Ebola: Very Crafty, False-Flag Vaccination-Blackmail?

[Serpo]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/14/ebola-very-crafty-false-flag-vaccination-blackmail/

[crimethink]

At least 40% of what "Veterans Today" reports is "patently false"...as admitted by its leader:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m-ZY0R1HdQ

[Serpo]

What as opposed to 100% of your beloved MSM.............

[BrewTech]

Way too many searchable (and cliche') buzzwords in that poorly written article for me to take it seriously. Scare-porn, nothing more AFAIAC.

[Serpo]

Tony Cartalucci
Activist Post (http://www.activistpost.com/2014/10/vaccines-penalizing-unvaccinated.html)

Slate has enthusiastically supported vaccinations and, in particular, establishment talking points and narratives regarding them, as well as a particular focus on dismembering mainstream anti-vaccine views.

In an article titled, " Endangering the Herd (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/08/anti_vaxxers_why_parents_who_don_t_vaccinate_their _kids_should_be_sued_or.html) ," Slate argues that those refusing to receive vaccines should be penalized, and the act of refusing to be vaccinated be criminalized.

The article would claim:
Parents who don’t vaccinate their kids may have the most heartfelt reason in the world: fear for their own children’s safety. But the basis for that fear is simply unfounded, and their decisions are putting other kids directly at risk. The bottom line is that the government’s interest in protecting children from getting the measles should trump parents’ interest in making medical decisions for their kids In an attempt to lend credibility to the article's premise - particularly that fears of vaccinations are unfounded - it cites a fictional television show and repeated assurances from governments that there is no link between vaccines and otherwise unexplained conditions like autism.
Indeed, fictional television shows and statements peddled by verified liars among the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom who brought us decade spanning wars based on now verified lies, form the basis of Slate's notion that those who fail to receive vaccines produced and distributed by big-pharmaceutical corporations like GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), should be penalized. GSK alone, has been convicted multiple times in courtrooms around the world of multibillion dollar bribery scandals (http://journal-neo.org/2014/06/04/glaxo-s-china-scandal-exposes-big-pharma-s-ugly-underworld/) and found guilty of and otherwise engaged in other immense improprieties.







http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-e1GuWywHOaM/VD4rJYEXu9I/AAAAAAAAKG8/3MQC9fH_KU0/s640/i7VTi.Sh55nM.jpg (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-e1GuWywHOaM/VD4rJYEXu9I/AAAAAAAAKG8/3MQC9fH_KU0/s1600/i7VTi.Sh55nM.jpg)


Image: GSK, one of several producers of the MMR vaccine, has been caught
once again amid a massive, multibillion dollar bribery scandal (http://journal-neo.org/2014/06/04/glaxo-s-china-scandal-exposes-big-pharma-s-ugly-underworld/), this time in
China. Literally convicted criminals, why would any rational human being
inject into their bodies anything produced by this corporation?


In one instance, when Chinese authorities began investing a nationwide multibillion dollar bribery racket run by GSK top executives, GSK formed teams to disrupt, bribe, and otherwise confront law enforcement authorities in an attempt to obstruct their investigation.

Criminality, upon criminality.

GSK has been accused and convicted of doing likewise in both Europe and the United States, yet they are still in business - a business that includes producing the very vaccines Slate believes people should be penalized for refusing to take.

Why would any rational human being allow themselves to be injected by something produced by such a corporation - a corporation literally convicted of criminality, fraud, and bribery? If GSK can bribe hundreds if not thousands of doctors and healthcare workers around the world to endorse their products, how difficult would it be to bribe writers at Slate who literally write for money?

Big-Pharma, not Activists, are Responsible for the Growing Mistrust of Vaccines

The debate isn't ultimately about the science of vaccines (http://localorg.blogspot.com/2014/07/compromised-vaccine-study-reveals-crux.html) , but rather a lack of trust of those charged with producing, monitoring the safety of, and distributing vaccines. The false narrative of science versus conspiracy theorists is peddled by the media, the government, and the corporations that hold influence over both because a narrative focusing on the wisdom of entrusting criminals and mass murderers with our health is an open-and-shut case.

Such a conclusion would result in the ditching of big-pharma's vaccines and seeking alternative solutions to immunization, vaccine production and distribution, and overall accountability for healthcare. This would in turn result in the decentralization of healthcare and pharmaceutical production (http://localorg.blogspot.com/2014/02/big-pharmas-profits-over-people-how-to.html) , breaking up the unwarranted wealth and influence of big-pharma and those throughout the government and media that have enriched themselves protecting this monopoly. Clearly this is an outcome many in the media, government, and across the board rooms of big-pharmaceutical corporations across the Western World will fight fanatically to prevent.

For the anti-vaccine movement - it may be wiser to focus on these aspects of the debate rather than be drawn into the false paradigm the media is trying to superimpose upon the issue. It may even be wise to not use the term "anti-vaccine movement," and instead make it an anti-big-pharma movement.

