PDA

View Full Version : US Orders Partial Evacuation Of Baghdad Embassy As Aircraft Carrier Arrives In Gulf



Ares
15th June 2014, 05:02 PM
Earlier today we reported that despite, or rather due to, all the confusing propaganda from either side, it was not exactly clear whether and how far away from Baghdad the ISIS offensive had been halted (if at all). It appears the confusion has also impacted none other than the US State Department, which moments ago announced it would evacuate an "substantial number" of the whopping 5,500 staff situated in the US embassy in Baghdad on the banks of the Tigris river, staff which incidentally is the largest of any US embassy. Additionally, the State Dept said that some additional U.S. govt security personnel will be added to Baghdad staff as result of instability and violence in certain areas of Iraq.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/06/iraq-embassy-8-map_0.jpg

According to the NYT, The exact number of people being evacuated was not clear Sunday. The embassy would remain open, a person familiar with the planning said, and much of its staff of about 5,500 would stay in Baghdad. The American government is expected to call the move a relocation, suggesting that it is a temporary precaution, the person said.

Many staff members who are leaving will be flown to Amman, Jordan, where they will continue their work at the embassy there. Not Benghazi? Oh wait, what difference does Benghazi make.

Others will be shifted from Baghdad to consulates here in Erbil, in the northern Kurdish region, and in Basra, in the south, which are not now under threat by the militants.

Other Americans in Iraq, particularly contractors working for companies that had been training the Iraqi military on weapons systems purchased from the United States, have already been evacuated from the country.
President Obama, on top of things, has said he is weighing a range of actions to help the Iraqi government turn back the insurgents, including airstrikes or other military aid. For now, however, as we reported last night, he is in Palm Springs hobnobing with the local donors, and looking at potential home purchases once his second term ends - the closer to the local golf courses, the better.

And in other news, to make the evacuation as seamless as possible and as we reported last week, the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush and two other U.S. Navy ships arrived in the Persian Gulf Sunday, as Iraqi troops mobilized to defend their country from a wave of Sunni insurgents taking over cities, NBC News reported. The USS George H.W. Bush was ordered to the Persian Gulf Saturday to protect American interests in the region.

Meanwhile, at least 15 people were killed and more than two-dozen were injured in explosions in Baghdad on Sunday, Iraqi police and hospital officials told the Associated Press. It was unclear if these were related to the ISIS offensive, and if, as unconfirmed reports on Twitter have suggested, ISIS advance forces have already entered the capital's neighborhoods.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/06/CVN%2077_0_0.jpg

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-15/us-orders-partial-evacuation-baghdad-embassy-aircraft-carrier-arrives-gulf

willie pete
15th June 2014, 06:30 PM
Benghazi all over again?

Ponce
15th June 2014, 09:50 PM
The US.......as usual.......making trouble where they want peace for only by making trouble can we survive..... and the only reason that we can do it is because we still have the best weapons...the same as the Zionist in Palestine, only their weapons will keep the free.

V

old steel
15th June 2014, 09:57 PM
It's like i have seen all of this before somewhere.

Oh well, w/e but i really can't tell if these are those sunny guys or shiteheads?


http://irinn.ir/news/55468/%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%A2%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%85%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%AF

old steel
15th June 2014, 10:44 PM
Here comes the Calvary.


http://i.cbc.ca/1.2676172.1402824284%21/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_300/iraq-united-states.jpg

gunDriller
16th June 2014, 10:03 AM
ISIS sure acts like Israel is pulling their strings.


who benefits from Iraqi civil war ?

who benefits from a weaker Iraq ?

who pushed the US to be their bitch/ security guard, by attacking Iraq, TWICE ?

Israel/ Israhell.

old steel
16th June 2014, 10:12 AM
Indeed, but get this.

Kerry Says Drones, Working With Iran Are Options in Iraq

http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/kerry-says-drones-working-with-iran-are-options-in-iraq

Now seriously, how does a nation go from being considered hostile, a threat to us and our interests, called on by Israel to be attacked countless times and now they are to be co operated with and not a peep out of Israel?

Bet no one saw this coming.

Rubicon
16th June 2014, 11:34 AM
ISIS in action, NSFW

https://archive.org/details/al_saleel_4

Hatha Sunahara
16th June 2014, 11:46 AM
I'm not sure what to believe here. This story presents an argument that the ISIS insurgents are independent actors, and that they are an imminent threat to US interests in Iraq, and that Americans need protection from them, or to be evacuated if such protection is not possible. I have been assuming that the ISIS actors are creations of the CIA and the Saudis and Gulf States, just like the Syrian 'rebels'. How else could they have emerged from nowhere so fast, fully armed, well organized and trained, and meet such little resistance when 'taking over' Iraqi cities? The story about ISIS executing large numbers of Iraqi soldiers is also suspect. Perhaps it's to create the impression that these actors are to be taken seriously and feared? Why is it we have never heard of them before last week? There is a potent fishy smell to these developments and the media presentation of them. I have my doubts that any of the stories other people are falling for are real. I'm going to believe this is a world class psy-op until something convinces me otherwise.

Hatha

EE_
16th June 2014, 12:13 PM
I'm not sure what to believe here. This story presents an argument that the ISIS insurgents are independent actors, and that they are an imminent threat to US interests in Iraq, and that Americans need protection from them, or to be evacuated if such protection is not possible. I have been assuming that the ISIS actors are creations of the CIA and the Saudis and Gulf States, just like the Syrian 'rebels'. How else could they have emerged from nowhere so fast, fully armed, well organized and trained, and meet such little resistance when 'taking over' Iraqi cities? The story about ISIS executing large numbers of Iraqi soldiers is also suspect. Perhaps it's to create the impression that these actors are to be taken seriously and feared? Why is it we have never heard of them before last week? There is a potent fishy smell to these developments and the media presentation of them. I have my doubts that any of the stories other people are falling for are real. I'm going to believe this is a world class psy-op until something convinces me otherwise.

Hatha

You got that right, the masses are falling for their BS. Most of us here know/should know, that everything the MSM pumps out is for consumption of the masses and is not to be believed. We're not privy to the truth.

mick silver
17th June 2014, 06:15 AM
take are guns hand them auto weapons , is this what a free country looks like