PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Gasoline Consumption Plummets By Nearly 75%



Ares
30th May 2014, 08:30 PM
Regular readers are familiar with my narratives on the U.S. Greater Depression, and (in particular) some of the government’s own charts which depict this economic meltdown most vividly. The collapse in the “civilian participation rate” (the number of people working in the economy) and the “velocity of money” (the heartbeat of the economy) indicate an economy which is not merely in decline, but rather is being sucked downward in a terminal (and accelerating) death-spiral.

However, even that previously published data, and the grim analyses which accompanied it could not prepare me for the horror story contained in data passed along by an alert reader. U.S. “gasoline consumption” – as measured by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) itself – has plummeted by nearly 75%, from its all-time peak in July of 1998. A near-75% collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption has occurred in little more than 15 years.

Before getting into an analysis of the repercussions of this data, however, it’s necessary to properly qualify the data. Obviously, even in the most-nightmarish economic Armageddon, a (relatively short-term) 75% collapse in gasoline consumption is simply not possible. Unless we were dealing with a nation whose economy had been suddenly ripped apart by civil war, or some small nation devastated by a massive earthquake or tsunami; it’s simply not possible for any economy to just disintegrate that rapidly, without there being some ultra-powerful exogenous force also at work.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/05-overflow/20140530_gas_0.png

So how can this raw data, produced by the government itself, be explained? To begin with; the government chooses to measure U.S. gasoline consumption in a very odd manner: by measuring the amount of gasoline entering the domestic supply-chain rather than by measuring actual consumption at the other end of the supply-chain – i.e. “at the pump”.

Why does the U.S. government, which (among other things) leads the world in the manufacture of statistics not produce any simple/direct measurement of gasoline consumption? How can the St. Louis Fed produce nearly 100 different charts on gasoline and diesel prices (for any/every price-category which can be imagined by these statistics geeks), but not a single chart on gasoline supply/demand?

There are several reasons for this unbalanced, anomalous, and simply absurd statistical methodology. First of all; the reason why the U.S. government produces a near-infinite number of charts on prices is because prices are what the Gamblers (i.e. bankers) use as the basis for their $100’s of trillions in gambling in the rigged casinos which the bankers call “markets”.

While supply/demand data is of utmost importance in the real world; the banker-gamblers don’t dwell in the real world. As regular readers already know; their derivatives casino, alone, is roughly twenty times as large as the entire global economy. To the bankers; the “real world” is nothing but fodder for their insane gambling.

Why use this data, at all, since it is such an inferior/distorted means of measuring U.S. gasoline consumption? Because the EIA uses exactly the same data to publish its own “estimates” of U.S. gasoline consumption:

Note: Product supplied measures the amount of gasoline that went into the supply chain and is used as a proxy for gasoline consumption. [emphasis mine]

The other half of this ridiculous statistical hodge-podge, where endless quantities of trivial/irrelevant price data are trumpeted, while any/all data which actually measures the (real) economy is suppressed (if not buried entirely) displays a government desperately trying to hide this massive economic collapse.



If you choose to measure the amount of gasoline leaving U.S. refineries and entering domestic inventories and call this “gasoline consumption”; you can hide the actual collapse in gasoline consumption – until those retail inventories are overflowing, and there is simply no more room in the storage tanks.

This is what we see today in the U.S.: a gasoline market which had been deliberately-and-dramatically over-supplied with gasoline at the wholesale end of the supply-chain (the refineries) has now practically ground to a halt. The same nation which previously amazed the world as it accumulated more automobiles and more miles of highways per capita than any nation on Earth (and by a huge margin) now has such an insane glut of gasoline that it’s massive chain of refineries have had to simply turn off the taps – until this pathetically anemic economy manages to burn-off some of that glut.

This conclusion becomes even more visible/obvious when we view the gasoline data just from the start of the mythical “U.S. economic recovery” to the present. At the start of the “U.S. recovery”; U.S. gasoline consumption was at a rate of 52 million gallons per day (already more than 20% below the 1998 all-time peak). In the five years since the start of this pretend-recovery; U.S. gasoline consumption has fallen all the way to 18 million gallons per day.

