Say Hi to the nice Police Officer

[Cebu_4_2]

Helmet Cam Shows SWAT Taser Man to Death During No-Knock Raid

“Nobody is listening to the cries in the house that he’s not fighting you. He just can’t breathe.”

WFAA 8 ABC (http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/tarrant/Video-shows-Fort-Worth-police-raid-that-left-man-dead-262965641.html) June 16, 2014 FORT WORTH — The family of a man who died after being shocked with a Taser says police video shows the man did not resist.
The raid by Fort Worth police in May 2013 was captured by helmet cameras worn by officers. Lawyers for the family of Jermaine Darden obtained the video and released it to News 8.

Fort Worth officers came with a “no knock” warrant after undercover cocaine buys at the home last year. They wanted surprise in case anyone inside was armed.

There were several people in the little house on Thannisch Avenue, including children. Jermaine Darden, 34, was kneeling on a couch, and may have been sleeping.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/helmet-cam-shows-swat-taser-man-death-no-knock-raid/#CexEYpqMWFhfZDL4.99



http://youtu.be/jKZ0F5QatYU

[7th trump]

Helmet Cam Shows SWAT Taser Man to Death During No-Knock Raid

“Nobody is listening to the cries in the house that he’s not fighting you. He just can’t breathe.”

WFAA 8 ABC (http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/tarrant/Video-shows-Fort-Worth-police-raid-that-left-man-dead-262965641.html) June 16, 2014 FORT WORTH — The family of a man who died after being shocked with a Taser says police video shows the man did not resist.
The raid by Fort Worth police in May 2013 was captured by helmet cameras worn by officers. Lawyers for the family of Jermaine Darden obtained the video and released it to News 8.

Fort Worth officers came with a “no knock” warrant after undercover cocaine buys at the home last year. They wanted surprise in case anyone inside was armed.

There were several people in the little house on Thannisch Avenue, including children. Jermaine Darden, 34, was kneeling on a couch, and may have been sleeping.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/helmet-cam-shows-swat-taser-man-death-no-knock-raid/#CexEYpqMWFhfZDL4.99



http://youtu.be/jKZ0F5QatYU
Lets see who here is going to defend this cocaine dealing family to which is the likes of being welfare recipients just using the system to steal from the tax payers?
Come on lets see you liberal democrats.

[mick silver]

is this what war look like on it own people ?

[EE_]

Lets see who here is going to defend this cocaine dealing family to which is the likes of being welfare recipients just using the system to steal from the tax payers?
Come on lets see you liberal democrats.

Hell no, I'm not going to defend them. I like seeing cops dressed in military gear bursting into homes and killing the criminal welfare recipients. It saves a lot of resources that would be wasted by bringing them into the court system.
Even if police make mistakes every once in a while, breaking into wrong homes and killing innocent people, it's still worth it. I think police should have the power to be judge, jury and executioner!
See, I'm no liberal democrat!

[Ares]

Hell no, I'm not going to defend them. I like seeing cops dressed in military gear bursting into homes and killing the criminal welfare reciepents. It saves a lot of resources that would be wasted by bringing them into the court system.
Even if police makes mistakes every once in a while, breaking into wrong homes and killing innocent people, it's still worth it. I think police should have the power to be judge, jury and executioner!
See, I'm no liberal democrat!

LOL love the sarcasm.

[7th trump]

Hell no, I'm not going to defend them. I like seeing cops dressed in military gear bursting into homes and killing the criminal welfare recipients. It saves a lot of resources that would be wasted by bringing them into the court system.
Even if police make mistakes every once in a while, breaking into wrong homes and killing innocent people, it's still worth it. I think police should have the power to be judge, jury and executioner!
See, I'm no liberal democrat!

Ok..ok... how about we turn this around.
Whats your take on the gang banger drug thugs who opened fire on the family murdering the dad, mom and innocent child who took a wrong turn down a street that the gang bangers thought was police?
Now what do you have to say?
Are you going to defend them as well?

Sounds to me you have a problem.

[Hitch]

Symptoms of cocaine use: Fast heart rate, enlarged heart, cardiac arrest. A user may seem "excited and act more confident."

http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/signs-symptoms-cocaine-use.html

They found drugs in the house. They got the warrant from buying drugs from this guy. Yes, this guy was a model citizen.

