.

It's one thing to say the towers came down by controlled demolition, it's another to say it was fictitious "free energy" weapons. That's sure to alienate and discredit the proponents of Israel's involvement with the events that day.

This is a classic technique, thanks for discrediting the "Israel did 911" message serpo by peddling this utter bullshit.

Have you read her book or seen the evidence she's collected?

[aeondaze]

Have you read her book or seen the evidence she's collected?

I don't need to. Free energy breaks the second law of thermodynamics. No one has ever successfully overturned the laws of thermodynamics, but feel free to try, cause unfortunately that's what it's going to take to convince me otherwise...

;)

[vacuum]

I don't need to. Free energy breaks the second law of thermodynamics. No one has ever successfully overturned the laws of thermodynamics, but feel free to try, cause unfortunately that's what it's going to take to convince me otherwise...

;)

First of all, directed energy weapons don't have anything to do with free energy. A laser is a directed energy weapon, for example. Her evidence does not imply free energy. She doesn't advocate free energy I don't think.



Now with those two topics separated, and on the topic of free energy:

Nuclear and solar are free energy, and they don't break the 2nd law.

NASA is working on free energy and it seems they have it (here (http://climate.nasa.gov/news/864) and here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtHR1NCzeKU))

The US government is funding it (see page 11, 3.6) (https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=1c56ac4a-0acd-43ee-a2ec-ab80b33f4146)

[aeondaze]

First of all, directed energy weapons don't have anything to do with free energy. A laser is a directed energy weapon, for example. Her evidence does not imply free energy. She doesn't advocate free energy I don't think.



Now with those two topics separated, and on the topic of free energy:

Nuclear and solar are free energy, and they don't break the 2nd law.

NASA is working on free energy and it seems they have it (here (http://climate.nasa.gov/news/864) and here (http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html))

The US government is funding it (see page 11, 3.6) (https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=1c56ac4a-0acd-43ee-a2ec-ab80b33f4146)

Then this would constitute a misleading use of terms

'Free energy' ( outside of well defined terms like Gibbs or helmholtz free energy) is categorically reserved for devices which contradict the second law of thermodynamics. This is the spirit of her meaning.

With these terms now well defined we can now ascertain that solar and nuclear energy most definately do not violate the second law and are NOT free energy.

You are simply conflating terms and meanings. It helps to have these well defined.

[madfranks]

I agree with aeondaze, "free energy" implies something for nothing. Especially when you read:


the federal government has in their possession a forensic investigation detailing critical evidence which confirmed the existence of free energy technology

it sounds like something new and sci-fi like.

[vacuum]

Here's what the free energy community defines it as:

For our purposes, "free energy" is defined as energy that is obtained from a source that is available free of charge and is non-depleting. (source (http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Free_energy))

That's the common usage definition if you talk to anyone who has done more than a superficial investigation of the subject. Tom Bearden has been saying solar is free energy for like 30+ years. So it is indeed the standard usage of the term. And it is free. It sustains life on earth and there is no bill.

[aeondaze]

Here's what the free energy community defines it as:

For our purposes, "free energy" is defined as energy that is obtained from a source that is available free of charge and is non-depleting. (source (http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Free_energy))

That's the common usage definition if you talk to anyone who has done more than a superficial investigation of the subject. Tom Bearden has been saying solar is free energy for like 30+ years. So it is indeed the standard usage of the term.

Well then that's bogus, slave labor would also be comsidered free energy then. If you believe this, you're prone to believing anything.

[vacuum]

Well then that's bogus, slave labor would also be comsidered free energy then. If you believe this, you're prone to believing anything.

If you want to leave standard physics to biological-evolutionary-socio-political-ethical-occult-hypertiger physics, then indeed the word could probably be used in that context. I've simply given you a definition, not a belief system.

[vacuum]

Here's the main practical question with regards to "free energy":

Is there an ambient, traveling, or trapped energy at a lower entropy than us which is hidden from us either in it's existence or method to untrap it? The answer to that question could be 'yes' just as easily as it could be 'no'.

[aeondaze]

If you want to leave standard physics to biological-evolutionary-socio-political-ethical-occult-hypertiger physics, then indeed the word could probably be used in that context. I've simply given you a definition, not a belief system.

If in this gobbledygook you mean observed phenomena, then yes I'd much prefer to leave it at that thanks.

The definition you gave has no basis in reality. Arguing photovoltaic energy is free is at best disingenuous and at worst utterly false.

Photovoltaic cells nor nuclear power plants themselves are free, they require capital expenditure as much as mining for coal or in fact any other source of energy that you can think of. Just because one individual has been saying it for thirty years does not make it correct or factual.

Blaming an opinion which has its basis in observed real phenomena on the 'occult' is utterly absurd and emotionaly reactive.

[vacuum]

Here's an article written on the definition of the term:
http://www.pureenergyblog.com/2013/03/13/575/8502265_introduction-to-the-free-energy-revolution/

[aeondaze]

Here's an entire article written on the definition of the term:
http://www.pureenergyblog.com/2013/03/13/575/8502265_introduction-to-the-free-energy-revolution/

Thanks vacuum, appreciate the link however, from what you've described to me I now know enough to be happy to steer clear. A definition is only as good as the clarity, reason and consistency with which it can be applied. This 'definition' of 'free energy' of which you subscribe is unbalanced and fallacious.

[Glass]

I think it is more an issue of where the inputs are in the energy consumption chain. Free energy is probably just that, free latent energy ready to be captured and utilised. A big issue is that capturing that energy and utilising it is not a free exercise in that it requires inputs.

Solar is considered free energy, however it has an inherent cost to build the infrastructure to capture it and then use it. It is also considered clean energy, however again, to capture it and use it requires unclean industries and so on.

So does the use of energy always incur a cost of resources, manufacturing and consequentially waste products. Is just a case of the the point in time where those costs are incured can be deferred or displaced from the place/location/time where the energy is being captured, thereby giving the appearance of clean or free energy.

The earth is a big magnatron and it is these magnetic fields which do produce energy or have energy potential. Scientists know this and have done for a long time. They know about the fields at the bottom surface of the oceans. I was reading something unrelated to energy. It may have been something to do with the topic of seismology where it was mentioned. I think it was in something posted on this forum.

using the definition of free energy, coal and oil would be classed as free. Its just the utilisation that costs money/enviro impact.

[woodman]

As soon as Israel gets a mention all the cackpot theories get a run so they can deliberately poison the well.

It's one thing to say the towers came down by controlled demolition, it's another to say it was fictitious "free energy" weapons. That's sure to alienate and discredit the proponents of Israel's involvement with the events that day.

This is a classic technique, thanks for discrediting the "Israel did 911" message serpo by peddling this utter bullshit.
I agree with you in general about the 'poisoning the well' technique. I think a lot of that is going on. However, to you and anyone else who have not investigated it, I ask you to watch the video of Rense interviewing Judy Woods about the towers. The video I refer to is on Rense's site and is labeled 'What Turned the Towers to Dust' or some such. A little investigation should get you to the video. In it she talks about directed energy weapons. I don't have any stance on directed energy weapons or free energy or any of the myriad things I don't know enough about to form a dedicated opinion of.

In the video I refer to, there is footage of the steel members of the tower turning into dust and and literally falling away with the breeze. Something exotic happeded that day. I don't know what and no one who's talking does either. It's all just speculation and that's all we have at this point. The videos are quite clear though. The towers turned into dust in mid air and nothing we know of can do that to solid matter.