This Traffic Stop Video Epitomizes Everything that is Wrong With Police Today

[General of Darkness]

The link has the video.

“We’ll get CPS to take your baby!”

At this point in the video, if your blood is not boiling you are not a human being. The police continue to make up new reasons why they were pulled over and why they are being detained/arrested. It is absolutely infuriating.

The asininity peaks when officer Denny backtracks and tells the family that he originally pulled them over because their lights weren’t on, but it is clearly daylight outside.

Eventually under duress and the threat of violence, the family is forced to exit the vehicle. Stockett was arrest for, wait for it….wait for it, obstruction of justice. These harassing tyrants have the audacity to claim that it was this family who was obstructing justice and not their jackbooted thuggery. Unbelievable.

No drugs were found.
The only thing absent from this video is the Sandusky police tasering and beating the family, however the threat of stealing someone’s child stings way more than a baton every could.

Stockett, for good reason, says he plans to fight the charges of obstruction. Please share this article to let other police officers know that when they violate people’s rights they will be exposed.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/traffic-stop-video-epitomizes-wrong-police-today/#Rr5YLzgYVWvrqwCF.99

[midnight rambler]

Sanctioned thuggery. And don't be getting lippy with us!

Typical donut munchers - absolute smarmy smart asses.

[Twisted Titan]

I would have never left my vehicle

As you can see officer asscrack just pulled a humdinger from his netheregions.

Not trying to monday morning qb his situation.

But rarely do i see it end well for civilians that exit their cars

[midnight rambler]

I would have never left my vehicle

As you can see officer asscrack just pulled a humdinger from his netheregions.

Not trying to monday morning qb his situation.

But rarely do i see it end well for civilians that exit their cars

Around here the professional thugs will break out your window without any hesitation whatsoever if you don't unass your car when COMMANDED to. As an option at their own discretion they then may beat the living shit out of you, for GP.

[EE_]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgLI5f_5TP8

[Twisted Titan]

Around here the professional thugs will break out your window without any hesitation whatsoever if you don't unass your car when COMMANDED to. As an option at their own discretion they then may beat the living shit out of you, for GP.



If i run into a officer ass crack while im doing my personal best to downplay the situation and just eat a money order and GTFO of their

If he decides to do the afformentioned and whip my ass ...i can most assuredly tell you.

That wont be the end of it


There will be severe consequences for those actions....i will definately see to it...

[Cebu_4_2]

Playing like that can get you killed in short order, he asked for it big time. Hope he gets a big payout if he goes for a lawsuit.

[crimethink]

White woman with a Black passenger? That's the most likely reason for the stop.

Give them the f##king ID, and then be on your way. You are outgunned - if ID makes them go away, hand it over.

"So I'm about the let their ass have it." TNB. Complete inability to assess the dangerous situation for what it was.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8

[crimethink]

Playing like that can get you killed in short order, he asked for it big time. Hope he gets a big payout if he goes for a lawsuit.

If the jury is Black, yes. If mixed or White, no. He hung himself with his own comments. He will likely get an out-of-court settlement merely for being Black. And guess who pays it? WE DO.

[Cebu_4_2]

If the jury is Black, yes. If mixed or White, no. He hung himself with his own comments. He will likely get an out-of-court settlement merely for being Black. And guess who pays it? WE DO.

I don't live in Sandusky so I don't. How many times a year you go to Cedar Point?

[crimethink]

I don't live in Sandusky so I don't.

The highest percentage of the lawsuit would be paid by those taxpayers local to Sandusky, but the effect ripples nationwide. Most "law enforcement" agencies also get Federal money.

[BrewTech]

The highest percentage of the lawsuit would be paid by those taxpayers local to Sandusky, but the effect ripples nationwide. Most "law enforcement" agencies also get Federal money.

They will get the bank's "money". There is no such thing as Federal money, because they don't have money, only debt. We will have a gun put to our head to keep paying taxes on endless debt regardless of this lawsuit, so does it really matter?

[crimethink]

They will get the bank's "money". There is no such thing as Federal money, because they don't have money, only debt. We will have a gun put to our head to keep paying taxes on endless debt regardless of this lawsuit, so does it really matter?

My point is that cops don't care since the consequences of whatever they do are effectively none; someone else always pays.

[Cebu_4_2]

My point is that cops don't care since the consequences of whatever they do are effectively none; someone else always pays.

Immune of consequences thus paid for bad or illegal behavior. Who the fuck wouldnt want a job like that. Go around harassing and killing just like jungle jim in the sandbox. This US is really fucked and not getting better by the day.

