UNEMPLOYED WHITE PEOPLE NEED NOT APPLY FOR NEW OBAMA JOBS PROGRAM - See more

[mick silver]

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_34888.php ... UNEMPLOYED WHITE PEOPLE NEED NOT APPLY FOR NEW OBAMA JOBS PROGRAM02-20-2014 2:03 pm - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (PA)
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/files/content/34888_1thm.jpg (http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_34888.php#)WASHINGTON -- President Obama is planning to introduce an initiative with specific targets: African-American and Hispanic men who have disproportionate rates of unemployment.

Under the "My Brother's Keeper" program, foundations, businesses and community groups would develop plans to help men of color at particularly vulnerable times of their lives, administration officials said.

In previewing the initiative during last month's State of the Union address, Obama said, "I'm reaching out to some of America's leading foundations and corporations on a new initiative to help more young men of color facing tough odds stay on track and reach their full potential."

Obama had planned to hold a White House event last week to officially present the project, but it has been postponed because of bad weather.

Among the challenges faced by the "My Brother's Keeper" program: The jobless rate for black men older than 20 in January was 12 percent, compared with 6.6 percent for the nation as a whole.

For Hispanic men older than 20, the jobless rate last month was 8.2 percent.

For younger blacks and Hispanics, unemployment rates are even higher.

One model for the new effort is a mentoring program in Chicago called "Becoming A Man," which encourages young men to develop education and job training goals.

In a meeting with Obama a year ago, members of the BAM program talked about problems with gangs, drugs, gun violence and substandard schools in their neighborhoods, and how so many young people are at risk for lives of crime, poverty or early death.

Speaking after that meeting, the nation's first African-American president, who grew up with an absent father, said he told the group, "I had issues, too, when I was their age. I just had an environment that was a little more forgiving."

Just as individuals have to change their approach and behavior, Obama said, "that's what it takes for communities to change. That's what it takes for countries to change. It's not easy."

Young men in the BAM program are expected to attend the White House ceremony whenever it is re-scheduled.

Two Obama administration officials discussed the "My Brother's Keeper" program on condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt Obama's announcement.
- See more at: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_34888.php#sthash.Nazv0D29.dpuf

[zap]

When is this guy getting out of office 2016?

[milehi]

Do those jobless rates include the incarcerated?

[osoab]

When is this guy getting out of office 2016?

You wish.

[palani]

When they become a problem we can always transport them ... precedent has been set.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2eqe9gj.jpg

While the 14th amendment protects the black folk it tends not to protect the white ones.

[mick silver]

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/WHITES/white_image08.jpg

[mick silver]

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/ZOG/gov_image03.jpg

[SWRichmond]

more reparations

[woodman]

more reparations
I think the more apt term is 'Rape'rations. As far as reparations go, they should do some actual work and pay the reparations to themselves. They are the only ones that I can tell by simply looking at them, that have the blood of the slave owners. If you are a descendant of slaves, you have the blood of the owners.

[madfranks]

Mick where do you find those comics?

[woodman]

Do those jobless rates include the incarcerated?

It is starting to seem as though anyone living in the US who is not a member of the 'club' is incarcerated.

[midnight rambler]

It is starting to seem as though anyone living in the US who is not a member of the 'club' is incarcerated.

The 'UNITED STATES' is history's largest open air prison.

[7th trump]

When they become a problem we can always transport them ... precedent has been set.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2eqe9gj.jpg

While the 14th amendment protects the black folk it tends not to protect the white ones.
Bullshit palani, and your statement is an admission that you, once again, haven't a clue!

The 14th amendment's sole purpose was to bring the negro up to the whites status by giving them the equal protections of the law. However, none of the northern states, after winning the civil war, would allow the colored races to be a political equal to the white race...."The People"!
Has nothing at all to do whether or not whites are protected by the 14th.....the 14th wasn't about the whites to begin with as the whites had the protections of the Bill of Rights where as the newly freed Negros had nothing to protect them from political encroachment...hence why the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
What you don't purport palani, from lack of understanding, is the 14th amendment is not a discriminatory piece of legislation.....you don't have to be colored to fall under the jurisdiction of the government via Section 1 of the 14th amendment.


Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
.....it was designed that way....as the government cannot be discriminatory at any time.
White people have been giving up their political "KING" status of "The People" since 1935 and filing government forms to get Social Security benefits as a "US citizen".

What you purport palani about the 14th amendment is half truths and at times just slivers of truths all garbled up in piles of internet bullshit armchair theories and lies.
Its any wonder you get out of bed and put your underwear on correctly.
Please research the subject before going off onto the internet and reading complete bullshit and passing it on as truth!