Since the beginning of “the U.S. economic recovery”; U.S. gasoline consumption has plummeted by nearly 2/3. As the pseudo-recovery began, and supposedly “strengthened”; U.S. refineries were ordered to fill up the inventories of their dealer network, in anticipation of the increased gasoline consumption which would have occurred in any real “recovery”.

But there never was an increase in U.S. gasoline consumption, because there never was a U.S. economic recovery. Rather, the Greater Depression has simply (and relentlessly) continued to pulverize the U.S. economy like a meat-grinder. To hide this devastation (as well as is possible), the government produces a wide array of its pseudo-statistics, that all contain myriad “adjustments” – which make it possible for these liars-with-numbers to distort the statistical picture of the U.S. economy beyond recognition.

Meanwhile, any/all statistics which measure raw data (and thus cannot be perverted with “adjustments”) are either suppressed (like the civilian participation rate), or not even measured, at all – as is the case with U.S. gasoline consumption. At the retail end; none of the “sales” statistics are adjusted for inflation, not even with the absurdly-fraudulent “CPI” numbers.

By not deflating sales data (at all) the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption “at the pump” is hidden within all this unreported inflation. As explained in previous commentaries; it is this same, unreported inflation which allows the U.S. to convert its large, negative, GDP readings (which would otherwise reveal the Greater Depression) into “economic growth”. It is this same, unreported inflation which allows the government (and employers) to hide the fact that U.S. wages have collapsed by more than 50%.

But what the liars-with-numbers cannot hide (any longer) is the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption which has accompanied the continued, downward spiral of the Greater Depression. The storage tanks are now all full. The only way to (temporarily) hide the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption any further would be to construct even more storage facilities. However, there is no possible economic justification for increasing storage capacity in a market of steadily/relentlessly declining demand.

Indeed, the exact opposite is true. The U.S. economy of the 21st century (a mere hollowed-out husk of what it was only 20 years earlier) will require less and less gasoline storage facilities over time, reflecting a supply network for a steadily shrinking market. As the One Bank completes its plundering of the U.S. economy, and completes its transformation of the U.S. Middle Class into the Working Poor, it is also simply using up more and more of its economic lies.

The Great Inflation Lie will continue to allow the U.S. government (and other Western governments) to crank-out absurd/imaginary positive numbers for GDP. It will continue to allow the U.S. government to crank-out absurd/imaginary numbers for retail sales (and hide the ongoing collapse of the entire U.S. retail sector).

But it can’t hide the fact that U.S. refineries have nearly stopped producing gasoline for the most-motorized society/economy the world has ever seen. It can’t hide the fact that there haven’t been so few people working in the U.S. economy (on a percentage basis) in 35 years.

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/images/stories/civpart_feb13.png

Readers who are stubbornly faithful to the plethora of pseudo-statistics which the U.S. government uses to hide this collapse may have been skeptical of my original denunciation of the “U.S. economic recovery”. They may have been more skeptical with assertions that this Wonderland Matrix of lies is being used to hide a Greater Depression.

However, there is no further room for skepticism when official, government numbers indicate a near-75% collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption over a mere 15 years, and a 65% collapse in consumption since the start of the (supposed) Recovery. Numbers such as this can only be encapsulated with acronyms like “DOA”.

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/images/stories/velocityfeb2014m2v_max_630_378.png

When we look at the EIA’s “gasoline consumption” numbers, and when we see the St. Louis Fed’s chart of the U.S. velocity of money (heartbeat of the U.S. economy); we don’t see an economy which is dying. We see an economy which is already dead.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-30/us-gasoline-consumption-plummets-nearly-75

Ponce
30th May 2014, 10:12 PM
And they blame the price of gasoline for the price of food going up.......does it means that 75% of people are not working?

V

Santa
30th May 2014, 10:16 PM
Weird...Traffic still sucks.

Shami-Amourae
30th May 2014, 10:26 PM
Less and less people go out shopping. More people are buying things online, which saves a ton of people from driving out to the store.

I basically only go out to shop for groceries or guns/ammo.

Horn
30th May 2014, 11:18 PM
Weird...Traffic still sucks.

City planners control signals to make up for lost gas demand, by having everyone burn a few gallons sitting in traffic jams.

