PDA

View Full Version : Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix headed for imminent water supply collapse



old steel
30th June 2014, 10:56 PM
Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix and other cities headed for imminent water supply collapse; wave of drought refugees now inevitable



https://www.etrust.pro/cgi-bin/trust/image.cgi?ID=499;size=M (https://www.etrust.pro/info/499.html)
http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Desert-Cityscape-640.jpg





http://www.naturalnews.com/images/authors/MikeAdams.jpgSunday, June 29, 2014
by Mike Adams (https://plus.google.com/u/0/108002809946749848449?rel=author), the Health Ranger
Tags: Las Vegas (http://www.naturalnews.com/Las_Vegas.html), water supply (http://www.naturalnews.com/water_supply.html), imminent collapse (http://www.naturalnews.com/imminent_collapse.html)
(NaturalNews) One bizarre trait that strongly characterizes modern human civilization is a widespread inability to plan ahead. On every issue imaginable -- debt spending, fossil fuels, health care costs, resource extraction and so on -- our citizens and political leaders demonstrate near-retarded cognitive function by failing to see where their actions might lead. (And it's almost as if they're proud to be so stupid, too.)

There's no better example of this than the city of Las Vegas, Nevada -- a city of 600,000 people who almost universally depend on one lake for their water.

And that lake is running dry at an alarming rate, after which there will be no more water for Las Vegas.

The lake is called Lake Mead, created by the Hoover Dam. Back in 1936, when the Las Vegas population was very tiny by today's standards, Lake Mead took six years to fill with water. Now, with over two million people in the greater Vegas region depending on its water, Lake Mead has dropped by 50% and is receding with alarming speed.

Where is all the water going? It's being siphoned off by large tunnel "straws" that redirect the water 25 miles to the city of Las Vegas. These straws, however, are sucking the lake dry. Tim Barnett, a climate scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, explains it this way in a Telegraph news story (1):

The situation is as bad as you can imagine. It's just going to be screwed. And relatively quickly. Unless it can find a way to get more water from somewhere Las Vegas (http://www.naturalnews.com/Las_Vegas.html) is out of business. Yet they're still building, which is stupid.

Ah, but "stupid" is popular, you see. Delusional thinking is embedded into the American culture at every level: medicine, finance, security, fossil fuels, the food supply and more. After all, only delusional thinking would allow continued real estate development in a city with no future water supply, yet it continues to this very day in Las Vegas.


The collapse of Las Vegas is now inevitableBarnett predicts the city's water supply will collapse when Lake Mead runs "bone dry" in less than 20 years. Rob Mrowka, a Las Vegas-based scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, agrees with his assessment, saying:

The drought is like a slow spreading cancer across the desert. It's not like a tornado or a tsunami, bang. The effects are playing out over decades. And as the water (http://www.naturalnews.com/water.html) situation becomes more dire we are going to start having to talk about the removal of people (from Las Vegas).

Mrowka, like anyone who applies rational thinking to the problems facing America today, will of course be aggressively ridiculed and condemned by the delusional-weavers. The greatest sin to commit in a society steeped in delusional thinking is to tell the truth about where things are headed. That's not something people want to hear, especially when the all the fountains at the Bellagio are so pretty.

Las Vegas currently uses 219 gallons of water per person, per day -- one of the highest figures in the nation. That this is taking place in a desert is extreme stupidity, and it proves the point of this article: humanity is shortsighted and living in a delusional fantasy where people think they never have to deal with the long-term effects of present-day actions.

Attempts to resolve this water shortage problem are themselves steeped in stupidity and desperation: Vegas is trying to build a desperate water pipeline by spending over $15 billion to pipe in billions of gallons of water from another water source 260 miles away, but this project has been halted by the courts due to environmental concerns. Even if the pipeline were built, it only delays the inevitable. Building a city in the desert and importing the water supply (http://www.naturalnews.com/water_supply.html) simply isn't sustainable because there's just not enough rainwater nearby to go around. Duh.