[Ares]

Symptoms of cocaine use: Fast heart rate, enlarged heart, cardiac arrest. A user may seem "excited and act more confident."

http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/signs-symptoms-cocaine-use.html

They found drugs in the house. They got the warrant from buying drugs from this guy. Yes, this guy was a model citizen.

Where does government derive it's power from to legislate what someone is and is not allowed to use with their own body? You can not legislate morality no more than you can legislate prohibition. Alcohol prohibition was an absolute failure. Drug prohibition is no different.

[EE_]

Ok..ok... how about we turn this around.
Whats your take on the gang banger drug thugs who opened fire on the family murdering the dad, mom and innocent child who took a wrong turn down a street that the gang bangers thought was police?
Now what do you have to say?
Are you going to defend them as well?
Sounds to me you have a problem.


See, now you're jumping from someone selling drugs to thugs physically harming/killing innocent people.
If you think a drug peddler deserves to be killed in a raid, you'd better get after big pharma too...the biggest drug peddler around! I bet more people die from big pharma drugs too.

I think the Jew just jumped the shark again...

http://www.destinyland.org/Fonzie%20jumping%20over%20the%20shark%20on%20Happy %20Days.jpg

*I'm only standing in until Palini and Midnight Rambler get back.

[Horn]

This sort of thing never happens in the Netherlands, or Switzerland.

Where they have recommended daily allowances of cocaine.

[Hitch]

Where does government derive it's power from to legislate what someone is and is not allowed to use with their own body? You can not legislate morality no more than you can legislate prohibition. Alcohol prohibition was an absolute failure. Drug prohibition is no different.

Ares, I don't think it's as black and white as you think. Yes in a 'ideal' world, we should all be able to take whatever drugs we want and not harm others. The fact is, the mexican drug cartels exist because they are feeding the huge drug problem we have in the states.

It's not the drugs, it's the whole environment that surrounds it....rape, murder, robbery. They know this guy was selling drugs, he wasn't just a user who wanted to be left alone. He was out for making a profit. That why I think the chances of this turd being a good citizen is next to zero.

[EE_]

This sort of thing never happens in the Netherlands, or Switzerland.

Where they have recommended daily allowances of cocaine.

Is that you in the avatar pic Mr. Hornputin?

[Horn]

Is that you in the avatar pic Mr. Hornputin?

He does have the posture of me in my high school year book photo, no that's Yul Brynner with hair!

[Hitch]

Here's a question to think about...seems there is some contradictions here. Folks say legalize drugs, it's my right to take what I want. Yet, the same folks blame the mass shootings on all the Big Pharma drugs pushed by big corporations to make our society fat, lazy, and mentally crazy.

Why is Big Pharma bad, yet a drug dealer like this one just exercising his freedoms?

[collector]

Big pharma is legitimized by the gov't. If we were allowed to decide what we put in our own bodies, big pharma and the medical industrial complex would lose A LOT of money - and that's a big reason why the war on certain drugs continues...in addition to the windfall of money going to the legal system and politicians

[Horn]

plus, you'd never be able to just naturally refine those types of drugs in your own bathtub at home.

Pharma's scientist types don't toke their own batch.

Never trust a dealer that doesn't blow his own stash. :)

[Ares]

Ares, I don't think it's as black and white as you think. Yes in a 'ideal' world, we should all be able to take whatever drugs we want and not harm others. The fact is, the mexican drug cartels exist because they are feeding the huge drug problem we have in the states.

The reverse is true. The Mexican drug cartels exist because drugs are illegal. Remove the laws around drugs and the cartels power vanish overnight. It's the same reason why we don't have violent alcohol peddling gangs now. It's legal, easy access, cheap and mostly good quality. Why would you need an "illegal" cartel with sometimes questionable quality? You don't when you can go to your local store and purchase however much you want.


It's not the drugs, it's the whole environment that surrounds it....rape, murder, robbery. They know this guy was selling drugs, he wasn't just a user who wanted to be left alone. He was out for making a profit. That why I think the chances of this turd being a good citizen is next to zero.

