PDA

View Full Version : Liberty Movement Rising



Ares
17th April 2014, 04:21 PM
"Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing." - Thomas Paine

The label of “fringe” is a common one used by statists, bureaucrats and paid shills in order to marginalize those who would stand against government corruption. The primary assertion being sold is that the “majority” joyously supports the establishment; and the majority, of course, is always right.

The liberty movement, which is a collection of numerous freedom organizations and political activists brought together by a shared philosophical bond, has been accused of “fringe” status for quite some time. With corporatist dominance over the mainstream media for decades backing an elitist machine in Washington and a global banking cartel footing the bill with money created from thin air, any such accusation can be made to seem “real” to those who are unaware.

The problem has always been a matter of physical action giving rise to an acknowledgment of numbers.

We have all heard the old story of the debate within the ancient Roman government over the idea of forcing the slave population to wear distinct armbands so that they could be more easily identified among the regular population. The concept was rejected on the realization that if the slaves were given a visual confirmation of their considerable numbers and strength, they would be encouraged to revolt against the Roman tyrants. That is to say, as long as the slaves felt isolated, they would remain apathetic and powerless. Of course, that was not always the case. Sometimes, a small group would stand up despite their supposed isolation, and the rest of the world, wide-eyed and astonished, would take notice.

The liberty movement has just experienced one of its first great moments of realization and empowerment in Clark County, Nev., and millions of past naysayers have been shell-shocked.

I covered my views in detail on the Bundy Ranch saga in Nevada in my article “Real Americans Are Ready To Snap (http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2089-real-americans-are-ready-to-snap),” amid the usual choir of disinformation agents and nihilists desperate to convince Web audiences that the liberty movement would do nothing to stop the Bureau of Land Management’s militant assault on Cliven Bundy’s cattle farm. This assault included hundreds of Federal agents, helicopters, contractors hired essentially as cattle rustlers and even teams of snipers.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CzIiMoVckcU

link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CzIiMoVckcU

The statists and socialists were certainly out in force to misrepresent the Bundy issue and frighten anyone who might consider taking a stand for the family. The Southern Poverty Law Center, not surprisingly, was hard at work spreading lies and disinformation about the confrontation in Nevada, painting a picture of fractured patriot groups and militiamen with “little training” going to face unstoppable Federal BLM agents and likely “ending up dead.” The SPLC insinuated that the movement was ineffective and in over its head.

The reality was much the opposite. Liberty groups arrived in droves and were staunchly unified — not by a centralized leadership, but in defense of the basic moral principles outlined in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Sources on the ground at the Bundy ranching operation relayed to me that at least 1,000 activists and militia members arrived over the weekend, with many more on the way. This one event proved certain points:

The liberty movement is not afraid to put itself in harm’s way for the right cause — even if this means facing off against highly armed government thugs.
The liberty movement has the ability to field a response team or even an army anywhere in the country at any time within a couple of days.
The liberty movement has the ability to change the course of events, even to the point of removing Federal agents from a region who are acting in an unConstitutional manner.
The Federal government is not invincible, nor is it unfazed by liberty movement opposition. They worry about our strength and ability.

Over the past weekend, we witnessed the true influence of the liberty movement. As thousands of activists and militia arrived in the area, the BLM finally began to understand what it was facing. The government agency that has been terrorized farming communities throughout the West for years, the agency armed with military-grade weaponry and hundreds of agents, ran away, as freedom fighters descended on the region.

Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval and Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie, two politicians who were deathly silent during the beginning of the Federal incursion on the Bundy ranch, have now suddenly become vocal in defense of Nevada ranchers against the BLM. It’s amazing how “inspired” politicians can become to do the right thing when they see an army of liberty activists marching against tyranny in their own backyard.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FgbS0F1-O1A

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FgbS0F1-O1A

Not only was the BLM forced to remove itself from the area, but it was also forced to relinquish all the cattle it had stolen from Bundy over the course of the past week. Here, liberty groups close in on the cattle holding pens of the BLM and take back Bundy’s property.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bD61YFxUga4

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bD61YFxUga4

Statists are indignant and furious over the surrender of the BLM. The same people who boasted that liberty activists would be slaughtered by Fed agents are now frothing at the mouth because they did not get their massacre. Not only that, but the bureaucracy they worship has shown itself to be impotent in the face of Constitutional champions. All I can say is nothing puts a bigger grin on my face than to see statists cry like babies when their delusions of grandeur are trampled on.

