The Illustrated Protocols of Zion by David Duke

[EE_]

No one can dispute a single word Duke says. That's why it can never be discussed by anyone.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-xjLa9xrOo

[Libertarian_Guard]

Dr. David Duke's video is solid gold! I can't disagree with a single word he said. Even more so, is his claim that "The Illustrated Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" is nothing more than "a literary fantasy" in comparison with "1984" he knocks the ball out of the park!

In 2014 Dr. Duke is a gift.

[Twisted Titan]

Taggggg

[Dogman]

I met duke years ago, and for awhile I believed in him, but not any more.


He now plays people like a guitar, to make his living.

Not worth the sweat off my balls, on a hot day.

There is a whole state that wishes he was not born,now ,they that remember.

But Louisiana politics have always been high intertainment for those that pay attention.

And him being a Doc is a hoot, The vid plays into hands that do not do any deep homework.

Biased to the max!

[singular_me]

I am all for the end of zionism... but when/if that happens, all abrahamic religions will fall apart.

[Santa]

I met duke years ago, and for awhile I believed in him, but not any more.


He now plays people like a guitar, to make his living.

Not worth the sweat off my balls, on a hot day.

There is a whole state that wishes he was not born,now ,they that remember.

But Louisiana politics have always been high intertainment for those that pay attention.

Why would it matter that you don't "believe in" David Duke or not?
The question is, is there anything in the video presentation that you disagree with?

[Dogman]

Why would it matter that you don't "believe in" David Duke or not?
The question is, is there anything in the video presentation that you disagree with?

Any thing he speaks about I Am questing!

And the vid, even less or more so!

Android Forum Runner

[Santa]

Any thing he speaks about I Am questing!

And the vid, even less or more so!


Just a reminder.
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance."

[Dogman]

Just a reminder.
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance.". And they that accept by blind faith are, less than ignorant!

Back at you!!

Ignorance can be fixed but stupidity can not!

What is your excuse?

Android Forum Runner

[Santa]

. And they that accept by blind faith are, less than ignorant!

Back at you!!

Ignorance can be fixed but stupidity can not!

Android Forum Runner

What does any of this gibberish have to do with the protocols of zionism?

David Duke is not some religious messiah. He's not even a Hollywood celebrity.

There's no cult of personality contest going on here. Who cares whether you like him or not. Hell, I don't particularly like Duke either.

The thing is, regardless of his tainted past and his rather ubernatural whiteness, he's correct in his assessment of today's Zionist control meme.

It's so obvious it makes my balls sweat more than normal.

[EE_]

. And they that accept by blind faith are, less than ignorant!

Back at you!!

Ignorance can be fixed but stupidity can not!

What is your excuse?

Android Forum Runner

There is no better example of astounding ignorance then organized Catholicism/Christianity's blind faith/blind worship of the Zionist Jew. It's the biggest problem I have with organized religion.

Anyone speaking against the Zionist Jew is branded as a hate monger. It's an effective way to attack someone, in the same way branding them an anti-semite or a racist is. All very strong words used to win a dispute without discussion.

IMO, the most contemptuous, hateful people on the planet are the Zionist Jews. They are atheist, not religious people.
Many are brilliant, unscrupulous, cunning, deceitful and evil. In their lust for money and power they will destroy anything that stands between them and their goals.

I out them not out of hate for them, but for their hatred of everyone else who are not "their people".
I hate no one. Hate is the most destructive emotion to anyone that has had hate in their heart.
Hate can only be reserved for the truly evil.

[Neuro]

No one can dispute a single word Duke says. That's why it can never be discussed by anyone.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-xjLa9xrOo
Strange that it is still on! Thanks for putting it on!

[Dachsie]

There is no better example of astounding ignorance then organized Catholicism/Christianity's blind faith/blind worship of the Zionist Jew.

There are a substantial number of Catholics who have for a long time spoken out against Zionism including Dr. E. Michael Jones, Dr. Robert Sungenis and this excellent website...

