BREAKING: Supreme Court Denies NDAA Lawsuit

[Ares]

BOWLING GREEN – On September 12th, 2012, Federal District Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of Section 1021 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. In July 2013, the 2nd Circuit ruled the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge that law.

Monday, the Supreme Court put the final nail in this suit by denying to hear the case, without comment.

The lawsuit at issue, Hedges v. Obama, was brought in early 2012 by a group of journalists, scholars and activists. Containing such noted figures as Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg, journalist Chris Hedges, and others, this “Freedom 7” challenged Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as unconstitutionally overbroad.

This section determines who is covered by the 2012 NDAA, and contains such vague terms as “substantial support” “direct support,” and “belligerent act” and, if one falls under one of these terms, they could be subject to indefinite military detention without charge or trial.

Dan Johnson, PANDA National Director, said:

“In 1944 the Supreme Court approved the pre-emptive detention of over 110,000 Japanese-Americans. The Court’s denial 70 years later proves that we cannot rely on 9 people in black robes to defend our freedom.

It is now up to the states, cities, counties, and people of this nation to show the Supreme Court that it is not the final arbiter of our human rights. As 5 cities have already done so, I urge Americans across the country to begin action to ban these sections in their communities, raise awareness, and push back against this denial. If Washington D.C. thinks this is the last they will hear from us, they are very, very wrong.”

In a statement on the outcome of this denial, lead plaintiff Tangerine Bolen wrote:

“We are no longer a nation ruled by laws. We are nation ruled by men who have so steeped themselves in a false narrative that at the same time they are exponentially increasing the ranks of terrorists, they are destroying the rule of law itself. It is madness upon madness – the classic tale of becoming the evil you purport to fight while believing you remain righteous. “

If the outcome of this lawsuit does not cement the fact that the courts will not defend the Constitution, nor our rights with it, there is little more evidence to be presented. The Federal tier has failed us. The states, localities, and eventually the people, are where we will stand. As we resist, the work of the plaintiffs will not be forgotten.

http://pandaunite.org/ndaa-breaking-supreme-court-denies-ndaa-lawsuit/

[midnight rambler]

Those trannies in the black dresses do NOT work for the people, they work strictly for the money powers - that could not possibly be more clear at this point.

[7th trump]

BOWLING GREEN – On September 12th, 2012, Federal District Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of Section 1021 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. In July 2013, the 2nd Circuit ruled the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge that law.

Monday, the Supreme Court put the final nail in this suit by denying to hear the case, without comment.

The lawsuit at issue, Hedges v. Obama, was brought in early 2012 by a group of journalists, scholars and activists. Containing such noted figures as Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg, journalist Chris Hedges, and others, this “Freedom 7” challenged Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as unconstitutionally overbroad.

This section determines who is covered by the 2012 NDAA, and contains such vague terms as “substantial support” “direct support,” and “belligerent act” and, if one falls under one of these terms, they could be subject to indefinite military detention without charge or trial.

Dan Johnson, PANDA National Director, said:

“In 1944 the Supreme Court approved the pre-emptive detention of over 110,000 Japanese-Americans. The Court’s denial 70 years later proves that we cannot rely on 9 people in black robes to defend our freedom.

It is now up to the states, cities, counties, and people of this nation to show the Supreme Court that it is not the final arbiter of our human rights. As 5 cities have already done so, I urge Americans across the country to begin action to ban these sections in their communities, raise awareness, and push back against this denial. If Washington D.C. thinks this is the last they will hear from us, they are very, very wrong.”