Who was he harming by selling drugs? Without anyone to sell too he would have no profit motive. Your definition of a good citizen is someone who abides by laws that are made up by legislators who exempt themselves and their cohorts. i.e. like the DEA and CIA importing narcotics. How come they don't get their door kicked in, tasered to death?

Like it or not Hitch the laws are selectively enforced. It all boils down to who you know.

[EE_]

He does have the posture of me in my high school year book photo, no that's Yul Brynner with hair!

My bad Mr. Hornbrynner

[Hitch]

Who was he harming by selling drugs? Without anyone to sell too he would have no profit motive. Your definition of a good citizen is someone who abides by laws that are made up by legislators who exempt themselves and their cohorts. i.e. like the DEA and CIA importing narcotics. How come they don't get their door kicked in, tasered to death?

Like it or not Hitch the laws are selectively enforced. It all boils down to who you know.

The biggest folks he was harming, is his neighbors, imo. Their kids can't play outside safely with drugged out people buying and selling illegal drugs. Facts are facts, drugs, unsafe use of firearms, robberies, prostituion, it's all part of that environment. The environment was what I was getting at. The actual act, a consensual transaction, isn't really a crime. That's only a crime because that particular drug is illegal...

Which also leads to your thoughts if all the drugs were legal, the cartels would go away. That's a good point, but what is worse, the cartels or big pharma? Who creates more slaves, and who harms more people? Personally, big pharma harms me more than the cartels. Big drug pushing corporations my taxes are paying for the slaves they create.

[Hitch]

Big pharma is legitimized by the gov't. If we were allowed to decide what we put in our own bodies, big pharma and the medical industrial complex would lose A LOT of money - and that's a big reason why the war on certain drugs continues...in addition to the windfall of money going to the legal system and politicians

Wouldn't big pharma actually get bigger if those drugs were legalized? I think they have the power to pounce on that opportunity, and start pushing those drugs to people who otherwise wouldn't have used them. More slaves to have control over and profit from.

[Ares]

The biggest folks he was harming, is his neighbors, imo. Their kids can't play outside safely with drugged out people buying and selling illegal drugs. Facts are facts, drugs, unsafe use of firearms, robberies, prostituion, it's all part of that environment. The environment was what I was getting at. The actual act, a consensual transaction, isn't really a crime. That's only a crime because that particular drug is illegal...

Which goes back to the community to set standards for its inhabitants. No government. Instead of having an arbitrary it's illegal to everyone (unless we choose who to prosecute) then don't do it here and have stiff fines, and penalties. If he was collecting welfare, cut it. You shouldn't be on the public dole while earning an income. In a free society those type of neighborhoods could spring up by sellers. You want 3lbs of Marijuana, well you drive 2-3 miles to "Potville" or whatever and buy however much you want. Living in that type of community you are well aware that drugs are bought and sold there. If you want to raise kids there, well that's up to you. But you can't complain if you move into the community and are offended that it goes on. :)


Which also leads to your thoughts if all the drugs were legal, the cartels would go away. That's a good point, but what is worse, the cartels or big pharma? Who creates more slaves, and who harms more people? Personally, big pharma harms me more than the cartels. Big drug pushing corporations my taxes are paying for the slaves they create.

I agree that cartels harm less people than Big Pharma. But also goes back to Big Government. Big Pharma is shielded by the FDA (They approved the drug that killed your aunt or uncle) So you can't sue the maker of the drug.... It really boils down to government preferential treatment. After a couple thousand people die the FDA will pull it from the shelves and Big Pharma doesn't even get a fine for negligence. No prosecution, nothing.

Personally I make it a point to avoid all drugs legal or illegal, but that's just my personal choice. I've never even smoked a joint in my life. Never had the desire too. But I could care less if someone else wants to light up. Their body, their choice. Also their consequences if their actions cause harm or property damage to another. Only then can you hold them to account. There is no such thing is pre-crime in a free society.

[Hitch]

Living in that type of community you are well aware that drugs are bought and sold there. If you want to raise kids there, well that's up to you. But you can't complain if you move into the community and are offended that it goes on. :).