[palani]

Please research the subject before going off onto the internet and reading complete bullshit and passing it on as truth!

Do you ever read what you write and apply your comments to yourself? Your 'truths' are not my 'truths'. That makes you just another snake oil huckster.


7th_trump starting a day of work on the farm:
http://i60.tinypic.com/4pw6sg.jpg

[mick silver]

http://www.wnd.com/2014/02/i-can-do-what-i-want/http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/02/toon140214.jpg

[7th trump]

Do you ever read what you write and apply your comments to yourself? Your 'truths' are not my 'truths'. That makes you just another snake oil huckster.


7th_trump starting a day of work on the farm:
http://i60.tinypic.com/4pw6sg.jpg

The truth is not your truth palani........hence why you do not accept any truth and make "your reality" in place of the TRUTH!

Why don't you explain to me why you would say this?

Do you ever read what you write and apply your comments to yourself?
You never get into the nuts and bolts of things so please explain why you would say this?
What are you trying to get at or am I supposed to guess and you deflect my guesses as you do all the time?

[palani]

What are you trying to get at or am I supposed to guess and you deflect my guesses as you do all the time?

Your half truth is that eliminating social security eliminates all tax obligations. The 16th amendment added no extra measure of power to congress to tax. They have always had the power to tax corporations and that is what they do. Your use of the money issued by a private corporation generates the tax liability yet you scramble some chicken bones and feathers, refer to a statute and suddenly INVENT a reason why you aren't such a corporation and therefore lack any obligation to pay taxes. This is bullsh*t because living breathing people cannot touch a FRN. They are corporate in origin and anyone who touches one becomes an agent of that corporation.

Your half truth is a half lie and your attempt to lend credibility to your chicken bone reading is truly pitiful. Statutes aren't laws. They are directives issued to corporations. You handle FRNs and you observe corporate directives. WELCOME TO THE LAND OF THE DEAD. and then you want to know why I don't follow the advice of a ZOMBIE?

[monty]

6061

Sent from my iPad using Forum Runner

[midnight rambler]

anyone who touches (a Federal Reserve Note) becomes an agent of that corporation.


Well gee, speaking of statutes, there it is plain as day in plain English -


Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/411

How can ANYONE claim there's ANY ambiguity there?? ???

[palani]

How can ANYONE claim there's ANY ambiguity there?? ???

A ZOMBIE might explain to you that the ambiguity arises from the interpretation of a SEMI-COLON and this is what I mean by the phrase "reading chicken bones".

[7th trump]

Well gee, speaking of statutes, there it is plain as day in plain English -



How can ANYONE claim there's ANY ambiguity there?? ???

Can you properly understand the structure of a statute?
Have you ever looked at the statute instead of taking another interpretation of what its suppose to mean?
Heres what I mean.

Since Palani is talking about semi-colons lets take a look at the actual statute to see how its structured to get a proper interpretation of the statute.

Heres the title of the statute in blue. Take notice of the semi-colons in the title as they separate the different attributes attached to FRN's

12 U.S. Code § 411 - Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption

Ok the semi-colons are there to separate the different attributes associated with FRN's....they are separated like this.

12 U.S. Code § 411 Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption
Now it takes no genius to figure out what part of the paragraph is associated with each section of the title....heck I'll make it real easy for you midnight since I see you cant really think on your own........a third grader can color code...lets see if you can color code like a third grader can!



Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.


I mean seriously...this isn't difficult, but some people just want to be conspiracy nutcases because they cannot for the life of them understand what they read and just fill in what they want to hear and see.....because a lie is better than the truth....they are drama queens!
Palani wants you to believe if you use frn's you are a federal agent and corporate owned....but the if he can read properly he'd soon understand (if he was honest ) that frn's are NOT obligations of the individual to pay taxes.....they are obligations of the federal government (see the red section I highlighted for you)....no different in operation than US Treasure note being obligations of the federal government.

[midnight rambler]

A ZOMBIE might explain to you that the ambiguity arises from the interpretation of a SEMI-COLON and this is what I mean by the phrase "reading chicken bones".

Those reading chicken bone religions can be a real hoot!

[palani]

Those reading chicken bone religions can be a real hoot!

Yep. They tend to believe what they need to believe. Not that I don't understand the concept. It takes time to understand that something you have worked for all your life is intrinsically not in your best interest.

The sovereign can actually charge you 100% tax for using his image. Of course if he did this people would soon abandon using his currency so he has done a study to determine the tax rate that gives him a maximum return without turning people entirely off. Then he calls this a 'benefit' and assigns anyone who uses these benefits as 'debtors' or 'slaves'.