This was a major victory for the liberty movement. But let’s be clear; the fight is just beginning.

I suspect that the Bundy event will be spun by news agencies and the government until it is unrecognizable. They will claim that the BLM left not because they were wrong, but because they were trying to keep people safe. They will claim that liberty movement protesters were the aggressors and the poor BLM agents were just trying to do their jobs. They will play the race card as they always do, much like this pathetically lazy and unprofessional article from Slate, which asserts that if the Bundy's had been black, the Liberty Movement would have never supported them. They will argue the so-called Federal legality of the raid itself, and paint Bundy as a “freeloader” who refuses to pay taxes and who is living off the American people. They will do everything in their power to destroy the image of the victory and soil the name of the Bundy family.

What they don’t seem to understand, though, is that the liberty movement does not care what the Federal government deems “legal” or “illegal.” Our only interest is what is Constitutional and what is moral. The dispute was never about the “legality” of Bundy’s use of the land, which his family used for grazing without interference for generations — until 1993, when the BLM used the absurd endangered species protection racket to put all of his neighbors out of business and threaten his ranch with invasion. Add to this the recently discovered fact that Senator Harry Reid's former assistant and friend Neil Kornze is now head of the BLM due to Reid's influence, and the fact that Harry Reid and his family are reaping financial rewards by driving farmers from all over the region where Cliven Bundy's ranch sits while arranging land deals with Chinese solar companies, and one has to ask, why should Bundy pay any of his hard earned money to the federal government when they are just going to use it to bulldoze his cattle and make Harry Reid more rich?

Disinformation websites like Snopes contend that Reid's "projects" are not being established anywhere near the Bundy Ranch, yet, one such project has already been launched only 35 miles south of Bundy, and, the BLM has erased a page from its website specifically mentioning the Bundy Ranch and it's "interference" with Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone Projects, the same projects Harry Reid and his son are heavily involved in.

What is amazing to me is that in light of this information hardcore socialists are still willing to defend Reid and the BLM. My question is, if the BLM is so innocent, then why are they erasing such data from their website at all? What were they trying to hide?

Harry Reid has not responded to the facts behind his financial involvement in the BLM's attacks on Nevada farmers, except to say that they are "conspiracy theories". He added when asked about the status of the confrontation:

“Well, it’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over...”

Yes, Harry, it won't be over until men like you are thrown behind bars.

Note that he says "an American people"; as if he is separate, as if he is referring to all of us as a subservient organism, or servant class. What Reid is saying is, the elites can't have "an American people" openly exposing their criminality and defying their tyranny, and then just walking away. I'm sorry to break it to Reid, but that is exactly how all of this is going to end.

Statists and bureaucrats like Reid continually attempt to argue this issue from the standpoint of Federal legality, obviously because the Federal government has the legislative and bureaucratic power to make any despicable action legal (at least on paper) if it wishes. However, the liberty movement has no interest whatsoever in Federal interpretations of legal precedence. We are only concerned with what is right. As the old saying goes, when injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.

The liberty movement also fully understands that the Bundy victory was only one battle at the beginning of a long war.

The BLM may very well be waiting for activists to leave the area before attacking again. And even if that is not the case, tyrannical systems have a way of attempting to make up for signs of weakness by escalating violence during the next siege. That is to say, we should expect the next event involving the BLM or other government agencies to be even more vicious than the Bundy incident. It is simply the natural inclination of totalitarian systems to exaggerate their power when their failings have been exposed.

That said, it should be noted that corrupt leadership often crumbles in the face of steadfast resolve and courage. We have a long way to go before this Nation is once again truly free, but the liberty movement has proven its invaluable worth over the course of the past several days. We arrived at a crossroads, and we are now moving forward in the right direction — without fear and without regret. It is in these moments when history is made — when common men and women thwart the odds, defy the darkness and make good on their beliefs by risking everything in the name of freedom.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-17/guest-post-liberty-movement-rising

mick silver
18th April 2014, 12:17 PM
behind bars is way to good for Harry Reid and others like him

monty
29th August 2015, 08:28 AM
Gold and silver are boring so lets visit the "Old West"where life is always filled with action!