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/

Pope Pius X told Theodore Herzel to take a walk.

[goldleaf]

And don't forget Fr. Denis Fahey!

[Neuro]

And don't forget Fr. Denis Fahey!
Neither Bishop Richard Williamson...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Williamson_(bishop)

[EE_]

Neither Bishop Richard Williamson...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Williamson_(bishop)

I tell religious people that Bishop Richard Williamson is my favorite Bishop!

[Neuro]

I tell religious people that Bishop Richard Williamson is my favorite Bishop!
Well done!

[Tumbleweed]

I tell religious people that Bishop Richard Williamson is my favorite Bishop!

I think bishop Williamson is a real catholic but the pope ain't.

[singular_me]

There is no better example of astounding ignorance then organized Catholicism/Christianity's blind faith/blind worship of the Zionist Jew.

well I think this is implied as there wouldnt be any bible without the 1st testatment... getting rid of zionism would mean that true torah jews, christians and muslims would shrink to a minority in the world religions. the 3 abrahamic faiths would lose their mainstream status all together.

[EE_]

Some might have seen this before...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4QSkKkKQZ4

[Dachsie]

Father Dennis Fahey said something like ...Regardless of whether the Protocols are a verified document, we see all that they contain being played out to their fullest in today's world. I agree with that. I think that was the gist of what David Duke was saying. All the objections raised as to their original source can be put aside as irrelevant because all the Protocols are being inacted right now.

Dr. Robert Sungenis does not have any opinion about the Protocols. He says he does not need to read them because he can clearly see what is happening in our world, especially in the Catholic Church. His implication was that he thinks what is playing out must coincide with the Protocols.

The Catholic Church's beginning compromise with Zionism came when they started banking with the Rothschild banks and according to Michael Hoffman, that affiliation began several hundred years ago.

As to organized religion of the Christian variety, one has to evaluate for themselves what is set out in the New Testament. It seems to me like there are numerous verses in the NT that show that Christ did establish a Church, His Church. It was, in part, an earthly visible hierarchical Church. That is called "the Church Militant." Catholic simply means "universal" and Christ's Church is "one, holy, catholic and apostolic." The other parts of the Church are "the Church Suffering" which refers to the poor souls in purgatory that we can pray for and 'The Church Triumphant" which is the heavenly Church where Christ and the saints, including those canonized saints and all the other saints who made it to heaven and to whom we can ask their intercessory prayers for us and our needs.

Bishop Williamson came to Austin Texas and gave a speech that I would love to listen to but try as I may I cannot locate the audio of that speech. It was at a Free Speech American Free Press Conference in I think April of 2013 with Texe Marrs as a co-arranger for the conference.

Bishop Williamson was kicked out of the SSPX sedevecantist church because he spoke out against the Holocaust. Many traditional Catholics, including Dr. E. Michael Jones, think that Bishop Williamson has gone a bit "off the rails" [my phrase] of late. There are many excellent talks by Bishop Williamson on YouTube.

[PatColo]

^ Williamson not only called out the hollowhoax, but also 911 and the boston hoax. E.M.Jones was on JFriend's podcast (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?62986-The-Jewish-Revolutionary-Spirit-amp-History-Dr-E-Michael-Jones-amp-Dr-Tom-Sunic&p=701641&viewfull=1#post701641) recently, and when jf put some hollowhoax feelers out, emj sidestepped them. I like emj's work overall, though.

