DNA Results For The Nephilim Skulls In Peru Are In

[Serpo]

DNA Results For The Nephilim Skulls In Peru Are In And The Results Are Absolutely Shocking by Sheep Media (http://asheepnomore.net/author/admin/) · February 12, 2014

Michael Snyder
How can we explain elongated skulls that are thousands of years old that contain genetic material “unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far”?
For months, many of us have been eagerly awaiting the results of the first DNA tests to ever be performed on the famous Paracas skulls. The results for one of the skulls are now in, and the scientist that did the testing is declaring that this skull represents a “new human-like creature” unlike anything that has ever been discovered before.
http://thetruthwins.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Elongated-Skull-Peru-Red-Hair-450x549.jpg (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/dna-results-for-the-nephilim-skulls-in-peru-are-in-and-the-results-are-absolutely-shocking/elongated-skull-peru-red-hair-2)
So are these actually Nephilim skulls? Do they come from a time when the world more closely resembled “the Lord of the Rings” than most people living today would ever dare to imagine?
There are those who believe that extremely bizarre hybrid races once roamed the planet. With each passing year, the scientific evidence continues to pile up on the side of those that are convinced that the Nephilim actually lived among us. As the knowledge of this evidence becomes more widespread, what is that going to do to the commonly accepted version of history that all of us have been taught?
If you are not familiar with the Paracas skulls, the following is a pretty good summary from a recent article by April Holloway (http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/initial-dna-analysis-paracas-elongated-skull-released-incredible)…

Paracas is a desert peninsula located within the Pisco Province in the Inca Region, on the south coast of Peru. It is here were Peruvian archaeologist, Julio Tello, made an amazing discovery in 1928 – a massive and elaborate graveyard containing tombs filled with the remains of individuals with the largest elongated skulls found anywhere in the world. These have come to be known as the ‘Paracas skulls (http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas-opinion-guest-authors/elongated-human-skulls-peru-possible-evidence-lost)’. In total, Tello found more than 300 of these elongated skulls, which are believed to date back around 3,000 years. A DNA analysis has now been conducted on one of the skulls and expert Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these enigmatic skulls.
As Holloway noted, it is researcher Brien Foerster that has been leading the charge in reviving interest in these elongated skulls. Now that the DNA results are in, interest in these skulls is almost certainly going to skyrocket. The following quote from the geneticist that conducted the DNA analysis comes from Brien Foerster’s Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/Shipibospirit?fref=ts). Please keep in mind that this geneticist was not told the history of these skulls in advance. So he was able to examine them without any preconceived notions. What he found was absolutely shocking…
Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.
As I have written about previously (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/13-nephilim-skulls-found-in-mexico), forensic analysis of these skulls show that they were not deformed by “cradle-boarding”. There are many examples of skulls that have been “cradle-boarded” down in South America, but the skulls that Foerster has been investigating are much different from those skulls. The following is more from April Holloway (http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/initial-dna-analysis-paracas-elongated-skull-released-incredible) about these skulls…

The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features arenot the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.
In fact, in a previous article (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/these-ancient-elongated-skulls-are-not-human) I discussed how a sample of red hair from one of these skulls was sent to a lab to be analyzed. The tests on that sample of hair also showed that these skulls are not human (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNm3jeCPaA).
Or at least they are not fully human.

So can we conclusively say that these are Nephilim skulls?
Of course many researchers are extremely excited about these findings, but they are warning everyone to stay cautious. For example, consider what L.A. Marzulli (http://lamarzulli.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/l-a-marzulli-and-brien-foerster-on-coast-to-coast-tuesday-night/) is saying about these skulls…

Our Geneticist has had his mind blown as the email indicates, but we must be cautious with our conclusions until all the evidence can be examined.With that in mind, take a good look at the two skulls in the picture above. I took this photo when I returned to the Chongos Necropolis a few weeks ago. The skull on the left shows only one parietal plate and a complete absence of a parietal suture. Is this a genetic trait that is only found in the Paracas skulls? If so, what does it signify?Chongos is one of the most enigmatic places I have ever found myself in. On this visit to the area we were accompanied by the mayor and an armed escort! Chongos is where the sample for the DNA testing and the subsequent results I posted above, has come from.Are these really Nephilim skulls? In my opinion, the evidence is beginning to stack up in that direction, but we must be cautious and patient for all the evidence to come in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qsj5QyB1bk

[Neuro]

Fascinating. Don't they look like the stone god statues of Easter island?

[crimethink]

Just as plausible an explanation is that a genetic mutation occurred in the royal families, and they were deliberately selected for due to mysticism. The skull faces look completely normal.

Living examples of elongated crania are seen in Africa today:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mangbetu+woman&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=KZRcVNCWKc6QigKhpoDABw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=743

The "DNA is non-human" claim is complete horseshit. Such an extraordinary claim demands extraordinary evidence - until it's submitted to several DNA labs for analysis (covertly if necessary), it should be considered by the sane as complete horseshit.

[aeondaze]

Just as plausible an explanation is that a genetic mutation occurred in the royal families, and they were deliberately selected for due to mysticism. The skull faces look completely normal.

Living examples of elongated crania are seen in Africa today:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mangbetu+woman&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=KZRcVNCWKc6QigKhpoDABw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=743

The "DNA is non-human" claim is complete horseshit. Such an extraordinary claim demands extraordinary evidence - until it's submitted to several DNA labs for analysis (covertly if necessary), it should be considered by the sane as complete horseshit.

Agreed. How can they say its a news species and then say this


it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence.

Lets see the COMPLETED sequence.

[Glass]

Did he say it was non human? I read he said it was a mutation. Human like.

[Neuro]

Just as plausible an explanation is that a genetic mutation occurred in the royal families, and they were deliberately selected for due to mysticism. The skull faces look completely normal.

Living examples of elongated crania are seen in Africa today:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mangbetu+woman&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=KZRcVNCWKc6QigKhpoDABw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=743

The "DNA is non-human" claim is complete horseshit. Such an extraordinary claim demands extraordinary evidence - until it's submitted to several DNA labs for analysis (covertly if necessary), it should be considered by the sane as complete horseshit.
The reasons for the elongated skulls in Africa is this:
http://www.epicweird.com/img/photos/weird-and-unexplainable-customs-of-ancient-mangbetu-tribe/weird-and-unexplainable-customs-of-ancient-mangbetu-tribe03.jpg...
however that wouldn't explain the increase in cranial weight and volume the above skulls have, if correct... But I definetely agree with you that the entire sequence should be analyzed by several sources before any conclusions are made, mitochondrial DNA is interesting though, it has a predictable rate of mutation through eons of time, but it sped up significantly the last two hundred thousand years in order to explain the genetic diversity of the human race, if the out of Africa theory is correct... Otherwise the genetic mutation rate of mtDNA between say a Bantu negro and a pure western European or Eskimo would suggest they diverged (had a common ancestor) 700,000 year ago...

[Neuro]

Did he say it was non human? I read he said it was a mutation. Human like.
I think it is entirely possible a distinct human race could have lived seperated from the rest of humanity in a distant valley in the Andes, for thousands of years, and then they were outbred and/or possibly went extinct from viruses/microbes the Indians carried which they had no immunity against. It happened to a large extent to the Indians when whites came to the Americas too...

[singular_me]

right in front our very eyes, history is being falsified every day in the TVnews.... humanity history is the hugest scam encompassing all others. Those who control history control the future. People believe they must endure war because wars are shown as inevitable in history books... and so on just about everything...

Those who think that the "DNA is non-human" claim is complete horseshit is the same reaction of those saying that HAARP is horseshit. It is all about having an open mind, open enough to receive and analyze new data. Reality is beyond fiction.

Every scholar knows that "elohim" is either plural or singular... every day I have to admit to the 'nefarious genius' of the NWO, right there in the bible, divide and conquer begins with plural vs singular.

anybody willing to find his/her way out of the matrix will have to consider the boldest train of thoughts ever.

Extraordinary evidence? I believe in the **Anunnaki-Elohim-Nephilim** because the elites have worshiped them since eons, not to mention that legends, mythologies, religions speak of them. Pre-diluvian civilizations become obvious once one has accepted that.

what the speaker in youtube video says makes absolutely sense to me. However, the real question starts with "if they werent aliens, WHY were they elongating their skulls??? Either ways, the answer will lead to same conclusions.

The Enigma of Cranial Deformation: Elongated Skulls of the Ancients
http://davidhatcherchildress.com/enigma-cranial-deformation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyDoiwKquaM

==============
another road leading to ancien egypt...


At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Mangbetu were only one of many small groups of people that settled on the northern edge of the Zaire rain forest. Prior to this, they lived in Sudan, and some say that they are originally of Egyptian descent…

http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/amarna-princess-head-225.jpg

http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I00001j8yS0dszrY/s/650/650/PWP88434-78-Ancient-Egyptian-art-Sculpture.jpg

http://www.thebarrow.org/stellent/groups/public/@xinternet_con_bni/documents/webcontent/bqjpg398.jpg

Ancient Egyptian quartz statue head of princess from Amarna. 18th Dynasty Ancient Egypt, 1345 BC . Neues Museum Berlin Cat No: AM 21223.

http://olmec98.net/Image71.gif

(beautiful) Mangbetu Woman
http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/7d/d3/f2/7dd3f265c3b12fb6e8a9318af443f641.jpg



so I guess that I also made my case about african history being distorted and concealed for the sake of plunder and keeping humanity in the dark.I am not afro-centrist because every culture/race is dealing with the same horseshit



More interestingly, this elongated head fashion which others may term “Cranial deformation” is also believed to have come from Egyptian Mayan and Vanuatu societies. Queen Nefertiti of Egypt was often depicted with what may be an elongated skull in historical drawings, just as King Tutankhamen. This goes to pose the question “could this culture really have come from Egypt?”


http://bibini.ghanaweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/long-head1.jpg

[aeondaze]

What a load of codswallop.

What your actually saying is humans have no history, because its all some other non-human entity that lived tens of thousands of years ago.

But the fact is WE are here and they are nowhere to be seen. Not only are they nowhere to be seen now, but they're nowhere to be seen in the archaeological record, not just the past ten thousand years, but the past 3.5 billion years, yet here you are claiming that human history is a scam. How thoroughly disingenuous!

You can believe whatever you want, that I have no problem with. What I have a problem with is your righteous indignation for the real history of the human species, its beyond ridiculous because none of it has any factual credibility whatsoever. Its all confabulation and hearsay.

You even have the temerity to try and utilize supposed scientific facts to support these dumb ideas whilst simultaneously claiming that modern scientific thought is wrong, you couldn't come across more foolish if you tried, and yet here we are again having to put up with your deluded pontifications and intent to thoroughly snuff out any trace of the human species in our historical understanding and replace it with phantasms that even if were true, have absolutely no relevance to the here and now.

Its all utterly preposterous, and that you can't even approach the consequences of your thinking with any kind of level headedness is astounding and only highlights your pig headed defiance and vicious intent to want to destroy any trace of the human archaeological record through distortions, lies and pathetic fabrications.

You're a disgrace.

[singular_me]

aeon... start searching... History of mankind is the hugest scam encompassing all others... get over it.

However, the real question starts with "if they werent aliens, WHY were/are they elongating their skulls. Either ways, the answer will lead to same conclusions.

Me a disgrace? when I am posting evidence linking facts that you wont be looking into? Did you even bother to watch the video in my posting or what?

[aeondaze]

However, the real question starts with "if they werent aliens, WHY were/are they elongating their skulls. Either ways, the answer will lead to same conclusions.

Are you serious?

There is a whole freaking page in wiki devoted to this very anthropological phenomena!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation


Artificial cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding is a form of body alteration in which the skull of a human being is intentionally deformed. It is done by distorting the normal growth of a child's skull by applying force. Flat shapes, elongated ones (produced by binding between two pieces of wood), rounded ones (binding in cloth) and conical ones are among those chosen.

What is so hard to understand about this. The human skull has a great degree of plasticity at a very early age! Surely you know that the plates in children's heads don't fuse together for some time after birth, its the very thing that allows a baby to pass through the birth canal during labor, you of all people should know this...o)(~

Why don't you address this instead of going off on some psychopathic tangent?