An interesting website put together by an Arizona cattleman. You might checkout his blog section and also the videos.

https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/blog/


August Newsletter



Home (https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/)
Blog (https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/blog/)
August Newsletter (https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/blog/2015/08/27/august-newsletter/)


POSTED BY LAVOY ON AUGUST 27TH, 2015
I thought I would post our first Newsletter to give everyone a feel of who I am and for what I stand for. Thank you for your support in the cause of Freedom!!!


Standing for Liberty
by LaVoy Finicum
August 20,2015


Dear Subscribers, THIS IS MY FIRST MONTHLY NEWSLETTER AND IT IS AN IMPORTANT ONE. THIS IS ABOUT THE FREEDOM OF MAN AND DEFENDING OUR CONSTITUTION IN ITS ORIGINAL INTENT. AS A NORTHERN ARIZONA RANCHER I HAVE A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO STAND UP AGAINST THE CONTROL OF THIS ALL POWERFUL CENTRAL GOVERNMENT.


WE NEED TO BE EDUCATED ON WHO IS LAWFUL/LEGITIMATE AND WHO IS NOT LAWFUL/LEGITIMATE. AMERICA USED TO BE A LAND WHERE THE “NATURAL RIGHTS” OF MAN WERE HELD INVIOLATE AND THE ONLY LEGITIMATE POWER OF GOVERNMENT WAS TO PROTECT A MAN IN HIS “LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY”.


TO PROTECT THOSE RIGHTS THE FOUNDING FATHERS PUT IN PLACE A CONSTITUTION WHICH FIRST, LIMITED THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT AND SECOND, DIVIDED THOSE POWERS INTO THREE EQUAL BRANCHES. SO WHAT IS IT THAT WE HAVE NOW?


LET ME SPEAK TO THAT WHICH I AM PERSONALLY ACQUAINTED WITH AND INVOLVED IN. HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF YOU WERE TOLD THAT ONE THIRD OF THE LAND MASS OF THE UNITED STATES IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A BUREAUCRACY THAT HAS ABSOLUTE POWER OVER THAT LAND WITH NO POWER OF RECALL BY THE PEOPLE; A BUREAUCRACY THAT HAS CONSOLIDATED ALL THREE BRANCHES OF POWER UNDER ONE HEAD?


LET ME PUT THIS LAND SIZE INTO PERSPECTIVE. YOU NEED TO COMBINE THE COUNTRY OF GERMANY, FRANCE, SPAIN, ITALY, PORTUGAL AND ENGLAND TO REACH AN APPROXIMATE EQUIVALENT IN LAND MASS SIZE.


A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT BEHIND A DESK CAN WRITE A POLICY OR DECREE WHICH IN EFFECT IS LAW. THIS BUREAUCRAT IS NOT ELECTED NOR ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE AFFECTED BY HIS DECREE. ONCE THIS DECREE IS IN PLACE THE BUREAUCRAT HAS HIS FEDERAL RANGERS ARMED AND EMPOWERED TO ENFORCE THOSE DECREES BY LETHAL FORCE IF NECESSARY. IF A PERSON GETS CROSSWAYS WITH ONE OF THESE STATUTES THEY ARE HAULED IN FRONT OF AN APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE WITH THE RISK OF GOING TO A FEDERAL PRISON.


I ASK YOU AMERICA IS THIS OKAY? FOR THE LARGE MAJORITY OF YOU IT PROBABLY HAS NO DIRECT IMPACT PERSONALLY ON YOUR LIFE. SO WHY SHOULD YOU CARE? YOU SHOULD CARE BECAUSE OUR GOVERNMENT HAS BECOME LAWLESS, REFUSING TO BE CONSTRAINED BY THE PARAMETERS THAT “WE THE PEOPLE” HAVE PUT UPON IT BY OUR CONSTITUTION. DO NOT BE DECEIVE INTO BELIEVING THAT ONCE A GOVERNMENT THROWS OFF THE RESTRAINT OF THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND THAT THEY WILL SELF-RESTRAIN THEMSELVES IN THEIR GROWTH AND POWER.