In a statement on the outcome of this denial, lead plaintiff Tangerine Bolen wrote:

“We are no longer a nation ruled by laws. We are nation ruled by men who have so steeped themselves in a false narrative that at the same time they are exponentially increasing the ranks of terrorists, they are destroying the rule of law itself. It is madness upon madness – the classic tale of becoming the evil you purport to fight while believing you remain righteous. “

If the outcome of this lawsuit does not cement the fact that the courts will not defend the Constitution, nor our rights with it, there is little more evidence to be presented. The Federal tier has failed us. The states, localities, and eventually the people, are where we will stand. As we resist, the work of the plaintiffs will not be forgotten.

http://pandaunite.org/ndaa-breaking-supreme-court-denies-ndaa-lawsuit/

Of course not when the SC consists mainly of Kenites. Whos tables did Christ over turn in the temple?
The Kenite tables....the same money powers that Midnight mentioned.
Obama appointed a she-kenite in his first term.

[Ares]

Those trannies in the black dresses do NOT work for the people, they work strictly for the money powers - that could not possibly be more clear at this point.

I like how they think that not hearing the case will make it go away and they don't have to decide on an obviously illegal "law"... It's a "win win" for teams blue and red.

[Twisted Titan]

the Supreme Court that it is not the final arbiter of our human rights.



The Final Arbiter of my rights is my Creator.

The next to the Final is Me.

The Third provisions are blued steele and polymer.

[mick silver]

there two sets of laws ......... one for them and one for us the faster you learn that the faster you know your rulers

[monty]

Ammon Bundy’s video and comments on NDAA


https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/y4/r/-PAXP-deijE.gif
The video is here:https://www.facebook.com/ammonbundy/videos/320032778506087/?hc_ref=ARSoVr6tnSVDbR9UvV_M2JWBOP_5mbUneEqRL7I-nP0eR7zzd7iKvWHNn0dHaFBvmkk

https://scontent-dft4-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p100x100/18193761_199971157178917_8103019407417817667_n.jpg ?oh=68c24bbeb12d44fb8e749986b34d18ae&oe=5AE967C7
(https://www.facebook.com/ammonbundy/?ref=nf&hc_ref=ARQ0k5xc5ACtA10CeXIrvWgJ7M6wZSIK1ocTIuc1pq5 Vx-28s_V8fQvxsqXoAV0JXt4)

Ammon Bundy (https://www.facebook.com/ammonbundy/?hc_ref=ARTpcqOzARnfQwZMyJAAEiPEAc2FKi4Qn1Xugn3UQF Pm8IyYDnKlY0AMsXf1lLsgHBE&fref=nf)

3 hrs (https://www.facebook.com/ammonbundy/videos/320032778506087/) ·

**Ammon Bundy Video**
My family, friends and I were incarcerated for nearly two years without bail and without any physical contact with our families. Was the NDAA part the forceful justification?

NDAA Explained in 3 Minutes: https://www.facebook.com/AmericansAgainstTheRepublicanAndDemocraticParties/videos/587343961473830/ (https://www.facebook.com/AmericansAgainstTheRepublicanAndDemocraticParties/videos/587343961473830/?fref=mentions)

NDAA promo video: https://www.facebook.com/pandaunite/videos/1973991335950859/ (https://www.facebook.com/pandaunite/videos/1973991335950859/?fref=mentions)

Listen to the Bundy Story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhNmZ2lWc9U (https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv% 3DGhNmZ2lWc9U&h=ATPudKxuTp3JdhA2YLb5Pt0FjHPi-dLhXvknmZO1Ev3T2Anwz0pkbu73TSKfPKm044J81--8BfKxoUlHHwLtXsKefZ2titcm6Qaf1D_Tksu7Hhs1y7Y5medog drVQcoNRTigBcaJNw8lUa8nYo8SdqTHdibNWD09tOilIwI-1OWwZd59NPjZKKPPP4XQ4pXmmvD0shUsc4sNsTu4G6DHOZPl3y PwXFruO_VlMY3nOtmpWbI7hWqDIAz_PWeFESw1fvW4c7qSZ0Q1 p4Wfj43t70v9h9jaqhgoHa8)

Please Act and Forward This Message.
Action alert https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/fe4/2/16/1f6a8.png
Sections 1021 and 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, Public Law 50 U.S.C. 1541, authorize the violation of no fewer than 14 provisions of the Constitution including over half of the Bill of Rights. The sovereign government of the Great State of Idaho has a duty to protect the rights of citizens and other persons within Idaho’s jurisdiction against such violations and from federal overreach. #StopTheNDAA (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/stopthendaa?source=feed_text&story_id=320032778506087)

Please email and call each representative on the State Affairs Committee and politely request they honor the oath they each took to protect and defend the Constitution and protect your civil liberties and due process by passing the Restoring Constitutional Governance Act of Idaho.