[Ponce]

As usual...I am here......alongating the skull on purpose was nothing more than trying to emitate those who had natural alongated skulls and were their Gods...the same what that the Incas use sacrafice others by taking their hearts out, what were they trying to do?.......lots of more surprises in the future, wait and see.

V

[singular_me]

aeon, plz deny they are not corrupting history every day on TV? plz deny that we are not bio-engineered with chemtrails, gmos, etc... in short that they are not manipulating our DNA, distorting the past, present and future. Forget about wiki.

And if you do, then maybe we could have a decent conversation.

ps: I didnt start this thread :)

[Neuro]

As usual...I am here......alongating the skull on purpose was nothing more than trying to emitate those who had natural alongated skulls and were their Gods...the same what that the Incas use sacrafice others by taking their hearts out, what were they trying to do?.......lots of more surprises in the future, wait and see.

V
Yes but you have the tribe in Thailand that elongate women's neck by putting metal rings between the shoulders and the head, and you have the old Chinese aristocracy binding the girls feet so they become petit and deformed to the point they could barely walk. You have women in the west today who inject silicone in their lips so they look like ducks. It could just be the fashion of the times or the tribe that determine these things... The capacity for weirdness among humans is enormous.

However, I think it is interesting if the difference in mitochondrial DNA in the coneheads of Peru pans out to be real, which is a possibility that shouldn't be denied. But I would imagine they still have a 99.9% overlap in genes in their DNA, just like we have a 95-99% overlap in encoded genes among other primates, and to a lesser extent among other mammals. If the coneheads DNA isn't terrestrial, then probably none of other humans, primates, mammals, birds and reptiles, fish, insects, plants, and amoebas and bacterias aren't terrestrial either. The only other somewhat realistic option would be if aliens came here and did genetic engineering to produce the current more advanced and thinking humankind we have today, out of the present earth gene pool. I am open to that idea, but there is no evidence supporting that theory and space is fucking vast! Which makes it unlikely... :)

[crimethink]

Those who think that the "DNA is non-human" claim is complete horseshit is the same reaction of those saying that HAARP is horseshit.


The Afrocentrist fanatic fails at logic yet again.



Reality is beyond fiction.


Fiction is your "reality."




Every scholar knows that "elohim" is either plural or singular...


Every scholar knows Elohim is plural..."Father, Son, Holy Spirit."

Obviously, you're not a scholar.




anybody willing to find his/her way out of the matrix will have to consider the boldest train of thoughts ever.


"Schizophrenia is the path to freedom."




Extraordinary evidence? I believe in the **Anunnaki-Elohim-Nephilim** because the elites have worshiped them since eons, not to mention that legends, mythologies, religions speak of them. Pre-diluvian civilizations become obvious once one has accepted that.

Some of us study real archaeology. Others study the works of actor-musician-pharmacists who claim to be "archaeologists."




However, the real question starts with "if they werent aliens, WHY were they elongating their skulls???


"If they aren't from outer space, why are they wearing space suits?"

http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/gallery/090326/GAL-09Mar26-1787/media/PHO-09Mar26-155778.jpg

Why? Because humans & humanoids do such things!




http://davidhatcherchildress.com/


Ah, another fake "archaeologist."




so I guess that I also made my case about african history being distorted and concealed for the sake of plunder and keeping humanity in the dark.


You are the one distorting it, and Negroids are not part of "humanity."

[crimethink]

when I am posting evidence linking facts that you wont be looking into?

Most of what you post is not "evidence."

[singular_me]

crimethink, I am barely reading you...

you and aeon prove the divide and rule theory...

there is something BIGGER out there.


Negroids are not part of "humanity."
and you assert that I insult you, makes sense... then exclude me because I am interacial, 50-50 african (mother) caucasian(father), with german last name ... and I am Rh- (among the special 15% of world population) LOL. sure I inherited subhuman genes. LOL

Oh and also, I speak 3 languages (soon 4 with spanish), my look is egyptian/indian-like as my mother was from the nile area.

HARD EVIDENCE: some negroids as you call them, were once pharaohs.

Racism will not resolve what is happening to Humanity

because of my origins, the western and african civilizations interest me the most, but we are ALL trapped. I guarantee you this.

edit

The Afrocentrist fanatic fails at logic yet again.
from my end, it sounds like you are talking to/of yourself. what serpo and I posted about is about facts that do involve OTHER cultures, not just africa. But you cannot acknowledge this otherwise your afrocentrism argument falls apart.

[Serpo]

As I have written about previously (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/13-nephilim-skulls-found-in-mexico), forensic analysis of these skulls show that they were not deformed by “cradle-boarding”. There are many examples of skulls that have been “cradle-boarded” down in South America, but the skulls that Foerster has been investigating are much different from those skulls. The following is more from April Holloway (http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/initial-dna-analysis-paracas-elongated-skull-released-incredible) about these skulls…
The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features arenot the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.

In fact, in a previous article (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/these-ancient-elongated-skulls-are-not-human) I discussed how a sample of red hair from one of these skulls was sent to a lab to be analyzed. The tests on that sample of hair also showed that these skulls are not human (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNm3jeCPaA).
Or at least they are not fully human...........

[singular_me]

humans hybrids or aliens?

Ah, another fake "archaeologist."
RE: it is intriguing that we have faux reps, dems, monetary values, news, education, weather conditions, food, wars... and that some still cannot get over the REAL value of PhDs which amount to peanuts since they all sustain the enslavement global agenda.

Get ready to become self-made in whatever field you like!

==============
Children Of Egypt: Elongated Skulls Of King Tut And Family

king tut skull , x-rays
http://www.auntminnie.com/user/images/content_images/sup_cto/2014_09_11_12_07_05_500_2014_09_12_ICR_mummy_14-King_Tut_skull.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLENp26OxmI

Secret Filming Of Odd Elongated Human Skulls In Bolivia
(there are hundreds of those skulls in bolivia and peru

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDqFaegTCBM
and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4gEUEIc23Q


Enormous Cone Head Of Paracas Peru: Lost Human History revealed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnERUZNqwbc

[Serpo]

Still plenty of cone heads out there in the burbs......................:D

[woodman]

Negroids are not part of "humanity."

I disagree with this. They are certainly human. Different race doesn't mean different species.

[Santa]

If there are indeed subhuman species as crimethink suggests, then by implication, it's likely there are superhuman species.
Would a superhuman species be a part of humanity, or would they think of themselves as "above" humanity, much as the shepherd thinks of his flock?

I don't know if it's true, but it certainly isn't far from the ongoing social paradigm.

Another way to define it would be that to be subhuman is to be more instinctual and to be superhuman is to be more daemonic.

[crimethink]

crimethink, I am barely reading you...


I don't expect you to understand me. We don't speak the same language. While I don't pretend to be a professional scientist, I aim to speak English that is grounded in sound science, i.e., observable reality.




you and aeon prove the divide and rule theory...


If anything, we prove the opposite. aeondaze and I don't see eye-to-eye on many ideological principles, but, he & I do see eye-to-eye on the realities of science. We have come together despite our differences to call your nonsense out for the dangerous nonsense it is.

It is you who are trying to divide people from reality.




and you assert that I insult you, makes sense... then exclude me because I am interacial, 50-50 african (mother) caucasian(father), with german last name ... and I am Rh- (among the special 15% of world population) LOL. sure I inherited subhuman genes.


If the indisputable fundamentals of human biology mean anything, Negroids simply are not fully Homo sapiens sapiens, and, therefore, not true humans. Negroids & Australoids are a breed apart, separate from Caucasoids & Mongoloids (including their hybrids in the Americas). No autochthonous civilization, no irreplaceable contributions to human culture, little to no ability to contribute anything of intrinsic value.

Whether one is an Adamist as I am, or an Evolutionist, either way, the Negroid is not Adamic, or is up to 300,000 years behind true humans, and such genes are, indeed, not beneficial to humanity.

I am sorry you take the facts of racial science personally.




HARD EVIDENCE: some negroids as you call them, were once pharaohs.


Irrelevant. As I've noted before, America currently has a Black Pharaoh. Neither achieved their positions through their own intellectual gifts.




Racism will not resolve what is happening to Humanity


Anti-racism (which is code for "anti-White") will assure humanity cannot challenge those who are destroying the world.




your afrocentrism argument falls apart.

You assert that Negroids were essential to Egyptian civilization, and that is both false and the foundational idea of Afrocentrism.

[crimethink]

I disagree with this. They are certainly human. Different race doesn't mean different species.

They are a different species, not merely a different race. Europeans and Northeast Asians, for example, are the same species. The Negroid is Homo erectus with significant influx of Homo sapiens neanderthalensis & Homo sapiens sapiens (true humans) genes (an alternate theory is that Homo neanderthalensis were themselves proto-Negroids).

If politics did not interfere with science, that Negroids (and Australoids) are not true humans would be universally accepted. "Racial equality" is a political, not a scientific concept. It is the foundation of the "universalism" (of which "globalism" is a child) which dominates this planet.

[crimethink]

If there are indeed subhuman species as crimethink suggests, then by implication, it's likely there are superhuman species.
Would a superhuman species be a part of humanity, or would they think of themselves as "above" humanity, much as the shepherd thinks of his flock?

I don't know if it's true, but it certainly isn't far from the ongoing social paradigm.

Another way to define it would be that to be subhuman is to be more instinctual and to be superhuman is to be more daemonic.

Many "transhumanists" are literal geniuses (IQs 140 or 145+) who believe themselves to be, or, on the verge of becoming, "superhuman." The neurotype known as Asperger's may be an "evolution" of human cognition that is developing into a natural "superhumanity." The SS studied it as such in the mid-1940s (Hans Asperger, MD, was a Viennese pediatrician working for the SS, and what is now known as Asperger's, ultra-high intelligence with indifference to "base-driven" social norms, was considered as desirable for a leadership class - Asperger's kids would be sent to the SS-ran Adolf Hitlerschulen & Ordensburgen leadership colleges).

I have a "genius-level" IQ, but don't consider myself as anything but "just human." An Adamite, or a member of God's finest creation, Adamic humanity. For example, the Chinese are very different from me, but I respect their abilities and contributions to civilization, and do not consider them "beneath" me. Humans have degenerated since Adam, both physically and mentally. It is a grave mistake not to promote the most healthy & most intelligent (doing so does not require brutality towards the sick or stupid), and, especially so their biological propagation. The political concept of "racial equality" is one of mankind's most dangerous myths (the reverse of what Jew "anthropologist" Ashley-Montagu claimed), as it has caused untold damage to the social & biological communities of our world. Of course, the political concept of "racial equality" is promoted foremost by those who wish to rule the planet for their master, the ones who have self-chosen themselves as a master race and insist on "'religious' [sic] (ethnic) exclusivity" for themselves.

[singular_me]

Crimethink, I interpret santa as saying: humans thinking that subhumans exist, systematically regard themselves as superhumans, and are demonic.


Whether one is an Adamist as I am, or an Evolutionist, either way, the Negroid is not Adamic, or is up to 300,000 years behind true humans, and such genes are, indeed, not beneficial to humanity..... I have a "genius-level" IQ, but don't consider myself as anything but "just human." An Adamite, or a member of God's finest creation, Adamic humanity.

anybody not part of adamic humanity, gets an inferior grade... enough said. Chosen ones?

2nd: all the way long, I have been saying that "some negroes as you call them" even became pharoahs and that does mean that they were people of influence. All I have come up with, are pictures of pharaohs with black facial features. And for pointing that out, you tag me as an afrocentrist.

If your ideology requires that you remain oblivious to this very fact, I can just hope that I will see voluntaryism in my life time and that people like you will be given their entire state.

I think you should re-read your posts while applying the russell quote in my sig to all of them...

edit: the empathy I am arguing for is based on the quote, does not derived from altruistic BS but applied physics . Yet *you* tell me that my sense of reality is kinda weak ???

[gunDriller]

What a load of codswallop.

always wondered how to spell that.

is it an English (as opposed to American English) word ?

