PDA

View Full Version : Last Chance to Register for Gun Confication



EE_
26th February 2014, 08:05 AM
Pretty funny, Connecticut citizens are giving the bureaucrats the finger.

SURREAL: Citizens Told They Have “One Last Chance” to Register Guns

If you have ever had a conversation with a die-hard liberal about the Second Amendment, chances are you have probably been called “paranoid” a time or two (…or fifty).

“What are you talking about? The government is not going to take your guns; I don’t know what you’re so worried about,” I can recall from a particular conversation. “Seriously, you’re just paranoid!”

If having the foresight to recognize that gun registration is not only wildly unconstitutional, but also a convenient means by which the government could use to eventually confiscate firearms makes me “paranoid,” then so be it. However, contrary to the liberal narrative, juvenile insults don’t actually alter reality.

As you know, there is a massive display of civil disobedience happening in Connecticut right now. Over 90% of the gun owners in the Constitution State have refused to comply with new anti-gun regulations; these laws require that all “assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines (over ten rounds) be registered as of January 1 of this year.

The state estimated that there are about 372,000 “assault weapons” and over two million “high-capacity” magazines within the state. But when the numbers came in, only about 50,000 “assault weapons” had been registered as well as 38,000 “high-capacity” magazines.

In other words, only about 3.7% of the “scary weaponry” within Connecticut has been registered with the government… meaning that 96.3% of innocent gun owners were considered felons overnight. (Of course, this did not phase them as they are continuing to ignore the so-called law.)

The bureaucrats bent on control didn’t like this so much, you can imagine. They are responding by sending another wave of letters to gun owners giving them “one more chance” to register their weapons with the government.

According to a local newspaper, the Journal Inquirer:

The state now holds signed and notarized letters saying those late applicants own rifles and magazines illegally.

But rather than turn that information over to prosecutors, state officials are giving the gun owners a chance to get rid of the weapons and magazines.
Stated differently, rather than immediately taking hundreds of thousands of gun owners to court over their shiny, new “felony,” the oh-so-benevolent overlords of Connecticut are “graciously” giving them another chance to comply — or else.

Here’s a copy of the letter gun owners received after having “missed” the January 1 deadline: (Click the image to enlarge.)
http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/tyranny-in-connecticut/#!

So, let’s get this straight… Residents in Connecticut have the choice of:

1.Complying with blatantly unconstitutional law by threat of government force;
2.Selling their weapon to a government-approved dealer;
3.Destroying their own guns or magazines;
4.Letting someone in a more pro-gun state hold them; or
5.Giving it directly to the police.

Talk about “land of the free”!

Ares
26th February 2014, 08:12 AM
Land Of the Obese and Home Of The Slave.

New national motto. Hopefully the gun owners in Connecticut continue giving the state government the finger.

Hatha Sunahara
26th February 2014, 09:53 AM
An unconstitutional 'law' is not a law. Void. Without effect. Does not have to be obeyed.

It's encouraging that people in Connecticut are not being tricked so easily into complying with unconstitutional laws. There should be some consequences for legislators and other government officials who pass or enforce such non-laws. I believe it is a crime to violate one's oath of office. It is also a crime to not prosecute such a crime. Treason, I believe. Seems that we have a great demonstration of the rampant corruption in the highest circles of the Connectucut government.


Hatha

Jewboo
26th February 2014, 10:59 AM
Over 90% of the gun owners in the Constitution State have refused to comply with new anti-gun regulations; these laws require that all “assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines (over ten rounds) be registered as of January 1 of this year.



http://img.mp3centa.com/images/albums/big/All_Time_Low/2006_-_Put_Up_Or_Shut_Up.jpg


This is the clearest "line in the sand" moment we will ever witness in our lifetime.

How can they possibly enforce it?


:rolleyes:


http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/1978795_517533805025943_1398729646_n.jpg

mick silver
26th February 2014, 11:04 AM
it look as if the fight to keep whats your has started ... the shoot that was heard around the world

7th trump
26th February 2014, 11:27 AM
it look as if the fight to keep whats your has started ... the shoot that was heard around the world

Since the "State of Connecticut" is a political overlay of the union state of Connecticut technically burrying the weapon in the ground, in your backyard, is removing it below the overlay of the "State of Connecticut".

However, I might imagine this would not fly by the robes who need the overlay to have a job.

7th trump
26th February 2014, 11:35 AM
An unconstitutional 'law' is not a law. Void. Without effect. Does not have to be obeyed.

It's encouraging that people in Connecticut are not being tricked so easily into complying with unconstitutional laws. There should be some consequences for legislators and other government officials who pass or enforce such non-laws. I believe it is a crime to violate one's oath of office. It is also a crime to not prosecute such a crime. Treason, I believe. Seems that we have a great demonstration of the rampant corruption in the highest circles of the Connectucut government.


Hatha

Yes technically true, however, Unconstitutional laws apply to those within the jurisidction of Congress.
You as a citizen eminating from the jurisdiction of Congress (14th amendment) cannot use this in defense.
The "People" can, however, you as a "US citizen" cannot, you are operating outside most of the protections of the US Constitution.

Spectrism
26th February 2014, 12:34 PM
"assault weapon".... LOL.... if I had any weapons they wouldn't be assault weapons....
they would all be LOVE WEAPONS.

ShortJohnSilver
26th February 2014, 04:30 PM
10-100 people ignoring the "law" - "domestic terrorists" "baby-rapers" etc. - like what happened in Waco with Koresh and Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge

100,000 people ignoring the "law" - hmmm, they can't quite propagandize the same way, can they?

mick silver
26th February 2014, 05:41 PM
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/4a/7e/8a/4a7e8a9d4e55b0c9845a0e6a23bc6831.jpg

mick silver
26th February 2014, 05:54 PM
http://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/cartoon_eric_holder_fast_n_furious_n_gun_confiscat ion.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qB5T-vQNH8w/UXri1ngqq0I/AAAAAAAAKuY/wOXUNZ3QRaY/s400/Cartoon+-+Obama+on+Gun+Control.jpghttp://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/obama-shooting-constitution-political-cartoon.jpg

mick silver
26th February 2014, 06:01 PM
http://image.patriotpost.us/2013-04-15-brief-cartoon.jpghttp://www.politifake.org/image/political/1211/the-key-genocide-vik-battaile-politics-1354008891.jpg

mick silver
26th February 2014, 06:04 PM
last one ... http://www.lifezilla.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Obama-Guns.jpghttp://brennerbrief.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/20121216-144146.jpg

mick silver
26th February 2014, 06:09 PM
http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/upload/12342/images/gun_control_obama.jpghttp://itmakessenseblog.com/files/2012/12/Gun-Control31-550x384.jpg