PDA

View Full Version : Self-Reliance And "Vive La Revolution"



Ares
19th February 2014, 03:42 PM
It’s pretty ironic that I have two visitors right now in my home– one from Ukraine and the other from Thailand.

Both of their countries are in the midst of chaotic turmoil right now, characterized by riots and violent clashes between protestors and police.

It reminds me of the old quote from Louis XVI upon being informed in 1789 that the French people had stormed the Bastille. The King asked, “Is it a revolt?”

“No, sire,” the duke replied, “It is a revolution.”

People in both of these countries have reached their breaking points. In Ukraine especially, economic conditions have deteriorated in almost spectacular form.

History is packed with examples of how people rise up in the streets whenever economic conditions deteriorate.

The French Revolution in 1789 is one famous example; the French people finally reached their breaking points after nearly starving to death.

The 2011 Egyptian Revolution and entire Arab Spring movement is a similar example.

In fact, a 2011 study from the New England Complex Systems Institute showed a clear statistical correlation between social unrest and (specifically) food prices. The higher food prices get, the greater the chances of riots and revolution.

This is not a condition exclusive to the developing world; it is a fundamental human trait to provide for one’s family.

And while human beings will take a lot of crap from their governments– stupid regulations, higher taxes, erosion of freedom, and even inflation– the moment that a man is no longer able to put food on the table for his family, revolution foments.

Europe and the US are not immune to this. And with deteriorating wealth gaps, 50%+ youth unemployment, unchecked government power, and a system that disproportionately favors the elite, the conditions are ripe.

The main difference is that Westerners have been brainwashed into believing that the civilized people voice their grievances in a voting booth rather than doing battle in the streets.

It’s a false premise. Unfortunately, so is violent revolution.

As my dictionary so perfectly defines, “revolution” has two meanings.

First, it can denote an overthrow of a sitting government, whether violent or ‘bloodless’.

But in celestial terms, ‘revolution’ denotes a complete orbit around a fixed axis. In other words, after one revolution, you end up right back where you started.

So whether violent or non-violent, or whether in a voting booth or on the streets, revolutions put a country right back where it started.

In the French revolution, people traded an absolute monarch in Louis the XVI for a genocidal dictator in Robespierre for a military dictator in Napoleon.

In 1917, the Russians traded Tsarist autocracy for Communist autocracy.

In 2011, Egyptians traded Hosni Mubarak for Mohamad Hussein Tantawi (who subsequently suspended the Constitution), for Mohamed Morsi (who as President awarded himself unlimited powers), for yet another coup d’etat.

All of this is because of a knee-jerk reaction– ‘if our country is having major problems, we should throw the bums out and let the man on the white horse take over.’

This creates a never-ending cycle in which the fundamental problems perpetuate.

It’s not about any single person or group of people. It is the system itself that needs changing.

In our system we award a tiny elite with the power to kill, steal, wage war, educate our children, and conjure unlimited quantities of paper money out of thin air.

This is just plain silly. And antiquated. We’re not living in the Middle Ages anymore where we need kings to tell us what to do, knights to keep the peace, and serfs to do all the work (and enrich the nobles).

Yet this is not too far from the system we have today.

The real answer is within ourselves. As Ron Paul told our audience in Santiago last year, become less dependent on the government and more self-reliant:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA5sIZfTxaw&feature=player_embedded

link to video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA5sIZfTxaw&feature=player_embedded

This idea is beginning to resonate with more and more people who are increasingly disgusted with the system… and all parties.

With our modern technology, transportation, and access to information, we have all the tools available to do this.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-19/self-reliance-and-vive-la-revolution

EE_
19th February 2014, 04:25 PM
Tell your visitors that the zionist occupied US goverenment is responsible for destroying the global economies and we don't approve of it one damn bit!

Twisted Titan
19th February 2014, 06:19 PM
And while human beings will take a lot of crap from their governments– stupid regulations, higher taxes, erosion of freedom, and even inflation– the moment that a man is no longer able to put food on the table for his family, revolution foments.


Not only revolution.

They will also get balling rolling in every department.

Those men that now have guns wont give a rats @$$ about a CCW they will start packing and using it and not sticking around for the clean up crew.

Authority figures wont. Be respected or saught for their opinions , people will govern themselves accordingly

Hatha Sunahara
19th February 2014, 08:25 PM
In our system we award a tiny elite with the power to kill, steal, wage war, educate our children, and conjure unlimited quantities of paper money out of thin air.

In our system we allow a tiny elite to usurp the power of our government. And when we've had enough, we go after the politicians who have sold our government out to the usurpers. When I hear people talking about 'voting out the incumbents' I have to laugh. Even if there was enough unity to do that, nothing would change. Those who replace the incumbents will quickly discover that they have no power, and voila, the status quo reasserts itself. The real power resides in those who ISSUE THE MONEY.

If you want a real change, a real revolution, you have to effect a change in the real power. You have to create new rules that address the issues that you find intolerable. Changing the faces of the people who enforce the rules without changing the rules guarantees there will be no change.

Now when I see Thais or Ukranians or Venezuelans, or even Americans burning down their central banks and hanging their bankers, and shutting down their mass media outlets, I might be convinced that a real revolution is taking place. Anything short of that is nothing more than a kabuki dance. Generally, I doubt that people rioting in the streets will achieve any change whasoever. Eventually, the populations of all countries will understand where the real source of power is. The status quo is the MONEY SYSTEM. If that is changed, everything else will change as well. Changing the money system will stop the usurpation of power. When people stop doing things for money, and start doing things because they believe in them, the world will change.

And yes, Ron Paul is right. Self-reliance is a high value personal quality. Generally, it means you can tell what is a lie. Knowing the truth is not nearly as important as knowing what is NOT the truth. The big revolution will happen when people en-masse see through the lies of the usurpers.


Hatha

Ponce
19th February 2014, 09:17 PM
It is not "Vive la revolution"........ but .........."Viva la revolucion"....... unless is another foreign language.

V

govcheetos
20th February 2014, 02:23 AM
It is not "Vive la revolution"........ but .........."Viva la revolucion"....... unless is another foreign language.

V

Is is.

Twisted Titan
20th February 2014, 04:36 AM
In our system we allow a tiny elite to usurp the power of our government. And when we've had enough, we go after the politicians who have sold our government out to the usurpers. When I hear people talking about 'voting out the incumbents' I have to laugh. Even if there was enough unity to do that, nothing would change. Those who replace the incumbents will quickly discover that they have no power, and voila, the status quo reasserts itself. The real power resides in those who ISSUE THE MONEY



Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): "I care not what puppet* is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The* man who controls Britain's money supply controls the* British Empire and I control the British money supply."*