Anywho, Henry "the hollowhoax really happened" Makow here, is critical of duke's latest... also indicting Michael Hoffman. Many reader comments, both pro & con HM's essay:

Feckless Goyim Downplay Protocols of Zion (http://henrymakow.com/2014/05/Feckless-Goyim-Downplay-Protocols-of-Zion.html) May 25, 2014


I think HM's critique is weak sauce. I'm way more dismayed by DD's ambiguity about 911, consistently taking a LIHOPey tact when he talks about it at all. I've never heard DD speak bluntly about hollowhoax truth either. :(

[Dachsie]

Dr. Jones is going through some wild mental gymnastics to stay in the Catholic Church and not be a sedevacantist or any other kind of break-away Catholic church. Anti-Popes since Vatican II are pushing people harder and harder, especially this current guy. Making the most outrageous statements that go against Christ's words and the traditional almost 2000 year official teaching of the church. The Church is being punished or chastised because of unfaithfulness. Things are only going to get worse.

I really appreciate Dr. Jones speaking out intelligently against the Jews and explaining the history of it, especially the history of the Church's reactions to the Jews. The policy was always something like Sicut Iudeus Non, which roughly translates to 'we won't mess with your people and their worship practices if you won't undermine and destroy the whole society.' Naturally, this has been thrown out the window because Vatican II was infested with Zionist shills including Malachi Martin.

Dr. Jones was on a show of Mark Glenn with Robert Sungenis and Mark Dankoff and they all agreed the Zionists played a crucial role in the planning and perpetration of 9-11. That show is online somewhere. Only problem is, the underlying premise was that 9-11 WTC destruction was caused by placement of [Dr. Steven Jones ] /nanothermite charges in the buildings which is absurd for a jillion reasons. The amount of material that would need to be extremely strategically placed would be hundreds of thousands of pounds of the stuff and it is not an explosive. It is an incendiary. The facts are the Twin Towers were blown to kingdom come.

I have exchanged a couple of emails with EMJ and he is also a bit fuzzy on one world government and how that really is the goal and how evil that is for all mankind. The bible throughout is pretty clear to me that God wants there to be individual sovereign nations, not a one world death and slavery system.

Jim Condit Jr has been doing a series of talks on isoc.ws. Part 2 is free and downloadable. He explains his sedevacantist position. The topic of the talk series is that the real Pope, Pope Siri, that was elected in the 1958 conclave was not allowed to be Pope and anti-Pope John 23 was put in instead. The implication is that some entity issued a threat to the conclave and said if you put in Pope Siri, we are going to nuke the Vatican. They wanted "their man" to get in and move forward their Zionist agenda for V2 and the future of the Church and some powerful threat at the last minute granted their wish to them.

Best I can tell, with almost no exceptions, you won't find anyone who is still in the mainstream Catholic Church will say that the Holocaust is a hoax. I think Jones thinks it is mainly a hoax but he won't say it is a total hoax. Dr. Jones' mother is from Germany and Dr. Jones speaks German fluently and has spent much time in Germany.

I am open to the Holohoax from what I have read and that is not that much. But I also think Hitler was a eugenicist to the extreme and wanted to build a master race. He killed anywhere between 60,000 and 120,000 innocent men, women and children, some but not anywhere near all were Jews, in NAZI Germany. So NO, HITLER IS NOT A NICE GUY, as John Friend and Deanna Spingola and Mike King try to peddle. Also I believe TPTB allowed Hitler to escape to South America where he lived out the rest of his life. We have to ask WHO allowed that escape to happen.

[dook everl]

I was told on one site not to use the word Jew. I was told to just call them Liberals I'm sure communist was ok also. Liberals on that site means communist jews.Use the term "One Worlders" instead. That detaches the reader from the left-right paradigm and gets him drawing distinctions about those who promote globalization on both the left and the right.
"Liberal" is a term that includes too many non-Jews to be difinitive.

[Neuro]

I was told on one site not to use the word Jew. I was told to just call them Liberals I'm sure communist was ok also. Liberals on that site means communist jews.Use the term "One Worlders" instead. That detaches the reader from the left-right paradigm and gets him drawing distinctions about those who promote globalization on both the left and the right.
"Liberal" is a term that includes too many non-Jews to be difinitive.
Here we tend to call them Jews or Zionists sometimes Talmudists...

welcome, btw!