YOU MAY ASK, “WHERE IN OUR CONSTITUTION DOES IT LIMIT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ITS OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF LAND?” IT IS IN ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 17. HERE OUR FOUNDERS LIST THE SPECIFIC LAND THEY MAY OWN AND CONTROL. REMEMBER THE INTENT AND LETTER OF THE CONSTITUTION IS TO LIMIT THE POWER OF A CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. THE CLAUSE IS AS FOLLOWS:


“TO EXERCISE EXCLUSIVE LEGISLATION IN ALL CASES WHATSOEVER, OVER SUCH DISTRICT (NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE) AS MAY, BY CESSION OF PARTICULAR STATES, AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF CONGRESS, BECOME THE SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND TO EXERCISE LIKE AUTHORITY OVER ALL PLACES PURCHASED BY THE CONSENT OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE IN WHICH THE SAME SHALL BE, FOR THE ERECTION OF FORTS, MAGAZINES, ARSENALS, DOCK-YARDS, AND OTHER NEEDFUL BUILDINGS.”


HEREIN WE SEE THAT THE 10 SQUARE MILE OF WASHINGTON DC IS CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMITTED FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO OWN AND EXERCISE CONTROL OVER. BUT LANDS WITHIN A STATE’S BOUNDARY THAT THE FEDS OWN AND CONTROL IS ONLY THOSE LANDS NEEDED FOR OUR NATIONAL DEFENSE SUCH AS FORTS, ARSENAL AND MAGAZINES.


ON TOP OF THAT THEY CANNOT TAKE IT FROM THE STATES, THEY MUST ASK TO PURCHASE IT FROM THE STATE’S LEGISLATURE. LET ME AGAIN QUOTE A PART OF THAT SECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION. “…PURCHASED BY THE CONSENT OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE…” IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWNED THE LAND THEY WOULD NOT NEED TO ASK TO PURCHASE THE LAND FROM THE STATE.


EVEN IF A STATE WANTED TO GIVE ALL THE LAND TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS FORBIDDEN FROM RECEIVING IT. THEY CAN HAVE ONLY THOSE LANDS NEEDED FOR THE DEFENSE OF OUR NATION, I.E. FORTS, ARSENALS, ETC.


THUS, “WE THE PEOPLE” THROUGH OUR CONSTITUTION HAS FORBIDDEN THE GOVERNMENT FROM CONSOLIDATING POWER. BUT THEY DO NOT FEAR THE PEOPLE. THEY ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES, THEY ARE AN EMPIRE WITH COMPLETE POWER WITHIN OUR COUNTRY.


IF YOU CONTROL THE LAND YOU CONTROL THE PEOPLE. I HAVE CHOSEN NOT TO BE CONTROLLED BUT TO LIVE AS A FREE MAN. AS A RANCHER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA I WILL NO LONGER BOW BEFORE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (BLM). I WILL NOT SIGN THEIR “MANDATORY TERMS AND CONDITIONS” AND I WILL NOT PAY THEM A GRAZING FEE. THE LAND IS NOT THEIRS.


I DO BELIEVE IN GOVERNMENT. THE PROPER FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS THAT GOVERNMENT WHICH IS CLOSEST TO THE PEOPLE, THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT. INSTEAD OF PAYING A GRAZING FEE TO THE FEDS I WILL PAY A PRODUCTION TAX TO MOHAVE COUNTY. MY GRAZING RIGHTS ARE A PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHT. (I OWN THE GRASS)


I INVITE ALL OTHER RANCHERS WHO DESIRE TO DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION TO STAND WITH ME. CLIVEN BUNDY IS STANDING IN NEVADA, STANTON GLEVES IS STANDING IN UTAH AND I AM STANDING IN ARIZONA. IT IS A SERIOUS AND DANGEROUS THING TO DO, TO REFUSE PAY A FEDERAL GRAZING FEE OR TO MEET THEIR “MANDATORY TERMS AND CONDITIONS”.


I INVITE ALL FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS TO STAND WITH ANY RANCHER WHO REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE BLM BUT WHO DOES ACKNOWLEDGES THE COUNTY AND THE STATE AS THE LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT.