Glass
30th May 2014, 11:56 PM
City planners control signals to make up for lost gas demand, by having everyone burn a few gallons sitting in traffic jams.

yes the more they can get you to burn the more they get in taxes. Down here they are complaining that despite there being more cars on the road sitting longer in traffic burning more fuel, the fuel efficiency of new cars is reducing the overall tax take.

So now they want to charge by kilometer. I'm guessing that is in addition to fuel levies, excise and taxes. We pay 56% in those already. If it were instead then two things come to mind. They won't make as much $$ because people are actually driving the same miles and using more fuel due to being stopped. Second, it is not about the money but in the tracking systems that need to be deployed to measure your miles.

So a scam by government. But lets call it a policy and people will think it's necessary and legit.

Horn
31st May 2014, 07:55 AM
So a scam by government. But lets call it a policy and people will think it's necessary and legit.

We've lost the reigns with applying only direct taxes, the natural economy's ebb and flow would right the necessary evil that is .gov.

Their plans are wholly unnatural and notional to possible alien only.

mick silver
31st May 2014, 11:19 AM
I don't leave the farm unless I need something then I make a list of stuff ... the price around here is 3.99 a gallon for reg unleaded

Cebu_4_2
31st May 2014, 12:21 PM
Reg is 3.29 as of yesterday. It is almost impossible to get non methanol fuel here and where it can be found is 1.00 more than the methanol crap. The Honda gets 7 mpg less and the Bimmer 5 less than with non methanol. Both require at least midgrade to run efficiently so the non methanol here is useless as it is only regular grade. I could detune both to run on regular but the effort is moot.

singular_me
31st May 2014, 08:35 PM
I still spend the same on gas

Dogman
31st May 2014, 08:48 PM
I live very near the local lake, and most of the traffic to and from passes close to the house. Not many years ago, there would be bunches of traffic. Now it is not as heavy, think cash is tight, and not as much cruising as there used to be. When I get out and hit the road, traffic is thinner, tho there are more people living in the area compared to lets say 10 years ago.

People are not getting out and cruising like they used to do here.

I am guessing they are watching their budget's!

Hell I still, one year later have less than 3000 miles on my new car, and that is what I am doing.

zap
31st May 2014, 08:55 PM
3.99 per gallon here.

Dogman
31st May 2014, 09:16 PM
3.99 per gallon here. 3.44 here at the station I trade with.

Ares
31st May 2014, 09:19 PM
3.34 for me. But I drive over the border to South Carolina where it's cheaper. Here in North Carolina 3.56

madfranks
1st June 2014, 06:38 AM
If demand is plummeting by 75%, why is gas still so damn expensive? Between $3.50 and $3.60 here.

Cebu_4_2
1st June 2014, 07:19 AM
If demand is plummeting by 75%, why is gas still so damn expensive? Between $3.50 and $3.60 here.

To crush the general population.

Ares
1st June 2014, 07:39 AM
To crush the general population.

It's much simpler than that. Inflation. The same pre-1964 quarter will STILL buy you the same amount of gasoline as it did back then. That in my opinion is the whole reason gasoline has gone up even with less demand. Gasoline suppliers can't give you gas for less than what it cost them to refine, transport or store.

Santa
1st June 2014, 08:04 AM
Welcome to the third world.
I recently picked up this little 1987 Honda Elite 250 scooter to use as my errand bike. Not bad. 70 mpg. Keeps up with traffic no problem, and it only cost $500...
though, I did have to add new tires, brakes, muffler and couple other things to bring it up to snuff. Rides like a champ now. It's my little pony.


http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac358/jackconrad/DSC02908.jpg (http://s915.photobucket.com/user/jackconrad/media/DSC02908.jpg.html)

Ponce
1st June 2014, 08:16 AM
Well, I still got my two scooters that I bought about five years ago......last time my Toyo gave me 52.6 mpg....... and the price in my Micky Mouse of a town is $4.12 per gallon, I fill up in the big town at $3.79 a gallon.

By the way Santa, I had a Honda Elite 250, I even put in a radio.

V

Santa
1st June 2014, 09:13 AM
Well, I still got my two scooters that I bought about five years ago......last time my Toyo gave me 52.6 mpg....... and the price in my Micky Mouse of a town is $4.12 per gallon, I fill up in the big town at $3.79 a gallon.

By the way Santa, I had a Honda Elite 250, I even put in a radio.