[PatColo]

DD raised more eyebrows recently in questioning the khazar origins of (~90% of...) todays "jooz". From one of the comments at the Makow link a few replies up,



V said (May 25, 2014):

A few weeks ago I read another article by David Duke that say's that he doesn't believe that the Jewish Khazar theory to be true. You can read it here:
http://davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/
This is totally opposite of the book that Texe Marrs wrote titled "DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline."

[Libertarian_Guard]

I was told on one site not to use the word Jew. I was told to just call them Liberals I'm sure communist was ok also. Liberals on that site means communist jews.Use the term "One Worlders" instead. That detaches the reader from the left-right paradigm and gets him drawing distinctions about those who promote globalization on both the left and the right.
"Liberal" is a term that includes too many non-Jews to be difinitive.


IMHO, more often than not, zionist is the preferred (phrase or word) word of choice.

The term (or word ) jew will only serve to distract you from accomplishing your goal.

[PatColo]

^ Joogle shares your concern! :D Search anything including the term Joo, and find this disclaimer linked at the top of the results: http://www.google.com/explanation.html




An explanation of our search results (http://www.google.com/explanation.html) If you recently used Google to search for the word “Jew,” you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We’d like to explain why you’re seeing these results when you conduct this search.


A site’s ranking in Google’s search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page’s relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for “Jew” brings up one such unexpected result.


If you use Google to search for “Judaism,” “Jewish” or “Jewish people,” the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for “Jew” different? One reason is that the word “Jew” is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word “Jewish” when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:





http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/jonah081500.asp



Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like “Judaism,” “Jewish people,” or “Jews” than the single word “Jew” In fact, prior to this incident, the word “Jew” only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it’s likely that the great majority of searches on Google for “Jew” are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.


The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.


We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.


Sincerely,
The Google Team


P.S. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at http://www.adl.org/rumors/google_search_rumors.asp. In addition, we call your attention to Google’s search results (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=anti-semitism) on this topic.

[EE_]

Texe Marrs


Why Do Jews Show No Guilt or Remorse Over Their Heartless Murder of Christ Jesus?

“We killed Jesus, and we’re proud of it.”


Some 2,000 years ago, the Sanhedrin, made up of the high priests of Judaism, ordered the killing of Christ Jesus. The Jews’ holy book, the Babylonian Talmud, brags about the killing of Jesus. The Jews make it known that it was not the Romans, but a proper rabbinical court that ordered his death, and they claimed it was well deserved. Here are but a few actual quotes from their Talmud:

Sanhedrin, 67a: Jesus was hanged on the eve of Passover.

Sanhedrin, 103a and 1076: Jesus was adjudged guilty of seducing, corrupting, and attempting to destroy Israel.

Zohar III, 282: Jesus died like a beast and was buried in an animal’s dirt heap.

Gittin, 57a: Jesus was punished by being sent to hell and being boiled in hot, fiery excrement.


So this is what the Jews, in their most holy book, the Talmud, say about Jesus Christ. And every word in the Talmud is honored by the rabbis as “Divine Truth.”

Rabbi Michael Radkinson, one of today’s greatest authorities on Jewish holy books, in his The History of the Talmud, states:

“The Talmud is one of the wonders of the world. Not a single letter of it is missing. It still dominates the minds of a whole people (the Jews) who venerate its contents as Divine Truth.”


Jewish Youth Are Proud of Killing Jesus
In a YouTube video, I recently witnessed two young Jewish thugs terrorizing a Palestinian family. They demanded, “Get out of Israel. This is our land. God gave it to us.”

When the Palestinians protested, explaining they were “Christian believers,” the two Jewish thugs really grew angry. One shouted, “F..k Your Jesus! We killed Jesus, and we’re proud of it.”

These young Jews showed their hatred toward Jesus. I have never, ever heard one Jew say that he or she is sorry that his ancestors killed Jesus. Most brag openly that they’d do it again.


