View Full Version : Another cop kills a dog TIED OUT ON A 3 FT. LEASH, and smirks
midnight rambler
10th May 2014, 07:36 PM
Easy, cheap, and hassle-free way to get a paid vacation. It's a no-brainer for those with no brains.
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/fate-of-officer-who-shot-tied-dog-and.html
midnight rambler
10th May 2014, 07:47 PM
Linked in the above link, cops bust into house without a warrant over extremely minor bullshit, chaos results in the family's pet parakeet getting out of its cage, when a family member protests, "(Look out for/be careful of) The bird!" one of the boy scouts...er I mean thug with a badge says, "Fuck the bird!" as he stomps it to death.
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/12/now-why-would-cops-need-to-kill-pet.html
mick silver
11th May 2014, 10:05 PM
cops saves puppy then kill 93 year old women . am i right hitch
Cebu_4_2
11th May 2014, 10:42 PM
Hitch is a cool dude if you don't know him directly. If you are out of his reach he will not pummel you or break your face. I someday will meet this dude, altho shalloy and a jackboot I want to check his abilities against a 5"1 dude. So far I dont think he can think fast enough to think...
Anyways Hitch likes pigs, and dogs dont like pigs?
mick silver
14th May 2014, 06:38 PM
ive ask you once to stop calling my hogs pigs yahoooooooooooooo is that alright mr jackboot
Hitch
15th May 2014, 07:50 AM
This thread is pretty funny actually. It just proves to me some posters here on this forum don't actually care about what's true or not. As long as they believe it's true, that's all that matters.
midnight rambler
15th May 2014, 07:56 AM
This thread is pretty funny actually. It just proves to me some posters here on this forum don't actually care about what's true or not. As long as they believe it's true, that's all that matters.
So what are you saying is not true in this thread?
Hitch
15th May 2014, 08:15 AM
So what are you saying is not true in this thread?
Just the comments directed towards me, that's all.
iOWNme
15th May 2014, 10:42 AM
This thread is pretty funny actually. It just proves to me some posters here on this forum don't actually care about what's true or not. As long as they believe it's true, that's all that matters.
Are you willing to have an honest debate on the 'truth' of 'Government'?
Im willing to have a discussion debate live with you and i will post it on my YT channel. You can record it as well, so you can have a copy. I will let you decided the time, day, and method of communication.
Do you honestly want to discuss/debate this topic, or do you just want to talk about discussing the truth?
Hitch
15th May 2014, 11:43 AM
Are you willing to have an honest debate on the 'truth' of 'Government'?
I am willing to have an honest debate anytime, however I respectfully decline your offer to have it recorded. I value my anonymity. I've have always respected that for the posters on this site, though there has been times where certain posters tried to post my personal information. Thankfully, they were wrong about that information.
Here's the problem I have with debating things on this forum. Whatever I post will not be taken for what is posted. It will be distorted, manipulated, and that's where truth is lost.
If you want to have an honest debate with me, ask away. The only thing I ask is to have some honor when doing so.
iOWNme
15th May 2014, 02:34 PM
I am willing to have an honest debate anytime, however I respectfully decline your offer to have it recorded. I value my anonymity. I've have always respected that for the posters on this site, though there has been times where certain posters tried to post my personal information. Thankfully, they were wrong about that information.
I never said anything about using your name and adress. LOL My offer still stands.
Here's the problem I have with debating things on this forum. Whatever I post will not be taken for what is posted. It will be distorted, manipulated, and that's where truth is lost.
I totally agree. It happens with what i post also, which is why a live real time discussion is the only way to see if either of our positions have any contradictions in them. My offer still stands.
If you want to have an honest debate with me, ask away. The only thing I ask is to have some honor when doing so.
Ive tried it many times, and it is to easy for people to be dishonest or change the subject in a forum post. In a real time live debate you can not do that, as it will be called out instantly. My offer still stands.
We can call it 'Debate: Anarchist vs Ex-Cop'
I do find it intersting that there is not one single Libertarian/Constitutionalist who will debate me live on the subject of 'Government'. You would think that someone here is confident enough in their beliefs that they would easily be able to defend those beliefs in a real world discussion/debate. So far, not one single person has accepted my offer. I find that very interesting.....
:)
Hitch
15th May 2014, 03:05 PM
We can call it 'Debate: Anarchist vs Ex-Cop'
This right there says you have an agenda. Ex-cop is a belief system I need to defend? No thanks. I hated being a cop. I want nothing to do with the police. I just post my opinion on here because I think some police related posts are misguiding folks.
iOWNme
15th May 2014, 03:45 PM
This right there says you have an agenda. Ex-cop is a belief system I need to defend? No thanks. I hated being a cop. I want nothing to do with the police. I just post my opinion on here because I think some police related posts are misguiding folks.
I was joking man...LOL
And yes you vehemently defend 'Cops' all the time saying that you used to be one so you know what its like. There is no such thing as a 'good cop' anymore than there is a 'good car jacker'. Being paid with stolen money DOES NOT make you virtuous. I dont care if you use the stolen money to feed the poor. You see there are actual things called right and wrong, just and unjust, moral and immoral. Using these tools to figure out the world is how i have come to my postition as an anarchist.
How did you come to your postition that we need 'Government' and 'Police'? I bet if you are honest with yourself, you will find contracdictions in this belief.
See,we are already going in circles. If we were talking live we could hash this out in 15 minutes. I promise to be nice. LOL
Are you sure you dont want to debate me? LOL
Hitch
15th May 2014, 04:17 PM
See,we are already going in circles. If we were talking live we could hash this out in 15 minutes. I promise to be nice. LOL
Are you sure you dont want to debate me? LOL
There you go again...'vehemently' defending cops, the agenda you paint is definitely a LOL. Since I was an ex-cop, automatically my opinions must be in favor of them, right?
