PDA

View Full Version : Why NOT believing in conspiracies is a sure sign of mental retardation



Ares
19th May 2014, 07:27 PM
Refreshing rationality: Why NOT believing in conspiracies is a sure sign of mental retardation.

(NaturalNews) The phrase "conspiracy theorist" is a derogatory smear phrase thrown at someone in an attempt to paint them as a lunatic. It's a tactic frequently used by modern-day thought police in a desperate attempt to demand "Don't go there!"

But let's step back for a rational moment and ask the commonsense question: Are there really NO conspiracies in our world?

The Attorney General of South Carolina would surely disagree with such a blanket statement. After all, he sued five pharmaceutical companies for conducting a price-fixing conspiracy (http://www.naturalnews.com/019879_price_fixing_drug_racket.html) to defraud the state of Medicaid money.

Similarly, in 2008, a federal judge ruled that three pharmaceutical companies artificially marked up their prices in order to defraud Medicare. (http://www.naturalnews.com/022835_drug_racket_Big_Pharma.html)

In fact, dozens of U.S. states have filed suit against pharmaceutical companies for actions that are conspiracies: conspiracy to engage in price fixing, conspiracy to bribe doctors, conspiracy to defraud the state and so on.

The massive drug company GlaxoSmithKline, even more, plead guilty to a massive criminal fraud (http://www.naturalnews.com/036385_GlaxoSmithKline_criminal_fraud_bribery.html ) case involving a global conspiracy to bribe doctors into prescribing more GSK drugs.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg. A deeper look into the criminality of just the drug industry alone reveals a widespread pattern of conspiratorial behavior to defraud the public and commit felony crimes in the name of "medicine."

What is a conspiracy, exactly?
As any state or federal prosecutor will gladly tell you, a "conspiracy" is simply when two or more people plot to commit an act of deceit (or a crime).

Thus, when three hoodlums plan to rob the local Quickie Mart, they are engaged in a "conspiracy" and will likely be charged with a "conspiracy to commit armed robbery" in addition to the different crime of "armed robbery." The fact that they planned it with several friends makes it a "conspiracy" worthy of additional felony charges, you see. When these charges are brought up in court, the judge doesn't look at the prosecutor and say, "You are a conspiracy theorist!" That would be absurd.

The idea, then, that there is no such thing as a conspiracy is flatly ludicrous. And people who condemn others as being "conspiracy theorists" only make themselves look mentally impaired.

To live in our modern world which is full of collusion and conspiracy -- and yet somehow DENY the existence of any conspiracies at all -- is an admission of a damaged brain. Of course there are conspiracies, and when people analyze those conspiracies, they are "theorizing" about what happened. This is, in fact, precisely the job that police detectives and FBI agents carry out almost daily.

Most police detectives are, in reality, "conspiracy investigators" and analysts.

There are endless examples of real conspiracies
Auto manufacturers routinely conspire to cover up mechanical defects that put customer lives at risk. Even National Public Radio lays out the full timeline of the General Motors conspiracy to hide the problem with its faulty ignition switches. (http://www.npr.org/2014/03/31/297158876/timeline-a-history-of-gms-ignition-switch-defect)

Last year, food corporations conspired with the Grocery Manufacturers of America (the GMA) to commit money laundering crimes in Washington state (http://www.naturalnews.com/042546_grocery_manufacturers_association_gmo_label ing_money_laundering.html) in order to funnel money into a campaign to defeat GMO labeling there.

The FDA conspired with a drug manufacturer to keep a deadly diabetes drug called Rezulin on the market (http://www.naturalnews.com/019497_FDA_drug_the.html) in the USA even after safety regulators pulled the product in Europe.

Similarly, the corrupt, criminal-minded operators of mainstream science journals conspired in a particularly evil way to railroad Dr. Andrew Wakefield with provably false accusations about the nature of his research (http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal .html) into the side effects of vaccines. The GMO Seralini study (http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_gmo_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.html) has been similarly railroaded by a genuine conspiracy of evil, corrupt science journal editors who routinely conspire to suppress all the science they don't want to be seen by the public. Fortunately, 150 other scientists have come to support Seralini with a global condemnation of the obviously contrived scientific censorship. (http://www.naturalnews.com/044555_seralini_study_gmos_scientific_integrity.ht ml)

We live in a world of such deception and collusion that, frankly stated, it's hard to find a large institution (such as medicine, agriculture or the war industry) which isn't involved in some sort of conspiracy at some level.

