PDA

View Full Version : Ecopop referendum: Swiss reject immigration curbs



Cebu_4_2
30th November 2014, 11:04 AM
Ecopop referendum: Swiss reject immigration curbs

Voters in Switzerland have decisively rejected a proposal to cut net immigration to no more than 0.2% of the population.
The country's 26 cantons rejected the proposal, with about 74% of people voting no in Sunday's referendum.
Supporters of the measure argued that it would have reduced pressure on the country's resources. Opponents said it would have been bad for the economy.

Around a quarter of Switzerland's eight million people are foreigners.
The measure would have required the government to reduce immigration from about 80,000 to 16,000 people a year.

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/79404000/jpg/_79404884_79404883.jpg

Under Switzerland's system of direct democracy, citizens can force a referendum if they muster enough signatures of support.
The country voted in February to re-introduce immigration quotas, in effect opting out of an EU free movement agreement.

The government still has to implement that referendum result, which threw relations with the EU into turmoil.

Two other referendums were also being held on Sunday: one on forcing the central bank to boost its gold reserves and one on scrapping a tax perk for wealthy foreigners.

They, too, failed to garner enough support for the measures to pass into law.

'Ecopop' The immigration proposal was dubbed the Ecopop measure, after Switzerland's 40-year-old Ecopop movement which seeks to link environmental protection with controlling population growth.

The BBC's Imogen Foulkes in Geneva says that while unemployment is low and living standards are high, many Swiss worry about overcrowding and environmental degradation.

Switzerland's population has grown by over a million in 20 years, and is currently 8.2 million. Some 23% of its inhabitants are foreign nationals, most of them from EU states.

Last year, net immigration stood at 81,000, according to public broadcaster Swiss Info (http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/immigration--one-vote--many-questions/38007016).
Supporters of the measure said restricting immigration would safeguard Switzerland's environment by reducing the need for new transport links and new housing.

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/79401000/jpg/_79401800_024919373-1.jpg
People voting in Bern on Saturday

The proposal also included a measure to limit overpopulation abroad by devoting 10% of Switzerland's overseas aid to family planning in developing countries.

Opponents, among them all the major political parties, argued that the proposals would be bad for the economy because business leaders wanted to be able to recruit skilled labour from across Europe.

They also feared that if passed, the measure could put the country in breach of its international commitments and damage its image.
Many environmental groups argued that if the Swiss really wanted to protect their environment, they should adjust their own lifestyles, the BBC's Imogen Foulkes said.

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/75306000/jpg/_75306515_line976.jpg
Immigration in Switzerland http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/79262000/jpg/_79262771_bags3.jpg
Switzerland recruited high numbers of foreign workers in the 1950s and 1960s


Switzerland's population is about 8.18 million - of whom 1.96 million are not Swiss nationals, according to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO)
EU citizens make up the vast majority of immigrants in Switzerland
The largest group of foreign nationals living in Switzerland is Italians; immigration from Italy started more than a century ago, but difficulties getting Swiss nationality meant many families remained Italian
The second largest group comes from Germany, and the third largest comes from the former Yugoslavia.

What is behind Swiss 'Ecopop' vote? (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30195633)

singular_me
30th November 2014, 11:49 AM
another clue as why the elites must be prepared to crash the world economy

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/charts/switzerland-government-debt-to-gdp.png?s=chedebt2gdp

old steel
30th November 2014, 12:02 PM
Stick a fork in them, they are done.

Serpo
30th November 2014, 01:19 PM
Who ever thought of backing printed money with gold is obliviously crazy.

madfranks
30th November 2014, 06:16 PM
Who ever thought of backing printed money with gold is obliviously crazy.

Wrong referrendum.

Why doesn't Israel hold a similar immigration referrendum? I'd love to hear their excuses.

crimethink
30th November 2014, 07:05 PM
My avatar applies yet again.

The population of the "Western" world is thoroughly corrupt, and chooses money and luxury over racial & national survival.

crimethink
30th November 2014, 07:06 PM
Why doesn't Israel hold a similar immigration referrendum? I'd love to hear their excuses.

No excuses, nor apologies:

Netanyahu: Israel is exclusively the homeland of the Jewish people

http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/52401-141126-netanyahu-israel-is-exclusively-the-homeland-of-the-jewish-people

PatColo
1st December 2014, 08:30 PM
cross-posting this here from the Swiss gold ref thread (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?80425-The-upcoming-Swiss-gold-referendum&p=742436&viewfull=1#post742436)-- as the questions are the same for the (alleged) immigration ref outcome:

....

Trying to get my head around what happened with this Swiss gold ref "78% NO" and immigration ref "74% NO". A news search turns up all joozmedia/rothschild "sources" parsing the election outcome.

In the OP infographic ("undated", & no source link :( ), they say polls (last week?) for the gold ref were 48% NO, 38% YES, 15% UNDECIDED. Yet by Sun 11/30 election, the outcome was allegedly 78% NO.... now, y'all know I'm not a FAKE ELECTION CT'ist :D, but WTF?! http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/smilies/300%20%2820%29.gif

Are we to believe that 78% of Swiss voted in such a pro-JWO manner? Coz I surely don't!

Then Gold's monday bounce, which began as a big plunge despite that the Swiss vote was not in doubt, is attributed (by said joozmedia) to the Swiss anti-gold vote! What am I not seeing here, in the notion that the Swiss allegedly voting NOT to cease gold sales, and rather to BUY gold to nearly triple their current holdings--- is somehow bullish for the POG?! :o CNBC (http://www.cnbc.com/id/102226050):




Gold rebounded sharply on Monday after Switzerland voted against a proposal to boost its gold reserves, driven by a weaker dollar and softening appetite for assets seen as higher risk, like stocks.

Swiss voters on Sunday rejected a proposal to lift central bank gold holdings to 20 percent of its forex reserves. Gold slid as low as $1,142.91 before bouncing back to a peak of $1,197.10 as traders judged the move was overdone.

U.S. gold futures for February delivery settled 3.6 percent higher at $1,218.10 an ounce—its highest level since October 29. Spot gold (http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/XAU%3D) was up 4 percent at $1,216 an ounce.



Read More Swiss voters resoundingly reject gold, immigration proposals (http://www.cnbc.com/id/102225615)




Notice the Sunday (US) plunge at the open, nearly $30:

http://www.kitco.com/images/live/gold.gif?0.15780135254849736



I'm thinking, some witches-brew of election fraud; followed by POG manipulation by the JPTB, and "spin" by their joozmedia division?

The subversive, outside the mainstream JSM Forbes :D spews:




12/01/2014 @ 8:00AM
2,448 views
The Truth Behind The Swiss Gold Referendum Escapes Most Of The Mainstream Media (http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2014/12/01/the-truth-behind-the-swiss-gold-referendum-escapes-most-of-the-mainstream-media/)