PDA

View Full Version : Ready for the Big One?



EE_
5th December 2014, 05:57 PM
Is the 'big one' coming? Study warns huge 1,000km long fault where megaquake will originate is 'eerily quiet'
Cascadia 'megathrust' fault is a 1,000 Km long dipping fault

It stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino California.
Researchers believe fault is 'locked' and pressure building in it.

By MARK PRIGG FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 16:05 EST, 4 December 2014 | UPDATED: 11:48 EST, 5 December 2014


The fault zone expected to generate the next 'big one' earthquake has gone silent.
Researchers are baffled by the lack of activity at the 1,00km long Cascadia fault which stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino in California.

Experts believe the lack of activity could point to a build up of pressure - which could lead to a massive killer quake.

The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) 'megathrust' fault is a 1,000 Km long dipping fault that stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino California.It separates the Juan de Fuca and North America plates.

THE MEGATHRUST FAULT
The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) 'megathrust' fault is a 1,000 Km long dipping fault that stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino California.

It separates the Juan de Fuca and North America plates.
New Juan de Fuca plate is created offshore along the Juan de Fuca ridge.
The Juan de Fuca plate moves toward, and eventually is shoved beneath, the continent (North American plate).

Two independent research initiatives have both found the same thing - the sound of silence under the sea.
The Cascadia earthquake fault zone lies underwater between 40 and 80 miles offshore of the Pacific Northwest coastline.

Earthquake scientists have listening posts along the coast from Vancouver Island to Northern California, and have been using ships to drop off and later retrieve ocean bottom seismographs. These record for up to a year right on top of the fault zone.

However, they have detected few signs of the grinding and slipping they expected.
It is 'a puzzle,' according to University of Oregon geophysics professor Doug Toomey.

'What is extraordinary is that all of Cascadia is quiet. It's extraordinarily quiet when you compare it to other subduction zones globally,' Toomey told the Seattle pi.

Two teams have been examining the area.
A joint Japanese-Canadian team dropped instruments offshore of Vancouver Island, while Toomey's team is in its fourth year of deployments.

Named the Cascadia Initiative, it is rotating among subduction zone segments offshore of Washington, Oregon and Northern California.

Researchers have been using ships to drop off and later retrieve ocean bottom seismographs - but still say the fault remains 'eerily quiet'.

The Cascadia Initiative (CI) is an onshore/offshore seismic and geodetic experiment that takes advantage of an Amphibious Array to study questions ranging from megathrust earthquakes to volcanic arc structure to the formation, deformation and hydration of the Juan De Fuca and Gorda plates.
Researchers say the area is 'locked'.

The Japanese-Canadian team, which published their research in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, wrote: 'The lack of interplate seismicity is interpreted to reflect complete healing and locking of the megathrust over three centuries after the previous great earthquake,' wrote Koichiro Obana and his co-authors in the BSSA paper.

Experts say this could cause major problem.
'If there were low levels of offshore seismicity, then we could say some strain is being released by the smaller events,' Toomey said.
'If it is completely locked, it means it is increasingly storing energy and that has to be released at some point.'

The Cascadia Initiative (CI) is an onshore/offshore seismic and geodetic experiment that takes advantage of an Amphibious Array to study questions ranging from megathrust earthquakes to volcanic arc structure to the formation, deformation and hydration of the Juan De Fuca and Gorda plates.

Toomey described himself as 'very concerned' and said it is 'imperative' people in the Northwest continue to prepare for a big earthquake.

The last full rip of the Cascadia Subduction Zone happened in January 1700.
The exact date and destructive power was determined from buried forests along the Pacific Northwest coast and an 'orphan tsunami' that washed ashore in Japan.

Geologists digging in coastal marshes and offshore canyon bottoms have also found evidence of earlier great earthquakes and tsunamis.

The inferred timeline of those events gives a recurrence interval between Cascadia megaquakes of roughly every 400 to 600 years, reports the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2861318/Is-big-one-coming-Study-warns-huge-1-000km-long-fault-megaquake-originate-eerily-quiet.html#ixzz3L4gmGW5J
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Dogman
5th December 2014, 06:06 PM
Its just a matter of time before the west coast will shake and bake!

Has happened before and will happen again!

The only question is, in our lifetime or not!

aeondaze
5th December 2014, 07:49 PM
The overwhelming majority of members here don't believe in plate tectonics, so why would they believe this?

Can't have earthquakes without plate tectonics...just sayin'.

If you accept earthquakes, then by default one must accept plate tectonics and by further extension, the paleontological record as is currently understood by modern scientific thought and its associated timelines - millions and billions of years.

This is where the rubber meets the road. All of the aforementioned phenomena results from plate tectonics.

vacuum
5th December 2014, 08:15 PM
Just curious, why do people not believe in plate tectonics, and what is the alternate belief?

crimethink
5th December 2014, 08:18 PM
The overwhelming majority of members here don't believe in plate tectonics


Evidence of this assertion?

I can think of a handful who might not. I'm not one of them.




If you accept earthquakes, then by default one must accept plate tectonics and by further extension, the paleontological record as is currently understood by modern scientific thought and its associated timelines - millions and billions of years.

Non-sequitur. That in blue does not necessarily follow the former.

What is certain is the Earth's crust is made up of plates, and these move against each other. Pangaea and similar are speculation, though there is strong evidence what are now South America & Africa once touched.

crimethink
5th December 2014, 08:20 PM
Just curious, why do people not believe in plate tectonics, and what is the alternate belief?