What is a "conspiracy theorist?
The pejorative "conspiracy theorist" is meant to demean and ridicule skeptics of official stories.

Most so-called "conspiracy theorists" are really skeptics, by definition. They're skeptical of what the government tells them. They're skeptical of the claim that drug companies are really only interested in helping humankind and have no desire to make money. They're skeptical that food corporations are telling them the truth about what's in their food. And they're also skeptical of anything coming out of Washington D.C., regardless of which party happens to be in power at the time.

People who are not skeptics of "official stories" tend to be dull-minded. To believe everything these institutions tell you is a sign of mental retardation. To ask questions, on the other hand, is a sign of higher intelligence and wisdom.

Skeptics of official stories, it turns out, also have the support of history on their side. How many times has it later been revealed that the American people were lied to by the very institutions we were supposed to trust?

For example, it is an historical fact that 98 million Americans were injected with hidden cancer viruses (http://www.naturalnews.com/041345_cdc_polio_vaccine_sv40.html) which were later found in polio vaccines strongly recommended by the CDC. In an effort to cover that up and rewrite history, the CDC later scrubbed all accounts of that history from its website (http://www.naturalnews.com/041593_CDC_polio_vaccine_SV40_cancer_virus.html), pretending it never happened.

That's more than a cover-up; it's an Orwellian-style conspiracy to selectively rewrite history and deny Americans any memory of a monumental, deadly error made by the CDC in collusion with the vaccine industry.

According to two former Merck virologists, that company conspired to fake the results of its vaccine tests (http://www.naturalnews.com/036328_Merck_mumps_vaccine_False_Claims_Act.html) by spiking test samples with animal antibodies, thereby falsely distorting the results to make the vaccine appear effective. The two virologists filed a False Claims Act with the federal government detailing the conspiracy, saying:

Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that "did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life ... virus neutralization in vaccinated people..."

Conspiracies of money and big banks
Every month, the Federal Reserve conspires to steal a portion of your wealth through "quantitative easing" -- an irresponsible money creation scheme that devalues all the currency already in circulation (i.e. the money in your bank account).

The money the Fed creates is, not surprisingly, handed over to the big Wall Street banks -- the same banks that received a jaw-dropping $29 trillion (http://www.cnbc.com/id/45674390) in "bailout money" since the near-collapse of U.S. banking in late 2008.

Why did this bailout money go to the banks instead of the American people? Because powerful people sat in dark rooms and colluded to send the money to the most influential banks. A conspiracy, in other words, by definition.

Had that same amount of money been equally distributed across the U.S. population, the Fed would have distributed nearly $100,000 to each and every citizen in America; man, woman and child. But instead of enriching the population, the banking bailout burdened the population with the debt now owed to the Fed by future taxpayers.

Every $1 trillion created by the Fed, after all, is $1 trillion "loaned" to the U.S. Treasury which must somehow be repaid. In truth, the minute you start to investigate how money is created, why the Federal Reserve is a private banking cartel and why the big banks get all the bailout money, you run head-first into genuine conspiracies almost from the outset. When you look up the word "conspiracy" in a dictionary, it should probably say, "See Banking and Finance."

Our world is full of conspiracies because it's full of people who deceive
The reason conspiracies are real is because humanity is a race capable of extreme deception. As long as there are people whose actions are based in greed, jealousy and a desire to dominate others, there will be real conspiracies plotted and operating across every sector of society.

The correct term for "conspiracy theorist" should really be "conspiracy analyst." Most of the people who are skeptical of official stories are, in fact, analyzing conspiracies in an attempt to understand what really happened and what took place behind closed doors.

A highly-recommended book the delves into this matter in more detail is the five-star-rated masterpiece Official Stories: Counter-Arguments for a Culture (http://www.amazon.com/Official-Stories-Counter-Arguments-Culture-Need/dp/147756134X) in Need by Liam Scheff.

This book will open the minds of those who still have the cognitive capability remaining to grasp it. (Sadly, the injection of mercury into babies in the form of vaccines has damaged so many brains across America that many people are now cognitively incapable of rational thought.)

