"Gentle Giant' had juvenile arrest record involving second degree murder...?

[midnight rambler]

And was a member of the Crips too??

http://gotnews.com/sued-st-louis-county-court-get-michael-browns-juvenile-arrest-records/

[mick silver]

he was a good kid and was about to turn his life around and start going to church and back to school ... breaking news https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/bho7cm5kw4010dv/images/1-936e5ee5c7.jpg

[Serpo]

Maybe he murdered people gently

[Neuro]

Maybe he murdered people gently
Isn't second degree murder a bit gentler than first degree on average?

[Camp Bassfish]

Isn't second degree murder a bit gentler than first degree on average?

I don't know. First degree has a higher level of intent. I'd think one would use a more exacting method for that. Except in torture situations. lol

[Cebu_4_2]

Except in torture situations. lol

Reasonable doubt...

[SWRichmond]

Say what you want about the dead man....he is not here to defend himself.

On that day, the violence didn't start until the police showed up and started it.

[willie pete]

Say what you want about the dead man....he is not here to defend himself.

On that day, the violence didn't start until the police showed up and started it.

I'm NOT carrying water for the po-po, just saying, they didn't show up that day until the gentile negro giant commited a strong-armed robbery :rolleyes:

[Neuro]

I don't know. First degree has a higher level of intent. I'd think one would use a more exacting method for that. Except in torture situations. lol
True for first degree murder a requirement is a plan to commit murder, so probably second degree murder is on average more brutal heat of the moment. Brutus was an anomaly...

[Neuro]

Say what you want about the dead man....he is not here to defend himself.

On that day, the violence didn't start until the police showed up and started it.
Have a cigar, sir!

[7th trump]

I'm NOT carrying water for the po-po, just saying, they didn't show up that day until the gentile negro giant commited a strong-armed robbery :rolleyes:

Have a cigar, sir!

[SWRichmond]

I'm NOT carrying water for the po-po, just saying, they didn't show up that day until the gentile negro giant commited a strong-armed robbery :rolleyes:

Except that's not why the policeman confronted him...he was confronted because he was walking down the middle of the street. As far as we know that initial conversation was not recorded, so we do not know who said what to whom. Did the young man have violent tendencies? Looks like he might have. Did that mean he needed or deserved to be killed? Not in my book. How about yours?

[midnight rambler]

Except that's not why the policeman confronted him...he was confronted because he was walking down the middle of the street. As far as we know that initial conversation was not recorded, so we do not know who said what to whom. Did the young man have violent tendencies? Looks like he might have. Did that mean he needed or deserved to be killed? Not in my book. How about yours?

If he committed two felonies in the presence of a cop as has been alleged, and then committed suicide by cop due to charging at a cop with a drawn weapon attempting to arrest him for the two felonies committed in the cop's presence then it sounds like a good shoot to me. And you should know by now that I'm no cheerleader for the donut munchers.

[iOWNme]

If he committed two felonies in the presence of a cop as has been alleged, and then committed suicide by cop due to charging at a cop with a drawn weapon attempting to arrest him for the two felonies committed in the cop's presence then it sounds like a good shoot to me. And you should know by now that I'm no cheerleader for the donut munchers.


Im not defending this guy because i have no idea what REALLY happened. (mainly because i wasnt there, and trusting known liars for information seems a bit sillly to me.)

Do you think if the 'Government' charges you with a felony and you are convicted, that you have done something wrong/immoral? Blanket statements like this are foolish to me, especially considering WHO ('Government') is trying to take the moral high ground. LOL

In this case the ones claiming he was a 'felon' have committed 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000x worse crimes than Mr. Brown could possibly dream of committing.

Your principle seems to be that if someone has committed a 'felony' (disobeyed the scribbles of the 'Politicians'), they have automatically done something wrong. This is a provable falshood.

I mean 'cheating' on your taxes is a 'felony'. LOL

[midnight rambler]

Im not defending this guy because i have no idea what REALLY happened.