The coming water wars of the Western USATruth be told, much of the Western USA is in the same dire situation as Las Vegas. Cities like Los Angeles were founded in the desert, then artificially supplied with water that's literally pumped over a mountain. If those pumps are halted for any reason, Las Vegas immediately reverts to a desert, and the city becomes a death trap for its millions of residents who rapidly discover they are living in a desert.

Even when the water is pumping, the entire state of California -- yes, 100 percent -- has already been classified as being in a state of "severe drought." Imagine what this looks like without the imported water.

Phoenix is also a city that's too large for its water supply. Nearby Tucson suffers much the same problem. Nevada, California, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah are all wildly unsustainable in terms of water supplies. They all depend in part on the Colorado River, but that River is also headed for imminent collapse.

High population cities not sustainable in most of the Western half of the United StatesTo fully grasp the seriousness of this situation, you might find it useful to scan this rainfall map of the United States:

http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/USA-rainfall-map.jpg

Every large city in an orange or red portion of this map is headed for collapse (http://www.naturalnews.com/collapse.html). This covers the majority of the Western half of the nation. Refuge areas will be those with plentiful rainfall such as the Pacific Northwest and regions far East of the Rockies.

This is why so many people are already headed to Central Texas, by the way. If you look at Texas, you'll notice it's clearly divided in terms of rainfall. Austin is roughly the dividing line, and everything West of Austin is bone dry, with little or no topsoil. East of Austin, you start to get precipitation which rapidly accelerates as you head toward Houston or East Texas, where patent trolls live in mucky swamplands and file lawsuits against technology companies.

This map might as well be called the "American migration map of 2050," because it shows where people will be forced to evacuate (areas in RED) and where they will be headed (areas in GREEN).

"The Colorado is essentially a dying river," says Mr. Mrowka. "Ultimately, Las Vegas and our civilization in the American South West is going to disappear, like the Indians did before us." (1)

No one is more hated in America than a truth-tellerOf course, anyone who dares point out this obvious fact in the USA is immediately branded a "conspiracy theorist" or a "doomsday pessimist." The politically correct stance on all this in America today is to live in the proper state of delusional denial that's socially acceptable.

Never mind the fact that these large U.S. cities -- Los Angeles, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Diego and more -- will collapse into ghost towns long before the year 2100. Yet we are told, instead, to worry about global warming because it might raise the sea level by two inches over that period of time. Global warming is the "popular fear" of the day, you see, but the truth about the dwindling water supply of cities like Los Angeles is simply imagined away as if the problem didn't exist at all.

Ironically, the most likely attempts to solve the water crisis will involve worsening global warming by burning coal to run energy-intensive desalination plants that produce fresh water. There's plenty of water to go around, after all, if you can just remove all the salt from it. But that process requires an enormous amount of energy at great expense. Desalinated water is so expensive that the mere act of washing your own car in your driveway might use $25 worth of water one day. Water is about to get very, very expensive across the South West, and that's if it exists at all.

Even solar-powered desalination plants are extremely expensive to get off the ground. Although "clean" in their operation, solar panels are made with lead and other toxic heavy metals, and the electronics that drive these systems require rare earth metals mined in China. Even with renewable energy, it turns out, there is no "clean" way to get fresh water out of the ocean... not at any cost.

Millions of clueless residents have a rude surprise waiting for them in the years aheadUltimately, Mr. Mrowka is the one who is correct: Present-day human populations are not sustainable in the South West. This is a mathematical certainty, and it leaves just two options: 1) Mass migrations away from the cities, or 2) Mass death.

One way or another, the populations will have to come down or die of dehydration. In that sense, the problem is self-solving from a planetary perspective. Humans who are too stupid to live within the boundaries of geological resources will be evacuated or eliminated, one way or another.

But you can also expect violence to erupt in this process as states or regions go to war over water rights. Water, after all, equals economic productivity in the context of agriculture, and he who controls the water reaps the benefit of crop production. You can fully expect to see violent conflicts over these water rights in the decades ahead as the American South West collapses back into its more natural desert-like state.

