Log in

View Full Version : Read Hillary Clinton’s Letters to Saul Alinsky



General of Darkness
27th October 2014, 01:28 PM
I mean people want this crazy zionist marxist bitch to be president?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09/22/read-hillary-clintons-letters-to-saul-alinsky/

https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/30burohmbk41lzfo/images/1-ae3b08d8d5.jpg


https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/30burohmbk41lzfo/images/2-87913fb337.jpg

midnight rambler
27th October 2014, 01:32 PM
And it certainly looks like a Bush-Clinton rematch for 2016. Oh joy.

woodman
27th October 2014, 03:30 PM
I mean people want this crazy zionist marxist bitch to be president?

Well, crazy, Zionist, Marxist bitches do. That covers a huge swath of the voting public. Ain't democracy grand?

crimethink
27th October 2014, 05:37 PM
Imagine if another candidate had letters like that exposed...only being written to George Lincoln Rockwell instead?

crimethink
27th October 2014, 05:40 PM
And it certainly looks like a Bush-Clinton rematch for 2016. Oh joy.

The Bush and Clinton Crime Families have been cahoots since at least the early 1980s. They've effectively run the country for their masters since at least 1981, when Reagan was shot (by Neil Bush's friend's brother). President Ebola is a distraction; we all know he's a post turtle. Clinton retreads like Holder were installed as directed.

EE_
27th October 2014, 06:35 PM
And it certainly looks like a Bush-Clinton rematch for 2016. Oh joy.

Might have to get a bumper sticker

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000086932/polls_NO_MORE_3656_138524_answer_5_xlarge.jpeg

Cebu_4_2
27th October 2014, 07:07 PM
Why are both letters printed off a supposed IBM typewriter that needs adjusting since 1971? In that time people serviced typewriters.... ad nausium. This so called letter is bullshit.

General of Darkness
27th October 2014, 07:14 PM
Why are both letters printed off a supposed IBM typewriter that needs adjusting since 1971? In that time people serviced typewriters.... ad nausium. This so called letter is bullshit.

You ever SCAN a document perfectly?

ShortJohnSilver
27th October 2014, 07:22 PM
The proportionally spaced font on the reply letter , is suspect to me. It was the case, that you could get such typewriters but I think they were not widespread. Would want to have further verification, just because if there is anything off it will be used to discredit the "Hillary Haters".

Cebu_4_2
27th October 2014, 07:27 PM
You ever SCAN a document perfectly?

I can scan anything and it don't look like a 3rd world country typewriter did it. I did typewriter repair in the early '80s and never saw shit this bad.

This is fake bro

PS They don/t have access to computers or laser printers (bubblejets work also)? 3rd world...

Cebu_4_2
27th October 2014, 07:28 PM
Fake.

crimethink
27th October 2014, 07:39 PM
Why are both letters printed off a supposed IBM typewriter that needs adjusting since 1971? In that time people serviced typewriters.... ad nausium. This so called letter is bullshit.

Are you saying they used the same typewriter to create these letters as for the fake "birth certificate" for Obama? :)

Cebu_4_2
27th October 2014, 07:42 PM
Are you saying they used the same typewriter to create these letters as for the fake "birth certificate" for Obama? :)

Dude... I don't want or need to hold your hand. What you think bro?

crimethink
27th October 2014, 07:42 PM
If these letters are "fake," one would think the leftists would be all over it, screaming "right-wing teabagger hoax!" But I'm not seeing that. Even snopes has nothing. It's like they're trying to pretend these don't exist.

crimethink
27th October 2014, 07:43 PM
Dude... I don't want or need to hold your hand. What you think bro?

It's a joke. But see my immediately previous post. If you've identified them as fake, why hasn't HuffPo, DailyKos, or the other Communist propaganda organs?

mick silver
27th October 2014, 07:49 PM
mick silver for president I will give everyone a 5 oz silver bar but I will have to tax you at 200% of the value

Hatha Sunahara
27th October 2014, 09:20 PM
Why is there no postmark and no cancellation stamp on the stamps on the envelope? She did mail it, eh?

I think this woman is politically toxic, and I am in no way defending her. Whoever put this out must think we're all pretty stupid though. I think this 'expose' will only strengthen the resolve of those who support this cackling witch.


Hatha

Cebu_4_2
27th October 2014, 09:34 PM
It's a joke. But see my immediately previous post. If you've identified them as fake, why hasn't HuffPo, DailyKos, or the other Communist propaganda organs?

Other side of the coin?

crimethink
27th October 2014, 09:49 PM
Why is there no postmark and no cancellation stamp on the stamps on the envelope? She did mail it, eh?

I think this woman is politically toxic, and I am in no way defending her. Whoever put this out must think we're all pretty stupid though. I think this 'expose' will only strengthen the resolve of those who support this cackling witch.


Hatha

I focused on the letters and almost completely ignored the envelope. Good catch. Back in those days, it was extremely rare to make it through the post uncancelled.

Glass
27th October 2014, 10:24 PM
So this is a 1968 FDR Stamp. Notice it has a vertical notation. It was also released in 1966.

http://usstampgallery.com/images/stamps/6dd367bb38ab6306c4913a15392fd8131fbca403.gif
http://usstampgallery.com/view.php?id=6dd367bb38ab6306c4913a15392fd8131fbca4 03

1966 version (http://usstampgallery.com/view.php?id=c5c15732584ed2820db3720243a42ca22f624d 80&Franklin_D_Roosevelt&st=roosevelt&ss=&t=&s=32&syear=&eyear=)

Supposedly there was another earlier release of an FDR with the horizontal text. Can see it on google but can't find any information about when it was released or confirmation it was an official release.

Ok so I think the ones in he first scan were released in 1968.
http://arago.si.edu/index.asp?con=2&cmd=1&id=144669&img=1&mode=1&pg=1&tid=2028981

Don't know why you would need airmail for domestic post. Anyway the stamps appear appropriate for the time.

JohnQPublic
27th October 2014, 11:15 PM
You ever SCAN a document perfectly?

Even Obama had a problem scanning his birth certificate. :rolleyes:

crimethink
27th October 2014, 11:22 PM
Don't know why you would need airmail for domestic post.

Until 1975, a lot of First Class Mail was still surface transport, i.e., rail. Air Mail Rate guaranteed faster service.

The stamps are fine, completely consistent. Why there is no hand cancel or machined mark is the big question.

govcheetos
28th October 2014, 11:23 AM
Distraction.

gunDriller
28th October 2014, 01:20 PM
> Read Hillary Clinton’s Letters to Saul Alinsky

I'd rather make love to a stinging nettle plant.

Though I guess it could be illustrative !