But do you know how many non violent, non aggressive 'acts' the 'Government' considers 'Felonies'? Blanket statement like this are foolish, especially considering WHO ('Government') is trying to take the moral high ground. LOL

Get real. And TRY to have a practical approach (much of the stuff you post is just impractical in practice imo). In the 'real world' you hit a cop (or even touch a cop) and that's one felony you will get charged with*. Merely touching a cop's service weapon is another felony. The donut munchers take felonies very serious REGARDLESS what YOU think - and they have guns, cages, a bad attitude (due to be in the 'baddest' gang around), AND they have the sanction of the collectivists operating the legal fiction known as 'THE STATE OF ________'.

*cops generally like to make up shit anyway so they can stack the charges on someone

[willie pete]

Except that's not why the policeman confronted him...he was confronted because he was walking down the middle of the street. As far as we know that initial conversation was not recorded, so we do not know who said what to whom. Did the young man have violent tendencies? Looks like he might have. Did that mean he needed or deserved to be killed? Not in my book. How about yours?

Well I suppose you could even go as far as saying, IF there hadn't been a call in of a strong-armed robbery, the police may not have even been going down the same street the gentle negro giant was walking in the middle of ::) , from my personal experience and of social occurrances, a large percentage of negroes in societies (theirs too) HAVE violent tendencies much more than other races. I wasn't there and I haven't been following the story closely, it was alledged though that the gentle negro giant punched the cop in the face ::), an action like that could very quickly escalate into anyone even the gentle negro giant being perforated. Your question to me is somewhat skewed because you insinuate that the gentle negro giant was perforated simply because he had "violent tendencies", and I don't think that is the case at all, to me, it's fairly straight forward; he had a physical confrontation with a cop that was much smaller than he was, the cop was threatened enough to pull out his .40 and put the gentle negro giant down, parallels the Zimmerman situation........::)


Moral of the story? Don't punch a cop in the face......maybe? :D

[midnight rambler]

Your principle seems to be that if someone has committed a 'felony' (disobeyed the scribbles of the 'Politicians'), they have automatically done something wrong.

That's just fucking moronic. I gather from this statement you think that there's nothing wrong with some ape chimping out, including chimping out where someone suffers grievous bodily harm.

[iOWNme]

Get real. And TRY to have a practical approach (much of the stuff you post is just impractical in practice imo). In the 'real world' you hit a cop (or even touch a cop) and that's one felony you will get charged with*. Merely touching a cop's service weapon is another felony. The donut munchers take felonies very serious REGARDLESS what YOU think - and they have guns, cages, a bad attitude (due to be in the 'baddest' gang around), AND they have the sanction of the collectivists operating the legal fiction known as 'THE STATE OF ________'.

*cops generally like to make up shit anyway so they can stack the charges on someone

I totally agree that there is a difference between moral vs practical. When you must act for 'practical' reasons, does this mean morality ceases to exist?

I simply asked you if YOU believe it is wrong/immoral to commit a 'feloy'? Considering not paying taxes, peeing outside and selling 'drugs' can all be a felony.

I want YOUR personal opinion. Thats all.

[iOWNme]

That's just fucking moronic. I gather from this statement you think that there's nothing wrong with some ape chimping out, including chimping out where someone suffers grievous bodily harm.

You made a statement based off of someone being a 'felon'. I asked YOUR personal opinion on if someone has done something immoral/wrong because they were convicted of a 'felony'.

The entire premise of your statement relies on someone believeing it is wrong to disobey the 'laws'. Which i find contradictory because most of the evil carried out in this world is done in the name of the 'law', not in spite of it.

Why is it so hard to give me YOUR PERSONAL opinion?

[mick silver]

New divide opens in Ferguson over media checks into Mike Brown's past ... http://news.yahoo.com/divide-opens-ferguson-over-media-checks-mike-browns-010911317.html