I agree with most of your post, except this part. But, I should have been more clear...I was thinking the drug dealers moved in after you had already established a home there. So, you go from a safe place for your kids...then sudden, they are not safe anymore.

When you talk about personal choice and drugs, I am the same way, I avoid them all, with the exception of alcohol.

The problem however, is a cultural thing now. Not just Big Gov, Big Pharma, all the corruption in the medical system. There is a massive entitlement mentality in the culture than can not be turned off. People are so dependent on the system, in their minds they are entitled.

Personal choice has been swapped for lack of taking responsibility for our own actions. And coupled with that, the constant need for looking for someone to blame.

[Awoke]

According to the cop lover, if you have a fast heart beat and you're not a model citizen, you should be tazered to death.

[Hitch]

According to the cop lover, if you have a fast heart beat and you're not a model citizen, you should be tazered to death.

Trying to attack my character just means you have no argument. You just have an opinion, that's it.

Watch the video again, he didn't die from the tazer. He was sitting upright and handcuffed at the end of the video.

Read my post above about not taking responsibility for your own actions, and drop the victim mentality, as well.

[BrewTech]

Symptoms of cocaine use: Fast heart rate, enlarged heart, cardiac arrest. A user may seem "excited and act more confident."

http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/signs-symptoms-cocaine-use.html

They found drugs in the house. They got the warrant from buying drugs from this guy. Yes, this guy was a model citizen.

LOL

GSUS, the place where you come to learn to be a "model citizen".

Really?

[BrewTech]

Ares, I don't think it's as black and white as you think. Yes in a 'ideal' world, we should all be able to take whatever drugs we want and not harm others. The fact is, the mexican drug cartels exist because they are feeding the huge drug problem we have in the states.

It's not the drugs, it's the whole environment that surrounds it....rape, murder, robbery. They know this guy was selling drugs, he wasn't just a user who wanted to be left alone. He was out for making a profit. That why I think the chances of this turd being a good citizen is next to zero.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

Any questions?

For fucks sake man!

I make and sell a drug (legal, ethanol, beer to be specific) of course, but no less destructive to human health and well-being if abused... Should I be tasered to death too??

Apparently you think so. If not, tell me how it is different.

I would even venture to say that what I provide is even MORE potentially dangerous than what cops are killing people for. I see many daily users of my drug that lead productive lives... yet I see occasional users of other, less potentially destructive substances being kidnapped or even killed for their troubles...

If you cheer on the murder of these people, you may as well cheer on my demise as well.

There is no difference, except in the wording of "public policy".

[iOWNme]

Lets see who here is going to defend this cocaine dealing family to which is the likes of being welfare recipients just using the system to steal from the tax payers?
Come on lets see you liberal democrats.

Do all Christians advocate for the DEATH PENALTY for people who's only crime was disobeying the 'State'?


Just where exactly were you standing in the crowd that was cheering on the crucification of Jesus? Were you right up front?

[7th trump]

Do all Christians advocate for the DEATH PENALTY for people who's only crime was disobeying the 'State'?


Just where exactly were you standing in the crowd that was cheering on the crucification of Jesus? Were you right up front?

Hahaha....loaded question.
What death penalty was imposed?
Show me a statute stating all cocaine dealers are to be put to death by no-knock tazer police?
These idiots knew the risk of doing something illegal...and now the cocaine dealer miscalculated that risk and paid for it...somehow in your little head this cocaine dealer is a saint all because he died from a tazer that the police didnt know would harm him.
Blame the risk miscalculation of the cocaine dealer on the police....how fucking convenient.

We have our winner.....the first democratic liberal coming t odefend the cocaine dealer is ...iownme.

If you truely beleive you own yourself then why do you use a ssn that implicates you are under the jurisdiction of the federal government?

[Hillbilly]

These Fuckers and their lap dog defenders have to know by now that there is a fair chance of killing someone when they deploy the tazer so it should not be a surprise to them anymore when someone does after doing so.

Tazer = Death Penalty-Lite a mobile electric chair brought to you by ZOG

[Santa]

No knock drug busts, searches and seizures are all due to the same thing, "The War On Drugs".
Anyone who believes the war on drugs is or ever has been a good thing is a fucking communist.