I actually don't know of any serious Creationist who questions plate tectonics. The speculation about where the plates were "millions and billions of years ago" is what is questioned.

There are some Creationists, however, who believe Noah's Flood would "be more understandable" if Pangaea was fact.

singular_me
5th December 2014, 08:27 PM
aeon, where did you get that??!!

and even in plate tectonics causing a deluge type of event... then by default one must accept that previous civilizations (may) have existed. :) :)

just sayin'.


The overwhelming majority of members here don't believe in plate tectonics, so why would they believe this?

Can't have earthquakes without plate tectonics...just sayin'.

If you accept earthquakes, then by default one must accept plate tectonics and by further extension, the paleontological record as is currently understood by modern scientific thought and its associated timelines - millions and billions of years.

This is where the rubber meets the road. All of the aforementioned phenomena results from plate tectonics.

vacuum
5th December 2014, 08:31 PM
aeon, the reason I ask is because I like this theory:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54966937/BroJon-News-What-Really-Killed-the-Dinosaurs

Here's a thread on it:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59225-What-really-killed-the-dinosaurs

What do you think?

Serpo
5th December 2014, 09:12 PM
Isnt Ponce up that way..........look what he is missing out on

and as to plates , I like these.............


http://65e226e929a5af0b2a5c-b2b05f995fc8916f7d7814d5d83ccb0d.r53.cf3.rackcdn.c om/products/1000/set-of-4-fortuny-dinner-plates-assor.jpg

expat4ever
5th December 2014, 09:43 PM
Isnt Ponce up that way..........look what he is missing out on

and as to plates , I like these.............


http://65e226e929a5af0b2a5c-b2b05f995fc8916f7d7814d5d83ccb0d.r53.cf3.rackcdn.c om/products/1000/set-of-4-fortuny-dinner-plates-assor.jpg

Those are nice. where did you pick them up?

As for Pangea. Maybe a theory but if you look at all of the land masses they pretty much fit together like a jigsaw puzzle for a 3 year old.

zap
5th December 2014, 09:53 PM
Yes EE ........I am ready for the MEGA THRUST !

EE_
5th December 2014, 10:05 PM
Yes EE ........I am ready for the MEGA THRUST !

Something tells me we're not talikg about earthquakes anymore ;)

http://product-images.imshopping.com/nimblebuy/2-hours-of-handyman-services-from-rent-a-man-1769652-regular.jpg
*Note, tool belt/tools look unused

aeondaze
5th December 2014, 10:12 PM
Just curious, why do people not believe in plate tectonics, and what is the alternate belief?

I can't answer either question.


Evidence of this assertion? I can think of a handful who might not. I'm not one of them.



To be frank I don't have any. I'm just going off memory, I read a post sometime ago where are theory involved plate tectonics and a whole bunch of posters started ridiculing it.
I would be happy to be wrong on this, it doesn't bother me.



Non-sequitur. That in blue does not necessarily follow the former.

Sure it does. You cannot even accept the physical reality of isotopic decay which is pivotal in verifying the age of strata/rocks/objects etc, so I don't suppose you are going to apply logic here either.



What is certain is the Earth's crust is made up of plates, and these move against each other. Pangaea and similar are speculation, though there is strong evidence what are now South America & Africa once touched.

Here we go again, even strong evidence isn't enough to shake you out of your creationist ivory tower.


...even in plate tectonics causing a deluge type of event... then by default one must accept that previous civilizations (may) have existed. :) :)

just sayin'.

No one musn't! This is a purely fallacious argument, devoid of facts and based on misconception and fantasy.


aeon, the reason I ask is because I like this theory:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54966937/BroJon-News-What-Really-Killed-the-Dinosaurs

Here's a thread on it:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?59225-What-really-killed-the-dinosaurs

What do you think?

Yeah, the mechanism is plausible, some of the dates seem out, hence why I disagree with its fundamental assertions about life.

The truth is we don't really know how the moon formed, where all that water came from, what started the planet rotating or what caused its inclined axis of rotation.


and as to plates , I like these.............

http://65e226e929a5af0b2a5c-b2b05f995fc8916f7d7814d5d83ccb0d.r53.cf3.rackcdn.c om/products/1000/set-of-4-fortuny-dinner-plates-assor.jpg

Are those plates for people on a diet, they look like they have holes in them, lol

old steel
5th December 2014, 10:31 PM
Its just a matter of time before the west coast will shake and bake!

Has happened before and will happen again!

The only question is, in our lifetime or not!

Yup, our lifetime. That and a whole lot more.

osoab
6th December 2014, 08:57 AM
The overwhelming majority of members here don't believe in plate tectonics, so why would they believe this?

Can't have earthquakes without plate tectonics...just sayin'.

If you accept earthquakes, then by default one must accept plate tectonics and by further extension, the paleontological record as is currently understood by modern scientific thought and its associated timelines - millions and billions of years.

This is where the rubber meets the road. All of the aforementioned phenomena results from plate tectonics.

I wouldn't say "don't believe in the plate tectonics".

I would say some, me included, would argue that there is a different mechanism for the shifting of plates than what is purported.

EE_
10th December 2014, 06:08 AM
New movie due out


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz9e0PGSDeU

crimethink
10th December 2014, 12:44 PM
New movie due out


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz9e0PGSDeU

Looks retarded. No quake on the San Andreas would destroy Hoover Dam.

Like 10.5 with bigger name actors.

mick silver
10th December 2014, 12:58 PM
I hope you feel better zap
Yes EE ........I am ready for the MEGA THRUST !