PDA

View Full Version : US Gov: Boston Bombing NOT "Act Of Terrorism"



PatColo
13th September 2014, 08:18 PM
What next? They going to declare it an Act Of Jooz.Gov Hoaxery? Joosh Lightening?


U.S. Treasury: Boston Marathon Bombing Not 'Act Of Terrorism'

http://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/boston-5.jpg (http://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/boston-5.jpg)

After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/09/jewish-neocons-responsible-for-911-msnbc.html), insurance companies paid out billions in damages (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/02/meet-lucky-larry.html) — more than ever before. So in 2002, Congress agreed to help in the future by creating federally insured — and relatively cheap — terrorism coverage for businesses.

Claims under that coverage were filed for the first time after the Boston Marathon bombings (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/09/wheelchairs-for-dummies-march-of-crisis.html). But insurance companies haven’t paid out — because the federal government doesn’t consider the Boston Marathon bombing an act of terrorism.

***Read full article here*** (http://wgbhnews.org/post/us-treasury-boston-marathon-bombing-not-act-terrorism)

Ares
13th September 2014, 08:28 PM
Of course not, false flags are not acts of terrorism. The 9/11 false flag not included.

crimethink
13th September 2014, 10:10 PM
Insurance is one of the scams of this modern world. Each policy comes with a book of exclusions.

Dogman
13th September 2014, 10:15 PM
Insurance is one of the scams of this modern world. Each policy comes with a book of exclusions.

And you are screwed if you do not read and understand the "fine" print!

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6762&stc=1

http://www.highsnobiety.com/uploads/pics/smallest-book-in-the-world-2.jpg

midnight rambler
13th September 2014, 10:56 PM
IF the injury in the photo in the OP were real blood would be pouring out of his stubs and there'd be a stream of blood trailing behind the wheel chair (not to mention the other unreal aspects of the photo). The gall of these assholes.

PatColo
13th September 2014, 11:22 PM
^ yeah, the BMB-Hoax was discussed in great detail here,
Thread: Large Explosions Reported At Boston Marathon - Photos Released (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?68751-Large-Explosions-Reported-At-Boston-Marathon-Photos-Released)
Dr. James Tracy emerged as sort of the David Ray Griffin of Sandy Hoax & BMB Hoax, see http://memoryholeblog.com/tag/boston-bombing/

Ares
14th September 2014, 06:56 PM
IF the injury in the photo in the OP were real blood would be pouring out of his stubs and there'd be a stream of blood trailing behind the wheel chair (not to mention the other unreal aspects of the photo). The gall of these assholes.

Yeah he would of bled to death within minutes as the femoral arteries would of depleted all of the blood in his remaining body in no time. A tourniquet would of not of stopped it.

Horn
15th September 2014, 12:42 AM
The issue, says Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute in New York, is size and scope. He says terrorism insurance is meant to cover acts on the scale of the September 11 attacks.

“What terrorism insurance does, is it provides protection against those more severe losses — the type of losses that can put you out of business," Hartwig said. "Generally it’s not for the lower level claims that might arise, the less-costly type of claims.”



I see, its only insurance for too big to fail acts of false flag terrorism... where payees would be part of the loop.

Hypertiger
15th September 2014, 12:47 AM
It happened on tax day.

September 11-2001 was the twin towers...Anthrax letters...and a fertilizer plant that blew up in France.

April 15-2013...There was the Boston bombing...Ricin letters...and a fertilizer plant that blew up in Texas.

Which lead to Orascom Construction Industries.

Founded 1950

Headquarters Cairo, Egypt

"OCI is a leading international fertilizer producer and construction contractor and one of the region’s largest corporations with projects and investments across Europe, the Middle East, North America, and North Africa."

Then this picture.

6776

4/26-Chernobyl
9/11-The World trade centers

10/1-Ryugyong Hotel

The Ryugyong Hotel is a pyramid-shaped skyscraper and has a height of 330 meters.

37 x 3 = 111
73 x 3 = 219

111+219 = 330

"In April 2008, after 16 years of inactivity, work on the building was restarted by the Egyptian company Orascom Group."

15 years from Chernobyl to The World trade centers

15 more is 2016...which would be just before the election.

You can see where Chernobyl blew up...

6775

Hint...The USSR was being powered by the USA...Under 1944 the Bretton woods global trade system

Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev admitted in a 2006 opinion piece that the disaster was a catalyst for the dismantling of the USSR.

“The nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl . . . was perhaps the real cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union five years later. Indeed, the Chernobyl catastrophe was an historic turning point: there was an era before the disaster, and there is the very different era that followed,” he wrote."

Born march 2...with Mikhail translating to Michael.

"On 25 December 1991, Gorbachev yielded to the inevitable and resigned as the President of the USSR, declaring the office extinct. He turned the powers that had been vested in the presidency over to Yeltsin. That night, the Soviet flag was lowered for the last time, and the Russian tricolor was raised in its place."

Then handed power to Yeltsin

"Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country is a 1991 American science fiction film released by Paramount Pictures."

"After the destruction of the moon Praxis (Chernobyl) leads the Klingon (Soviet) Empire to pursue peace with their long-time adversary the Federation (NATO), the crew of the (US)S Enterprise must race against unseen conspirators with a militaristic agenda."