How The "War On Drugs" Brought Communism To America

Alan and Stephne Roos of Bothell, Washington are victims of Communism. The couple -- a butcher and dental assistant, respectively -- lost their automobiles to the officially sanctioned form of theft called "asset forfeiture" because their 24-year-old son Thomas has used them to conduct drug transactions.

Neither Alan nor Stephne has been charged with a crime of any kind. Under the Communist premises of the "War on Drugs," it isn't necessary to be convicted of a crime in order to lose one's property, since the State is empowered to seize anything its agents wish to steal, at any time they wish to do so, as long as some "drug nexus" can be established to justify the theft.

The theory and practice of Communism are based on the denial of private property, and the administration of "justice" under Communism is collectivist in nature. It is not necessary to prove the guilt or innocence of an individual accused of a crime against socialism, explained Lenin shortly after the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917; it is sufficient to demonstrate that the accused belongs to a collective regarded as an enemy of the State.

Once this is understood, it becomes clear that Communism came to America -- in principle, if only intermittently in practice -- in 1970 with the passage of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act. That measure nullified the right of private property by permitting law enforcement to steal (or "forfeit") money and physical assets believed to be involved in, or the proceeds of, narcotics trafficking.

The very term "forfeiture" carries a connotation that property rights are contingent and can be revoked when those acting on behalf of the State choose to do so. Under the Anglo-Saxon tradition of liberty under law, property can be taken only following due process of law; this would require a criminal proceeding in which the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty of a specific offense and convicted by a jury of their peers. None of this is true where "asset forfeiture" is concerned.

Under the first Bush administration, which was led by a former CIA Director (every individual holding that post is also the Kingpin-in-Chief ex officio of the global narcotics trade), a model anti-drug statute was created in Washington, D.C. and sent out to various state legislatures. The seizure and forfeiture provision in Washington State's version of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act is typical of laws governing the practice throughout the country, and the same is true of the forfeiture mechanism created by that statute. The experience endured by Alan and Stephne Roos could happen to anyone living in the USSA.

Thomas Roos, who had already served six months in jail on drug-related charges, was pulled over repeatedly in 2005 by police who found evidence of illegal drug transactions. In August of that year the local counter-narcotics soviet, called the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force (SRDTF), "forfeited" the family's late-model Nissan. Following another arrest, the SRDTF stole the second vehicle, a refurbished 1970 Chevy Chevelle "muscle car."

Alan and Stephne insist that they didn't know that their son was using the cars to conduct drug transactions, and that they were furious with him for doing so. They explained as much to the "designated hearing officer" for the County Sheriff's Department, who ruled that a "preponderance of evidence" existed that the cars had been used for drug trafficking.


Once that decision was made -- not by a jury, or a judge, but by an official of a Sheriff's Department that stood to profit from the seizure -- Alan and Stephne were informed that they had the burden to prove that they weren't aware of Thomas' activities in order to receive the "benefit" of the "innocent owner exception."

In other words:

Once the police stole Alan and Stephne's cars, what had been a right was transmuted into a contingent, government-granted "benefit." The Washington State statute specifies that "no property right exists" in assets that are stolen by the government in this fashion. And in order to qualify for the exception, Alan and Stephne, like all others in such a predicament, were required to prove their innocence -- not regarding a criminal act, mind you, but regarding what the state Court of Appeals called their "mental state."

Not surprisingly, given that (once again) the hearing officer worked for the department that had already stolen the cars, and had every reason to justify that theft, ruled against Alan and Stephne, insisting (in the words of the state Court of Appeals) "substantial evidence supported a finding that Alan and Stephne knew or should have known that Thomas was using the vehicles to acquire possession of drugs."

In upholding the theft of Alan and Stephne's property, the Court of Appeals pontificated that the "innocent owner exception" in an asset forfeiture applies only when "the claimant is able to demonstrate that the illegal activity for which the vehicles was used was undertaken without the claimant's knowledge or consent."

Add the "War on Terror" to that roster for the totalitarian trifecta.


If Alan and Stephne knew about, or consented to, Thomas' use of their cars to deal drugs, why weren't they charged as either co-conspirators or accessories, before their property was seized by the State?