Slate - were it anything other than pages for rent - would focus more on who is responsible for the vast mistrust the public has for big-pharmaceutical corporations and the governments they have verifiably bribed, lobbied, and in some cases, directly control - rather than focus on rational people who do not trust this vast concentration of wealth, influence, and control over human health.
Read more at http://www.activistpost.com/2014/10/vaccines-penalizing-unvaccinated.html#aFwMJd9zJdZD8pwR.99

[crimethink]

What as opposed to 100% of your beloved MSM.............

My beloved Jewsmedia? LOL

I will quote the Jewsmedia when they tell the Truth. I will ignore the Jewsmedia when it lies (which is most of the time).

But you just can't help yourself in posting horseshit from Veterans Today, regardless of how idiotic or even insane it is.

[crimethink]

Way too many searchable (and cliche') buzzwords in that poorly written article for me to take it seriously. Scare-porn, nothing more AFAIAC.

We're getting "there is absolutely nothing to worry about" from the liars like Frieden, and we're getting "martial is coming next week!" from the liars with self-promoting websites. The Truth is, of course, somewhere in between those two extremes.

Horseshit sites like Veterans Today (and to a lesser extent, InfoWars) serve the Babylon System well, either willfully or unwittingly, by generating noise that interferes with people seeking out, and finding, the facts. A lot of people read this crap, and become disillusioned with seeking the important facts, since it seems to many that "the Truth" can not be known.

[Serpo]

Not on drugs are you CT

[crimethink]

Not on drugs are you CT

Are you in love with Gordon Duff?

[Serpo]

Gordon Duff...............there is nothing on this thread posted by him WTF are you rambling about now and if you dont like my threads than just FOCT.

Ive even added it too my sig......FOCT

[crimethink]

Gordon Duff...............there is nothing on this thread posted by him WTF are you rambling about now and if you dont like my threads than just FOCT.

Ive even added it too my sig......FOCT

Each and every time you post lies (that is, whenever you post something from "Veterans Today"), I'll repost the Gordon Duff video where he admits he willfully lies, and that his propaganda site, "Veterans Today," posts material that is "at least" 40% "patently false." (his words).

You must think you're really clever with your "FOCT" .sig line. When do you graduate 8th grade?

[Serpo]

foct

[crimethink]

foct

You are a pathetic, bitter little man. If "man" is even deserved.

[Serpo]

you are a pathetic, bitter little man. If "man" is even deserved.

look whos talking ,you just admitted that you are going to stalk me

[crimethink]

look whos talking ,you just admitted that you are going to stalk me

If you post something that isn't lies, I will either ignore it, or possibly even Thank it.

If you post lies, such as from Veterans Today, you're damn right I will address it.

You want to make this a "personal" thing, and it's not. I've routinely Thanked you for various posts, when they are valuable. I've complimented you when deserved. But you get butt-hurt when you're told something isn't legit.

[Glass]

is it lies or is it propositions? Are they just running scenarios? I think so. I think most of us here got past the 8th grade and have some discernment for the truth or so one. I think most people fudge, the truth, their own capabilities, times when they crossed the blue line and so on.

A lot of material get run up the flag pole here. Some of it's good. Some not. Lets not get all worked up about it.

Mean while Dallas is going to be declared a state of emergency tomorrow. Hopefully this source is acceptable quality:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?79645-Dallas-Commissioners-Will-Declare-State-Of-Disaster-Tomorrow-Over-Ebola&p=733121#post733121

[crimethink]

I think most of us here got past the 8th grade and have some discernment for the truth or so one.


Even most college graduates have little to no ability to discern fact & fiction.




I think most people fudge, the truth, their own capabilities, times when they crossed the blue line and so on.


Have you actually listened to Duff's admission? 40% "patently false." Not sensationalized or hyped - "patently false" (that means, complete lies, without even a veneer of factuality).




A lot of material get run up the flag pole here. Some of it's good. Some not. Lets not get all worked up about it.


I merely point out that Duff and Veterans Today are admitted sources for willful lies. Certain others get "worked up" over it, and tell me to F**k Off.




Hopefully this source is acceptable quality.

Is ZeroHedge in the business of "patent falsehoods"? I'm not aware of it.

[Glass]

I think your a bit up yourself attitude is grating. As I said no one really gives a shit if duff is full of it.

AS I ALSO SAID grown ups can work it out for themselves.

So YES I did read what you said, you clearly did not read what I said.

[crimethink]

I think your a bit up yourself attitude is grating.


I really shouldn't have to point it out, but, alas, that's the state of "discernment" in Western civilization nowadays.




As I said no one really gives a shit if duff is full of it.


Is this GSUS or God Like Productions? Is this just entertainment for you?




AS I ALSO SAID grown ups can work it out for themselves.


Grown ups laugh at shameless lying clowns like Duff, not post their shit with seriousness.




So YES I did read what you said, you clearly did not read what I said.

I didn't ask you to read what I wrote - I asked if you actually listened to Duff say what he said. "Fudging" is white lies. "40% patently false" is deep, dark black lies. Woefully immoral.