V
Some of them even came factory equipped with Kenwood stereo's.
I really like them because they have a liquid cooled 244cc 4 stroke thumper motor that's been around for decades and is still being manufactured.
Lot's of inexpensive drive train parts available. Ease of operation and maintenance. Reliable as anything out there. Purrs effortlessly along at 65mph all day long.
I just put a throttle lock(cruise control) on it yesterday so I can take my hand off the grip when I'm cruising the highways, and since I live way out in the country
that's about all I do. The nearest city is 50 miles away. The closest small town is 10 miles away.

Very practical.

Dachsie
1st June 2014, 09:33 AM
"We've lost the reigns with applying only direct taxes, the natural economy's ebb and flow would right the necessary evil that is .gov."

Spoken like a true libertarian.

mick silver
3rd June 2014, 09:01 AM
theres only what a few companys now that control the price of gas now , not like back in the day when there were family shops every were

Ares
3rd June 2014, 09:07 AM
theres only what a few companys now that control the price of gas now , not like back in the day when there were family shops every were

Not true, the price of gasoline has been pretty consistent when measured against gold or silver. The reason being is extraction and refineries, those have been basically the same since the days of standard oil. What you are seeing is family gas stations disappearing because of cost and regulation involved to run them. Minimum wage hikes, business compliance and regulation for the state and federal government, it's more hassle to run a gas station now than it was from when I was a kid.

How do I know? I worked in a family owned gas station and the owner sold it to BP back in 2000. I sent him an email and asked why he was selling. He said it seemed like the right time, minimum wage had gone up again, and he was tired of the gasoline tax compliance regulations that required to have an accountant on staff basically year round just to keep the books up to date. Just said the business was a hassle, while he enjoyed seeing everyone in the community (very small town only 2,000 people or so) it just became cumbersome to own and operate.

If you know anyone personally who owns a gas station, they'll most likely tell you the same thing. That it's incredibly difficult to run, and manage. Especially with gas prices that change by the hour anymore. Gas stations only earn 2-3 cents per gallon sold, rest goes to refineries, transportation, state, county, city, and federal taxes.

They make the bulk of their money on items sold in the store, which not very many people buy anymore because they just use a card at the pump.

mick silver
3rd June 2014, 09:24 AM
I am told what I have to make you pay for gas from a big company . at one time there was gas refier all over this country now they are all owned by a few . big oil owns all the refineries ,at one time there was over 500 small refineries all over this country ... family owned now big oil . I still remember gas wars gas for 21 cents a gallon .. family owned

Ares
3rd June 2014, 09:40 AM
I am told what I have to make you pay for gas from a big company . at one time there was gas refier all over this country now they are all owned by a few . big oil owns all the refineries ,at one time there was over 500 small refineries all over this country ... family owned now big oil . I still remember gas wars gas for 21 cents a gallon .. family owned

Again, not exactly true. Most of those refineries were standard oils. When the U.S. government declared Standard Oil a Monopoly and forced Rockefeller to break it up. What did he do? He broke it up as required by law, but bought majority shares in each company. Making him a trillionaire by today's standards. So the government made him even richer with the standard oil breakup.

Refineries themselves are extremely expensive to build, even during Rockefeller's time. It wasn't really a family business to get into oil refining unless you were already wealthy. The price of gasoline is determined by the cost of extraction+refining. That really is the bulk of what you pay for. Although most don't figure the cost of inflation but that's a different topic all together.

Anyway take a pre-1964 quarter, it's melt weight is worth about $3.50 of silver, pretty close to a gallon of gasoline right now. So using pre-1964 money a gallon of gas is about 32 cents a gallon. I'm averaging here as its different by region. So in all reality the cost of gasoline really hasn't gone up by much in 5 decades, about 6 cents if my math is correct.

If you want to complain about why refineries are vanishing and the only entities wealthy enough to operate one, look no further than your friendly government sponsored EPA.

Cebu_4_2
3rd June 2014, 09:49 AM
I thought Ron Paul said a gallon was worth a silver dime not quarter. I could be mistakin tho.

http://www.mikecann.net/2011/09/ron-paul-gallon-of-gas-costs-silver.html

Ares
3rd June 2014, 09:52 AM
I thought Ron Paul said a gallon was worth a silver dime not quarter. I could be mistakin tho.

http://www.mikecann.net/2011/09/ron-paul-gallon-of-gas-costs-silver.html

Not sure how accurate it is, but I've seen anywhere from 23 cents a gallon up to 35 cents a gallon for regular gas in 1964.