Chair Thomas F. Loertscher
tloertscher@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 522-3072 (tel:(208) 522-3072)
Statehouse (208) 332-1183 (tel:(208) 332-1183) (Session Only)

Vice Chair Jason A. Monks jmonks@house.idaho.gov Bus (208) 884-8684 (tel:(208) 884-8684)
Statehouse (208) 332-1036 (tel:(208) 332-1036) (Session Only)

Lynn M. Luker lluker@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 375-8254 (tel:(208) 375-8254)
Bus (208) 343-0022 (tel:(208) 343-0022)
Statehouse (208) 332-1039 (tel:(208) 332-1039) (Session Only)

Brent J. Crane bcrane@house.idaho.gov Bus (208) 466-0613 (tel:(208) 466-0613)
Statehouse (208) 332-1058 (tel:(208) 332-1058) (Session Only)

Joe Palmer jpalmer@house.idaho.gov Bus (208) 887-9488 (tel:(208) 887-9488)
Statehouse (208) 332-1062 (tel:(208) 332-1062) (Session Only)

Vito Barbieri vbar@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 620-0873 (tel:(208) 620-0873)
Statehouse (208) 332-1177 (tel:(208) 332-1177) (Session Only)

James Holtzclaw jholtzclaw@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 284-9542 (tel:(208) 284-9542)
Statehouse (208) 332-1041 (tel:(208) 332-1041) (Session Only)

Steven Harris sharris@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 861-8638 (tel:(208) 861-8638)
Statehouse (208) 332-1043 (tel:(208) 332-1043) (Session Only)

Randy Armstrong armstrong@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 251-8157 (tel:(208) 251-8157)
Statehouse (208) 332-1046 (tel:(208) 332-1046) (Session Only)

Priscilla Giddings pgiddings@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 570-8616 (tel:(208) 570-8616)
Statehouse (208) 332-1033 (tel:(208) 332-1033) (Session Only)

Dustin Manwaring dmanwaring@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 252-5295 (tel:(208) 252-5295)
Statehouse (208) 332-1079 (tel:(208) 332-1079) (Session Only)

Christy Zito czito@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 590-4633 (tel:(208) 590-4633)
Statehouse (208) 332-1181 (tel:(208) 332-1181) (Session Only)

Heather Scott hscott@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 920-3120 (tel:(208) 920-3120)
Statehouse (208) 332-1190 (tel:(208) 332-1190) (Session Only)

Elaine Smith esmith@house.idaho.gov Home (208) 237-1462 (tel:(208) 237-1462)
Statehouse (208) 332-1031 (tel:(208) 332-1031) (Session Only)

Paulette E. Jordan pjordan@house.idaho.gov Bus (208) 332-1175 (tel:(208) 332-1175)
Statehouse (208) 332-1175 (tel:(208) 332-1175) (Session Only)

Print Hearing Set For Wednesday 1/31/2018 at 9:30 am State Affairs Idaho State Capitol Room EW40. If you are able to make the hearing, please do. There will not be public testimony at the print hearing. PANDA Idaho
Thank you,
Jason Casella
Grassroots Coordinator


5K Views
191 Likes16 Comments403 Shares (https://www.facebook.com/ammonbundy/videos/320032778506087/?comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22O%22%7D)

Edit: J Grady



http://youtu.be/T4hlMkKIoUs


https://youtu.be/T4hlMkKIoUs

[JDRock]

5 jews on the court

[Cebu_4_2]

5 jews on the court


Takes 6 to hang someone right?