Jews harass woman in streets of Jerusalem. From birth, Jewish youth are taught to hate and persecute “inferior” non-Jews.



Sarah Silverman, Jewish comedian, stated on her HBO-TV special, that she’d do it right this time: “I’d put his body in a meat grinder and make mincemeat of it,” she said. “Presto! No more Jesus!”

Her live audience roared with laughter.

Jews Offer No Apology for Killing Jesus
We live in an age of apology and confession. Everyone seems to be confessing what they or their ancestors did wrong and apologizing for it. The Pope has apologized to the Jews for the Catholic Church having persecuted them in past history. The Germans paid—and still pay—billions in reparations to alleged holocaust victims. Whites who practiced apartheid in South Africa apologized and made black Nelson Mandela head of their country. In the U.S.A., our Congress apologized to the blacks for the wrong done them in slavery.

But the Jews have never apologized to anyone, especially to the Christians for having killed Jesus. In fact, the Jews believe themselves to be perfect “God-men.” They never apologize to anyone. We know, of course, of the horrific crimes of the Jews during the French Revolution. Later, in the 20th century, the Jews in Soviet Russia were responsible for the purging and murder of 66,000,000 hapless innocents.

However, to this day, though the Jews harp incessantly about the wrong done them by Hitler and the Nazis in supposedly putting some six million to death, they never utter one word of apology or regret for their tribe massacring eleven times that many in the U.S.S.R.


The Jews’ holy book, the Talmud, is full of horrible slurs and defamation of Jesus.



Why is this? Why do the Jews obstinately refuse to apologize for their countless crimes against humanity? Why do they brag and even laugh about their dishonorable killing of Jesus? Why do the Jews display such a monumental lack of remorse?

I know the answer to this question. It is because most Jews are psychopaths.

Psychopaths Feel No Remorse
Professor Robert Hare, a criminal psychologist, is the world’s leading expert on criminal psychopaths. “It stuns me, as much as it did 40 years ago when I started, that it is possible to have people so emotionally disconnected that they can function as if other people are objects to be manipulated and destroyed without any concern,” Hare says.

Hare has developed a test of 20 criteria to determine if a person (or possibly an entire nation or race) is of a psychopathic mind. Amazingly, the Jews possess every single one of these deviant traits. For example, they possess glibness and superficial charm and have a grandiose sense of self-worth. The psychopath is a pathological liar; he is cunning and manipulative, emotionally shallow, callous and lacking in empathy, unwilling to accept responsibility, has a parasitic lifestyle and, most of all, lacks remorse.

Today, our criminal justice system in most states allows the family of convicted murderers to stand up at the conclusion of a trial, and tell the convicted person of the pain he has caused by taking the life of their loved one.

It has always seemed to me that this is a ridiculous thing because the cries of anguish of the victims’ families, does not at all cause the callous murderer to feel empathy. He has no remorse, and so all the time the family member spends pouring out his heart is wasted. The murderer sits passively and rarely shows any feelings. If he does, it’s all a big show, designed to fool and deceive the Judge into giving him a lighter sentence.

Psychopaths Are Not Like You and Me
The Jew, particularly, doesn’t waste his breath on the Christian who confronts him with his crime. The Talmud is a book the Christian never reads, so the Jew simply sits back and refuses to take responsibility. “Jesus was responsible for his own death,” the Jew will explain. Or, “Hey, the Roman soldiers carried out his crucifixion. It wasn’t the Jews.”

When someone like actor/director Mel Gibson produces a movie (The Passion of the Christ) fingering the Jews, the Jewish ADL and other Jews become hysterical. They scream and shout, “anti-Semite!”

Here again, this is a definite sign of the tainted psychopath mind. A criminal is always likely to blame the victim, remarking “He shouldn’t have got in the way,” or “That girl shouldn’t have dressed like that. She was asking for it,” or something similar.


