Time mag: NO gun permits in Nancy Lanza's name in public records

[midnight rambler]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2CJVaYHqBw

[Ares]

I'm SHOCKED I tell you..... /sarcasm

[Sparky]

I don't understand the implication of this. This isn't saying that she didn't have gun permits, right? Isn't this simply saying the information isn't publicly available? I'm not sure what to make of this clip.

[Amanda]

Gun permits are public records. There are no gun permits her name. The whole thing is a hoax. Here's the video description: Published on Jan 11, 2013- So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.


Also, FYI, there's NO EVIDENCE of Adam or Nancy Lanza going to gun ranges or practicing shooting. ATF Special Assistant Agent Gene Marquez said his agency "has not been able to uncover any evidence that the mother and the son were actively engaged in going to the gun ranges, practicing marksmanship, or anything of that nature."
(source: http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/15/us/connecticut-lanza-family-profile/index.html?iref=allsearch)

It's a total HOAX

Also, fyi, for those with time on their hands, that youtube channel actually has some good info that's worth going through. Back when SH first occurred, he was putting out some great stuff. He also stayed on top of the Batman/Aurora story, other suspicious shooting events that occurred w/drills, and I think the Boston Bombing too.

[Serpo]

There is something crook about Sandy Hook.

[Libertytree]

I don't know about that state/county but I've had lots of guns that weren't "registered" locally, some with the fed but others with no one.

[palani]

The coroner refuses to release death certificates. Those are public records too.

[Sparky]

I don't know about that state/county but I've had lots of guns that weren't "registered" locally, some with the fed but others with no one.

But the significance of this is that a major storyline in the Newtown shootings was that her guns were all registered. I'd still like some confirmation that no registration in public records means not registered. Where would I go to see this public record?

[Libertytree]

But the significance of this is that a major storyline in the Newtown shootings was that her guns were all registered. I'd still like some confirmation that no registration in public records means not registered. Where would I go to see this public record?

I don't remember...did they say they were registered or legal?

[Sparky]

I don't remember...did they say they were registered or legal?

I found articles that described the guns as "legally registered".

[Amanda]

Yeah, lots of articles reported that the guns were legally registered to Nancy Lanza. Here's a good example--and notice how there isn't a named source for the info. The headline indicates the info on that came from some sort of "official." They just lie and make this stuff up--that's all it is, that's how they do it.

Connecticut Shooter Adam Lanza's Guns Were Registered To Mother Nancy Lanza: Official
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/15/connecticut-shooter-guns_n_2306913.html

excerpt: "Investigators are combing gun shops and ranges in the area, and looking into the ownership of the weapons involved. Lanza's mother had legally registered four weapons, and his father had two."


Also, on the whole public records issue, here are a couple of videos of the parent hoaxers hard at work to keep the info from the public (I already posted this info on the SH thread, but am reposting in case some missed it)

They want your donations, they want you to lose your gun rights, but they don't want you to have any proof as to what happened at Sandy Hook, meaning no release of 911 calls, death certificates, crime scene photos, etc.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Ne_FCVeZo

And here's this French-Canadian father complaining about the "hoaxers." Well, maybe people don't believe him b/c of his shoddy acting right after the supposed event http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KSlbFivqRk (at 43 sec he almost cracks a smile, wasn't able to conjure up a tear for her, just said almost nonchalantly "very sad, but eh, but no...") And if this were true, then why the bloody hell isn't he suing them for not giving his daughter a key to lock her classroom?? And what about her car that was supposedly shot up--if these bullet holes were really from 12/14/12, then why the hell does one of them already have rust on it (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtUqGukP2SY at 13 sec mark)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7lSGrU0Brc

[midnight rambler]

Yeah, lots of articles reported that the guns were legally registered to Nancy Lanza. Here's a good example--and notice how there isn't a named source for the info. The headline indicates the info on that came from some sort of "official." They just lie and make this stuff up--that's all it is, that's how they do it.

Connecticut Shooter Adam Lanza's Guns Were Registered To Mother Nancy Lanza: Official
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/15/connecticut-shooter-guns_n_2306913.html

excerpt: "Investigators are combing gun shops and ranges in the area, and looking into the ownership of the weapons involved. Lanza's mother had legally registered four weapons, and his father had two."


Also, on the whole public records issue, here are a couple of videos of the parent hoaxers hard at work to keep the info from the public (I already posted this info on the SH thread, but am reposting in case some missed it)

They want your donations, they want you to lose your gun rights, but they don't want you to have any proof as to what happened at Sandy Hook, meaning no release of 911 calls, death certificates, crime scene photos, etc.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Ne_FCVeZo

And here's this French-Canadian father complaining about the "hoaxers." Well, maybe people don't believe him b/c of his shoddy acting right after the supposed event http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KSlbFivqRk (at 43 sec he almost cracks a smile, wasn't able to conjure up a tear for her, just said almost nonchalantly "very sad, but eh, but no...") And if this were true, then why the bloody hell isn't he suing them for not giving his daughter a key to lock her classroom?? And what about her car that was supposedly shot up--if these bullet holes were really from 12/14/12, then why the hell does one of them already have rust on it (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtUqGukP2SY at 13 sec mark)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7lSGrU0Brc

If 'they' can confidently pull off this elaborate of a hoax, one can only imagine what sorta nonsense they're going to come up with next.