By the way, I use the phrase sovereign above pretty loosely. The U.S. has never been a sovereign entity. This is proven by their benefit of bankruptcy. A sovereign does not think in terms of not fulfilling contracts.

[7th trump]

Ok palani show us all here the connection between 12usc 411 and the specific "wages" that are shown on the W2 (specifically box 3 on the W2,3121(a) "wages", and box 1, 3401(a) "wages") that are used to determine individual taxes.
Surely, a guy who claims your professional status of knowledge in law (cough cough) has already researched the connection and can clearly convey it to the readers?
Or are we gonna see the typical deflection non-answer of asking a question with a question.

You can even employ "midnightrambler" in helping you with the task at hand of educating everyone how frns are tied to the W2.
Come on lets see it!!

[palani]

Come on lets see it!!
I once asked if I could pay a court fine in gold. The first question out of the judges mouth was 'U.S.coin?' But unfortunately for him I had only brought an Austrian gold piece and he could not face the fact that gold at the time was valued at over $1,000 an ounce. Had it been a U.S. coin in either $20 or $50 denomination he could have accepted it at face value and sent me a bill for the remainder.

Courts it seems turn a blind eye to fraud but insist upon padding their retirement with their IGG (ill gotten gain).

[7th trump]

That's not explaining how 12usc 411 is connected to a W2 or even a 1099 palani.
I specifically asked you to connect 12usc 411 to the "wages" listed on the W2....now lets see it!

How is not accepting a gold piece of foreign currency padding a retirement.
Did not the judge ask if it was a US coin?....and the judge didn't accept the foreign coin as payment so how is this conceded as fraud?

What kind of drugs are you on palani?

[palani]

now lets see it! Which statute would you like?


How is not accepting a gold piece of foreign currency padding a retirement. Fair question. Had it been a $20 gold piece he would have accepted it, exchanged it for a $20 FRN and used the coin to pad his retirement.




Did not the judge ask if it was a US coin? Is there a problem with my original statement?


....and the judge didn't accept the foreign coin as payment so how is this conceded as fraud? The U.S. accounts for gold at $42.22 per ounce rather than its current market value. The difference between the two figures is classed FRAUD.


What kind of drugs are you on Is reality a drug?

You see, your problem (other than being a ZOMBIE) is that you force a solution to your problem by these mental gyrations in order to let you continue your anti-people behavior. The solution you have settled on is not stable. You cannot maintain it because your solution is not rational. I could instruct you to THINK but I believe you have forgotten how to do that.

[midnight rambler]

I'm thinking this crazy religion we see practiced by at least one poster here involves reading chicken entrails as well. Some pretty far out shit.

[7th trump]

Which statute would you like?

Fair question. Had it been a $20 gold piece he would have accepted it, exchanged it for a $20 FRN and used the coin to pad his retirement.



Is there a problem with my original statement?

The U.S. accounts for gold at $42.22 per ounce rather than its current market value. The difference between the two figures is classed FRAUD.

Is reality a drug?

You see, your problem (other than being a ZOMBIE) is that you force a solution to your problem by these mental gyrations in order to let you continue your anti-people behavior. The solution you have settled on is not stable. You cannot maintain it because your solution is not rational. I could instruct you to THINK but I believe you have forgotten how to do that.
Ok, I'll play along with this 12usc 411 frn's thingy!
You say 12usc 411 is the reason behind being taxed on labor.

Ok then.......I want to know the connection between 12usc 411 (banking statute) and the 26usc 3121(a) "wages" that are listed in box 3 of the W2 (social security statute).
I'm all ears palani...all ears...convince me pup!

[7th trump]

I'm thinking this crazy religion we see practiced by at least one poster here involves reading chicken entrails as well. Some pretty far out shit.

The only ignorance practiced here is your demonstration in attempting to piss me off...its not working commy!

[palani]

You say 12usc 411 is the reason behind being taxed on labor.

The tax is on money rather than labor. The reason is found in Mathew 22


19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.

20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

Or do you have a higher statute than this I can refer to?

[7th trump]

The tax is on money rather than labor. The reason is found in Mathew 22



Or do you have a higher statute than this I can refer to?

You're asking me?
I thought you had this 12usc411 fully understood?
Are you suggesting you don't have a scant idea what the nexus is between 12usc 411 and the W2?
If what you are saying about 12usc 411 being the cause on being taxed then the W2 listing amounts earned and amounts deducted should reciprocate back to 12usc 411 should it not?
The criteria the government requires on the W2 is found at 26usc 6051.