[woodman]

It would truly be fascinating to know the real history of the human race. I imagine there have been many, many, subsets of humanity. I regard all races of 'men' as being human; even the Ashkenazi. I'm sure there have been many dead end hybrid races that have probably gone on for untold generations in remote places and finally fizzled out. In the end it is a matter of finding a niche in the environment and utilizing resources effectively to further one's genetics. The story is probably complex as hell and certainly convoluted so torturously as to be indecipherable. I'd love to have a time machine.

Crimethink, I respect your intellect and do love debate. I do believe that if you were possessed of African genetics, either wholly or partially, you would feel yourself to be fully human. I think, and feel it reasonable, that we all, whether Nordic or Mediterranean or Oriental, have an extremely complicated mix of genetics derived from many primordial pools of varying traits. It is unimaginable that during the many ages of commerce and warfare between tribes both primitive and technical that one races genetics are not comprised of a mixture of another's. It is human nature to want to have sex with other races and to take concubines through warfare or privilege. It is also arguable that to feel human is a defining characteristic of humanity itself. Can anyone argue that Africans suffer from the 'human condition'? I guess it boils down to your personal definition of 'human'. If your definition is not the same as mine, then we simply cannot argue with each other on an effective basis.

What is human? A hell of a question. We can say that the actions and plots of the elite are inhuman as are the actions of those thugs they hire that destroy humanity on a regular basis. Do you believe these inhuman actors are human? I'll bet you do.

You say that Negroids are Homo Erectus and that may very well be true. What is probably closer to the truth is that they have a preponderance of genes shared with that sub-set of humanity. To think that those same genes did not make it into European or Asiatic stock is preposterous. There are so many proven instances of Europeans in Asia and in Africa to not think that these genes in part do not belong to all of us.

[Santa]

Many "transhumanists" are literal geniuses (IQs 140 or 145+) who believe themselves to be, or, on the verge of becoming, "superhuman." The neurotype known as Asperger's may be an "evolution" of human cognition that is developing into a natural "superhumanity." The SS studied it as such in the mid-1940s (Hans Asperger, MD, was a Viennese pediatrician working for the SS, and what is now known as Asperger's, ultra-high intelligence with indifference to "base-driven" social norms, was considered as desirable for a leadership class - Asperger's kids would be sent to the SS-ran Adolf Hitlerschulen & Ordensburgen leadership colleges).

I have a "genius-level" IQ, but don't consider myself as anything but "just human." An Adamite, or a member of God's finest creation, Adamic humanity. For example, the Chinese are very different from me, but I respect their abilities and contributions to civilization, and do not consider them "beneath" me. Humans have degenerated since Adam, both physically and mentally. It is a grave mistake not to promote the most healthy & most intelligent (doing so does not require brutality towards the sick or stupid), and, especially so their biological propagation. The political concept of "racial equality" is one of mankind's most dangerous myths (the reverse of what Jew "anthropologist" Ashley-Montagu claimed), as it has caused untold damage to the social & biological communities of our world. Of course, the political concept of "racial equality" is promoted foremost by those who wish to rule the planet for their master, the ones who have self-chosen themselves as a master race and insist on "'religious' [sic] (ethnic) exclusivity" for themselves.

This Adamic God chosen super master race you speak of sounds like it came straight out of Babylonian Talmudic tradition.
I've read that Asperger's occurs almost exclusively in Jewish populations. It's interesting that the SS sent them off to leadership colleges.

[steyr_m]

I dunno, I'm leery of stuff like this.

[crimethink]

Crimethink, I interpret santa as saying: humans thinking that subhumans exist, systematically regard themselves as superhumans, and are demonic.


I'm sure you want to see things that way.




anybody not part of adamic humanity, gets an inferior grade... enough said.


It's not an ego or pride thing; it's a reality thing.

Negroids have had thousand of years to "prove" themselves, but they are still the same animalistic tribes they've always been.




all the way long, I have been saying that "some negroes as you call them" even became pharoahs and that does mean that they were people of influence.


Their positions were absolutely meaningless, just as Obama's position is absolutely meaningless, to the discussion of racial science. They did not earn their positions by virtue of their superior intellects. Period.

Al Sharpton is a "person of influence" - does that mean Negroids are, therefore, "smart"?

[crimethink]

It would truly be fascinating to know the real history of the human race. I imagine there have been many, many, subsets of humanity. I regard all races of 'men' as being human; even the Ashkenazi. I'm sure there have been many dead end hybrid races that have probably gone on for untold generations in remote places and finally fizzled out. In the end it is a matter of finding a niche in the environment and utilizing resources effectively to further one's genetics. The story is probably complex as hell and certainly convoluted so torturously as to be indecipherable. I'd love to have a time machine.

Crimethink, I respect your intellect and do love debate. I do believe that if you were possessed of African genetics, either wholly or partially, you would feel yourself to be fully human. I think, and feel it reasonable, that we all, whether Nordic or Mediterranean or Oriental, have an extremely complicated mix of genetics derived from many primordial pools of varying traits. It is unimaginable that during the many ages of commerce and warfare between tribes both primitive and technical that one races genetics are not comprised of a mixture of another's. It is human nature to want to have sex with other races and to take concubines through warfare or privilege. It is also arguable that to feel human is a defining characteristic of humanity itself. Can anyone argue that Africans suffer from the 'human condition'? I guess it boils down to your personal definition of 'human'. If your definition is not the same as mine, then we simply cannot argue with each other on an effective basis.

What is human? A hell of a question. We can say that the actions and plots of the elite are inhuman as are the actions of those thugs they hire that destroy humanity on a regular basis. Do you believe these inhuman actors are human? I'll bet you do.

You say that Negroids are Homo Erectus and that may very well be true. What is probably closer to the truth is that they have a preponderance of genes shared with that sub-set of humanity. To think that those same genes did not make it into European or Asiatic stock is preposterous. There are so many proven instances of Europeans in Asia and in Africa to not think that these genes in part do not belong to all of us.

You are arguing the universalist position, and, in that sense, it is true we cannot "argue with each other on an effective basis." Universalism begins with the false premise(s) that "we are all the same" or, "all men are humans." Universalism is the modern form of the ideology that built the Tower of Babel.

If you are presented with medicine, would you prefer it to be 99.9% pure, or 50.0% pure? The same goes for races. If "some" Negroid genetics exist in European populations, that simply does not negate the general factuality of what I assert. It is fact that Negroid influence exists in Southern Europe, due to the Roman Empire, et. al.'s mistakes. Such influence is usually overt. And such influence accounts for the failings of such areas compared to those areas with much less or no Negroid influence.

The honest observer, who considers the fossil record of Homo erectus, and skulls of Homo sapiens sapiens (true humans), and, the Negroid or Australoid, must conclude that the latter and Homo erectus are the same or similar species, with Homo sapiens sapiens being substantially different and inherently distinct. It doesn't matter if one believes in Darwinism or not; the fossils are real, and so are the modern skulls.

As for what it means to be truly human, the Bible's definition of "in our likeness" should be followed. Self-awareness and the desire to "do the right thing" among them. So, yes, those who desire to consistently do "the wrong thing" - and those who have given up their awareness of both self & the higher dimensions of reality, or never had them in the first place, may be reasonably excluded from "being human." I do not consider only Negroids & Australoids to be subhumans. I regularly apply the concept to those of wholly White ancestry who have chosen or otherwise become animalistic in thought & behavior. The Talmudvision has effectively "subhumanized" many White people - they are White Niggers who are closer to beasts than the Image of God in their "thinking" & behaviors.

[crimethink]

This Adamic God chosen super master race you speak of sounds like it came straight out of Babylonian Talmudic tradition.


Man was created in the Image of God, separately, and is self-evidently God's finest creation. No other species can do what he can. Or, at least, should do.

If you want to claim Genesis is "Babylonian Talmudic tradition," that is your prerogative, but it would make you look as a fool.




I've read that Asperger's occurs almost exclusively in Jewish populations. It's interesting that the SS sent them off to leadership colleges.

You've read wrong. Something from Henry Madkow?

Asperger's is going to show up in any population with ultra-high intelligence, whether its Ashkenazim, Aryans, or Northeast Asians. Whether we like it or not, the Ashkenazim have among the highest average IQ of any group in the world, since they deliberately selected for intelligence in breeding pairs (e.g., Rabbi's sons with Rabbi's daughters).

Germans have always been considered "cold and calculating," and being hyper "cold and calculating," as "Aspies" are often accused of being, is just being an "extreme Kraut."

[Santa]

Man was created in the Image of God, separately, and is self-evidently God's finest creation. No other species can do what he can. Or, at least, should do.

If you want to claim Genesis is "Babylonian Talmudic tradition," that is your prerogative, but it would make you look as a fool.




You've read wrong. Something from Henry Madkow?

Asperger's is going to show up in any population with ultra-high intelligence, whether its Ashkenazim, Aryans, or Northeast Asians. Whether we like it or not, the Ashkenazim have among the highest average IQ of any group in the world, since they deliberately selected for intelligence in breeding pairs (e.g., Rabbi's sons with Rabbi's daughters).

Germans have always been considered "cold and calculating," and being hyper "cold and calculating," as "Aspies" are often accused of being, is just being an "extreme Kraut."

Interesting. Dr Asperger himself labelled the condition "autistic psychopathy" and it was known as such until 1981.
Still, I find it fascinating if true, that the SS sent kids with this condition, whether Ashkanazim or not, off to "leadership colleges".

I will say that cold and calculating intellect is often at dire odds with the warmth inherent in humanity.

[crimethink]

Interesting. Dr Asperger himself labelled the condition "autistic psychopathy" and it was known as such until 1981.


Autism in general was "childhood schizophrenia" into the 1980s. Asperger called his patients "little professors." It was this trait foremost that was considered valuable. Psychology has always been a field where extreme thinking has dominated (consider: electroshock for depression). It took decades for the "psychotic" & "psychopathic" stigmas to be dropped, under great pressure. Hans Asperger was hardly a maverick operating apart from his field (he was in the city of the Great Fraud, Sigmund, that is, after all).




Still, I find it fascinating if true, that the SS sent kids with this condition, whether Ashkanazim or not, off to "leadership colleges".


I presume you are aiming at the "Nazi brutality" meme? "The Evil Nazis™ selected psychopathic children to learn more efficient ways of genocide..." That kind of thing?

In reality, those with the Asperger's neurotype would be excellent administrators in an "efficient" state. Personal biases based in ignorance, superstition, and "tradition" would be less influential for them. Corruption is increased where personal interests are substituted.




I will say that cold and calculating intellect is often at dire odds with the warmth inherent in humanity.

"Cold and calculating" is often the difference between victory and defeat, or life and death.

"Cold and calculating" (realist) = "the homeowner shot dead the home invader, protecting his wife & three children from the thug bent on murder."

"Warm and compassionate" [sic] (e.g., "liberal") = "the homeowner hesitated, concerned that the home invader was merely a misguided 'disadvantaged youth,' and was stabbed to death. The thug went on to rape the four remaining victims, before stabbing them to death, as well."

The "warmth inherent in humanity" is synonymous with "being nice." Of course, "nice" originally meant "foolish" or "stupid." It retains this in the application of "well-behaved" (synonym: compliant, obedient). There is a fine line between being compassionate and being gullible. Likewise, there is a fine line between being a guardian, and a predator.

The Germanic peoples have always been considered "cold & calculating" by the darker ones - yet they have no problem enjoying the vast bounty of fruits that have come from the "cold & calculating" minds, and hearts, of the Germanic peoples.

[woodman]

You are arguing the universalist position, and, in that sense, it is true we cannot "argue with each other on an effective basis." Universalism begins with the false premise(s) that "we are all the same" or, "all men are humans." Universalism is the modern form of the ideology that built the Tower of Babel.

If you are presented with medicine, would you prefer it to be 99.9% pure, or 50.0% pure? The same goes for races. If "some" Negroid genetics exist in European populations, that simply does not negate the general factuality of what I assert. It is fact that Negroid influence exists in Southern Europe, due to the Roman Empire, et. al.'s mistakes. Such influence is usually overt. And such influence accounts for the failings of such areas compared to those areas with much less or no Negroid influence.