[Hatha Sunahara]

The cops are doing exacty what their bosses want them to do. If you think the taxpayers are their bosses, you are mistaken. If you think they are restrained by any laws, you are mistaken. Their bosses are the people who control the money supply, which allows them to control everything that happens. Cops are selected for their inability to make moral judgments as much as for their willingness to obey orders. They see themselves as elites because they are untouchable, and unaccountable. They are the poster boys for a harsher more brutal America. They are like the Roman Praetorian Guard whose job it was to protect the Emperor and to impose his will on others. Today however, the emperor is not a person but the system of power relationships that exists based on who controls the flow of monety. Whoever does this has no face and no body, and the MSM pretends this system does not exist, and it is politically incorrect, even taboo to talk about it, lest people will think you're crazy. Keep this in mind when the cops do what they do to you--because they are protecting an insane, immoral system propped up entirely by money and everyone's recognition that they cannot live without it, and their willingness to do what it takes to keep the money flowing to all the right people.



Hatha

[crimethink]

The cops are doing exacty what their bosses want them to do. If you think the taxpayers are their bosses, you are mistaken. If you think they are restrained by any laws, you are mistaken. Their bosses are the people who control the money supply, which allows them to control everything that happens. Cops are selected for their inability to make moral judgments as much as for their willingness to obey orders. They see themselves as elites because they are untouchable, and unaccountable. They are the poster boys for a harsher more brutal America. They are like the Roman Praetorian Guard whose job it was to protect the Emperor and to impose his will on others. Today however, the emperor is not a person but the system of power relationships that exists based on who controls the flow of monety. Whoever does this has no face and no body, and the MSM pretends this system does not exist, and it is politically incorrect, even taboo to talk about it, lest people will think you're crazy. Keep this in mind when the cops do what they do to you--because they are protecting an insane, immoral system propped up entirely by money and everyone's recognition that they cannot live without it, and their willingness to do what it takes to keep the money flowing to all the right people.


I don't think anyone believes the cops work for us. As you say, they are the Praetorian Guard, protecting the "elite."

The cops do not enforce "law." They enforce the will of those who love money. Don't interfere with that collection of money or the protection of those who love money, and you greatly reduce the likelihood you will be "served" and "protected" at gunpoint, Taserpoint, or batontip.

Unfortunately, we get to pay for all of it, whether we like it or not.

[kiffertom]

He hung himself with his own comments. Hanged! the man was hanged! the picture was hung! For centuries, hanged and hung were used interchangeably as the past participle of hang. However, most contemporary usage guides insist that hanged, not hung, should be used when referring to executions: convicted killers are hanged; posters are hung. But see the usage notes below.
Examples:

Don't mention a rope in the house of one whose father was hanged.

"A room hung with pictures is a room hung with thoughts." (Joshua Reynolds)

"The sheriff's deputies, who hanged the horse thief at night, are expected to hang around until they are sober, after which they could well end up with hanged or hung looks on their faces--and hangovers for sure."
(Robert Oliver Shipman, A Pun My Word: A Humorously Enlightened Path to English Usage. Rowman & Littlefield, 1991)http://grammar.about.com/od/alightersideofwriting/a/hangedgloss.htm

[crimethink]

Hanged! the man was hanged! the picture was hung! For centuries, hanged and hung were used interchangeably as the past participle of hang. However, most contemporary usage guides insist that hanged, not hung, should be used when referring to executions: convicted killers are hanged; posters are hung. But see the usage notes below.
Examples:

Don't mention a rope in the house of one whose father was hanged.

"A room hung with pictures is a room hung with thoughts." (Joshua Reynolds)

"The sheriff's deputies, who hanged the horse thief at night, are expected to hang around until they are sober, after which they could well end up with hanged or hung looks on their faces--and hangovers for sure."
(Robert Oliver Shipman, A Pun My Word: A Humorously Enlightened Path to English Usage. Rowman & Littlefield, 1991)http://grammar.about.com/od/alightersideofwriting/a/hangedgloss.htm

I shall continue to use "hung" in the manner I did, despite a tiny self-appointed elite of academics claim I ain't using it right. :)

"Hung" vs. "hanged" is similar to the argument of "ain't" vs. "isn't."

Your source appears to make a gross error, BTW: "For centuries, hanged and hung were used interchangeably as the past participle of hang." Merriam-Website notes the first use of "hung" was in 1848.

Language evolves because so-called "rules" are not abided by.