PDA

View Full Version : Martin Armstrong Fears World War III Is On The Horizon



Ares
27th April 2014, 05:26 PM
Russia and China are becoming closer thanks to Obama and his insane policies behind the NSA that have left America trying to find friends in a dark hour. The sanctions being imposed on Russia have sent China into its camp. The USA is finding it increasingly more difficult to be the bully in the school-yard. No former administration has ever acted with such arrogance and blind stupidity than the Obama Administration. The net result is to empower Russia and to inspire a new dynamic-duo of Russia-China against the USA. China supported Russia, when Western countries launched an anti-Russian campaign. With both of their economies turning down, this is by no means the proper time to impose sanctions. All this policy is doing is re-enforcing Putin and placing him in the position where he must become more aggressive or seem weak in the shadow of Obama.

In keeping with the idea that the West/America plotted the fall of the Soviet Union as a covert plot rather than the economic collapse of Communism, feeds directly into the idea that the majority of people see whatever happens to them as a victim of someone else rather than the consequences of their own stupidity. Putin’s statements that the fall of the Soviet Union was the greatest tragedy of the 20th Century is gaining momentum in Russia.

There is now talk of Mikhail Gorbachev being put on trial. Gorbachev was the last president of the USSR and the proposition to bring him to trial for the collapse of the Soviet Union is being bantered about. This is part of the propaganda machine to enrage the people to justify the invasion of at least Eastern Europe. Putting Gorbachev on trial will be an indictment of the West and further the conspiracy theory that it was a plot and not economics.

The Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev delivered a well received speech in the Duma in Russia demonstrating the rise in power and determination of the New Russia. He stated regarding trade how the West suppressed Russia. ”For 17 years, we were actually kept in the hallway, where we argued that we deserved the right to enter the world trading community, that we meet its standards. Now we have a full right to demand other WTO member countries should observe the regulations with respect to Russian goods.”

The treatment of Russia by the Obama Administration has been appalling to say the least even before Crimea. The policies that are in place and the thinking is so outdated built around an ego of self-centered aggrandizement, it is hard to see how this cannot lead to any place other than armed conflict. I stated upfront, give the East Ukraine back to Russia on a timetable and allow free elections there that should have been monitored. The people should have decided this issue, not politicians. That should have been the serious solution just as East Germany was given back to the West. Failing to reach such a negotiated settlement allowing for real free elections has led to this confrontation with no escape. Both sides now have their backs against the wall and neither will back down fearing this will be a sign of political weakness.

Putin is playing into the conspiracy of a victim – not that Russia fell because of economics. This is going over very well and this is the danger for therein we find the seeds of war.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-27/martin-armstrong-fears-world-war-iii-horizon

Shami-Amourae
27th April 2014, 05:44 PM
The question I always have is is this all planned, or are "our leaders" really this stupid?

Ares
27th April 2014, 05:49 PM
The question I always have is is this all planned, or are "our leaders" really this stupid?

It really is a fine line between stupidity or preplanned..... It's difficult to tell which is which in this upside down world. However if the U.S. keeps poking the Russian bear while having to deal with internal strife that threatens its own existence and power, I don't really see that as planned. Just being completely ignorant, arrogant and stupid.

Any general will tell you, a multi-front war is the most difficult to combat. Internal strife is ratcheting up, while external circumstances are also leading to a conflict. It's going to be an interesting next couple of years......

Dogman
27th April 2014, 05:50 PM
The question I always have is is this all planned, or are "our leaders" really this stupid?
Look at history, the same mistakes are always repeated!

In some ways this is a repeat of the lead up to WW2. Just a different actor/country, making the land grabs! Using the same kinds of justifications!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Hatha Sunahara
29th April 2014, 01:53 PM
There is a new battlefield that nobody seems to recognize or attach much importance to. Cyberspace. There have never been any wars fought in cyberspace because it is brand new. When you are thinking about war, try to factor in how it will play out in cyberspace. It's not too difficult imagining how you will be sizzled by a nuclear weapon. It's not too hard to imagine also that nuclear weapons cam make the world unlivable--both for the elite and everyone else. Unless the world succumbs to the madness of its leaders, nuclear war is not an option, and not likely. War will be fought using hitherto unknown weapons. EMP weapons have never before been used in wars. Nor has any war had to deal with cyberspace. Maybe if EMP weapons are used, there will be no cyberspace in large parts of the world. If cyberspace remains in tact, try to imagine how it would be used as a battlefield. I think mostly to get people to believe lies, and to act upon them. Believing lies will become a deadly business.

I think for these reasons, any major war is not and cannot be planned. I doubt that anyone who isn't paid by a government to act will participate in any major war. Governments can no longer 'draft' people into military forces. And all governments are so financially stretched that the will not be able to pay any large number of people to fight a war. So, wars will be waged by drones and highly paid (but small in numbers) mercenaries. I think though that the world will fall apart before the elite can orchestrate any large war.


Hatha

Dogman
29th April 2014, 01:59 PM
There is a new battlefield that nobody seems to recognize or attach much importance to. Cyberspace. There have never been any wars fought in cyberspace because it is brand new. When you are thinking about war, try to factor in how it will play out in cyberspace. It's not too difficult imagining how you will be sizzled by a nuclear weapon. It's not too hard to imagine also that nuclear weapons cam make the world unlivable--both for the elite and everyone else. Unless the world succumbs to the madness of its leaders, nuclear war is not an option, and not likely. War will be fought using hitherto unknown weapons. EMP weapons have never before been used in wars. Nor has any war had to deal with cyberspace. Maybe if EMP weapons are used, there will be no cyberspace in large parts of the world. If cyberspace remains in tact, try to imagine how it would be used as a battlefield. I think mostly to get people to believe lies, and to act upon them. Believing lies will become a deadly business.

I think for these reasons, any major war is not and cannot be planned. I doubt that anyone who isn't paid by a government to act will participate in any major war. Governments can no longer 'draft' people into military forces. And all governments are so financially stretched that the will not be able to pay any large number of people to fight a war. So, wars will be waged by drones and highly paid (but small in numbers) mercenaries. I think though that the world will fall apart before the elite can orchestrate any large war.


Hatha

Hatha, in many ways I agree with you totally. The web interconnections and social media will tell the tale if anyone pays attention. It is harder to keep anything secret today, but still not impossible. Depending on the filtering and online nanny's that will read ip's and visit you in the early hours.