26 U.S. Code § 6051 - Receipts for employees

(a) Requirement
Every person required to deduct and withhold from an employee a tax under section 3101 or 3402, or who would have been required to deduct and withhold a tax under section 3402 (determined without regard to subsection (n)) if the employee had claimed no more than one withholding exemption, or every employer engaged in a trade or business who pays remuneration for services performed by an employee, including the cash value of such remuneration paid in any medium other than cash, shall furnish to each such employee in respect of the remuneration paid by such person to such employee during the calendar year, on or before January 31 of the succeeding year, or, if his employment is terminated before the close of such calendar year, within 30 days after the date of receipt of a written request from the employee if such 30-day period ends before January 31, a written statement showing the following:

(1) the name of such person,
(2) the name of the employee (and his social security account number if wages as defined in section 3121 (a) have been paid),
(3) the total amount of wages as defined in section 3401 (a),
(4) the total amount deducted and withheld as tax under section 3402,
(5) the total amount of wages as defined in section 3121 (a),
(6) the total amount deducted and withheld as tax under section 3101,
(7) Repealed. Pub. L. 111–226, title II, § 219(a)(3),Aug. 10, 2010, 124 Stat. 2403]
(8) the total amount of elective deferrals (within the meaning of section 402 (g)(3)) and compensation deferred under section 457, including the amount of designated Roth contributions (as defined in section 402A),
(9) the total amount incurred for dependent care assistance with respect to such employee under a dependent care assistance program described in section 129 (d),
(10) in the case of an employee who is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, such employee’s earned income as determined for purposes of section 32 (relating to earned income credit),
(11) the amount contributed to any Archer MSA (as defined in section 220(d)) of such employee or such employee’s spouse,
(12) the amount contributed to any health savings account (as defined in section 223(d)) of such employee or such employee’s spouse,

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6051

Why are you referencing a Bible passage when the W2 lists 26usc 3121(a) "wages" and 26usc 3401(a) "wages"?
Mathew 22 is about the empire of Rome and its taxing laws which are long long dead!
Romes tax laws have absolutely nothing at all to do with the United States social security laws.

Are you lost, confused and cant find your way?
Are you telling me you didn't do any research.
Well I'll tell you 12usc 411 doesn't even look remotely close any "wages" reported on the W2.
Looky there....theres no mention of frns at all in 26usc 6051....hmmm...interesting!

Why is that palani?
Can you divulge in why 26usc 6051 doesn't mention frn's or 12usc 411?
What does 12usc 411 (banking statute) have to do with 26usc 3121(a) "wages" (internal revenue (social security) statute)?

[palani]

You're asking me? Don't you know?



I thought you had this 12usc411 fully understood? Did I make a statement that I fully understood 12 USC 411?



Are you suggesting you don't have a scant idea what the nexus is between 12usc 411 and the W2? Why would I claim to understand such a thing?


The criteria the government requires on the W2 is found at 26usc 6051. Why would I argue with an insane person?


Why are you referencing a Bible passage when the W2 lists 26usc 3121(a) "wages" and 26usc 3401(a) "wages"? What are the wages of sin?



Mathew 22 is about the empire of Rome and its taxing laws which are long long dead! Maxims of law originate from the Roman empire.


Romes tax laws have absolutely nothing at all to do with the United States social security laws. I suppose I would be expecting a miracle if the blind were to suddenly see?

[midnight rambler]

I'm guessing that those who read chicken bones and chicken entrails also rely on the fantasies of those in the attorn biz (aka having a license to lie, cheat, and steal) from time to time - since they're into such crazy shit to begin with.

[7th trump]

Don't you know?


Did I make a statement that I fully understood 12 USC 411?


Why would I claim to understand such a thing?

Why would I argue with an insane person?

What are the wages of sin?


Maxims of law originate from the Roman empire.

I suppose I would be expecting a miracle if the blind were to suddenly see?
Just as I thought ....you cannot tie what's purported on the W2 (social security "wages") to the use of FRN's (12usc 411).
And from the looks of it you are up to your old bag of tricks of deflection. Instead you're eagerly and purposely going to misdirect everyone to believing a scam theory you cannot confirm as fact.
Nothing but double speak armchair lawyerism coming out of you palani. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of you....tell a lie until it becomes truth.

[7th trump]

I'm guessing that those who read chicken bones and chicken entrails also rely on the fantasies of those in the attorn biz (aka having a license to lie, cheat, and steal) from time to time - since they're into such crazy shit to begin with.

Hey look palani....you have a fan......hes so eagerly strokes your ego.
Do you take him with you every where you go?
Or do you leave him at home with a bowl of water and some dog food?