Dr. Robert Hare, world-renowned criminal psychologist, reports that psychopaths have no remorse for their crimes. They are cunning and manipulative.


Psychopaths are not like you and me, says Professor Hare and other authorities. They have no remorse. They’re glad they murdered or raped. They will do it again given the chance. They are truly like aliens from another galaxy in their thinking. To expect them to understand the pain and despair they inflict on others is not reasonable. They are immoral, lacking in empathy and are devoid of human feelings.

The Jewish Psychopath Cannot Reform
Dr. Hare says that, regrettably, the psychopath cannot reform. We can’t make him feel for his victims or have remorse at what he has done. He is what he is.

Jesus put it this way in John 8, when he flatly told the Jews: “Ye are of your father the devil, and lusts of your father ye will do.” A psychopath is, in fact, a devil in human form.

Only Jesus Himself can change or redeem the psychopath. But few will receive Him into their heart. No remorse, no regret, remember?

The Apostle Paul said that the Jews “killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets... and are contrary to all men” (I Thes. 2:15).

Isn’t it, therefore, insane of the Christian Zionists to exalt and praise the very ones, the psychopaths, the devil men, who not only killed the Saviour, Jesus Christ, but also killed their own prophets? These deceived Christian Zionists are so full of demonic spirit that, in defiance of the Bible’s clear teaching, they actually lift up and praise the psychopath Jews and exalt them as “God’s Chosen People.” May Jesus forgive them for this horrible, satanic doctrine.

“Wherefore he saith, awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light” (Ephesians 5:14).

http://www.texemarrs.com/062014/remorseless_killers.htm

[PatColo]

Bollyn:

David Duke and YouTube Censorship (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_14726)
June 7, 2014

http://www.bollyn.com/public/Duke_Video.jpg
David Duke's video promoting The Illustrated Protocols of Zion


A dedicated supporter of 9-11 Truth wrote from Massachusetts telling me that he had posted a comment under a recent YouTube video by David Duke. After checking the comments under the video, I wrote back to inform him that I did not see the comment he had posted.



I informed him that YouTube regularly censors comments about 9-11 videos in such a way that the comment is only visible to the person who posted the comment when he is logged in, but is not seen by the general public. I have taken this matter up with Google/YouTube in the past and have yet to receive a proper response that explains why viewers' comments are being censored.



The problem faced by this supporter of 9-11 Truth is, in my opinion, a good example of the saying, "He who owns the pipeline, controls the product." Google bought YouTube and since they own the pipeline, they decide what messages get posted and which don't. One should not expect free speech on a controlled network.



I am posting the following email because it provides an important lesson in how censorship works on the Internet - in reality. It also gets into the subject of why David Duke, who presents himself as a critic of organized Zionism, completely ignores the evidence of Zionist involvement in the crime of the century: 9/11. How much sense does that make?



The email from my loyal supporter in Massachusetts begins:



Hi David Duke,



Several days ago I posted a comment in the comments section under your new video titled "The Illustrated Protocols of Zion by David Duke". It criticized you for not acknowledging the Jewish role in 9/11 and it questioned whether you were really fighting as a patriot for the truth. However, I have now found that that comment was censored. (This was not immediately evident to me because I needed to sign out of youtube to see that it was censored.) Are the Jews who run youtube censoring comments in your videos to protect your reputation? Or did you censor it?



Here is the comment I posted:



David Duke, this video is good and you have done quite a bit of good work. But I just cannot get past the fact that on probably THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT you defend the enemy completely. For you to keep saying that we just don't know who did 9/11 is a serious shortcoming.