"The 1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt, also known as the August Putsch or August Coup (Russian: Августовский путч Avgustovsky Putch), was a coup d'état attempt by a group of members of the Soviet Union's government to take control of the country from Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev."

The film was released in North America on December 6, 1991.

"On 8 December 1991, the presidents of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (formerly Byelorussia), signed the Belavezha Accords, which declared the Soviet Union dissolved and established the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)" Yeltsin helped to loot the former USSR into the ground...1998...remember the Asian economic flu...The so called collapse of LTCM?

By 1999 Russia was at it's lowest point economically basically...ever...right at the bottom...An Yeltsin handed everything over to Putin.

From 1999 to 2008...Russia hyperinflated up with Putin riding the up swing...then Putin was uninstalled as president in 2008...and Russia collapsed down into 2009 like every economic zone on Earth...and then the bounce up to 2013...Putin was reinstalled in 2012.

It's all staged managed.

Dachsie
15th September 2014, 07:31 AM
Well, as our old friend Billy says..“depends-on-what-is-is”

Terrorism

The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property in order to coerce or intimidate a government or the civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives.

The Boston "bombing" WAS an act against property in order to coerce the civilian population in furtherance of political AND social objectives,

however, the BMB was NOT an "unlawful use of force or violence.

Since when are smoke bombs violent?

So, just move on. No terrorism here.

___
By the way, when you start looking at words and their legal definitions, "terror" and "violence" get very malleable meanings when it comes to things the USA does.

When we blow up innocent men, women and children in foreign military actions, are we supposed to believe that the USA does not practice terrorism and violence on innocent people?

_________
Of course, the insurance industry - all forms of insurance, is a giant government racket. It is really one entity with the banking industry. When state insurance regulatory commissions are charged with regulation of the giant crooked insurance enterprise, they, just like the SEC regulating Goldman Sachs, become equally crooked, to say nothing of revolving-door employees between industry and regulatory agencies.

gunDriller
15th September 2014, 07:46 AM
looks to me like one of the most active terror groups in the US (besides Israel) has drawn its members from various domestic law enforcement agencies.

PatColo
15th September 2014, 09:39 AM
however, the BMB was NOT an "unlawful use of force or violence.

Since when are smoke bombs violent?

So, just move on. No terrorism here.

I recall hearing a Clint Richardson interview maybe 2 years ago, where he explained that djooz.gov's FF "terror attacks" like 911, are not technically illegal. I don't recall the legal gymnastics which accounted for the reason, but that's the deal.

I also recall from Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon", his explaining the special regulatory laws quietly put in place over the years which rendered the CIA's drug trafficking also not illegal.

I don't recall the source, prolly Clint R again, but laws were enacted decades ago making clandestine chem/bio/etc "experimentation" on the US public.... drumroll.... not illegal.

:(

so bottom line is, djooz.gov's "unlawful use of force or violence" in the instance of the BMB Hoax was not illegal. While I assume none of the crisis actors at the scene there were injured; what about that couple of patsy Russian brothers they murdered in the aftermath, and I recall a third guy was also gunned down in his home by the FBI in the course of an "interview" ??

Dachsie
15th September 2014, 10:06 AM
what about that couple of patsy Russian brothers they murdered in the aftermath, and I recall a third guy was also gunned down in his home by the FBI in the course of an "interview" ??

From the legal perspective, I imagine those murders were not part of the "event."

I heard Dr. Fetzer say regarding Sandy Hook something along these same lines, that is, that there be nothing legally wrong with what was done at Sandy Hook. Rense interview Js

http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-Rense%20JFK%2019.mp3

start listening at about 0:28:00

Dr. Fetzer says someone has said that these staged events that happen to be televised may not even be illegal, no matter what inferences people may make from viewing the event on TV.

Partial transcript
Begins at 0:31:28

“This fellow, Dan Cady, whose research I have recently discovered even suggests that if…that…there may not be any laws against actually having staged events that happen to be televised, and if they were conducting this as a staged event that was televised and people happened to draw inferences, it might even be possible that they weren’t technically guilty of violating the law”


________

I always get a bit vexed when I hear things like this. I always felt that all these years we did researching all these hoaxes and false flag events that we should have at least been gathering our information in a way that ALSO satisfied legal definitions and laws, e.g., establishing legal "evidence" at the same time we are accruing non-legal proofs. I realize there probably will never be a criminal legal case and we no longer have the rule of law and there are no honest judges and lawyers left, but still think it would have been wise to concurrently have followed legal tenets in all our truth finding.

Dr. Fetzer has no intention of ever pursuing any of his research to big criminal lawsuits. He goes strictly by rules of human logic and reasoning. He makes some very strong sounding declarative statements in some of his latest VT articles, but they do not mean a thing legally.

Horn
15th September 2014, 12:27 PM
2 weeks after sandy hook


On 12/29/12, President Obama signed HR 4310, the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Section 1078 (thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.4310 of the bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the US, which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Act was passed.

Read more at http://www.maxkeiser.com/2013/06/first-time-since-1948-propaganda-is-now-legal-in-the-u-s/#fuI3IxovUL279poE.99

http://www.maxkeiser.com/2013/06/first-time-since-1948-propaganda-is-now-legal-in-the-u-s/