The honest observer, who considers the fossil record of Homo erectus, and skulls of Homo sapiens sapiens (true humans), and, the Negroid or Australoid, must conclude that the latter and Homo erectus are the same or similar species, with Homo sapiens sapiens being substantially different and inherently distinct. It doesn't matter if one believes in Darwinism or not; the fossils are real, and so are the modern skulls.

As for what it means to be truly human, the Bible's definition of "in our likeness" should be followed. Self-awareness and the desire to "do the right thing" among them. So, yes, those who desire to consistently do "the wrong thing" - and those who have given up their awareness of both self & the higher dimensions of reality, or never had them in the first place, may be reasonably excluded from "being human." I do not consider only Negroids & Australoids to be subhumans. I regularly apply the concept to those of wholly White ancestry who have chosen or otherwise become animalistic in thought & behavior. The Talmudvision has effectively "subhumanized" many White people - they are White Niggers who are closer to beasts than the Image of God in their "thinking" & behaviors.


I don't know anything about Universalism or arguing from that position, but I assure you I do not believe that we are all the same. Nor are we all equal. Equality is a scary thing. It is the death of the individual. Without the individual there can be no freedom. I buy stamps at the post office and I see one from the roll that says "Equality Forever" and I find that very disturbing and disgusting at the same time.

I don't believe in equality because it is bullshit. The law should treat us equally but beyond that it is pure stupidity.

As far as the genetics go, I allow that 'they' are far from 'us' genetically. This means we are not equal. However, they can procreate with all the other races, producing viable offspring. This tells me they are human. They love and emote just as any other humans do. Have use of language and all the other attributes that we call human. Therefore they are human, part of the family of man, and to deny this is simply Talmudic thinking. Again, it comes back to what you consider human to be. I am looking at it empirically.

[singular_me]

singular_me
all the way long, I have been saying that "some negroes as you call them" even became pharoahs and that does mean that they were people of influence.

CRIMETHINK
Their positions were absolutely meaningless, just as Obama's position is absolutely meaningless, to the discussion of racial science. They did not earn their positions by virtue of their superior intellects. Period.

Al Sharpton is a "person of influence" - does that mean Negroids are, therefore, "smart"?

this could be said about almost any politicians, they ALL are UNfit (and will always be) ... of influence exactly, otherwise how can you explain their positions? Skills do not come into account. Al Sharpon tells what he is told to do, just like many others. I see puppets-masters and their puppets everywhere. I see slaves everywhere.

Any living creature has its place on earth, everything happens for a reason , declaring that some races are non beneficial is like saying God made a mistake, hence is imperfect, it is putting oneself in God's shoes and making the decision for him, which can only cause evils. And it is something nobody should attempt to make... as it is most fundamental Natural Law. (respect for Life)

also, I see a very dark cloud in your big picture as it doesnt take into account 2000+years of cultural brainwashing and deceptions on all sides... any concept, ideology discarding such a rock solid proof is ultimately built on sand.

In my view, all cultures and races are equal in crimes, there isnt a single country/culture that doesnt have its shares of atrocities to hide... I dont call this a sign of being civilized.

Genetics is on its death bed anyway as Epigenetics is about to take over since it has been discovered it is the RNA that encodes the DNA.

[Horn]

I think it is entirely possible a distinct human race could have lived seperated from the rest of humanity in a distant valley in the Andes, for thousands of years, and then they were outbred and/or possibly went extinct from viruses/microbes the Indians carried which they had no immunity against. It happened to a large extent to the Indians when whites came to the Americas too...

If I understand the baseline theorem,

is that there was a red haired and bearded elongated skull race of individuals that were almost global or empirical race.

Ruling, or at least propagating thru advanced knowledge/technology..

[Horn]

Ah, another fake "archaeologist."

crimethink, is bobbing for apples in a barrel full of plastic/wax model apples.

[crimethink]

I don't know anything about Universalism or arguing from that position, but I assure you I do not believe that we are all the same. Nor are we all equal. Equality is a scary thing. It is the death of the individual. Without the individual there can be no freedom. I buy stamps at the post office and I see one from the roll that says "Equality Forever" and I find that very disturbing and disgusting at the same time.

I don't believe in equality because it is bullshit. The law should treat us equally but beyond that it is pure stupidity.

As far as the genetics go, I allow that 'they' are far from 'us' genetically. This means we are not equal. However, they can procreate with all the other races, producing viable offspring. This tells me they are human. They love and emote just as any other humans do. Have use of language and all the other attributes that we call human. Therefore they are human, part of the family of man, and to deny this is simply Talmudic thinking. Again, it comes back to what you consider human to be. I am looking at it empirically.

You're not looking at it empirically. You're looking at it politically, and emotionally, as you have been taught.

The very concept that some humanoids are not true humans is "offensive" to most people, because they're been taught since very little that "we are all people."

The ability to interbreed proves nothing. No one disputes lions & tigers are different species, but they, too, can interbreed.

That other primates, even other species, like dolphins & whales, have language and emotions, and deeply care for their young and families, cannot be seriously disputed. Does that mean they, too, are human?



Therefore they are human, part of the family of man, and to deny this is simply Talmudic thinking. Again, it comes back to what you consider human to be.

You, not I, are arguing the Talmudist's position on "the human race" [sic]. Talmudists were in the forefront of forcing their "anti-racist" positions on society through both government and criminal organizations like the NAACP (led by Jews for most of its existence). Not until the 20th Century was it forbidden to accept the reality that the Negroid was not Adamic, that is, not human. Negroids as "beasts of the field" was an accepted fact in the 19th Century and before. Why do you think the Founders could simultaneously say that "all men are created equal" while holding Negroids as cattle?

The false legend that Ham, son of Noah, became Negroid as his curse is directly from the Talmud. So, no, I do not argue the Talmud's position. Ham remained an Adamite, giving birth to the White Mediterranean North(east) African peoples.

What do I consider "human" to be?

The Negro a Beast...or 'In the Image of God' (published in the last year of the 19th Century)

https://archive.org/details/thenegrobeastori00carrrich

[crimethink]

Any living creature has its place on earth, everything happens for a reason , declaring that some races are non beneficial is like saying God made a mistake, hence is imperfect, it is putting oneself in God's shoes and making the decision for him, which can only cause evils.

I never said the Negroid has no place on Earth. Obviously, he was put here for a reason. Considering the grave mistakes in interacting with him, perhaps he's here as a test to humans. Definitely, though, trying to integrate him into human society, and especially, mating with him, are fatal errors. The Negroid and Australoid are wildlife, and should be left to their native habitats.

[woodman]

You're not looking at it empirically. You're looking at it politically, and emotionally, as you have been taught.

The very concept that some humanoids are not true humans is "offensive" to most people, because they're been taught since very little that "we are all people."

The ability to interbreed proves nothing. No one disputes lions & tigers are different species, but they, too, can interbreed.

That other primates, even other species, like dolphins & whales, have language and emotions, and deeply care for their young and families, cannot be seriously disputed. Does that mean they, too, are human?




You, not I, are arguing the Talmudist's position on "the human race" [sic]. Talmudists were in the forefront of forcing their "anti-racist" positions on society through both government and criminal organizations like the NAACP (led by Jews for most of its existence). Not until the 20th Century was it forbidden to accept the reality that the Negroid was not Adamic, that is, not human. Negroids as "beasts of the field" was an accepted fact in the 19th Century and before. Why do you think the Founders could simultaneously say that "all men are created equal" while holding Negroids as cattle?

The false legend that Ham, son of Noah, became Negroid as his curse is directly from the Talmud. So, no, I do not argue the Talmud's position. Ham remained an Adamite, giving birth to the White Mediterranean North(east) African peoples.

What do I consider "human" to be?

The Negro a Beast...or 'In the Image of God' (published in the last year of the 19th Century)

https://archive.org/details/thenegrobeastori00carrrich

Well, damn. I've had a bottle of wine and maybe my thoughts aren't as organized as they could be, but I will try to address your post. Firstly, you do know the meaning of empirical, right? Let us establish that to be 'subjective' is to be enslaved by personal prejudices and not able to see clearly due to the glasses of training you have over your eyes. We can move on to 'objectivity'. To be objective is to look at the world through a lens that is unclouded by any personal or preconceived notions; nothing to cloud the primitive essence of experience.

You may feel that negroes are inferior in many ways and I will not debate this. Whites are also inferior to negroes in some ways. I know that most whites cannot jump very high, nor do we have the bulbous, gibbous ass that many negroes hold in high esteem. So we are not equal. You however are blinded just as the Jews are. They claim that we are cattle and less than human and you claim that blacks are less than human. I merely claim that blacks are of the family of man. I say this because they have all the attributes that scientifically qualify them as such. Empirically:---- relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory <an empirical basis for the theory----they are human. You know I don't give a fuck about any systems or theory. They are there to blind us, don't you agree?

So ask yourself honestly. If you were stuck on an island with a female negro and you knew you'd never get off it. Would you mate with her? If you did, she would become pregnant and bear children. Would these children be human?

[crimethink]

Firstly, you do know the meaning of empirical, right?


Do you?




Let us establish that to be 'subjective' is to be enslaved by personal prejudices and not able to see clearly due to the glasses of training you have over your eyes. We can move on to 'objectivity'. To be objective is to look at the world through a lens that is unclouded by any personal or preconceived notions; nothing to cloud the primitive essence of experience.

You may feel that negroes are inferior in many ways and I will not debate this. Whites are also inferior to negroes in some ways. I know that most whites cannot jump very high, nor do we have the bulbous, gibbous ass that many negroes hold in high esteem. So we are not equal.


LOL

Physically, humans are "not equal" to horses, either. Of course, any reasonable comparison has an element of subjectivity, since criteria must be selected. What does the ability to play basketball or have a large ass do for the advancement or even sustentation of civilization? Nothing, that's what. You are moving the criteria in order for the Negroid to be "superior" to humans.

My position is based solidly upon empirical evidence, not opinions. Were I to erroneously allege that, for example, Chinese are "subhumans," that would be purely subjective, and impossible to argue based on evidence.




You however are blinded just as the Jews are.


I am willing to dismiss what the Jews demand I believe. You are unable, or unwilling, to do so.




They claim that we are cattle and less than human and you claim that blacks are less than human.


Upon what criteria do the Jews claim all Goyim are cattle?

Upon what criteria do I claim the Negroid is a beast?

See the difference? (probably not...)



I say this because they have all the attributes that scientifically qualify them as such.


This is pure opinion. Chimpanzees & dolphins share the traits you proposed earlier that define "human." The criteria for what makes someone "human" must be raised above mere communication and emotional capacity, or the criteria become meaningless.




Empirically:---- relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory <an empirical basis for the theory----they are human.


The system (modern politically-driven anthropological/sociological theory) demands that we accept Negroids as human. Your position is not empirical. I demonstrated that the very criteria you used fail the test.




You know I don't give a fuck about any systems or theory. They are there to blind us, don't you agree?


Of course. My own undergraduate field, anthropology, has substituted political correctness for genuine scientific methods of studying races and species.




So ask yourself honestly. If you were stuck on an island with a female negro and you knew you'd never get off it. Would you mate with her? If you did, she would become pregnant and bear children. Would these children be human?

I'm not into bestiality, so, no. My stance is the same as if my only potential "companion" was a man. Sex does not dominate my mentality like most modern males. Most males concern themselves with the neck down, driven by animal urges. I find a female attractive based on her human traits, that is, her face, with the rest of the body second. I could succeed in being celibate if a proper mate were not available.

I don't expect my position on this to be understandable. The vast majority of the population is driven by sex and booze. I am not. That's one reason I'm resistance to Jewish mind control; they corrupt the population through endless salacious "entertainment" and copious amounts of intoxicants. If you're not a sex fiend or drunk, you're probably "one that can see."

[singular_me]

crimethink, if you say that they are a non beneficial species , you will have to deal with my interpretation, sorry.