HOW CAN WE EVER SAVE OUR LIBERTY IF THE INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT STAND, IF HE IS AFRAID, IF HE IS NOT WILLING TO PUT ALL HE HAS ON THE LINE? I PROMISE YOU THAT IF YOU STAND GOD WILL STAND WITH YOU.


IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT HAPPENS IT MATTERS THAT YOU STAND.

0 0 Google +0 0 StumbleUpon0Delicious00
CATEGORIES:

Comments



What comes to my mind after reading this is something my own father pointed out to me many years ago. The policies of the United States governemnt are controlled by the bureaucracies and the unelected bureaucrat sitting behind the desk. No matter who is elected to congress or president these things will not change unless these montruous bureaucracies are eliminated. Donald Trump will not change the face of government.
Monty

- See more at: https://www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com/blog/2015/08/27/august-newsletter/#sthash.RUEkmtwF.dpuf

Carl
29th August 2015, 09:40 AM
Restoring the Republic.

The 17th amendment supposedly amends Article 1 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, it does not amend Article 5, which prohibits taking the state's right to equal suffrage in the senate via amendment and without the state's expressed consent. As per Article 5, each individual state, all 50 of them, must consent to the 17th, and if only one state withdraws its consent, the 17th is automatically voided.

" ~ that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate." It doesn't say, unless three fourths of the other states decide otherwise. "No State, Without Its Consent."

The 17th was unconstitutional from its inception, Alabama; Florida; Georgia (refused to vote on it); Kentucky; Maryland; Mississippi; Rhode Island; South Carolina; Virginia; Utah (explicitly rejected amendment);. Did not consent.

The 17th is basically, a nonbinding agreement that is held in place by the rule of custom and ignorance.

Being unlawful to begin with, the 17th does not need to go through the repeal process, all the states' have to do is withdraw their consent to it, as per Article 5, and seat their selection of Senators.

IF the states' legislators were to do this, it would effectively end the 100+ year rule of progressive (socialist) democracy and restore the Republic. It would also decimate the DNC/RNC national party apparatus and cut the corporate bribery funneled through campaign funding by half, leaving the remaining half ineffectual. It would force people who divide themselves along party lines to seek common ground and common goals to counter state's ambitions in congress. And of course, it would toss the biggest monkey wrench into the gears of the Neoliberal/Neocon's nation destroying, empire building machinations.

Over time, the people would withdraw their attention from the newly established Federal and focus upon the politics of local and state import, and states will regain their individual, independent personalities, establishing laws that work towards their own population's ends independent of other states and of Federal interference. We would, once again, become a nation of states, distinct.

States' reputation of the unconstitutional 17th represents the fulcrum, the point at which the ever expanding centralized fascist police state can be overturned. All that needs to be done is to convince the states' legislators (the lever) that it is in their best interests to do it. They stick that one constitution based step into D.C., and we'll rush them with more constitution based reforms.

If nothing else, we'll find out for certain which side of the totalitarian fence the states are standing on.

The only thing I would suggest to the states' legislators when they right the enabling law, is that they stipulate that the selectee must be native born to their state and have served for a minimum of six years in elected public service within the state.

monty
29th August 2015, 11:28 AM
This is all very interesting. I was not aware of the Article 5 point. I have known about he illegal ratification arguments. Some influential soul needs to prod his state legislature into adopting your ideas.

madfranks
29th August 2015, 11:54 AM
First this:


I WILL NO LONGER BOW BEFORE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (BLM).

Then:


I DO BELIEVE IN GOVERNMENT.


I think this guy needs to make up his mind. You can't be a believer in government and then outright reject government.

madfranks
29th August 2015, 11:54 AM
IF the states' legislators were to do this,

They won't.

monty
26th December 2015, 04:25 PM
http://s19.postimg.org/rslhxbmub/image.png



http://bundyranch.blogspot.com.co/2015/12/notice-redress-of-grievance-action.html

Horn
26th December 2015, 10:46 PM
From all the news surrounding US/Israel/ISIS terror attacks,

liberty and tea parties appear to have taken a backseat to first being named a Libertard Commmunist.