Senate BILL - ILLEGAL to DISSENT - YOU will NOT RESIST - ALL must join NWO

[General of Darkness]

While all the OTHER shit is going on, ISIS, Ukraine, Ebola, etc etc etc. This is the shit that's happening quietly.

YES, this guys voice is kind of annoying, but I think he gets the point across, this is some scarey shit.

I'm really starting to feel like those of us paying attention are really being backed into a corner while the 99.99% of the other fucking sheep are unaware, and it's not their fault they've been manipulated to be that way.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFguEhcVbBc&list=UUA1EHjwJ9RN2we7WK3MPiMw

[Glass]

nothing in that video relates to the thread title.

the video is about being unable to grow vegetables. What reference to it being illegal to dissent I don't know.

[General of Darkness]

nothing in that video relates to the thread title.

the video is about being unable to grow vegetables. What reference to it being illegal to dissent I don't know.

I guess growing your own food that's not filled with GMO's is dissent cock holster.

[crimethink]

S 510 died years ago:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s510

HR 2751 superseded it, and exempted "small producers" under $500,000 annual gross sales.

[General of Darkness]

S 510 died years ago:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s510

HR 2751 superseded it, and exempted "small producers" under $500,000 annual gross sales.

Now a post that's helpful. Thank you.

[crimethink]

Now a post that's helpful. Thank you.

I was worried for a bit. Glad I found it for both our sake's.

[Glass]

I was worried for a bit. Glad I found it for both our sake's.

yes lucky because GoD's posts are always 100% helpful. And He has special names for everyone. Point remains. I think we had that discussion here in the last couple weeks didn't we? Sensationalised thread titles that don't reflect the subject matter. But that's ok. It's all in the name of DOOOOOOOMMMMMm.

[Twisted Titan]

They can pass any bill they desire.

Free Men always do right by their Family and Fellow Man.

[palani]

It has always been illegal to dissent. With your citizenship you agreed to not dissent.

What is not illegal is to expatriate. When you do this then you have no reason to dissent.

Law always provides a remedy but frequently you have to think about it for a bit before you take it.

[Ponce]

Laws and regulations are only a guide line and not the word of God.......unless is the word of a cop...comply or you will die...hell, die anyway BANGGGGGGGGG.

V

[crimethink]

With your citizenship you agreed to not dissent.


Natural-born citizens "agree" to nothing.

How long have you been a member of the satanic Cult of the Bar? Only a lawyer can "think" like you do.




Law always provides a remedy but frequently you have to think about it for a bit before you take it.

Yes, God's Law does. Man's law does not.

[midnight rambler]

Natural-born citizens "agree" to nothing.

WTF would anyone ever want to be a 'citizen', ESPECIALLY of a society founded on death and destruction, and mocking God??


Man's law does not (provide a remedy).

Not at all true. There's always a remedy, the trick is to get the Satan-worshiping transvestites in the black dresses to recognize the remedy. Case in point is UCC 3-603(b) which VERY CLEARLY provides a remedy (i.e. discharging debt with a promissory note)...good luck getting those assholes to recognize it.

[palani]

Natural-born citizens "agree" to nothing. Natural-born in the vernacular of the time of the signing of the constitution meant precisely "bastard". So your contention is that bastard citizens agree to nothing? If so how are you going to prove that?

Yes, God's Law does. Man's law does not.
If there exists a law no matter the source then there exists a remedy for if there is no remedy then there is no law.

Funny how people proclaim themselves for 'man' and then follow human laws.

[palani]

UCC 3-603(b) which VERY CLEARLY provides a remedy (i.e. discharging debt with a promissory note)...good luck getting those assholes to recognize it.

Wimpy: "I'll gladly pay you Friday for a hamburger today!"

UCC would mention discharge but they clearly avoid the issue of 'extinguish'. Debts have not been extinguished by money since 1933.

[midnight rambler]

Wimpy: "I'll gladly pay you Friday for a hamburger today!"

UCC would mention discharge but they clearly avoid the issue of 'extinguish'. Debts have not been extinguished by money since 1933.

Well of course - it's IMPOSSIBLE to 'pay' a debt with a debt.

Those who compiled the UCC included the remedy at 3-603(b) just so they could say, "See? We DID provide you with a remedy!" Much like the catchall remedy found at UCC 1-308 formerly UCC 1-207.

[palani]

Well of course - it's IMPOSSIBLE to 'pay' a debt with a debt.

Those who compiled the UCC included the remedy at 3-603(b) just so they could say, "See? We DID provide you with a remedy!"

I agree. These guys did an extraordinary job of feathering their own nest at the expense of society.

[crimethink]

WTF would anyone ever want to be a 'citizen', ESPECIALLY of a society founded on death and destruction, and mocking God??


A person born in a jurisdiction is a citizen. You need not accept it or acknowledge it, though the government or regime holding that jurisdiction will claim you. You can certainly refuse it, but are under no moral obligation to do so.




Not at all true. There's always a remedy, the trick is to get the Satan-worshiping transvestites in the black dresses to recognize the remedy. Case in point is UCC 3-603(b) which VERY CLEARLY provides a remedy (i.e. discharging debt with a promissory note)...good luck getting those assholes to recognize it.

If the supposed "remedy" exists, yet acknowledgement is readily refused, it is no "remedy." "Judicial discretion." At the whim of the black-robed whore. So-called "case law."

[palani]

A person born in a jurisdiction is a citizen.

1) Persons are not born. They are created by some action, word or representation.
2) Jurisdiction has diction as a root. Diction is speech. Speech is a word. With jurisdiction something is spoken. That something creates a person. My contention is that the oath is what the 'juris' stands for. So jurisdiction is 'oath spoken'. Such an oath creates a container called a 'person'. That person is then the subject of rights and obligations. The rights side is easy. Everyone wants them. The obligations side is a poser though. Jonas found himself at sea to escape an obligation to god else he would never had spent three nites in the belly of a whale.