PDA

View Full Version : Police confiscate Indiana man’s bodily fluids using forced catheterization



Santa
21st May 2014, 12:48 PM
Ouch! Unfukingbelievable...

http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/william-clark/



Police confiscate Indiana man’s bodily fluids using forced catheterization
The forced penetration was described as "painful, degrading and humiliating."

Posted on May 21, 2014 by Site Staff in News
(Source: Esteem® exam gloves)

(Source: Esteem® exam gloves)

SCHERERVILLE, IN — A federal lawsuit alleges that police officers forged the results of a breath alcohol test and then forcibly penetrated a man’s body with a catheter to extract his bodily fluids.

William B. Clark, 23, gave a disturbing account detailing official police misconduct and invasive, forced medical procedures.

Clark, of Crown Point, was pulled over on the evening of May 20, 2012, while driving on U.S. 30 near its intersection with U.S. 41, on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Schererville Police Officer Matthew Djukic initiated the traffic stop, and Officer Damian Murks responded in a separate vehicle. Mr. Clark was asked to perform a Breathalyzer test, which he did.

The suit alleges that the results of the breath test were falsely reported to create a pretext to arrest Clark. The legal limit in Indiana is 0.08 BAC, police claimed Clark’s was 0.11 BAC. While on the scene, Officer Djukic searched the interior of Clark’s car with a canine, a process Clark says was done illegally.

Mr. Clark was then taken to the St. Margaret Mercy Hospital in nearby Dyer, Indiana. Clark submitted to a blood test, the lawsuit states, which showed that his BAC only 0.073 — below the legal limit. The blood test is the most accurate method to measure blood-alcohol content.

As the case against Mr. Clark began to fall apart, officers required that Mr. Clark provide a urine sample. However, Clark wasn’t able to urinate. Officer Djukic allegedly became impatient and made an effort to forcibly extract a urine sample. Clark states that he was physically restrained by Officer Djukic while hospital staff moved in to force a catheter through his penis to extract urine. The suit claims Officer Murks was complicit in the process.

During the forced catheterization, Clark “loudly moaned in pain.” He states that the process was “painful, degrading and humiliating.”

Despite the blood test that indicated he was legal to drive, Mr. Clark was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

In Indiana, those who refuse chemical tests generally have their driver’s licenses suspended. Forced fluid extraction requires a warrant. (See IC 9-30-6-7)

Clark has filed a federal lawsuit with the U.S. District Court in Hammond. Named as defendants are Officer Matthew Djukic, Officer Damian Murks, the town of Schererville, and the Franciscan Alliance which owns the hospital.

Dogman
21st May 2014, 12:55 PM
Hope he wins and laughs all the way to his nearest trusted p.m dealer, and not to a bank!

Android Forum Runner

Ares
21st May 2014, 12:59 PM
Hope he wins and laughs all the way to his nearest trusted p.m dealer, and not to a bank!

Android Forum Runner

The victim is 23, he's all about that paper... The taxpayer will foot the bill, and Officer jackass will get a 2 week payed administrative leave while Internal Affairs investigates and will find no wrong doing. Wash, Rinse, Repeat.

Dogman
21st May 2014, 01:02 PM
The victim is 23, he's all about that paper... The taxpayer will foot the bill, and Officer jackass will get a 2 week payed administrative leave while Internal Affairs investigates and will find no wrong doing. Wash, Rinse, Repeat.

Probably right, but one can hope!

Android Forum Runner

Spectrism
21st May 2014, 01:04 PM
Hospital staff that took part in the forced unlawful act begin showing up in the local river after committing apparent suicide.

Officer develops arsenic poisoning and drops off the force.

midnight rambler
21st May 2014, 01:57 PM
It's simply how a good manager efficiently manages a herd of livestock*. I fail to see what the big deal is.

*behave as livestock, get treated as livestock

iOWNme
21st May 2014, 03:08 PM
Im still waiting for the day i hear "A Cop tried to stick his hands in a innocent mans pants. The man resisted, the Cop pulled his weapon, then the man pulled his own weapon and blew his head off. Weather report up next."


I know, i know. I will be waiting a long time.

Dogman
21st May 2014, 03:14 PM
Threat to life is the key.

gunDriller
21st May 2014, 05:38 PM
that sounds like Indiana.

Dan Quayle's state, no ?

any state where he is one of the 'Elite' - well, that should tell you something.

Hitch
21st May 2014, 05:41 PM
I just don't believe this whole story. Media BS propaganda.

It reeks of agenda. They want us afraid of cops and this story just is over the top. Divide and conquer.

Ares
21st May 2014, 05:46 PM
I just don't believe this whole story. Media BS propaganda.

It reeks of agenda. They want us afraid of cops and this story just is over the top. Divide and conquer.

How is being afraid of cops an agenda? Historically that usually results in resentment when the people who you think are your protectors start treating you like a criminal. The last time that happened, there was a revolution, tax collectors and enforcement officers found themselves on the wrong side of a gun and didn't live to tell about it.

This type of criminal activity by police breeds that type of animosity. You can have all of the body armor, Armor Personal Carriers, Assault weapons, pepper spray and the power of the state at your personal disposal. None of that protects the cop, his family, or his home from reprisal.

To me this brings a very dangerous and distrustful agenda for police. What happens if some poor cop pulls some guy over and the first thing the guy does is draw a weapon and shoots the cop because "he was in fear for his life"?

How can detectives solve crimes when people fear even talking to the police? The ironic thing of all of this, is that the police themselves are boxing themselves in a corner.

midnight rambler
21st May 2014, 05:59 PM
I just don't believe this whole story. Media BS propaganda.

It reeks of agenda. They want us afraid of cops and this story just is over the top. Divide and conquer.

Really?

https://www.google.com/search?q=forced+enema+traffic+stop+new+mexico&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

And you expect us to take you seriously??

Hitch
21st May 2014, 06:45 PM
Really?

https://www.google.com/search?q=forced+enema+traffic+stop+new+mexico&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

And you expect us to take you seriously??

I am saying, based upon my life experience, this is a bunch of BS.

I don't expect anything from you. Take me seriously, don't take me seriously, I really don't care at this point.

I post what I believe in. I thank folks who teach me something. That is all.

collector
21st May 2014, 07:03 PM
Sue all involved in civil court - no union rep to defend them, take them for all he can since they operated outside the color law and beyond their legal restraints

Ares
21st May 2014, 07:14 PM
Sue all involved in civil court - no union rep to defend them, take them for all he can since they operated outside the color law and beyond their legal restraints

That is something I would do. However this guy most likely has an attorney whose going after a paycheck. Taxpayers take the hit, cop MIGHT get a mark on his record.

Santa
21st May 2014, 08:22 PM
I am saying, based upon my life experience, this is a bunch of BS.


Hitch...your personal life experience has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of this case.
You're making an emotional judgement call based on completely irrelevant criteria.

However, you may have a point in the possibility of a subversive campaign to foment the populace against traditional authority.
I don't know. I'm open to the possibility of it being used to further a globalist agenda, if that's what you're getting at.

Dogman
21st May 2014, 08:24 PM
That is something I would do. However this guy most likely has an attorney whose going after a paycheck. Taxpayers take the hit, cop MIGHT get a mark on his record. Yes taxpayers will take the hit, but to get rid of some bad cocksuckers, you have to make the taxpayers bleed.

Here bad cops in time will be exposed and driven off, even know of one that got burned out as a message, they were not wanted here.

mick silver
23rd May 2014, 10:55 AM
police state