Ultimately, Mother Earth wins all water wars. Humans who are too stupid to realize this will either be involuntarily relocated or removed from the gene pool.

Sources for this article include:
(1) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10932785/The-race-to-stop-Las-Vegas-from-running-dry.html)


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045790_Las_Vegas_water_supply_imminent_collapse.ht ml#ixzz36C3uKwnp

Dogman
30th June 2014, 11:07 PM
Good example not to build in a desert or semi one, and out stripping available resources.

Because someday the piper will want to be payed!

Shami-Amourae
30th June 2014, 11:09 PM
Good example not to build in a desert or semi one, and out stripping available resources.

Because someday the piper will want to be payed!

It's fine as long as the population doesn't go over a certain threshold. Any location can run out of resources if the population is too large.

Dogman
30th June 2014, 11:10 PM
It's fine as long as the population doesn't go over a certain threshold. Any location can run out of resources if the population is too large. Exactly!

EE_
1st July 2014, 02:11 AM
The article states "One bizarre trait that strongly characterizes modern human civilization is a widespread inability to plan ahead." I don't think it's a lack of foresight/planning ahead.
It's that men have become so obsessed with getting the money in their own pocket right now, that they don't care about the future. A fat bonus now beats investment in our future, hands down! Money trumps everything.


I'm not so sure things will play out as projected in 30 years. I don't believe mankind will survive as it is for 30 more years.
Throw in the out of control Fukushima and the Israel sponsored WWIII coming and we should have a greatly reduced population.

In the near term, 3 to 5 years, these areas will be a concern. Those on city water prepare to get reamed. People on wells will be lucky as long as the wells don't run dry. I would imagine the digging of new wells will be severely restricted by government.

We'll see how this drought map changes after the summer.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/431px_width/public/June-24-2014-US-Drought-Monitor-Map.png?itok=jEM-Eq7M

EE_
1st July 2014, 04:35 AM
Migration map for 2013. It will be interesting to see 2014 and 2015 migration maps.

http://wp.streetwise.co/wp-content/uploads//2014/01/migration-map.jpg

UNITED VAN LINES’ ANNUAL MIGRATION STUDY REVEALS OREGON AS TOP MOVING DESTINATION OF 2013


Michigan Moves off High Outbound List after 16 Years with Moving Deficit
ST. LOUIS - After four straight years as runner-up, Oregon has finally made it to the winner’s circle, and Michigan can finally breathe a sigh of relief.

Those are the key findings from United Van Lines’ 37th Annual Migration Study, which tracks the states the company’s customers move to and from during the course of the year. The study found that Oregon is the top moving destination of 2013, with 61 percent of moves to the state inbound ones. And after 16 consecutive years at or near the top of the outbound list, Michigan appeared in the balanced category for 2013. Michigan had claimed the top outbound spot from 2006-2009.

The District of Columbia (57 percent inbound) fell to the number five position on the inbound list after five consecutive years as the top moving destination. New additions to the 2013 top inbound list include South Dakota (57 percent), Texas (56 percent) and Colorado (55 percent).

“As the nation’s largest household goods mover, United’s shipment data illustrates national state-to-state migration trends,” said Carl Walter, vice president of United Van Lines. “We’ve been tracking the number of inbound and outbound domestic moves for nearly 40 years, and through our study are able to identify the states that are attracting or losing residents.”

“Business incentives, industrial growth and relatively lower costs of living are attracting jobs and people to the Southeastern and Western states such as South Dakota, Colorado and Texas,” said Michael Stoll, economist, professor and chair of the Department of Public Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles. “We’re also seeing continued migration to the Pacific Northwest as young professionals and retirees are drawn to amenities including public transit, green space and the local arts and entertainment scene.”

United has tracked migration patterns annually on a state-by-state basis since 1977. For 2013, the study is based on household moves handled by United within the 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C. United classifies states as “high inbound” if 55 percent or more of the moves are going into a state, “high outbound” if 55 percent or more moves were coming out of a state, or “balanced” if the difference of inbound and outbound is negligible.

Moving In
The top inbound states of 2013 were:

Oregon
South Carolina
North Carolina
District of Columbia
South Dakota
Nevada
Texas
Colorado


The Western U.S. is represented on the high-inbound list by Oregon (61 percent) and Nevada (56 percent). Nevada remained on the high inbound list for the third consecutive year.

The Carolinas each made the top five with South Carolina at 60 percent and North Carolina at 58 percent inbound moves. North Carolina has been on the high inbound list every year since 1993, and South Carolina has held a spot on the top inbound list 16 out of the past 18 years.


Moving Out
The top outbound states for 2013 were:

New Jersey
Illinois
New York
West Virginia
Connecticut
Utah
Kentucky
Massachusetts
New Mexico


New Jersey (64 percent) continued to top the high outbound list claiming the top spot for three out of the past four years. Illinois (61 percent) held steady at the number two spot after falling from the top spot in 2011.

The Northeast is the most prominent region on the high-outbound traffic list. In addition to New Jersey, New York (61 percent), Connecticut (59 percent) and Massachusetts (56 percent) are also included.

Kentucky (56 percent) joined West Virginia (60 percent) as the only Southern states to appear on the high outbound list. New Mexico (55 percent) and Utah (58 percent) represented the Western U.S. on the list.


Balanced
Several states gained approximately the same number of residents as those that left. Those states include Nebraska, Tennessee, Iowa, Alabama, Louisiana and Indiana. Michigan appeared on the balanced list for the first time since 1997.

“After 16 years with a migration deficit, Michigan has joined the balanced category due to improvement in its economy over the past two years,” said Stoll. “Despite having an unemployment rate higher than the national average, home sales and home prices are up showing an increased demand for housing, the state’s per capita income is up, and automakers in Detroit have rebounded and are hiring.”

Uncle Salty
1st July 2014, 05:30 PM
When the chemtrails stop, regular rain patterns will return to the west coast.

milehi
1st July 2014, 07:11 PM
Im fuckin outta here by the end of the year. For a number of reasons.

Stop Making Cents
1st July 2014, 07:19 PM
Good thing 50 million beaners have been added to the southwest. That should really help.

zap
1st July 2014, 07:20 PM
Which way you going milehi ?

Shami-Amourae
1st July 2014, 07:57 PM
Migration map for 2013. It will be interesting to see 2014 and 2015 migration maps.

http://wp.streetwise.co/wp-content/uploads//2014/01/migration-map.jpg

UNITED VAN LINES’ ANNUAL MIGRATION STUDY REVEALS OREGON AS TOP MOVING DESTINATION OF 2013


Michigan Moves off High Outbound List after 16 Years with Moving Deficit
ST. LOUIS - After four straight years as runner-up, Oregon has finally made it to the winner’s circle, and Michigan can finally breathe a sigh of relief.

Those are the key findings from United Van Lines’ 37th Annual Migration Study, which tracks the states the company’s customers move to and from during the course of the year. The study found that Oregon is the top moving destination of 2013, with 61 percent of moves to the state inbound ones. And after 16 consecutive years at or near the top of the outbound list, Michigan appeared in the balanced category for 2013. Michigan had claimed the top outbound spot from 2006-2009.

The District of Columbia (57 percent inbound) fell to the number five position on the inbound list after five consecutive years as the top moving destination. New additions to the 2013 top inbound list include South Dakota (57 percent), Texas (56 percent) and Colorado (55 percent).

“As the nation’s largest household goods mover, United’s shipment data illustrates national state-to-state migration trends,” said Carl Walter, vice president of United Van Lines. “We’ve been tracking the number of inbound and outbound domestic moves for nearly 40 years, and through our study are able to identify the states that are attracting or losing residents.”

“Business incentives, industrial growth and relatively lower costs of living are attracting jobs and people to the Southeastern and Western states such as South Dakota, Colorado and Texas,” said Michael Stoll, economist, professor and chair of the Department of Public Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles. “We’re also seeing continued migration to the Pacific Northwest as young professionals and retirees are drawn to amenities including public transit, green space and the local arts and entertainment scene.”