Give him a dog treat would you....hes deserves something for his loyalty.

[Shami-Amourae]

Mick where do you find those comics?

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/CartoonIndex1.htm

https://encyclopediadramatica.es/A_wyatt_mann

[ShortJohnSilver]

I am glad that open debate is available on the forum.

But if I wanted to troll up a board and make its main messages disappear behind a wall of noise, I would hire palani and 7thT to do exactly what they are doing.

I am not the mod, but if I were, I would tell you 2 fight-to-the-death types to either keep it on your own thread or face bannination.

[ShortJohnSilver]

I am glad that open debate is available on the forum.

But if I wanted to troll up a board and make its main messages disappear behind a wall of noise, I would hire palani and 7thT to do exactly what they are doing.

I am not the mod, but if I were, I would tell you 2 fight-to-the-death types to either keep it on your own thread or face bannination.

[palani]

I am glad that open debate is available on the forum.

But if I wanted to troll up a board and make its main messages disappear behind a wall of noise, I would hire palani and 7thT to do exactly what they are doing.

I am not the mod, but if I were, I would tell you 2 fight-to-the-death types to either keep it on your own thread or face bannination.

Let's see if I understand this. You are happy to have open debate except when you are not involved?

Does that pretty much sum up your view in general?

[Santa]

Your use of the money issued by a private corporation generates the tax liability. Living breathing people cannot touch an FRN. They are corporate in origin and anyone who touches one becomes an agent of that corporation. Statutes aren't laws. They are directives issued to corporations. You handle FRNs and you observe corporate directives.

Good point. This is true.


Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.


So is this.


It takes time to understand that something you have worked for all your life is intrinsically not in your best interest.
The sovereign can actually charge you 100% tax for using his image. Of course if he did this people would soon abandon using his currency so he has done a study to determine the tax rate that gives him a maximum return without turning people entirely off. Then he calls this a 'benefit' and assigns anyone who uses these benefits as 'debtors' or 'slaves'.


And this.


I once asked if I could pay a court fine in gold. The first question out of the judges mouth was 'U.S.coin?' But unfortunately for him I had only brought an Austrian gold piece and he could not face the fact that gold at the time was valued at over $1,000 an ounce. Had it been a U.S. coin in either $20 or $50 denomination he could have accepted it at face value and sent me a bill for the remainder. The U.S. accounts for gold at $42.22 per ounce rather than its current market value. The difference between the two figures is classed FRAUD.


Courts it seems turn a blind eye to fraud but insist upon padding their retirement with their IGG (ill gotten gain).


The tax is on money rather than labor. The reason is found in Mathew 22

19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.

20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.


You're on a roll, Palani. Good stuff.

[midnight rambler]

Good point. This is true.



So is this.



And this.







You're on a roll, Palani. Good stuff.

Although the concept of FRNs being used as a vehicle to rob the people of all their wealth/value is extremely simple to grasp for some reason very few are able to wrap their heads around it. IMO it has to do with VERY effective brainwashing*, a lot of which entails creating the illusion that those pieces of paper actually have value instead of viewing them as the toxic, ruinous, and completely fraudulent debt instruments they actually are - the very vehicle of our ultimate demise (for intelligent folks this CANNOT be disputed). When I try to engage someone in a conversation about what FRNs truly the vast majority of the time I get this blank look from them, as if they don't want to be bothered with thinking about it (it must make their brain hurt - again, the programming is very deep and powerful on this matter).

One very fascinating thing that I've always noticed and found amusing is how people get all excited and giddy when they 'see' what they perceive to be *a lot of money* (i.e. a substantial stack of FRNs, or even a wad of FRNs). Even before I was 21 stacks of FRNs never did impress me, and at that point in my life I saw at least a couple of hundred thousand in FRNs laid out on at least one occasion (don't ask lol). What I find even more fascinating is that while a stack of $4K in FRNs may make some people here in the states salivate like Pavlov's dog, three 1 oz. gold Phillys don't impress them in the least. lol

*the use of armed guards and armored trucks to 'protect' stacks of FRNs, the portrayal of FRNs in the media, etc.

[BrewTech]

What I find even more fascinating is that while a stack of $4K in FRNs may make some people here in the states salivate like Pavlov's dog, three 1 oz. gold Phillys don't impress them in the least. lol

*the use of armed guards and armored trucks to 'protect' stacks of FRNs, the portrayal of FRNs in the media, etc.
http://www.theroundtableonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/pliesmoney-1.jpg

Still not sure how this is as effective as it is, but it is what it is.