BTW, regarding needing police, yes society needs police to function and keep the predators from attacking the sheep. Did you know you are a cop? You should know, you should know and understand that you have the same rights, as a sworn officer, when it comes to arrest, citizens arrest is no different.
If more people would actively take steps to better their communities, maybe sworn paid officers won't have to do the dirty work. And yes, that means handling drunks who've pissed themselves. Nobody wants to deal with that, so you conveniently call the police just like you would order a pizza.
Go out there, quit typing and fight crime yourself. Go arrest someone, then get back to me. Then we will debate.
iOWNme
15th May 2014, 04:35 PM
There you go again...'vehemently' defending cops, the agenda you paint is definitely a LOL. Since I was an ex-cop, automatically my opinions must be in favor of them, right?
No. The posts you have made over the past two years defending 'Cops' in situations that human morality says otherwise.
BTW, regarding needing police, yes society needs police to function and keep the predators from attacking the sheep. Did you know you are a cop? You should know, you should know and understand that you have the same rights, as a sworn officer, when it comes to arrest, citizens arrest is no different.
So we need to violently boss people around and steal their money in order to keep them safe from 'other' criminals who may try and boss them around and steal their money? This is the inherent contradiction in Statism. When it comes to morality, your position is inferior to anarchy. Since anarchy means 'no rulers' can you plase tell me WHO should tell you how to live your life?
I am absolutely not a 'cop'. I am a human being who uses his own free will and conscience to figure out thr world, not the scribbles of 'politicians'.
If more people would actively take steps to better their communities, maybe sworn paid officers won't have to do the dirty work. And yes, that means handling drunks who've pissed themselves. Nobody wants to deal with that, so you conveniently call the police just like you would order a pizza.
You FUCKING STATIST! Can you tell me who this drunk man harmed by peeing on himself? Hitch, if you IMAGINE the scribbles from 'politicians' to be 'Law' and disobeying them is a 'crime', then YOU are the victim of mind control.
Again, you have NO MORAL COMPASS. You throw morals in the wind and then complain when they land on your head. GACK.
Go out there, quit typing and fight crime yourself. Go arrest someone, then get back to me. Then we will debate.
The only 'crime' to fight is that of Statism, which is why i am an anarchist. I have helped many members here to see the inherent contradictions in the belief in 'Government'. The problem with the world exists between the ears of the people, which is why i do what i do.
So now your excuse for not debating me is that i have an 'agenda'? LOL I do have an 'agenda' and it is to stop the most violent criminal gang on the face of this planet: The belief in 'Government'.
Hitch
15th May 2014, 04:53 PM
So now your excuse for not debating me is that i have an 'agenda'? LOL I do have an 'agenda' and it is to stop the most violent criminal gang on the face of this planet: The belief in 'Government'.
Read your response in that last post. You are bursting a seam. If we actually did debate things on radio, would you snap?
See, this is the problem with society. Calling me a Statist, a fucking pig, no moral compass, etc does not accomplish anything. Nothing.
The fact of the matter is, society is too lazy to handle situations on their own. They call the police. They would rather be taxed...and pay out of pocket, than deal with what the police have to deal with.
Bottom line.
I have a question, has anyone, anyone on this forum arrested someone for a crime? Yes, citizen's arrest, has ANYONE here done that?
If you have, you can call me a pig anytime. If you haven't, shut the fuck up.
iOWNme
16th May 2014, 06:41 AM
Read your response in that last post. You are bursting a seam. If we actually did debate things on radio, would you snap?
Your advocating for violence to be used against innocent non violent people. And when i call you out for it, Im the one who is 'bursting'? Your damn right i am.
See, this is the problem with society. Calling me a Statist, a fucking pig, no moral compass, etc does not accomplish anything. Nothing.
Your advocating violence be used against innocent non violent people. I am under no moral obligation to be nice to you, or to condone your inane irrational view. There are some people who will be nice to you while you advocate violence. Then there are other people (like me) who will bash you over the head with philosophy. Both ways work on different people. Yes you are a Statist, as you believe we need a State to keep us all in line. But then when i ask you who should run your life, you run from this question because you see the inherent contradiction in it. Do you think 'Statist' is some dirty word or something? It seems your more upset about being called a Statist, than you care about advocating violence against innocent non violent people. This is a WARPED perception of reality.
The fact of the matter is, society is too lazy to handle situations on their own. They call the police. They would rather be taxed...and pay out of pocket, than deal with what the police have to deal with.
Bottom line.
What does this have to do with human morality? See you IMAGINE that if the 'majority' of people want something that the 'Cops' have to do it. You are a STATIST with no moral compass. I guess if the 'majority' of people want to kill all the cops, then thats ok? Again, you have no principle upon which your statements rest. I cannot apply your logic to anywhere else in reality and come to the same conclusion. Which means you are IMAGINING that scribbles from 'politicians' can alter human morality. THEY CAN NOT.
I have a question, has anyone, anyone on this forum arrested someone for a crime? Yes, citizen's arrest, has ANYONE here done that?
Do you even know what a 'crime' is? Is a 'crime' disobeying the scribbles of 'politicians'?
If you have, you can call me a pig anytime. If you haven't, shut the fuck up.
I have never called you a pig. Pigs are one of the smartest animals in the animal kingdom. I do not see a relevant comparison between the two.
Hitch
16th May 2014, 08:28 AM
Your advocating for violence to be used against innocent non violent people. And when i call you out for it, Im the one who is 'bursting'? Your damn right i am..
Gaslighting. I've come familiar with this term because I see this tactic used all the time on this forum.
I have NEVER ONCE advocated violence to be used against innocent non violent people. Your manipulation of posts is exactly why I would never have a debate with you.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.