View Full Version : NATO to send 10,000 troops to east Ukraine?
midnight rambler
30th August 2014, 06:53 PM
http://rt.com/news/183828-nato-rapid-deployment-force/
Hatha Sunahara
30th August 2014, 08:28 PM
Europe gets its natural gas from Russia.
There ia a campaign of media lies now claiming that Russia has invaded east Ukraine. It's because the seperatists are kicking the asses of the Kiev zionazis. Ukraine should be divided in two, and if the east wants to be a part of Russia, Nato, nor the US or anybody else but Russia has anything to say about it.
Hatha
mick silver
2nd September 2014, 01:28 PM
all this is going to do is set the stage for a new war , and I don't see any winners in this one
midnight rambler
2nd September 2014, 01:42 PM
all this is going to do is set the stage for a new war , and I don't see any winners in this one
Hell, the Death Cult is setting the stage everywhere for a new war, a really large war - WW4. The question is, will it kickoff in the ME or Ukraine? I'm betting on Ukraine.
Serpo
2nd September 2014, 01:44 PM
all this is going to do is set the stage for a new war , and I don't see any winners in this one
How about the dollar which is what its all about in the first ,second and third place.
Neuro
3rd September 2014, 03:27 PM
Hell, the Death Cult is setting the stage everywhere for a new war, a really large war - WW4. The question is, will it kickoff in the ME or Ukraine? I'm betting on Ukraine.
WW4? What happened to WW3?
Dogman
3rd September 2014, 03:30 PM
WW4? What happened to WW3?. These days odd numbers are so out of favor!
Lol!
midnight rambler
3rd September 2014, 03:52 PM
WW4? What happened to WW3?
WW3 was the Cold War. How can anyone dispute that*?? ??? Here's one clue: the Veterans of Foreign Wars accepts into their membership ANY vet who served during the years of the Cold War, even if they never left the states.
*the Berlin air lift, the Korean 'War' complete with 'prisoners of war', Hungary '56, Gary Powers, Cuba (including the missile crisis), the Vietnam War complete with 'prisoners of war', Czechoslovakia '68, Afghanistan v1979, Iran-Contra, etc., etc. were ALL Cold War conflicts
A whole lot more than most people realize - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_events_in_the_Cold_War
woodman
3rd September 2014, 05:27 PM
all this is going to do is set the stage for a new war , and I don't see any winners in this one
They seem to be doing everything they can to start a major war. They must be getting frustrated. It's like trying to get magnesium to burn. It's a hard start but once it's going, look out.
Horn
3rd September 2014, 05:32 PM
Blowin smoke, NATO wouldn't risk its members dropping off like flies with requests from its participants.
Maybe they will just hire Australians, those guys are all gun-ho.
Dogman
3rd September 2014, 05:43 PM
Blowin smoke, NATO wouldn't risk its members dropping off like flies with requests from its participants.
Maybe they will just hire Australians, those guys are all gun-ho.
Its the snazzy Boonie hat with the snap up sides they wear!
Dashing look don't ya know!
;)
Danubian
3rd September 2014, 08:56 PM
I posted this in another thread.... this is the possibility I see.
When the war with Syria - I mean ISIS - starts in earnest, I reckon the Israelis will see the opportunity to hit Iran.
It could also precipitate a decision for Russia to partition Ukraine and leave Kiev and the western half to the Zionist oligarchs.
Three events that could trigger each other.
Ponce
3rd September 2014, 09:53 PM
10,000 more military "advisors" hummmmmmmmmmm sounds familiar?
V
Neuro
4th September 2014, 01:14 AM
WW3 was the Cold War. How can anyone dispute that*?? ??? Here's one clue: the Veterans of Foreign Wars accepts into their membership ANY vet who served during the years of the Cold War, even if they never left the states.
*the Berlin air lift, the Korean 'War' complete with 'prisoners of war', Hungary '56, Gary Powers, Cuba (including the missile crisis), the Vietnam War complete with 'prisoners of war', Czechoslovakia '68, Afghanistan v1979, Iran-Contra, etc., etc. were ALL Cold War conflicts
A whole lot more than most people realize - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_events_in_the_Cold_War
I can accept that. However it is commonly not referred to as such. Thanks for clarifying!
Neuro
4th September 2014, 01:17 AM
Blowin smoke, NATO wouldn't risk its members dropping off like flies with requests from its participants.
Maybe they will just hire Australians, those guys are all gun-ho.
Strange with a country that doesn't seem to have much problem with anyone sending their young ones out to get killed in others wars. But what can you do when the queen calls you?
Horn
4th September 2014, 08:32 AM
Australia to step up formal partnership with NATO at summit
(Reuters) - Australia (http://www.reuters.com/places/australia?lc=int_mb_1001) is set to step up its partnership with NATO, its foreign minister said on Tuesday, as the country pursues a bigger role in global crises from Iraq (http://www.reuters.com/places/iraq?lc=int_mb_1001) and Syria (http://www.reuters.com/places/syria?lc=int_mb_1001) to Ukraine (http://www.reuters.com/places/ukraine?lc=int_mb_1001).
Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who is due to host Russian President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders at a G20 summit in November, has used a number of recent speeches to signal a more muscular approach to foreign policy.
Although Australia (http://www.reuters.com/places/australia?lc=int_mb_1001) is not a NATO member, its troops fought alongside the coalition in Iraq (http://www.reuters.com/places/iraq?lc=int_mb_1001)and Afghanistan (http://www.reuters.com/places/afghanistan?lc=int_mb_1001), which Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has called the basis for an expanded partnership in current and future conflicts.
"Tomorrow the defense minister and I will travel to Wales to attend the NATO summit and I can confirm that Australia will be accepting a formal invitation to become what is called an enhanced partner," Bishop told parliament.
Membership in the Enhanced Partnership Program is designed to give non-member states earlier access to the planning of military operations and a presence in NATO's governing bodies.
Australia on Monday unveiled fresh sanctions against Russia (http://www.reuters.com/places/russia?lc=int_mb_1001) over what Abbott called its "bullying" of neighboring Ukraine (http://www.reuters.com/places/ukraine?lc=int_mb_1001), where the Kremlin is accused of backing pro-Russian insurgent groups battling the government in Kiev.
Abbott has struck perhaps the toughest line of any Western leader against the rebels in Ukraine, accused by Western countries and intelligence agencies of shooting down MalaysiaAirlines (http://www.reuters.com/sectors/industries/overview?industryCode=60&lc=int_mb_1001) Flight MH17 in July, killing all 298 passengers and crew, including 28 Australians.
Australia has also joined a multinational relief effort, dropping military equipment and aid to Kurdish forces fighting Islamic State militants in northern Iraq
.
Abbott has not ruled out participating in air strikes in Iraq or Syria (http://www.reuters.com/places/syria?lc=int_mb_1001).
The NATO summit on Thursday and Friday will mark the end of 13 years of combat inAfghanistan (http://www.reuters.com/places/afghanistan?lc=int_mb_1001) by U.S. and other foreign troops
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/02/us-australia-nato-crisis-idUSKBN0GX0BY20140902
Neuro
4th September 2014, 08:41 AM
They will come to the 100th anniversary of their devastating losses in the Dardanelles... They don't have family planning in Australia?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.