And remember: the next time someone flings the phrase "conspiracy theorist" in your direction, simply know that they are effectively wearing a DUNCE hat on their heads by admitting they have failed to acknowledge that true conspiracies are rather commonplace.

That's not merely a theory, either: it's a statement of fact.

http://www.naturalnews.com/045172_conspiracy_theories_rational_thought_corpor ate_collusion.html

singular_me
20th May 2014, 05:46 AM
most people will see conspiracies, but wont act upon them because it requires to change their mindsets, Conspiracies paralyze people's thoughts, the ego wants to hold on cherished delusions... conspiracies mirror what they/we want to avoid to ask them/ourselves, its an holographic Universe. In this sense, we create our own reality. The blame game is futile... without taking responsibility for what it is, the NWO and all the layers of conflicts it has created are not only here to stay but will only get worse.

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." -- J. Edgar Hoover.

The monster is also within... works both ways... facts also exists to show us how to fix ourselves

aeondaze
20th May 2014, 06:02 AM
You definately know a lot about cherished delsions, but not much else.

Notice how they didn't talk about the pyramids? :)

They also didn't mention 'scientific' conspirators, instead they correctly identified the corporate pharmaceutical industry, which can hardly be described as 'scientists'. They correctly understand the difference between the two, its a pity the intelectualy impaired amongst us can't.

Ares
20th May 2014, 06:20 AM
You definately know a lot about cherished delsions, but not much else.

Notice how they didn't talk about the pyramids? :)

They also didn't mention 'scientific' conspirators, instead they correctly identified the corporate pharmaceutical industry, which can hardly be described as 'scientists'. They correctly understand the difference between the two, its a pity the intelectualy impaired amongst us can't.

While I can appreciate the disagreement you may have with Singular_me, can you keep the back and forth in the thread that is the target of your gripe?

aeondaze
20th May 2014, 06:40 AM
It wasn't off topic in any way whatsoever, so I'm having a little trouble empathising with your objection.

Ares
20th May 2014, 06:55 AM
It wasn't off topic in any way whatsoever, so I'm having a little trouble empathising with your objection.

I never said it was off topic. You were taking jabs at Singular_me and even referenced the previous thread that you had a disagreement in.

aeondaze
20th May 2014, 07:09 AM
I never said it was off topic. You were taking jabs at Singular_me and even referenced the previous thread that you had a disagreement in.

I didn't reference the 'thread', I referenced the 'topic' FWIW, anyhow...I've said my piece.

singular_me
20th May 2014, 12:17 PM
ponder this Aeon:

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." -- J. Edgar Hoover.

what is your interpretation of that quote? Do you know who Hoover is , don't you... do you? The handicap he also means is called *denial*... which has to do with the ego: self-admitting to being a total slave preyed upon. And this thought is much too horrific for many, hence they are handicapped.

okay ONLY the corporate pharmaceutical industry can hardly be described as "scientists" :)

what do you do with bio/geoengineering, the military complex, central banking, democracy and humanitarian aid farces, designed obsolescence..... the list is long.

additionally you dont read well the OP:
To live in our modern world which is full of collusion and conspiracy -- and yet somehow DENY the existence of any conspiracies at all -- is an admission of a damaged brain.

So the author of the OP and I fully agree. I just expounded upon it.

denial is the REAL monster (majority of population), brainwashing (by the minority) works because of it - and otherwise.



They also didn't mention 'scientific' conspirators, instead they correctly identified the corporate pharmaceutical industry, which can hardly be described as 'scientists'. They correctly understand the difference between the two, its a pity the intelectualy impaired amongst us can't.

you referring to me as "intellectually impaired" is actually mind boggling :)

aeondaze
20th May 2014, 06:33 PM
Oh YAY for you!

Its nice that you get a warm and fuzzy feeling when people agree with you, it just goes to show how you're really just another sheep trying to masquerade as a leader.

Often when people agree with me I fear that I have missed something or maybe that I got it wrong somehow, lol. I RARELY trust other peoples judgement, too often it has proven to be worhtless, and more often than not they not a whole lot less about the world than I, so why shold I take their misguided opinions seriously?

Who am I to judge if thats what you need to feel good about yourself!

Again the only subject you're fit to speak about is denial, of which we have over 70 pages of proof!

Unlike you, I think for myself :rolleyes: