PDA

View Full Version : Israeli Jew Fischer proposes 'bail-inable long term debt' - i.e. Bail-in



gunDriller
28th August 2014, 06:29 AM
Israeli Jew Fischer proposes 'bail-inable long term debt' ... i.e. Seizure of Customer Accounts.


Maybe surprising at first. But then, not so surprising.


"Though Fischer doesn’t detail exactly what “bail-inable long term debt” actually is, one only needs to look to Europe, namely Cyprus, to understand what he means.

When the Cypriot banking system collapsed because of an inability to service its debt in 2013, the government forced bank depositors to cover the debts. This led to banks forcibly seizing funds from depositor accounts in order to pay their debts.

According to the Fed Vice Chairman, the U.S. government is now proposing similar rules, following in the footsteps of Europe and Japan, who have already prepared such measures.

The bottom line is that financial, economic and monetary policymakers in the United States are fearful that another crisis, perhaps even worse than what we saw in 2008, is going to be playing out in the very near future. Otherwise, why would they find it necessary to take the drastic step of forcing bank depositors to act as a backstop for their financial institutions?

But this time around, it won’t be the government that bails them out directly. Instead, if you have an account with the bank, you are an unsecured creditor for that institution, just like the people of Cyprus were for their banks. And when that bank inevitably comes under pressure because of an inability to cover their debts, it is you who will become the bailout mechanism.

It’s not hard to imagine how this scenario might play out the next time around.

At the first hint of another crisis we’re going to see panic that will make 2008 look like a picnic. First, stock markets will sell off en masse across the world as a scramble to not be the last one out takes hold of investors. This, in turn, will lead to liquidity problems at major financial institution across the country. As banks run out of cash to cover the tens of billions of dollars they need to service their existing debt, they will turn to the new policies described by Stanley Fischer.

What this means is that one morning you could wake up and see ten or twenty percent of your funds transferred out of your account and exchanged for long-term debt (like a bond) with the promise that the bank will pay it back to you at a later date.

The immediate result, as you might expect, will be widespread bank runs, just as we saw in Europe when Cypriot depositors got hit. But, there will be no cash to be had save a few hundred dollars here and there, as banks will limit ATM withdrawals and will likely shut their doors to customers.

This, of course, would have an effect similar to what we recently saw in Ferguson, except riots and looting will be taking place in every major city across the country.

And though it may seem like an impossible scenario to envision in today’s peaceful and stable America, the U.S. military and Department of Homeland Security doesn’t think so. For the last several years they have been war-gaming and simulating widespread economic collapse scenarios and they’ve been stockpiling everything from armored vehicles to riot gear in over 8,000 counties across the United States in preparation for the civil unrest that would explode from coast to coast."


Yeah. People don't like their money stolen by Jews, or anybody else for that matter.

The many $Trillions of dollars that were made in credit derivatives from the mid-90's to today ... apparently not available to help shore up balance sheets ?

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/fed-vice-chairman-warns-your-bank-may-seize-your-money-to-recapitalize-itself_08272014

Hatha Sunahara
28th August 2014, 08:40 AM
There was a time (I even remember it) when people wouldn't publicly propose to steal from the public because such a proposal is shameful, and unwise. But apparently, not today. The point of insuring bank deposits (through the FDIC) was to remove the concern that people would lose their savings held in bank accounts due to bank failures. So, now we hear all these proposals from the elite to steal the savings of depositors to PREVENT bank failure.

I think this is another piece of evidence that the people running the financial system and their counterparts in the political system are certifiably INSANE.


Hatha

EE_
28th August 2014, 09:54 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX3hDbi5liU

osoab
28th August 2014, 06:20 PM
There was a time (I even remember it) when people wouldn't publicly propose to steal from the public because such a proposal is shameful, and unwise. But apparently, not today. The point of insuring bank deposits (through the FDIC) was to remove the concern that people would lose their savings held in bank accounts due to bank failures. So, now we hear all these proposals from the elite to steal the savings of depositors to PREVENT bank failure.

I think this is another piece of evidence that the people running the financial system and their counterparts in the political system are certifiably INSANE.


Hatha

What percentage of the population has even heard of the idea of banks just seizing your accounts?

It is easy to get away with it if no one knows what you might possibly do. Besides, sociopaths just don't care.

Hatha Sunahara
28th August 2014, 06:51 PM
What percentage of the population has even heard of the idea of banks just seizing your accounts?

It is easy to get away with it if no one knows what you might possibly do. Besides, sociopaths just don't care.

I don't know what percentage have never heard any such proposal. I would suspect that many, if not most of those who have heard such proposals are ignorant of the law and don't believe such a thing is possible.

I've asked some of my less aware friends. None of them are worried, and most of them think I'm paranoid. After they lose their savings, I know most of them will deny that I ever talked to them about it. I don't expend any energy persuading people who think they already have all the answers. People don't wake up unless they suffer. So, let them suffer. A suffering population is an aware population.


Hatha

Dogman
28th August 2014, 07:15 PM
If no activity or contact from the account holder, it is up in the air here, tho the ways of the national banks go, so will the local ones.

The one I am with now , now min balance, no fee for a statement, not sure how long that will last. Have changed from my old bank that I had a account with over 30 years, because they started the fee crap.

But with the fee schedules most banks have now, if nothing is put in the monthly fee's will eventually eat everything in the account, and then pile up so the account holder owes fees to the bank, they take your principle left in their care, and take it away with their monthly fees until the balance goes below 0 into negative territory and then the account holder owes the bank.

Sucks huge lemons.

Everyone in gov wants your property and wealth however large or humble one holds.

Hypertiger
29th August 2014, 01:42 AM
In 2008 the USA reached maximum potential inflation...The USA along with the 1944 Bretton woods global trade system has been in a controlled collapse since.

If the system was just allowed to implode to oblivion...You would all be dead now.

the roaring 6 decades began to end in 2008.

2009 to 2013 was an engineered bounce that began to collapse back down into 2014.

Flight 17 was shot down when the DOW peaked.

It's all setting up for a fall into the fall.

Yield rates have been collapsing for 33 years...the net producers of yield have been imploded towards absolute 0 by the net consumer of yield to power the explosion of the net consumers of yield towards absolute 1.

Yields must keep going down...or the economy implodes...but they can not keep being powered lower.

And if they are powered higher...the economy will implode.

It's almost checkmate.

gunDriller
29th August 2014, 05:55 AM
I don't know what percentage have never heard any such proposal. I would suspect that many, if not most of those who have heard such proposals are ignorant of the law and don't believe such a thing is possible.

Chase is already doing it, at the rate of about $10 a month for Chase Freedom VISA card customers/ victims.