I have heard an interview of Eustace Mullins (by Daryl Bradford Smith on December 16, 2006) in which Mullins says, in so many words, that you are controlled opposition [3:00 to 4:10] and that "David always does what he is told to." [4:07-4:09]




http://www.bollyn.com/public/Duke_Video_Page.jpg
"Eustace Mullins on David Duke, useful idiot” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVbmwkFRDRo&feature=youtu.be)
URL Link - http://youtu.be/vVbmwkFRDRo

(http://youtu.be/vVbmwkFRDRo)
Others also say that you are controlled opposition, including John DeNugent. When you combine this with your insistence that we don't know who did 9/11 – when the question of who did it is completely spelled out in Christopher Bollyn's book (Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed The World) – it is very suspicious. Bollyn is one of the most significant – if not the most significant – researchers of 9/11.



Mike Delaney's video about 9/11, “Missing Links”, which you reportedly had on your website for years, is mostly based on Bollyn's work. If you are NOT an agent, controlled opposition, then I challenge you to read Bollyn's book (if you haven't already) and publish a critique of it on your website publicly explaining why that mountain of evidence contained in those pages is not good enough to conclude that the Israeli Mossad did 9/11 with the help of powerful Jews in the U.S. Then defend yourself from the torrent of criticism that is sure to come now that more and more patriots know who really did 9/11.



http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_14726

[Norweger]

I was told on one site not to use the word Jew. I was told to just call them Liberals I'm sure communist was ok also. Liberals on that site means communist jews.Use the term "One Worlders" instead. That detaches the reader from the left-right paradigm and gets him drawing distinctions about those who promote globalization on both the left and the right.
"Liberal" is a term that includes too many non-Jews to be difinitive.

http://www.jewishproblem.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Dr.-Joseph-Goebbels-Identify-the-Jew.jpg

[PatColo]

In These Very Moments, The Protocols Are Being Rewritten (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/08/in-these-very-moments-the-protocols-are-being-rewritten/)


Posted by Gilad Atzmon (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/atzmon/) on February 8, 2015


Is telling the truth about Jewish power Antisemitism?


http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/uploads/2014/01/F131015DV008.jpg
Yossi Sarid



By Gilad Atzmon (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/atzmon/)

For many years my detractors have pointed at the following quote as evidence of my anti Jewish sentiments:



“American Jewry makes any debate on whether the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ are an authentic document or a forgery irrelevant. American Jews do control the world.”




Both Zionists (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc371iqJ5Jk) as well as anti Zionist Zionists (http://blog.sjjp.org.uk/index.php/2006-11-24/gilad-atzmon-in-edinburgh/) cling to this quote as evidence that my ideas are ‘anti Semitic’. As if Jewish power and dominance is a product of my sick imagination.


In the article on antisemitism that was published back in December 2003 (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/on-anti-semitism-by-gilad-atzmon.html?rq=On%20anti%20semitism) I presented an extensive list of Zionist Jews in Bush Administration. I also pointed out that “in Clinton’s administration the situation was even worse. Even though the Jews only make up 1.9 per cent of the country’s population, an astounding 56 per cent of Clinton’s appointees were Jews.” I tried to warn Jews that their excessive power is dangerous for our universe as well as Jewry.


I have never retracted or apologised for statements of what I believed and still believe to be the truth. It is not a secret that with time, many scholars have supported my position. In 2006 Mearsheimer and Walt published their book on The Israeli Lobby.


45% of the Brits are regarded by the Jewish leaders as ‘antisemites’ because the Brits acknowledged in response to survey questions that Jews enjoy extensive power in media, politics and finance.


For 12 years I’ve been accused of being an ‘antisemite’ for stating the obvious – the question of whether the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ is an authentic document or a forgery is irrelevant. Jewish power in media, finance and politics is immense and devastatingly dangerous.


Today, Yossi Sarid, the Israeli light Zionist veteran politician agreed with my position. This is what he wrote in Haaretz (http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.641334?utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social):



“In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.”




One question remains, is telling the truth about Jewish power Antisemitism?


My answer is unequivocal. No it isn’t, truth is liberation.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/08/in-these-very-moments-the-protocols-are-being-rewritten/