Just to Help You Out a Bit

[palani]

There are those who worry about signatures they made in the past. Those under the sign of a notary must be worried about to some extent but if you choose a notary above the age of 80 you won't have to worry about him for very long.

If you are ever placed in a setting where a form is brought up that some entity would like you to admit you signed ... and generally where your signature is the only one on the form ... the response should be (in any place or forum) ...

"I would be happy to comment on the authenticity of that signature as soon as (that paper) has been entered into evidence."

The trick here is that the person who signed the form or document is the ONLY one who can enter it into evidence. As soon as you admit your signature you are not attesting to just that but also the truth of what is on the form or letter. Now if you do that without examining it closely you might find staples have been removed or changes made by deletions or additions. Any change at all nullifies the signature.

Yours is the only signature. You are the only one who can enter a document into existence. By saying 'That is my signature' you actually bring the document to life .. you share some of your life force with it.

[Ponce]

Palani.........in court ONLY the original document can be introduced as evidence......I should know, a Jewish boss I just to work for tried to screw me up that way........the Judge and my attorney were ready to admit it as evidence till I told them why it was not legal, the judge asked me "Sir, are you an attorney?" my answer was..."No sir, but neither am I ignorant or stupid".......case dismissed.

V

[palani]

in court ONLY the original document can be introduced as evidence

Any document (or video for that matter) can be entered into evidence. That is, as long as someone is able to testify.

Lots of times documents are recorded. Then the recorded document (a copy) is brought in and you are supposed to look at it and say "I signed it". There is no obligation to testify against yourself but I suppose it is human nature to move the conflict forward from the trial to the conviction.

[Ponce]

Could be so since my original Land Patent is admissible if a copy has been notarize......and I say that it is real......could be true.

I am worried, beginning to understand what Palani is saying...........they are coming to take me away HaHa.

V

[mick silver]

ponce ........... http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/a3/db/71/a3db7150b49d3ce5d0edbb5219cd0366.jpg

[mick silver]

nope here ponce ... http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/0d/c5/09/0dc5091693b09954a78786649d77abb2.jpghttps://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4918573312/h6D149531/

[palani]

Could be so since my original Land Patent is admissible if a copy has been notarize......and I say that it is real......could be true.

More than likely your original land patent was recorded at the county. And back in those days they didn't use copy machines. They used CLERKS and charged by the word. The copy don't look like your land patent but check with your recorders office.


I am worried, beginning to understand what Palani is saying...........they are coming to take me away HaHa.

V

Out of the mouths of two or more witnesses are facts established. Take for example my discovery of 1,600 square miles of land (m/l). Public notice was made. Publisher certifies to this. Legal notice at courthouses and public buildings was made. Photos were taken and a witness was present. Markers were placed, livery of seisin (sample of earth) taken and wild rose seeds and rock piles were left to mark the spot. Truly alloidal property as no property tax has ever been paid and there is no basis for the county to seize the property I am claiming.

[Ponce]

My Land Patent is all original with I typed myself but for the original and first owner that is a photo copy and is notarize on the back.

V

[Cebu_4_2]

Now if you do that without examining it closely you might find staples have been removed or changes made by deletions or additions. Any change at all nullifies the signature.


They changed documents on my 1st divorce and remortgage papers. My sig was on 1 page only, the mortgage was a signature all by itself on a single page.

[palani]

the mortgage was a signature all by itself on a single page.

Gee... a blank check.

A little secret? One Dollar Fox stamp. You can get them for $3-$5 on ebay. For $10 you can get an official lens from the postal service. The Fox stamp has a couple holograms on them. The stamps are useful for several reasons.

1) the dollar symbol has two rails ... actually a dollar ... as opposed to most stamps that say FOREVER or just have a number.

2) the hologram ... you fix it to any document you want to remember as AN ORIGINAL. Then you use the magic decoder lense when asked to verify your signature .. if it is a copy then you get no hologram.

3) back to the dollar .. that is CONSIDERATION. Lacking CONSIDERATION you have no access to a COURT OF LAW. Without this all you get is a COURT OF EQUITY where losing is considered HONORABLE.

Another trick ... security paper. You can get a pack at STAPLES for under $10. When you print anything on it and sign it you have an ORIGINAL. If anyone copies it the copy will display the words UNAUTHORIZED COPY. Let's see what they do about THAT at the recorders office. Are they violating your COPYRIGHT when they record it?