"The negro a beast"; or, "In the image of God"; the reasoner of the age, the revelator of the century! The Bible as it is! The negro and his relation to the human family! ... The negro not the son of Ham .. (1900)
https://archive.org/details/thenegrobeastori00carrrich

the bible is a fabulous/master piece of work in the sense that everybody can project him/herself into it, no wonder that it took around 400 years to write it down, enough time to stretch the word of God. How many (bloody)schisms since then, how many different churches? And you want me to believe that "your version" is the only one reliable? absolutely laughable.

edit:

Of course. My own undergraduate field, anthropology, has substituted political correctness for genuine scientific methods of studying races and species.

here is a good story. Remember the infamous king of belgium who ordered the massacre of at least 10 millions of backs for the sake of a red rubber market boom? when germany gave rwanda to belgium just after ww1, belgians found no better idea to establish that the hutus were inferior to the tutsis by measuring their facial traits and compare them, ultimately came to the conclusion that the tutsis were more noble than the hutus which have negroid facial features, unlike the tustis. The 2 groups had NEVER known racism until then, and the hutus resentment reached a break point with the genocide. Belgium made sure that after the independence, the tutsis would be in control and remain their puppets. The genocide is the culmination of anger among a group that was treated as subhumans for about several decades.

So, WHO do you think are the most uncivilized between the blacks and the whites? If being superior just means the right to pillage, commit genocide and induce a call for genocide, if all this sounds futile to you, santa's demonic statement has serious legs.

"The negro a beast" .... advice: read and re-read... the walter russell quote in my sig, because the beast works both ways.

Genuine scientific methods? so when are you going to take a look into epigenetics?

Epigenetics Shatters "The Central Dogma"
Eriksen goes on to discuss something called "The Central Dogma" of molecular biology, which states that biological information is transferred sequentially and only in one direction (from DNA to RNA to proteins). The ramification of buying into the central dogma is that it leads to belief in absolute determinism, which leaves you utterly powerless to do anything about the health of your body; it's all driven by your genetic code, which you were born with.

However, scientists have completely shattered this dogma and proven it false. You actually have a tremendous amount of control over how your genetic traits are expressed—from how you think to what you eat and the environment you live in.

You may recall the Human Genome Projectii , which was launched in 1990 and completed in 2003. The mission was to map out all human genes and their interactions, which would than serve as the basis for curing virtually any disease. Alas, not only did they realize the human body consists of far fewer genes than previously believed, they also discovered that these genes do not operate as previously predicted....
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/04/11/epigenetic-vs-determinism.aspx

Sorry darwin will have to make compromises or LET IT GO. About time, his theory has done enough damages

Dr. Lipton on Epigenetics (control “above” the genes) Bruce Lipton, PhD, proposes a “new” biology, how the mind can reprogram genes... so you see crimethink, characters such as Lipton are my favs.

edit:
"The negro a beast" ... is it borrowed from Freud or what?

[Santa]

The ability to interbreed proves nothing. No one disputes lions & tigers are different species, but they, too, can interbreed.

Actually, this example does offer pretty good empirical evidence. Lion and tiger offspring are sterile. It's a one shot deal. There's no explosion
of Liger populations in the wild. Same with horses and donkeys. Mules don't make mulletes. It's a dead end. This alone empirically destroys
your argument.

Now, if a fair haired Nordic princess mates with a blue black negroid, what happens? Half a continent gets populated with their mulatto offspring.
Hell, the offspring are often more fertile than the parents. In other words, nature is telling you something. You may not like it, but its fact.

Ideological dogma does not trump nature.

[zap]

OK how bout we get to the beginning.... Adam and Eve were they black and white? (white and white)

Just depends on what your brainwashed into ?

They were neither..... because its just a fairy-tail !

Go ahead and over think it .......oh yes they were in the garden and that snake fuxked them all up ......ya. no apples stupid !!!!

[crimethink]

Actually, this example does offer pretty good empirical evidence. Lion and tiger offspring are sterile. It's a one shot deal.


http://www.ligerworld.com/are-the-ligers-sterile.html

Another example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefalo

And:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wholphin




Ideological dogma does not trump nature.


If one ugly mess, uh, I mean one brown race were God's ("Nature's") intent, it would have happened along ago. However, ideological dogma is doing its damnedest to make it so.

[crimethink]

OK how bout we get to the beginning.... Adam and Eve were they black and white? (white and white)

Just depends on what your brainwashed into ?

They were neither..... because its just a fairy-tail !

Go ahead and over think it .......oh yes they were in the garden and that snake fuxked them all up ......ya. no apples stupid !!!!

If the Bible is a "fairy tale," it's even worse for the Negroids. They're then 300,000 years behind humans in evolution, and, should "logically" be subjected to the same fate of other non-Homo sapiens sapiens. And if the White man won't do it, the Yellow man will.

[singular_me]

http://www.ligerworld.com/are-the-ligers-sterile.html

Another example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefalo

And:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wholphin



Sterility

Commonly, it is believed that all ligers are sterile. The species is formed by the crossbreeding of male lions and female tigresses. Still, it is important to know that while most ligers are sterile, there can be cases in which these animals mate. The most obvious example in this context is the 15-year-old ligeress who gave birth to a healthy li-liger after mating with a lion. The event occurred at a Munich Zoo.

In fact about 6 cases of female ligeresses giving birth have been registered until today. The fertility of ligers is low and when a female is not sterile she can only produce one cub at a time. There has never been a cub born by two liger parents and no fertile male liger cases have ever been registered.
http://www.ligers.org/the-breeding-of-ligers.html

[Neuro]

If the Bible is a "fairy tale," it's even worse for the Negroids. They're then 300,000 years behind humans in evolution, and, should "logically" be subjected to the same fate of other non-Homo sapiens sapiens. And if the White man won't do it, the Yellow man will.
Aren't they? I mean the Neanderthal didn't go extinct by killing. The pure Neanderthal was inbred with Homo Sapiens Sapiens, mostly in the Middle East... I would say the same thing has happened in Africa where you had inbreeding with Homo Sapiens Erectus and Homo Sapiens Sapiens, especially in North and East over millenias. Due to ice age migrations...

[crimethink]

Aren't they? I mean the Neanderthal didn't go extinct by killing. The pure Neanderthal was inbred with Homo Sapiens Sapiens, mostly in the Middle East... I would say the same thing has happened in Africa where you had inbreeding with Homo Sapiens Erectus and Homo Sapiens Sapiens, especially in North and East over millenias. Due to ice age migrations...

Neanderthals 'may have been killed off by modern humans'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/5972268/Neanderthals-may-have-been-killed-off-by-modern-humans.html


Did We Mate Or Murder [sic] Neanderthals?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-we-mate-or-murder-neanderthals/

[crimethink]

Sterility

Commonly, it is believed that all ligers are sterile. The species is formed by the crossbreeding of male lions and female tigresses. Still, it is important to know that while most ligers are sterile, there can be cases in which these animals mate. The most obvious example in this context is the 15-year-old ligeress who gave birth to a healthy li-liger after mating with a lion. The event occurred at a Munich Zoo.

In fact about 6 cases of female ligeresses giving birth have been registered until today. The fertility of ligers is low and when a female is not sterile she can only produce one cub at a time. There has never been a cub born by two liger parents and no fertile male liger cases have ever been registered.
http://www.ligers.org/the-breeding-of-ligers.html

The liger fertility debate is very much open, as my link and your link show.

And, for beefalo and wholphins?

You may also explain why separate species Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens could interbreed.

[crimethink]

Discussion of human and non-human primate traits:

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap9.html

And, a statement:

Finally, the genetic distance between Homo sapiens and Homo erectus is estimated as 0.170 24 (mean given as 0.19), 25 about the same as the genetic distance between the Bantu Africans and the Eskimos, but the genetic distance between living Africans and Eurasians is 0.23 (Table 7-1, p. 45). Thus, Homo sapiens is more closely related to Homo erectus than Eurasians are to sub-Saharan Africans. Either erectus should be reclassified as Homo sapiens erectus or sub-Saharan Africans should be reclassified as Homo africanus.

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap28.html

[Neuro]

Neanderthals 'may have been killed off by modern humans'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/5972268/Neanderthals-may-have-been-killed-off-by-modern-humans.html


Did We Mate Or Murder [sic] Neanderthals?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-we-mate-or-murder-neanderthals/
The interesting thing is that those articles are from 2009 and 2010... Since then it has been discovered that Europeans have a low percentage of Neanderthal mtDNA (I think somewhere around 1-4%), and in the Middle East probably much bigger in certain populations. I have no doubt that Neanderthal and Sapiens murdered each other on occasion, but I think it is generally accepted today that they "disappeared" through cross breeding...

[woodman]

As far as this topic goes CT, I think the most appropriate statement would be "None so blind as those who refuse to see." Yu are completely stuck in your view and cannot see the facts. The facts being as we keep pointing out, that by all established criteria for being the same species, blacks are human. So are Mexicans and Eskimos.

[crimethink]

The interesting thing is that those articles are from 2009 and 2010... Since then it has been discovered that Europeans have a low percentage of Neanderthal mtDNA (I think somewhere around 1-4%), and in the Middle East probably much bigger in certain populations. I have no doubt that Neanderthal and Sapiens murdered each other on occasion, but I think it is generally accepted today that they "disappeared" through cross breeding...

Trouble is, the DNA "analysis" is far more subjective than archaeological evidence which shows sapiens technology "used on" neanderthalensis. These "scientists'" politically-driven agenda is intended to support race-mixing (e.g., Europeans "aren't pure" so why shouldn't they breed with subhumans today?).

What has not been, and might not be able to be shown, is that DNA that purports to be exclusively "neanderthalensis" may very well be shared independently.

[crimethink]

As far as this topic goes CT, I think the most appropriate statement would be "None so blind as those who refuse to see." Yu are completely stuck in your view and cannot see the facts. The facts being as we keep pointing out, that by all established criteria for being the same species, blacks are human. So are Mexicans and Eskimos.

You want to believe what is not real. Is there a reason you insist Negroids are human? Family connection? Wife? Child? Grandchild? Yourself? That's the only logical explanation for your insistence.

I've shown that different species can and do interbreed. I've shown that indisputably non-human species share the traits you yourself established as criteria for being human.

[crimethink]

Only a nut alleges these are of the same species:

69696970

(notice the yellow sclera, seen among apes - a better example, here: http://aninchofhope.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/boy.jpg)

[crimethink]

Koko the Gorilla: IQ of 71.0 to 91.7, depending upon the test (higher scores also cited)

Negroids: average IQ of 56 to 67

Australoids: average IQ of 62

http://iontheworld.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/iqworld.jpg


If Negroids are "persons," then it is logical...

The Case for the Personhood of Gorillas

http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/patterson01.htm

We present this individual for your consideration: She communicates in sign language, using a vocabulary of over 1,000 words. She also understands spoken English, and often carries on 'bilingual' conversations, responding in sign to questions asked in English. She is learning the letters of the alphabet, and can read some printed words, including her own name. She has achieved scores between 85 and 95 on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test.

She demonstrates a clear self-awareness by engaging in self-directed behaviours in front of a mirror, such as making faces or examining her teeth, and by her appropriate use of self-descriptive language. She lies to avoid the consequences of her own misbehaviour, and anticipates others' responses to her actions. She engages in imaginary play, both alone and with others. She has produced paintings and drawings which are representational. She remembers and can talk about past events in her life. She understands and has used appropriately time-related words like 'before', 'after', 'later', and 'yesterday'.

She laughs at her own jokes and those of others. She cries when hurt or left alone, screams when frightened or angered. She talks about her feelings, using words like 'happy', 'sad', 'afraid', 'enjoy', 'eager', 'frustrate', 'mad' and, quite frequently, 'love'. She grieves for those she has lost- a favourite cat who has died, a friend who has gone away. She can talk about what happens when one dies, but she becomes fidgety and uncomfortable when asked to discuss her own death or the death of her companions. She displays a wonderful gentleness with kittens and other small animals. She has even expressed empathy for others seen only in pictures.

Does this individual have a claim to basic moral rights? It is hard to imagine any reasonable argument that would deny her these rights based on the description above. She is self-aware, intelligent, emotional, communicative, has memories and purposes of her own, and is certainly able to suffer deeply. There is no reason to change our assessment of her moral status if I add one more piece of information: namely that she is not a member of the human species. The person I have described - and she is nothing less than a person to those who are acquainted with her — is Koko, a twenty-year-old lowland gorilla.

