PDA

View Full Version : Chicago Mayor to Seek Six-Month Delay on Gun Law Overturn



Cebu_4_2
10th January 2014, 05:18 AM
Chicago Mayor to Seek Six-Month Delay on Gun Law Overturn By Andrew Harris Jan 9, 2014 2:18 PM ET LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloomberg.com%2Fnews%2F2014-01-09%2Fchicago-mayor-to-seek-six-month-delay-on-gun-law-overturn.html&title=Chicago+Mayor+to+Seek+Six-Month+Delay+on+Gun+Law+Overturn&summary=Chicago+Mayor+Rahm+Emanuel+told+the+city%E 2%80%99s+attorneys+to+seek+a+six-month+delay+of+a+federal+court+ruling+that+struck+ down+a+ban+on+gun+sales+within+city+limits.&source=Bloomberg.com)








http://www.bloomberg.com/image/iLxwvgwOI.Oc.jpg (http://www.bloomberg.com/photo/homicide-scene-investigation-in-chicago-/-ipGSn24c1Yvk.html) Photographer: Scott Olson/Getty Images Police investigate a homicide scene after a 24-year-old man was found dead with a... Read More (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-09/chicago-mayor-to-seek-six-month-delay-on-gun-law-overturn.html#)

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (http://topics.bloomberg.com/rahm-emanuel/) told the city’s attorneys to seek a six-month delay of a federal court ruling that struck down a ban on gun sales within city limits.
U.S. District Judge Edmond Chang on Jan. 6 ruled the 2010 law, which prohibits any transactions involving firearms short of a family inheritance, is unconstitutional.
Chang imposed his own delay on the decision taking effect, saying he wanted to give the city time to either seek a stay pending appeal or enact a lawful regulation. Emanuel, in a statement today, said he wants the time to craft a new ordinance.
“Though I fully disagree, the city has little option but to follow the ruling of the court,” the mayor said.
“I’ve instructed the Law Department to work with public safety experts and community leaders to create a comprehensive set of restrictions on the sale of firearms to ensure that illegal guns don’t find their way into the hands of criminals or straw purchasers.”
Chicago (http://topics.bloomberg.com/chicago/)’s murder rate last year fell 18 percent from 2012, with the number of homicides dropping to 415 from 503. The third-most populous U.S. city registered the lowest homicide rate since 1966.
Still, there were 1,864 shooting incidents and 2,328 shooting victims, according to Chicago Police Department statistics.
‘Stark Reality’ “The stark reality facing the city each year is thousands of shooting victims and hundreds of murders committed with a gun,” Chang said in his decision.
The judge said the city has an obligation to protect its citizens as well as the people’s constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms for self defense.
“That right must also include the right to acquire a firearm, although that acquisition right is far from absolute,” he said, citing restrictions on gun ownership by felons and the mentally ill, and commercial sales license requirements.
Chang said the city’s law went too far in “banning legal buyers and legal dealers from engaging in lawful acquisitions and lawful sales of firearms.”
The judge set a Jan. 13 deadline for city lawyers to file any request for a stay of his ruling and scheduled a court conference for the following day.
The 2010 lawsuit was filed by three Chicago residents, licensed as gun owners by the city and state, and the Illinois (http://topics.bloomberg.com/illinois/) Association of Firearms Retailers.
Plaintiffs’ lawyer Charles Cooper (http://topics.bloomberg.com/charles-cooper/), of the Washington law firm Cooper & Kirk Pllc, didn’t immediately respond to a telephone message seeking comment on the mayor’s announced plans.
The case is Benson v. City of Chicago, 10-cv-4184, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Harris in federal court in Chicago at aharris16@bloomberg.net

Twisted Titan
10th January 2014, 05:42 AM
That right must also include the right to acquire a firearm, although that acquisition right is far from absolute,”



what part of shall not be infringed you don't understand?

Cebu_4_2
10th January 2014, 06:05 AM
what part of shall not be infringed you don't understand?

The Zionist jew part.

Hatha Sunahara
10th January 2014, 09:01 AM
The Chicago ban on guns started in 2010. It took 4 years to get constitutional rights reinstated in the nation's second largest city. I just wonder how many people in Chicago were killed because they were unable to defend themselves during that period. I am somewhat amazed that the wheels of 'justice' actually still work anywhere in this country. Is it possible that the judiciary still abides by the constitution? Or is this just an anomalous glitch--just a bump in the road to having a constitution free country? I cannot dismiss the fact that it was the Supreme Court that gave the green light to dismantling all our constitutional rights when it intervened in the 2000 presidential election and endorsed the rule of the current elite cabal by declaring George Bush the winner of that election. I sincerely doubt that this overturning of Chicago's gun ban has any effect on the takeover by the NWO. I also wonder if this decision applies to Washington DC and New York City's gun bans. Or is the constitution locally variant?


Hatha

mick silver
10th January 2014, 11:13 AM
they mother fers are scare to death of the gangs and they know there the ones doing all the killing , if not why not go after them with everything you have . i ask a cop this , and he would not anwser me , and i know his ass , i know why and most here know why they dont