Cost of a new home: $20,500.00
Cost of a new car: $
Cost of a first-class stamp: $0.05
Cost of a gallon of regular gas: $0.30
Cost of a dozen eggs: $0.54
Cost of a gallon of Milk: $0.95

http://www.1960sflashback.com/1964/economy.asp

mick silver
3rd June 2014, 09:57 AM
now we have the few refineries that own all the gas stores you buy from , again only a few own the shops you buy from ... and again they owned epa that force small people out , again they control gas an sales points . again the refineries should of never been the owners of the stores they again control what you pay

Ares
3rd June 2014, 11:28 AM
now we have the few refineries that own all the gas stores you buy from , again only a few own the shops you buy from ... and again they owned epa that force small people out , again they control gas an sales points . again the refineries should of never been the owners of the stores they again control what you pay

Even without crony capitalism, you'd still have this type of scenario. Standard oil thrived in a pure capitalist system (pure in the sense that is not as regulated as today).

Market forces determine price of a gallon of gas more than anything. Even with this most recent consolidation the price of gas has been relatively unchanged when compared to REAL MONEY that is, not fiat. So your complaint about the consolidation of gas stations resulting in the increase price of a gallon of regular gas is unwarranted. They can't control the price of gasoline anymore than you can control the sun coming up in the morning or going down in the evening.

But if you can consolidate the solar energy you receive during that time that the sun is shining you can sell more of it, that is what you will do to increase revenue for yourself as well as your share holders. Do I like what Big oil is doing? Hell no I don't. But I also can't blame them for seeking profit. The way they go about obtaining that profit in my opinion is completely unethical i.e. having a say in the legislation that gets passed that make mom and pop type gas stations and refineries a thing of the past due to over regulation and taxation, while exempting themselves etc. But we also can't expect any different when our own government runs the same way. Passing laws for us, while exempting themselves.

Not picking on your Mick, just trying to put what you had to say in a better light than "It's Big Oil's Fault". When there is a lot more to it than that.

madfranks
3rd June 2014, 12:16 PM
Even without crony capitalism, you'd still have this type of scenario.

...

I also can't blame them for seeking profit. The way they go about obtaining that profit in my opinion is completely unethical i.e. having a say in the legislation that gets passed that make mom and pop type gas stations and refineries a thing of the past due to over regulation and taxation.

I see a contradiction in your post. Without this legislation, regulation, and taxation, would we still have this type of scenario?

Ares
3rd June 2014, 12:40 PM
I see a contradiction in your post. Without this legislation, regulation, and taxation, would we still have this type of scenario?

Yes, pure capitalism or Anarcho-Capitalism if you will. Will have the same or similar outcome. We got to see it first hand if you read through the American industrial revolution.

Standard Oil, Ford, DuPont, General Electric, Westinghouse, etc. They bribed, bought, buried and climbed their way to the top in their respective markets. The only thing that prevents businesses or corporations from growing larger is not government regulation, but market conditions. Once you get too big, you become inefficient and are unable to adapt to the changes needed to stay competitive with new comers. Say for example BP is able to get all refineries under their umbrella. They are the world leader in oil extraction, refining, and delivery making theirs the cheapest gasoline on the planet. However someone comes along and invents a vehicle that doesn't run on gasoline, hell it could be cold fusion for all we know. Regardless of the energy source, BP is totally unequipped to handle this new type of energy source and has to contract, retool, and reorganize it's company to remain in the energy sector.

Now under Anarcho-Capitalism, and Crony Capitalism, there is NOTHING stopping the company in either scenario of getting to the top of their respective market. However the difference is that under Crony Capitalism, they stay in the top due to government regulation, and taxation. Even working to prevent new types of competition from gaining entry in their market.

My first remark about "even without crony capitalism" was meant to show that a company could get to the top. Using methods of acquisitions, mergers, and technology lease, / transfer sales etc. Crony Capitalism uses government and political favors to get to the top, either way the top is the goal and is usually achieved. Staying there is where Crony Capitalism really "shines" by political favors, bought and paid for congressman / senators, and even purchased elections etc.