But comrade, that's how the justice system works in bourgeois countries still groaning beneath retrograde, delusional concepts such as the sanctity of private property and the rights of the accused. The belief in Due Process of Law was the opiate of the masses, and eliminating that opiate was the central -- albeit unspoken -- objective in the Grand And Glorious War On Drugs.

[7th trump]

These Fuckers and their lap dog defenders have to know by now that there is a fair chance of killing someone when they deploy the tazer so it should not be a surprise to them anymore when someone does after doing so.

Tazer = Death Penalty-Lite a mobile electric chair brought to you by ZOG

The real question is, albeit an honest question, a question most here don't want to hear as it hurts their ears is these thug cocaine dealers have to know by now that there is a fair chance of selling to an under cover cop who will come with more cops to raid the place where something just may go wrong.
Theres a fair chance someone is going to be killed or seriously hurt.
It sounds to me that Hillbilly here doesn't believe in taking responsibility for one self and wants to put the blame on someone else....you know a pos liberal type.

Nobody has yet said it....but I've never seen one instance where the police have cited a person injecting an illegal substance for personal use...I only see them convicting for selling and/or possession.
So that argument earlier about a person having a legal right to put what ever substance into their body is moot.
If it is ever brought up then that person is an idiot that doesn't observe very well.

[EE_]

Death by Big Pharma painkillers higher than heroin and cocaine combined
Tuesday, June 17, 2014 | 2 comments

First major review provides evidence of sharp increase in deaths from painkillers in US and Canada and leading causes.

The number of deaths involving commonly prescribed painkillers is higher than the number of deaths by overdose from heroin and cocaine combined, according to researchers at McGill University. In a first-of-its-kind review of existing research, the McGill team has put the spotlight on a major public health problem: the dramatic increase in deaths due to prescribed painkillers, which were involved in more than 16,000 deaths in 2010 in the U.S. alone. Currently, the US and Canada rank #1 and #2 in per capita opioid consumption.

"Prescription painkiller overdoses have received a lot of attention in editorials and the popular press, but we wanted to find out what solid evidence is out there," says Nicholas King, of the Biomedical Ethics Unit in the Faculty of Medicine. In an effort to identify and summarize available evidence, King and his team conducted a systematic review of existing literature, comprehensively surveying the scientific literature and including only reports with quantitative evidence.

"We also wanted to find out why thousands of people in the U.S and Canada are dying from prescription painkillers every year, and why these rates have climbed steadily during the past two decades," says Nicholas King, of the Biomedical Ethics Unit in the Faculty of Medicine. "We found evidence for at least 17 different determinants of increasing opioid-related mortality, mainly, dramatically increased prescription and sales of opioids; increased use of strong, long-acting opioids like Oxycontin and methadone; combined use of opioids and other (licit and illicit) drugs and alcohol; and social and demographic factors."

"We found little evidence that Internet sales of pharmaceuticals and errors by doctors and patients -- factors commonly cited in the media -- have played a significant role," Prof. King adds.

The findings point to a complicated "epidemic" in which physicians, users, the health care system, and the social environment all play a role, according to the researchers.

"Our work provides a reliable summary of the possible causes of the epidemic of opioid overdoses, which should be useful for clinicians and policy makers in North America in figuring out what further research needs to be done, and what strategies might or might not be useful in reducing future mortality," says King. "And as efforts are made to increase access to prescription opioids outside of North America, our findings might be useful in preventing other countries from following the same path as the U.S. and Canada."

The results of this research are published in the American Journal of Public Health, http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301966

Source:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-06/mu-dbp061714.php

[Hitch]

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

The Mexican drug cartels exist because of drug prohibition.

Any questions?

For fucks sake man!.

Yeah, I already asked the question. Post #19 in this thread. It was conveniently ignored, also ignored, was me agreeing with death to the cartels if drugs were legalized.

I will ask this question again. What is worse the drug cartels or big pharma? If you legalize drugs, big pharma WILL swoop in to profit.

[Horn]

If you legalize drugs, big pharma WILL swoop in to profit.

The market is already cornered by the CIA, Hitch.