For almost twenty years, Koko has been living and learning in a language environment that includes American Sign Language (ASL) and spoken English.[1] Koko combines her working vocabulary of over 500 signs into statements averaging three to six signs in length. Her emitted vocabulary — those signs she has used correctly on one or more occasions - is about 1,000. Her receptive vocabulary in English is several times that number of words.

Koko is not alone in her linguistic accomplishments. Her multi-species 'family' includes Michael, an eighteen-year-old male gorilla. Although he was not introduced to sign language until the age of three and a half, he has used over 400 different signs. Both gorillas initiate the majority of their conversations with humans and combine their vocabularies in creative and original sign utterances to describe their environment, feelings, desires and even what may be their past histories. They also sign to themselves and to each other, using human language to supplement their own natural communicative gestures and vocalisations.

[Neuro]

Trouble is, the DNA "analysis" is far more subjective than archaeological evidence which shows sapiens technology "used on" neanderthalensis. These "scientists'" politically-driven agenda is intended to support race-mixing (e.g., Europeans "aren't pure" so why shouldn't they breed with subhumans today?).

What has not been, and might not be able to be shown, is that DNA that purports to be exclusively "neanderthalensis" may very well be shared independently.
I agree with what you say about the DNA-tests, one problem is that it is based on very few specimens... Anyway if you look at Middle Eastern people today, many have Neanderthal features (short stocky builds), troll like face structure, especially among lower class Arabs and Turks, but also among Jews (Ariel Sharon). Middle Eastern people are also more agressive, clan/tribe minded, misogynist...

[Cebu_4_2]

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.telegraph.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Fa rchive%2F02788%2FARIEL-SHARON_2788071b.jpg&f=1

[crimethink]

What God wants:

http://theameliaagency.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/family_3.png http://www.lifeinsure.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Happy-Asian-Family.jpg


What the Jew World Order wants:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/29/article-0-1A90D8FB000005DC-532_634x701.jpg

[crimethink]

I agree with what you say about the DNA-tests, one problem is that it is based on very few specimens... Anyway if you look at Middle Eastern people today, many have Neanderthal features (short stocky builds), troll like face structure, especially among lower class Arabs and Turks, but also among Jews (Ariel Sharon). Middle Eastern people are also more agressive, clan/tribe minded, misogynist...

Sharon is an Alpine-Armenoid composite, of Polish & Russian Khazar ancestry. Whether he is a modern form of a Neanderthal is up in the air. Supposedly, the Neanderthals were fairly peaceful, so that would tend against Sharon being their descendant.

The Middle East, as crossroads of civilizations, has suffered great changes in racial makeup over the millennia. Who and what lived there in, say, 4000BC, is not there now, at least in pure form. The original populations of the Middle East were Mediterranean White peoples. Millennia of invasions and enslavement has created the modern populace, "generally" a very racially-mixed one. Lots of Negroid ancestry among the Arabs, as is seen in their often frizzy hair and thick lips. However, pockets of Whites and almost Whites still exist, such as among the Kurds, the Chaldeans, and the Syrians. The Berbers, once pure Mediterraneans, and likely originally looking like the authochthonous Canary Islanders (often red-haired), are now not uncommonly almost pure Negroid, especially where their trade paths touch south of the Sahara.

[singular_me]

crimethink
If the Bible is a "fairy tale," it's even worse for the Negroids. They're then 300,000 years behind humans in evolution, and, should "logically" be subjected to the same fate of other non-Homo sapiens sapiens. And if the White man won't do it, the Yellow man will.

so here we all can see that you'd support their full eradication.

race shouldnt and cannot compete because they are complementary, what a race has, the other doesnt. Its god's intent, it is designed to happen that way. god doesnt condone genocides, humans do. Who knows, maybe one day your life may depend on a black running much faster than you.

Also intelligence is always relative, could you survive 3 months in the jungle with a knife? Do you think it is a sign of intelligence to drop mega bombs on countries? Every time I dig into a bloody and savage african guerrilla (or any other developing country), I find western corporations and economic hitmen behind then, the same that are trying to kill us softly but surely.

Blacks have most contributed in music and sports and they are catching up in sciences. Miles Davis, Haile Selassie... both men, examples among many, have proven that blacks are capable to be highly refined, would they use modern music instruments or basic native drums. Lets look at the speculative antique art market, isnt it ironic that the creations of those subhumans are being sold for million?

Every now and then, I happen to think that the irrational fear of the black man has freudian origins as african men have the reputation of being well endowed and enduring performers in bed, and that it always has been perceived a threat. It's all unconscious most of the time, but this century old cliche is well alive and kicking.... it like jews in finance. Hard to deny.

and lastly crimethink, you always go find the worse pictures of blacks, do you know how many of them are appealing? Just imagine me posting images of extreme obese whites to make the point that westerners are stupid?

My guess is that these pictures below prove epigenetics to be correct, that the environment has changed and is changing black DNA since slavery times.... Darwin is dying... about time


http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/2e/e6/32/2ee63259eee0a08fb6d5a7064a336354.jpg

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lydiwjp8aa1r3snspo1_500.jpg


http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=70966547

https://38.media.tumblr.com/93575c50a96500cdaf6c79be7fd59a59/tumblr_mg0ru0LsqS1r7vt7vo1_500.png

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Cnc4TPwKBEQ/SOfp1gn6EWI/AAAAAAAAAZc/vyd8V_KmN6c/s1600-h/Hannah+Miss+BB.jpg

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmrfw2OVZv1qlnd2eo1_500.png

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Cnc4TPwKBEQ/SOfp1gn6EWI/AAAAAAAAAZc/vyd8V_KmN6c/s1600-h/Hannah+Miss+BB.jpg

[singular_me]

and you claim to know what god wants.... and telling me that my brain could fall off ??? LOLLOL


there is nothing wrong with interbreeding... as long as cultures and races allow VOLUNTARY interactions. You cannot prevent that and your Adamic theory would have to join the ranks of the most coercive and brutal regimes ever to make it come true... but which would be doomed anyway

what you want is **forced diversity preservation** which is not better that **forced multiculturalism**, see the duality here, the controlled opposition?, you are a mere collectivist and on the path of making my walter russell quote even more accurate by the days.

edit
Races and cultures interbreeding is as old as mankind. If you wish to preserve your own genes, fine by me, really but contending that it should be the social rule is completely unethical.

Any extreme ideology carries it own seeds of destruction within because benevolence and empathy truly rule the whole game in the end.



What God wants:

http://theameliaagency.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/family_3.png http://www.lifeinsure.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Happy-Asian-Family.jpg


What the Jew World Order wants:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/29/article-0-1A90D8FB000005DC-532_634x701.jpg

[crimethink]

so here we all can see that you'd support their full eradication.


I'm sorry you are only semi-literate.

Please re-read: "If the Bible is a "fairy tale"...

If God doesn't exist, and Darwinism is completely correct, the complete extermination of Negroids and Australoids would indeed be logical.




race shouldnt and cannot compete because they are complementary


Humans gain nothing from Negroids or Australoids.




Also intelligence is always relative, could you survive 3 months in the jungle with a knife?


Logical fallacy.

Can you live in the jungle indefinitely like a baboon?




Every time I dig a bloody and savage african guerrilla (or any other developing country), I find western corporations and economic hitmen behind then, the same that are trying to kill us softly but surely.


Remove the White or Chinese guns and presence, and you still have savage Negroids killing each other. The White man, and now, the Yellow man, have only made the native African's normal behavior "more efficient."




Blacks have most contributed in music and sports and they are catching up in sciences.


LOL

As valuable as Obama's "contributions" to "constitutional scholarship."

Jungle rhythms and booming noise is not "music." The Negro Football League and the Negro Basketball Association are completely superfluous to civilization. In fact, they are symptoms of a dying culture, just like the panem et circenses of dying Rome.

As for Niggers "catching up in sciences," maybe, say, in several eons they'll create their completely-native civilization. Until then, African "science" is limited to potions made of boiled babies.




Miles Davis, Haile Selassie... both men, examples among many, have proven that blacks are capable to be highly refined, would they use modern music instruments or basic native drums.


Both are of part-Caucasoid ancestry, Selassie especially so. Great examples, Goldissima!

As for "highly refined," that's a completely subjective position. Jizz music v. Mozart? LOL




Lets look at the speculative antique art market, isnt it ironic that the creations of those subhumans are being sold for million?


Jews, White liberals, and White faggots spending their ill-gotten gains on trash? That's nothing new.

As we all know, money does not equate value.




Every now and then, I happen to think that the irrational fear of the black man has freudian origins


There it is, folks! Goldissima looks to her fellow tribesman, Sigmund Fraud, to figure out why we are "White racists." LOL




as african men have the reputation of being well endowed and enduring performers in bed, and that it always has been perceived a threat.


Kinky anthropologists have determined that the "endowed Nigger" myth is just that: myth.




It's all unconscious most of the time, but this century old cliche is well alive and kicking.... it like jews in finance. Hard to deny.

Again, there it is! Goldissima also makes light of the fact that Jews dominate banking. Goldissima clearly believes - or at least wants you to believe - that Jews "earned" their place in finance, and that Niggers are "feared" because they are so "manly."




and lastly crimethink, you always go find the worse pictures of blacks, do you know how many of them are appealing?


There are much, much worse Niggers I could post photos of. What I posted is a reasonable example of the average unmixed Negroid.




My guess is that these pictures below prove epigenetics to be correct, that the environment has changed and is changing black DNA since slavery times.


LOL - the Niggers want to be more like Whitey, and simply "wished" their DNA to give them green(ish) eyes.




https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/93575c50a96500cdaf6c79be7fd59a59/tumblr_mg0ru0LsqS1r7vt7vo1_500.png

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmrfw2OVZv1qlnd2eo1_500.png


Sorry, those are the product of bestiality.

I always love when Afrocentrists post Niggers with the "whitest" features to show the "beauty" of Niggers.

[Buddha]

The T and A on that black woman is not a white feature.

[crimethink]

there is nothing wrong with interbreeding... as long as cultures and races allow VOLUNTARY interactions. You cannot prevent that and your Adamic theory would have to join the ranks of the most coercive and brutal regimes ever to make it come true... but which would be doomed anyway


Considering you are half-Jew, half-Negroid, it is understandable that you value your own kind. However, some of us want to see that the beauty of Aryan woman does not perish from the Earth.

Interbreeding with Negroids is merely another form of bestiality, and, as such, it is completely reasonable to prohibit it. Want to engage in such filthy behavior? Fine - go to Africa.




what you want is **forced diversity preservation**


I want to tend the garden, and prevent invasive species from destroying the beauty of our garden.




you are a mere collectivist


There's that Jew buzzword again.




Races and cultures interbreeding is as old as mankind.


Yet, the White race is still here, proving that most didn't engage in the bestiality you want to see more of.




If you wish to preserve your own genes, fine by me, really but contending that it should be the social rule is completely unethical.


"Unethical"? LOL

Tolerating and even promoting abomination is what is unethical.




Any extreme ideology carries it own seeds of destruction within because benevolence and empathy truly rule the whole game in the end.

New Age sewage, right from Judeo-Freemasonry. The extreme ideology you promote, aiming to obliterate the beauty of the White race, is the real threat.

"There is a time..."

[crimethink]

The T and A on that black woman is not a white feature.

Her ass? Perhaps. There are plenty of White girls with large breasts, but that wasn't what I was referring to. Her eyes and her hair are not Negroid in origin. Even her facial form is moderated by White genetics.

[Buddha]

Her ass? Perhaps. There are plenty of White girls with large breasts, but that wasn't what I was referring to. Her eyes and her hair are not Negroid in origin. Even her facial form is moderated by White genetics.

The hair is weave, or it took her whole life to grow out.

[singular_me]

best of luck with your creationist adamic endeavor, crimethink. I have other things to do than chatting with someone whose dream is to see 30% of world population being terminated.