United has tracked migration patterns annually on a state-by-state basis since 1977. For 2013, the study is based on household moves handled by United within the 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C. United classifies states as “high inbound” if 55 percent or more of the moves are going into a state, “high outbound” if 55 percent or more moves were coming out of a state, or “balanced” if the difference of inbound and outbound is negligible.

Moving In
The top inbound states of 2013 were:

Oregon
South Carolina
North Carolina
District of Columbia
South Dakota
Nevada
Texas
Colorado


The Western U.S. is represented on the high-inbound list by Oregon (61 percent) and Nevada (56 percent). Nevada remained on the high inbound list for the third consecutive year.

The Carolinas each made the top five with South Carolina at 60 percent and North Carolina at 58 percent inbound moves. North Carolina has been on the high inbound list every year since 1993, and South Carolina has held a spot on the top inbound list 16 out of the past 18 years.


Moving Out
The top outbound states for 2013 were:

New Jersey
Illinois
New York
West Virginia
Connecticut
Utah
Kentucky
Massachusetts
New Mexico


New Jersey (64 percent) continued to top the high outbound list claiming the top spot for three out of the past four years. Illinois (61 percent) held steady at the number two spot after falling from the top spot in 2011.

The Northeast is the most prominent region on the high-outbound traffic list. In addition to New Jersey, New York (61 percent), Connecticut (59 percent) and Massachusetts (56 percent) are also included.

Kentucky (56 percent) joined West Virginia (60 percent) as the only Southern states to appear on the high outbound list. New Mexico (55 percent) and Utah (58 percent) represented the Western U.S. on the list.


Balanced
Several states gained approximately the same number of residents as those that left. Those states include Nebraska, Tennessee, Iowa, Alabama, Louisiana and Indiana. Michigan appeared on the balanced list for the first time since 1997.

“After 16 years with a migration deficit, Michigan has joined the balanced category due to improvement in its economy over the past two years,” said Stoll. “Despite having an unemployment rate higher than the national average, home sales and home prices are up showing an increased demand for housing, the state’s per capita income is up, and automakers in Detroit have rebounded and are hiring.”

Shocked there's a lot of people leaving Utah. It's expensive to live there, but a nice state overall.

In Idaho I think a lot of people born in Idaho leave it and a lot of people from out of state move here. I've met a lot of out-of-staters who are very right-wing like me. They seem to love the state more than the natives.

I know a lot of White Californians wanting to move to Oregon. They want to get out of the shithole they created, and are too stupid to realize they will just repeat the same bullshit over again.

singular_me
1st July 2014, 09:17 PM
Adam's article is excellent but lets add some more data to the big picture

(excerpt of my 10 page column, soon to be released)

The second story comes from Florida and beyond, and too starts like a dream, the dream to settle in a neighborhood featuring awesome lawns and make sure to keep one's lawns as radiant green as possible, regardless of the costs, after all doing so, one is told, will protect the real estate market values in the area. Gimme green (video) is repeated like a mantra because after all, where there is an obsession, there are huge profits: a $41-billion industry that fuels the nation's largest irrigated crop-the lawn. But behind the dream lies the absolute nightmare... as 200 gallons of fresh water per person per day are required to sustain the illusion, not to mention all the chemicals used to erdicate weeds and which end up poisoning aquifers. Even golf greens are now serious health hazards due to pesticides. How long will it take for people to realize that this collective delusion must end? But another threat shows on the horizon as USDA Approved Invasive GMO Grass in 2011. Roundup kills everything except the grass engineered to stand up to it, lawns all over the country will be green, lush — and higly toxic.

Global And Suicidal 'Blue Gold' Monetization
How far will corporations and blind consumers go before it is too late? While the soda industry is a major culprit responsible for worldwide depletion, it is worth noticing that a family of 4 showering every day use up to 200 gallons daily, or the total use for the entire United States, that’s nearly 1.2 trillion gallons of water used just for showering - daily! Just imagine how much of our precious Blue Gold, households could save if people were taking 4 showers weekly instead. Sinks exist for a reason, don't they? And the buck does't stop here as there are many other things that could help reduce water consumption without inducing any frustrations. When education supports our way of life, awareness helps us see the bright side and therefore encouraging.

