PDA

View Full Version : Federal wood burning rule prompts rural backlash



mick silver
24th February 2014, 06:00 AM
Federal wood burning rule prompts rural backlashhttp://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/oXh_6AJBHy_uEbdrklkymA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9Zml0O2g9Mjg-/http://l.yimg.com/os/152/2012/04/21/image001-png_162613.png (http://www.ap.org/)By DAVID A. LIEB | Associated Press – 21 hrs ago



t









http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/_7qzUQtgLtjRAJXbUXR4nA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Y2g9ODk4O2NyPTE7Y3c9MTExNztkeD0wO2 R5PTA7Zmk9dWxjcm9wO2g9NDcyO3E9ODU7dz01ODg-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/eb2d4d9b9e17a8074c0f6a706700e49f.jpg
View Photo (http://news.yahoo.com/lightbox/darwin-woods-cuts-wood-wood-burning-stove-uses-photo-160552294.html)Associated Press/L.G. Patterson - Darwin Woods cuts wood for his wood burning stove that he uses to heat his workshop Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, at his home near Clark, Mo. Woods says he considers the proposed …more



RELATED CONTENT





http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/GNvoFjM_Y6I_rg4YIWwp9g--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Y2g9OTgyO2NyPTE7Y3c9MTQxOTtkeD0wO2 R5PTA7Zmk9dWxjcm9wO2g9MTMyO3E9ODU7dz0xOTA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/4131f3179e15a8074c0f6a70670021b0.jpgView Photo (http://news.yahoo.com/lightbox/darwin-woods-stokes-fire-wood-burning-stove-uses-photo-160257752.html)Darwin Woods stokes the fire in …

http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/tLs3mGNsJqoj.a3pvyBWLA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Y2g9NTkwO2NyPTE7Y3c9MTA5NztkeD0wO2 R5PTA7Zmk9dWxjcm9wO2g9MTAzO3E9ODU7dz0xOTA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/b1d32ce79e18a8074c0f6a7067002e2a.jpgView Photo (http://news.yahoo.com/lightbox/darwin-woods-checks-fire-wood-burning-stove-uses-photo-160643071.html)Darwin Woods checks on the fire …





JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A federal proposal to clean up the smoke wafting from wood-burning stoves has sparked a backlash from some rural residents, lawmakers and manufacturers who fear it could close the damper on one of the oldest ways of warming homes on cold winter days.
Proposed regulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency would significantly reduce the amount of particle pollution allowed from the smokestacks of new residential wood-powered heaters.
Wood-burning stoves are a staple in rural homes in many states, a cheap heating source for low-income residents and others wanting to lessen their reliance on gas or electric furnaces. Outdoor models often cost several thousand dollars, but indoor stoves can cost as little as a few hundred dollars and sometimes double as fashionable centerpieces in homes.
Some manufacturers contend the EPA's proposed standards are so stringent that the higher production costs would either force them out of business or raise prices so high that many consumers could no longer afford their products.
"There's not a stove in the United States that can pass the test right now — this is the death knoll of any wood burning," Reg Kelly, the founder of Earth Outdoor Furnaces in Mountain Grove, told Missouri lawmakers during a recent hearing.
More than three dozen Missouri lawmakers have co-sponsored a bill that would symbolically fight back against the EPA by declaring that "All Missourians have a right to heat their homes and businesses using wood-burning furnaces, stoves, fireplaces and heaters."
This past week, a Missouri House committee endorsed a revised measure that proposes to ban state environmental officials from regulating residential wood heaters unless authorized by the Legislature.
Missouri appears to be one the first states to introduce legislation in response to the proposed EPA regulations. But concerns over wood-stove pollution and regulations also have been simmering in other states, including Utah and Alaska.
States such as Washington and New York already have adopted stricter emission rules. And last fall, New York's attorney general led a coalition of seven states in a federal lawsuit seeking to compel to the EPA to adopt new emission limits on wood-fired boilers, which heat water that is piped into a home's radiator system.
The EPA's existing regulations date to 1988 and don't apply to all of the different kinds of wood-burning devices now in use. Under a proposed rule change released last month, the EPA would give manufacturers five years to meet standards that would reduce emissions by an estimated 80 percent.
The EPA has scheduled a public hearing next Wednesday in Boston, and the sponsor of the Missouri legislation plans to travel there to make his case.
"What they're doing is unnecessary, and it comes against our American values and our traditions," said Rep. Tim Remole, a Republican who has a wood stove at his rural Missouri home.
There are about 12 million wood stoves in U.S. homes, including about 9 million that are less than half as efficient as the newer stoves, according to the EPA. The agency's proposed rules would not affect stoves already in homes.
Most people who own wood stoves have other means of heat, such as electric or gas furnaces. But about 2 percent U.S. homes rely on wood as their primary heating source — a figure that has been rising over the past decade.
Darwin Woods, who owns a farm near the small central Missouri town of Clark, said his 12-year-old outdoor wood stove heats both his home and water. Though he wouldn't be forced to upgrade the stove, Woods views the proposed EPA rule as an intrusion.
"It's just another way for them to control my life and lifestyle and basically force me to pay more for just survival," Woods said.
Others point to the negative health effects from burning wood. The fine particles can worsen asthma and cardiovascular problems, ultimately leading to earlier deaths, according to the American Lung Association.
In Utah, Republican Gov. Gary Herbert has called for a winter ban on wood-burning in an attempt to improve air quality. The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation has also proposed its own emission requirements.
But some homeowners "want to keep their fireplaces to have a way to heat homes and cook food in the event an earthquake cuts gas lines and power," said Erin Mendenhall, a Salt Lake City council member and executive director of Breathe Utah, which is offering to replace wood stoves with gas units.
The National Firewood Association, based in Duluth, Minn., says some of the pollution from wood-burning stoves could be reduced if people would burn only aged wood rather than wood with too much wet sap.
"A properly burning wood fire — there's virtually no smoke or smell," said Executive Director Scott Salveson.
___

palani
24th February 2014, 06:10 AM
You can build your own rocket mass stove for somewhere around $50 and these things only put out humidity with little or no smoke.

BrewTech
24th February 2014, 06:35 AM
More than three dozen Missouri lawmakers have co-sponsored a bill that would symbolically fight back against the EPA by declaring that "All Missourians have a right to heat their homes and businesses using wood-burning furnaces, stoves, fireplaces and heaters."
This past week, a Missouri House committee endorsed a revised measure that proposes to ban state environmental officials from regulating residential wood heaters unless authorized by the Legislature.

Pathetic fucking sellouts...

"All Missourians have the right to keep themselves warm... unless we decide that some unelected bureaucrats, well-connected to the energy industry, would like to impose their will on said people in order to maintain their monopoly."

One has to wonder what criteria would need to be met for the legislature to "authorize" said regulation...

I really can't see a reason to carry on maintaining this facade of "states" anymore. All directives and policy originate in DC. Just have the media set up a channel* on TV that does nothing but disseminate the "rules" in real time as they are declared, and be done with all the bullshit.

*I guess C-SPAN already does this...

Twisted Titan
24th February 2014, 08:17 AM
There is not a wood burning stove In the US that can pass that EPA test right now....that is the death knell for the wood burning industry





“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it...

There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt.

Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the ame, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”

mick silver
24th February 2014, 09:12 AM
once people had enough of theys rules an laws we may see people starting to fight back . i will not give my wood stove up . there nothing like a wood stove for heat it warm you to the bones . this morning i started cutting wood for next winter heat

Cebu_4_2
24th February 2014, 06:58 PM
There is not a wood burning stove In the US that can pass that EPA test right now....that is the death knell for the wood burning industry

I thought there already was a law passed making no current stoves legal and old ones a violation. I think I read this 1 year ago last fall and haven't heard a thing since.

milehi
24th February 2014, 08:03 PM
Around here, anyone above 3500' is exempt.

Ponce
24th February 2014, 10:12 PM
In the old days the laws were made to protect you and not to kill you, anyway, I am to angry to say more.

V