[7th trump]

What God wants:

http://theameliaagency.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/family_3.png http://www.lifeinsure.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Happy-Asian-Family.jpg


What the Jew World Order wants:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/29/article-0-1A90D8FB000005DC-532_634x701.jpg

The white Caucasian race is a special special race.
God created all races, all of them...African included, but the white Caucasian race is the race Christ was to come through.
You can switch the heads around and you wont be able to tell there's a difference in skin color.

No race is better than any other race....all races sin the same and are judged the same.
The white Caucasian race with all its blessing, and curses, is not better than any other race.
Sure.....it was the race Christ was to come through but that doesn't make the Caucasians a supreme race.
All races have their attributes. God made the fisherman, the husbandry (farmer), the hunter, the gatherer. Each has their own special attributes.
The Caucasians were the farmers ...always have been and always will be.....the Bible came directly from the Caucasian race...its main setting is one of a farmer (the wheat from the tares, grape vines, fields.......ect).
Take away the blessing of the race and the Caucasians are just as primitive as any primitive African or Indian.

Race mixing isn't good in the eyes of the Lord....but its not something you'll be sent to hell for.
All the Caucasian race was for besides the race Christ was to come through was to be an example to the other races...and the Bible as its core to guidance to overcome the wicked one

[Cebu_4_2]

The white Caucasian race is a special special race.
God created all races, all of them...African included, but the white Caucasian race is the race Christ was to come through.
You can switch the heads around and you wont be able to tell there's a difference in skin color.

No race is better than any other race....all races sin the same and are judged the same.
The white Caucasian race with all its blessing, and curses, is not better than any other race.
Sure.....it was the race Christ was to come through but that doesn't make the Caucasians a supreme race.
All races have their attributes. God made the fisherman, the husbandry (farmer), the hunter, the gatherer. Each has their own special attributes.
The Caucasians were the farmers ...always have been and always will be.....the Bible came directly from the Caucasian race...its main setting is one of a farmer (the wheat from the tares, grape vines, fields.......ect).
Take away the blessing of the race and the Caucasians are just as primitive as any primitive African or Indian.

Wheat is a poison in disguise for the Caucasian. Not sure about the other breeds.

[crimethink]

someone whose dream is to see 30% of world population being terminated.

I never said or implied that, at all.

However, you want to see bastardization of the entire White race. That is, the extermination of all that makes the White race, my race, everything unique that it is. Truly, as sad, and evil, as it is, this is understandable, for when one is the product of the ultimate abomination, that one will find the existence of beings which it can never be offensive.

[crimethink]

The white Caucasian race is a special special race....No race is better than any other race

So, which is it?




God created all races, all of them...African included


Not once have I suggested or implied that God did not create the Negroid.




No race is better than any other race....all races sin the same and are judged the same.


This latter position of yours is assumption. However, God wants all of His creatures capable of worshiping Him to do so. That is why Christ commanded all to "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature." Do you want to allege He meant we should preach the Gospel to ants, pheasants, and coyotes? Or, can you accept that there are bipedal "creatures" capable of understanding the Gospel like humans?




Take away the blessing of the race and the Caucasians are just as primitive as any primitive African or Indian.


Not true, at least for comparison to the Negroid. The ancient Celts & Germanics, for example, attained a very high level of culture prior to Christianity - think Stonehenge or the Externsteine. The Celts & Germanics created "human rights" and had their own moral systems, including monogamy for life. St. Paul recognized that the Pagans, while in darkness of God's true nature and wants for humanity, could have a rudimentary understanding of and proof of the existence of God through the inherent character of the world itself (Romans 1:19-20). And let us not forget the "pagan" Magi, Aryan Zoroastrians from what is now Iran, coming to worship the Son of God.




Race mixing isn't good in the eyes of the Lord....but its not something you'll be sent to hell for.


Without repentance and the cover of Christ's blood, yes, you will. It's an abomination, perhaps, the ultimate abomination. One of the criteria for Noah's salvation from an utterly corrupted world was the fact he was "perfect in his generations," or, in modern terms, racially pure. That the Bible makes a "big deal" about that should be easily understood, but it's no longer.




All the Caucasian race was for besides the race Christ was to come through was to be an example to the other races...and the Bible as its core to guidance to overcome the wicked one

The Adamic race was commissioned to bring godliness and godly things to the world, and, despite corruption interceding so often, it has done so. And, indeed, through Adam's seed, the Second Chance was brought forth.

[singular_me]

I never said or implied that, at all.

crimethink
If the Bible is a "fairy tale," it's even worse for the Negroids. They're then 300,000 years behind humans in evolution, and, should "logically" be subjected to the same fate of other non-Homo sapiens sapiens.And if the White man won't do it, the Yellow man will.



However, you want to see bastardization of the entire White race. That is, the extermination of all that makes the White race, my race, everything unique that it is. Truly, as sad, and evil, as it is, this is understandable, for when one is the product of the ultimate abomination, that one will find the existence of beings which it can never be offensive.

redux
what you want is **forced diversity preservation** which is not better that **forced multiculturalism**, see the duality here, the controlled opposition?.... Races and cultures interbreeding is as old as mankind. If you wish to preserve your own genes, fine by me, really but contending that it should be the social model is completely unethical.

[crimethink]

The lying Afrocentrist deliberately misquotes me


This is the key phrase: If the Bible is a "fairy tale".

Since it is not a fairy tale - and you know I don't consider it such - you are lying when you claim I advocate the latter part of the sentence.




If you wish to preserve your own genes, fine by me, really but contending that it should be the social model is completely unethical.

I understand you want the entire world to look like you, a mixed-species Khazar Jew/Negro crossbreed, but some of us do not. There is nothing "unethical" about maintaining the integrity of God's Image. I don't want future generations to be ugly mystery meat, an abomination in the eyes of God, and all sane humans.

[Glass]

well that was informative.

[Horn]

well that was informative.

another case of a man placing his own laws above God's,

not recognizing his prayer unto the glory of blaspheme.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpq7wn2YPYU

[singular_me]

Let me get it straight, you have been saying all along that negroids do not deserve to be on the planet, regard them as beats, abominable creations, etc... in short just hate them so much but you'd rather hide your dream to see them all exterminated in a sentence with a double meaning and the use of the future tense ("And if the White man *won't* do it, the Yellow man *will*), which actually betrays you... Then you scream "wolf" when somebody gets it

In the mean time, you, of course, can say that I am a bastard, the product of the ultimate abomination, and retarded of the worse kind then you wonder why somebody like me draws conclusions of what you are saying ???

In fact, you can't even manage your own thoughts because they are confused and blinded by hatred to the extremes. You advocate for "forced segregation" while not even seeing what it has in common with "forced multiculturalism". Same coercive aims, paths to get there are just opposite. Dualism at its finest. Total doom will come this way.

Second, and this to show how unrealistic you truly are, you blindly go after blacks while not even taking into account the so many christians who would **never** embrace your adamic/chosen ones ideal. Ever, never. Let me tell you one thing, crimethink, you'd better worry of all those christians and convert them first (and shuts down the internet globally) before trying to do anything else , because they are a much bigger challenge than blacks are. It is like placing the horse before the cart.

Also, since our first exchanges about the subject, I always have been **pro voluntary segregation** and am realistically aware that cultures/races have always interbred, history proves it. Here, you are the one twisting what I am saying.

Again, best of luck with your doomed adamic prospect (religiously Orwellian) as it disregards the very basic laws of physics mentioned by walter russell in my sig. Your understanding of the Greater Reality is kind of baffling to say the least.





This is the key phrase: If the Bible is a "fairy tale".

Since it is not a fairy tale - and you know I don't consider it such - you are lying when you claim I advocate the latter part of the sentence.
I understand you want the entire world to look like you, a mixed-species Khazar Jew/Negro crossbreed, but some of us do not. There is nothing "unethical" about maintaining the integrity of God's Image. I don't want future generations to be ugly mystery meat, an abomination in the eyes of God, and all sane humans.

[Santa]

http://www.ligerworld.com/are-the-ligers-sterile.html

Another example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefalo

And:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wholphin




If one ugly mess, uh, I mean one brown race were God's ("Nature's") intent, it would have happened along ago. However, ideological dogma is doing its damnedest to make it so.

It did happen long ago. It's been happening and it is happening at an ever accelerating rate. Mostly due to advancements in technology which caused a loss of cultural and ethnic isolation, but admittedly also and perhaps equally due to opportunistic political expediency, most often under the dogmatic corporate fascist psychopathic principle of cold and calculating efficiency. Which, by the way, I find disgusting both in theory and implementation.

[crimethink]

Let me get it straight, you have been saying all along that negroids do not deserve to be on the planet


No, I did not.





regard them as beats


Yes. And?



abominable creations


No, I did not. God regards miscegenated monstrosities to be abominations. I agree with Him.



in short just hate them so much


Jewthink Buzzword Alert: "Hate!"





but you'd rather hide your dream to see them all exterminated in a sentence with a double meaning and the use of the future tense ("And if the White man *won't* do it, the Yellow man *will*), which actually betrays you... Then you scream "wolf" when somebody gets it


You want to see the entire world's population to be just like you. You dream of the world remade in your crossbred image. This is typical of all crossbreeds. Having no natural identity, they despise those who are what they can never be.

If I wanted all Niggers to be exterminated, I'd just say it. I'm not shy.

I want them all back in Africa, by whatever means are necessary.




In fact, you can't even manage your own thoughts because they are confused and blinded by hatred to the extremes.



Jewthink Buzzword Alert: "Hatred!"




You advocate for "forced segregation" while not even seeing what it has in common with "forced multiculturalism".


One is preservation, the other, destruction.

You hate the idea of people whose biocultural integrity is intact securing that integrity. As one who is like you, people retaining such identity is an affront to your existence.




Second, and this to show how unrealistic you truly are, you blindly go after blacks while not even taking into account the so many christians who would **never** embrace your adamic/chosen ones ideal. Ever, never.


Most "Christians" are enthralled to the Devil and his wares, like money, and his ideology, like interracism.

Most Christians in the last 2000 years found what I believe to be self-evident. I really don't care what most of today's "Christians" believe or think of me. Only God's opinion matters.




Let me tell you one thing, crimethink, you'd better worry of all those christians and convert them first (and shuts down the internet globally) before trying to do anything else , because they are a much bigger challenge than africans are.


Quality above quantity.




Also, since our first exchanges about the subject, I always have been **pro voluntary segregation**


That is asking the weeds to stay out of the garden. "Voluntarily." LOL





and am realistically aware that cultures/races have always interbred, history proves it.


And history proves that all of my ancestors did not lie down with beasts.




Again, best of luck with your doomed adamic prospect (religiously Orwellian) as it disregards the very basic laws of physics mentioned by walter russell in my sig. Your understanding of the Greater Reality is kind of baffling to say the least.

Walter Russell, LOL. Just another New Age kook, whom you worship.

Your "greater reality" is anything but reality.

[crimethink]

It did happen long ago. It's been happening and it is happening at an ever accelerating rate. Mostly due to advancements in technology which caused a loss of cultural and ethnic isolation, but admittedly also and perhaps equally due to opportunistic political expediency, most often under the dogmatic corporate fascist psychopathic principle of cold and calculating efficiency. Which, by the way, I find disgusting both in theory and implementation.

The continued existence of genuine human diversity proves that universal miscegenation has not occurred.

Interracists shriek about the "importance of racial diversity," yet, genuine racial diversity is seen most readily in the White, Adamic race. The very race they want to exterminate through racial bastardization.

Love of money ("Fascism") is the greatest enemy of biocultural integrity (aka "racial preservation"). So-called "conservatives" (usually, corporatists) are only interested in conserving their money, and, racial integrity has generally been "bad for business."

[singular_me]

crimethink, spare me the jewsih sword and take responsibility instead. If it is OKAY for you to downgrade a race to the level of beasts, you should be ready for what comes next... coming up with the jewish label when one disagrees with you or defends one's stance, is not very solid as a proof of maturity and even perhaps could reveal dogmatic mind control. Just as saying: I am right coz you are a nazi ....

however, I am glad to see that you skipped... if the whites wont do it, yellows will.

Any ideology putting the group before the individual is doomed to fail as it is collectivism. At best we all can choose what rules we wish for our own family. I think chosen ones-adamic should get together to buy an island and go live there. That is a lot more realistic and practical than sending all the blacks back to africa. Enforcing world segregation.