Cebu_4_2
2nd July 2014, 03:17 AM
I like it, well written and conclusive.

I drink about 2 gallons of water a day including beer but that would be less without beer since it is dehydrating. So go figure 1.5 gallons. Shower can be done with a gallon if planned and not just standing in there.

I still can't figure how thet get 200+ gallons per person a day.
Help me with this. I don't even hoard rain (chemtrail water) and am good.
A neighbor down the way (bout 1/2 mile) was spraying weeds, I ask him "using diesel?"
He said hell no that's not good for the planet, using Roundup.

When it read the meek shall inherit the earth I want a better definition of that sentence.

singular_me
2nd July 2014, 03:51 AM
the investigation of the producers of Gimme green (shorter version is available on the net, vimeo) which I watched while back (the full DVD version) , and http://ramirezgroup.com/snippet/the-way-the-united-states-showers-could-save-up-to-4-8-billion-a-year/

edit: your question...
However, Las Vegas still uses 219 gallons of water per person per day, one of the highest figures in the US. In San Francisco the figure is just 49 gallons.

Most of that water is used to sprinkle golf courses, parks and lawns so the water authority has declared war on grass, paying homeowners to remove it from their gardens at the rate of $1.50 per square foot.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10932785/The-race-to-stop-Las-Vegas-from-running-dry.html

and

Southern Nevada Authority
Since 2002 when SNWA's drought response plan was first developed, these measures have helped Southern Nevada reduce its water demand from about 314 gallons per person per day to about 219 gallons in 2012.

The Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) Board of Directors has established a conservation goal of 199 gallons per capita per day by 2035. To help our community reach this goal, SNWA member agencies have implemented the following drought-related water restrictions:
http://www.snwa.com/consv/restrictions.html


I like it, well written and conclusive.

I drink about 2 gallons of water a day including beer but that would be less without beer since it is dehydrating. So go figure 1.5 gallons. Shower can be done with a gallon if planned and not just standing in there.

I still can't figure how thet get 200+ gallons per person a day.
Help me with this. I don't even hoard rain (chemtrail water) and am good.
A neighbor down the way (bout 1/2 mile) was spraying weeds, I ask him "using diesel?"
He said hell no that's not good for the planet, using Roundup.

When it read the meek shall inherit the earth I want a better definition of that sentence.

mick silver
2nd July 2014, 10:36 AM
our government would not do that and I point to history that it has happen before ... that's what I have been told when we talk about chemtrails
When the chemtrails stop, regular rain patterns will return to the west coast.

old steel
2nd July 2014, 10:46 AM
our government would not do that and I point to history that it has happen before ... that's what I have been told when we talk about chemtrails

They won't stop until WE make them stop.

Horn
2nd July 2014, 10:50 AM
6467

76-77 look lower, overall a cycle. My guess is hype to raise water bills.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_22894159/californias-sierra-snow-pack-dry-and-getting-drier

Horn
2nd July 2014, 11:00 AM
I still can't figure how thet get 200+ gallons per person a day.

Casinos in Las Vegas make water flow uphill then dump it back down to California.

I've personally seen 1000's of gallons being pumped away per minute underneath each of those city island casinos. Each of them are a city unto themselves, the per capita probably reflects alot of dumped/cycled grey water back to California. Afterall its a main attraction to the whole Oasis ideal. I worked on a highend property once that had a 500gallon natural tub that was imported from Italy. The water was heated then cycled and drained thru it at each use.

I would spend a good 60 gallons a day irrigating my yard in the Summer when I lived there, my guess is Lake Mead is being used by Denver expansion over the Colorado before it has a chance to arrive.

The city west should worry even more about its petrol consumption to support more so than its water, it will be a more immediate threat to it in the near future.