I seriously doubt your understanding of Reality otherwise you'd have mastered my russell quote by now

[crimethink]

crimethink, spare me the jewsih sword and take responsibility instead. If it is OKAY for you to downgrade a race to the level of beasts, you should be ready for what comes next... coming up with the jewish label when one disagrees with you or defends one's stance, is not very solid as a proof of maturity and even perhaps could reveal dogmatic mind control.


You allege my stance is based on "hate," and that is just a canard that the Jewsmedia likes to use to suppress opinions like mine.

I don't "hate" cockroaches or rats, either.




however, I am glad to see that you skipped... if the whites wont do it, yellows will.


If Darwinism were true, it would be logical to eliminate the lower forms of hominid life. This is a fact. The Chinese are not a Christian people, and, unlike mostly Christian Whites, they will, indeed, wipe them out.

I'm sorry it's so difficult for you to understand that.




Any ideology putting the group before the individual is doomed to fail as it is collectivism.


Human civilization is based on so-called "collectivism."

Denouncing human communities as "collectivism" is Jewthink. Only the self-chosen Master Race, Talmud Jewry, is allowed to collectively work together for their own mutual benefit. The Goyim are to be divided against themselves, and, especially, the most threatening group of Goyim, the White race, must be broken down, atomized, into the smallest parts, preferably individuals operating alone, even without families. This has been the sole goal of the Jewsmedia and the Jewish-driven "education" system.

I dispense with Jewthink and gladly embrace my biocultural community. It is as designed by God.

Anyone who attacks so-called "collectivism" serves the Jew.




At best we all can choose what rules we wish for our own family. I think chosen ones-adamic should get together to buy an island and go live there.


Some of us are working for an all-White state right here in North America, and yes, we will not hesitate to use force to achieve it, as necessary. Our children, grandchildren, and on, are very worth it.




I seriously doubt your understanding of Reality otherwise you'd have mastered my russell quote by now

I don't worship Russell, as you do. He was competent in the hard sciences, like Einstein, but, again like Einstein, often an imbecile in social sciences and humanities.

[Horn]

It did happen long ago. It's been happening and it is happening at an ever accelerating rate. Mostly due to advancements in technology which caused a loss of cultural and ethnic isolation, but admittedly also and perhaps equally due to opportunistic political expediency, most often under the dogmatic corporate fascist psychopathic principle of cold and calculating efficiency. Which, by the way, I find disgusting both in theory and implementation.

Also it was determined long ago that blondes are dumb, so they tend to avoid each other anymore...these days.

[singular_me]

crimethink, Your stance is absolutely meaningless to me and as well as to many others, I fear. In my view it is absolutely possible to embrace the ideology of "protecting one gene's pool" without labeling oneself a supremacist-chosen one claiming to speak in the name of God. This is delusional. The holographic universe is going to catch up with you at some point.

advice: start acting upon it now and set up a grass root campaign to get the money for an island so the chosen ones-adamic will be living their dreams, in paradise forever.

[Cebu_4_2]

crimethink, Your stance has absolutely meaningless to me and for many others too I fear.

advice: start acting upon it and set up a grass root campaign to get the money for an island so the chosen ones-adamic will be living their dreams, in paradise forever.

Free room/board/drinks I am in!

[Santa]

Free room/board/drinks I am in!

I'm in too, but only if a bevy of indigenous Polynesian hoola girls serve the drinks.

edit: indigenous Polynesian hoola girls/animals...

edit: indigenous Polynesian hoola/slave girls/animals...

edit: Naked indigenous Polynesian hoola/slave girls/animals...:)

[zap]

Ok serious now , I think crimethink is over the top, although I do agree with him on race-mixing, because I was brought up to breed, and have babies with a ( white man ) a man who has genes like me.( who has the same features).. although I did go a little-dark ,Ie Italian, with my own kind....

I dont think I am racist but maybe I am singular_me. I think you are black or mixed and don't you think there is a small difference in our genetics? I think the men you would find attractive aren't the same as the ones I would .... yes just differences but maybe genetics?

[Cebu_4_2]

Polynesia is to easy to wipe out based on low lying islands.

Santa lets go visit!

[Cebu_4_2]

Ok serious now , I think crimethink is over the top, although I do agree with him on race-mixing, because I was brought up to breed, and have babies with a ( white man ) a man who has genes like me.( who has the same features).. although I did go a little-dark ,Ie Italian, with my own kind....

I dont think I am racist but maybe I am singular_me. I think you are black or mixed and don't you think there is a small difference in our genetics? I think the men you would find attractive aren't the same as the ones I would .... yes just differences but maybe genetics?

I agree 100% here.

[singular_me]

this is exactly what I have said zap, maybe you haven't read it because I was editing:
In my view it is absolutely possible to embrace the ideology of "protecting one gene's pool" without labeling oneself a supremacist-chosen one claiming to speak in the name of God. No racism here but a respectable choice.

for me, being a mixed race, it is not a given. I was raised in a white family (my african mother died when I was 1yo and my father remarry with a caucasian, my sisters and brother are white). Actually, culturally blacks do not like me because I sound like a white (no slavery complex). I never have dealt with racism in my life directly because of my western culture and on top of that being quite pretty, I just fit everywhere. I generally attract blond and blue eyed men... HAahahaha. No kidding... LOL

seriously I dont have any genetic dilemma, as I have learned to stand on my own 2 feet and rarely take sides in racial issues. My son is interracial too, and thinks alike. If there is any difference, I'd rather look at the intellectual compatibility instead of the skin color.

I have heard black supremacists speaking like CT, and I can assure you that my wording is the same than which I use to address CT. Enforced multiculturalism has created a new breed of multicultural supremacists and I have the same attitude towards them. Consistency matters to me.



Ok serious now , I think crimethink is over the top, although I do agree with him on race-mixing, because I was brought up to breed, and have babies with a ( white man ) a man who has genes like me.( who has the same features).. although I did go a little-dark ,Ie Italian, with my own kind....

I dont think I am racist but maybe I am singular_me. I think you are black or mixed and don't you think there is a small difference in our genetics? I think the men you would find attractive aren't the same as the ones I would .... yes just differences but maybe genetics?

[singular_me]

free!! Gosh Cebu... but first you need to get yourself an adamic ID, i heard that customs there are worse than the TSA . :)

edit: and dont forget a copy of your family three.


Free room/board/drinks I am in!

[crimethink]

crimethink, Your stance is absolutely meaningless to me and as well as to many others, I fear.


Of course it is! It's my fault, actually. I had naive confidence that someone of your mixed-race heritage could care about or even understand what I am saying.




The holographic universe is going to catch up with you at some point.


LOL - more New Age nonsense.

More of that "we are all one" Luciferian crap, actually.

[crimethink]

I think crimethink is over the top

Define "over the top" and explain in what way(s).

[singular_me]

LOL - more New Age nonsense.
the problem with people who follow doctrines and dogmas, is that they will eventually miss or reject the piece of information that will eventually turn out being their trap.

Holographic theories are sciences (quantum physics and neuroscience)... look for the holographic brain on youtube

Universe Hologram
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/29/space-hologram-experiment-two-dimensions_n_5726262.html
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-we-live-in-a-holographic-universe/
http://www.nature.com/news/simulations-back-up-theory-that-universe-is-a-hologram-1.14328



Of course it is! It's my fault, actually. I had naive confidence that someone of your mixed-race heritage could care about or even understand what I am saying..

You just defend your stance so poorly ...

[Horn]

How many here believe that the new and created multitudes of international mixed race will allow jews to remain pure and whole?

[woodman]

How many here believe that the new and created multitudes of international mixed race will allow jews to remain pure and whole?

You have to think in terms of the Hierarchy. Those at the pinnacle of power will do as they please and mate with whom they choose. That is what this genetic destruction is all about; whacking down the intellect and ruling abilities of the common people to allow those on top to keep their power. The common Jew is just as dispensable as the common Christian. They don't care because they are beyond caring.

[singular_me]

my Russell quote eventually determines the outcome, it only is a matter of time. Yes, it has been this way much tooooo long but the blow out will be in proportion.

the best way to end this aberration is to explain people economics... the race card wont do it justice as they control all oppositions.



How many here believe that the new and created multitudes of international mixed race will allow jews to remain pure and whole?

[Neuro]

You have to think in terms of the Hierarchy. Those at the pinnacle of power will do as they please and mate with whom they choose. That is what this genetic destruction is all about; whacking down the intellect and ruling abilities of the common people to allow those on top to keep their power. The common Jew is just as dispensable as the common Christian. They don't care because they are beyond caring.
The main difference would be that the Israeli state has legislation that actually discourages race mixing, apart from many Jewish supremacist groups that influence the populace in choosing kosher. In Goy-countries it is a different story, instead the greatness of race-mixing or homo-sexuality is continuously pumped out in jew-owned media, and import of third-worlders is accelerated into the gene-pool. The agenda is clearly the eradication of the white race. The Israeli state may allow, grudgingly, mixed marriages with whites, allthough not encouraged.

I had a relation over 20 years ago with an Israeli girl, she later got married with a black guy from Nigeria, I think, first they didn't allow entrance to Israel for him for two years, one time he even came with proper visa's, and was sent back alleging that the visa was false. When finally allowed entrance her neighbors burned down her house, and the police wasn't too interested in investigating the crime. She divorced him, and he was immediately deported. Her father didn't speak to her during the time she was married to him, while we were together, they kind of accepted it, but it was clear they would have preferred a 'nice Jewish boy'.

Now I am married since 15 years, with a woman from Turkey, but with a European/mediterranean complexion. I think they are better, they are brought up to be feminine, while Swedish girls are masculinized over the last 40 years...

[Tumbleweed]

I always got kick out of Casious Clay and enjoyed watching him fight. Another thing I liked about him was his views on race mixing expressed in the video below.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

[Cebu_4_2]

Ali is a smart person, never knew this about him.


http://youtu.be/x4aUq74I4BM
http://youtu.be/x4aUq74I4BM

[singular_me]

Like I told zap, that is people's prerogative to mate/date within their own racial background. But Clay's interview highlights more of a cultural/mindset issue than the skin color one.


I dont know how my caucasian father could find my african birth mother attractive, they were world apart culturally. well, that's why she decided to stay there and that my father took me with him when he became aware that my mother's family would never accept a half-breed. So I was fortunate that my father was a responsible man and sent me to the french riviera to live with his mom. My grand mother became my mother for about 2 years... until my father remarried a caucasian who directly accepted me as her own child.

edit: back then multiculturalism didnt exist yet, so I didnt go through any society brainwashing and dont buy the NWO agenda. That could explain why I rarely take side(s), see the good and ugly everywhere.

[Horn]

You have to think in terms of the Hierarchy. Those at the pinnacle of power will do as they please and mate with whom they choose. That is what this genetic destruction is all about; whacking down the intellect and ruling abilities of the common people to allow those on top to keep their power. The common Jew is just as dispensable as the common Christian. They don't care because they are beyond caring.

Spainards in the Americas may have thought as well a couple hundred years ago.

I am completely surrounded by a halfbred race.

[singular_me]

and dont forget the quarter-bred and eighth-bred. :)




I am completely surrounded by a halfbred race.

[Horn]

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=6992&stc=1

That Ancient Origins youtube channel u posted goldie, looks to be a popular favorite,

they even have an AO logo that appears somewhat similar to the Anarchist's symbol...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvL2U8In-AU

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCblsdi4UwxXHG8jVLnZBNUQ

http://www.ancient-origins.net/video

[singular_me]

horn, since you first derailed this thread, here is "secrets in plain sight author's" latest
although I dont like FB, I dont mind to log in to hang out with awesome people on his FB page.

Pyramids in plain math... :)
(not from bronze age, evidence)
http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa-opinion-guest-authors/mathematical-encoding-great-pyramid-002323

[aeondaze]

If "secrets in plain sight" had all the answers, why the need to for the second installment.

How many more installments are required to map out this supposedly 'factual' account?

Oh thats right, they're attempting to use everyday, well known and understood knowledge to explain fictitious theories.

Can't wait for the next bogus installment!

:p