PDA

View Full Version : Corporations Have Renamed ‘High Fructose Corn Syrup’



Serpo
11th December 2014, 05:15 PM
http://cdn.naturalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/general_mills_chex_735_350.jpg
http://cdn.naturalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/userphoto/34.thumbnail.png
by Barbara Minton
Posted on December 10, 2014





Big Food is at it again, hiding ingredients they know we really don’t want to consume in their products. This time it’s the presence of a new version of high fructose corn syrup. But this is not the innocuous fructose that has sweetened the fruits humans have eaten since time began. This is a questionable ingredient with many names that could be causing all sorts of health problems.
The product is General Mills’ Vanilla Chex (http://www.generalmills.com/Home/Brands/Cereals/Chex/Chex%20Brand%20Product%20List%20Page.aspx), an updated version of the Chex cereal sold in most conventional grocery and discount stores for many years. The front of the box clearly states that the product contains “no high fructose corn syrup” (HFCS), but turn it over to read the ingredient list and there it is – the new isolated fructose.

Why is that a problem? According to the Corn Refiners Association (http://www.corn.org/products/sweeteners/) (CRA), there’s been a sneaky name change. The term ‘fructose’ is now being used to denote a product that was previously known as HFCS-90, meaning it is 90 percent pure fructose. Compare this to what is termed ‘regular’ HFCS, which contains either 42 or 55 percent fructose, and you will know why General Mills is so eager to keep you in the dark.
CRA explains:
“A third product, HFCS-90, is sometimes used in natural and ‘light’ foods, where very little is needed to provide sweetness. Syrups with 90% fructose will not state high fructose corn syrup on the label [anymore], they will state ‘fructose’ or ‘fructose syrup’.”

High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a food ingredient that has become widely used as a cheaper replacement (http://www.omgfacts.com/lists/9891/It-s-cheaper-for-U-S-companies-to-use-high-fructose-corn-syrup-than-cane-sugar) for natural sugar during the past 40 years. That 40 year time span has also seen skyrocketing incidence (http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1709463) of obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic diseases. While as yet it has not been established that HFCS is the direct culprit, the circumstantial evidence is hard to overlook.
Nailing Down Links Between HFCS and Bad Health Outcomes

A study (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25449399) just published investigated the effects of various sugar solutions on lab rats. It found that the isolated fructose solution, as opposed to other sugars tested, resulted in a doubling of circulating triglycerides.
Another study (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25242636) published in late summer found that consumption of HFCS-55 negatively impacts hippocampal function, metabolic outcomes, and neuroinflammation when consumed in excess during the adolescent period of development.
Yet even more research published this year (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24985013) found higher-than-expected amounts of isolated fructose in beverages they tested. Popular drinks made with HFCS contain 50% more isolated fructose than glucose. They concluded that beverages made with HFCS have a sugar profile very different than sucrose (table sugar), in which fructose and glucose are equivalent and balanced. Additionally, this research team suggested that current dietary analyses may underestimate actual fructose consumption.
Consumer watchdog group Citizens for Health has petitioned the FDA (http://foodidentitytheft.com/citizens-for-health-broadens-its-petition-seeking-labeling-of-fructose-amounts-in-hfcs/) asking for labeling specifying the amounts of fructose in products containing HFCS, as well as notification to food producers that any product containing HFCS at a higher level than 55% fructose is considered to be adulterated under federal regulations and cannot be sold in interstate commerce.
How do General Mills and other Big Food companies navigate such issues? Bill Bonvie, writing for (http://foodidentitytheft.com/) Food Identity Theft, notes that corn refiners are:
“simply eliminating the high fructose corn syrup designation for the laboratory sweetener that’s nine-tenths fructose and calling it what it really is: fructose. And that’s how a processed-food product like Vanilla Chex that contains “fructose”, a substance that, according to the corn refiners, used to be called HFCS-90, can now declare itself to be high fructose corn syrup-free.”

As for General Mills, it has a history of deceiving the public (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/11/19/3594144/general-mills-settlement/). Earlier this year, it was prohibited from labeling its products (http://naturalsociety.com/general_mills-gmo-ingredients-forced-drop-100-natural-labels/) that contain synthetic ingredients as ‘natural.” The Fortune 500 company reached a settlement agreement with the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) that would prevent it from designating its 30 Nature Valley products, which include granola bars, crispy squares, and trail mix bars- as 100% natural.
But General Mills is not alone in deception. CSPI has also been successful (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/11/19/3594144/general-mills-settlement/) in removing the ‘natural’ labels from 7Up (Dr Pepper Snapple), Crystal Light (Kraft Foods), and Edy’s Ice Cream (Dreyer’s).
Don’t Reward Bad Behavior

If you want to engage in a healthful diet and you don’t want to be fooled by Big Food, it is essential that you read the labels of the products you buy. If you see ingredients that compromise health or that you can’t pronounce or understand, walk away from all the products made by that company. It is clear that company does not have your best interests at heart. Buy only from companies that have demonstrated over and over that they care more about you than they do about their bottom line.

http://naturalsociety.com/watch-corporations-renamed-high-fructose-corn-syrup/

JohnQPublic
11th December 2014, 06:23 PM
Fructose is the bad actor in sugar.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?73507-Fat-Chance-Fructose-2-0-presented-by-Dr-Robert-Lustig-Sequel-to-quot-Sugar-The-Bitte&highlight=sugar+bitter+truth

vacuum
11th December 2014, 06:27 PM
This is actually a very good thing. If previously the ingredient listing HFCS could have meant either 55% or 90% fructose, then it was ambiguious what you were getting. With this new designation you know if you are getting concentrated fructose, which is a good thing since that ingredient is much worse than conventional HFCS.

BrewTech
11th December 2014, 08:40 PM
Fructose, from natural sources, in realistic amounts(meaning the amount one would ingest from a natural source), is not the cause of the health problems referenced.

JohnQPublic
12th December 2014, 07:37 AM
Fructose, from natural sources, in realistic amounts(meaning the amount one would ingest from a natural source), is not the cause of the health problems referenced.

The amount you get in an apple is not an issue. First it is a small amount (4-6 grams maybe). Next, it is tied into the fiber make-up of the apple, and it takes the digestive system 10 minutes or so to extract it. The result is the concentration hitting the liver is very low, and the liver can process it without resorting to more extreme mechanicsms that are required when a high concentration hits it instantaneously.

Now take 5-6 apples and extract the juice and drink it. You might as well drink a Pepsi (which has a similar amount of fructose in it whether HFCS or cane sugar), except there is actually a little nutritional value to the apple juice. When you drink the juice, all the sugar (5-6x what is in an apple) is immediately available, and the concentration that hits you liver is probably 10-50x higher. Now it is an issue.

Shami-Amourae
12th December 2014, 08:24 AM
I just try to avoid all processed foods all together. Breakfast cereals have literally no nutrition, and should be completely avoided. You'd literally be better off eating a cardboard box.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xCtI3gGP8Y

JohnQPublic
12th December 2014, 11:24 AM
I just try to avoid all processed foods all together. Breakfast cereals have literally no nutrition, and should be completely avoided. You'd literally be better off eating a cardboard box.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xCtI3gGP8Y

I did not realize they extruded cereals. I have worked in polymer extrusion. Not sure it necassarily needs to be damaging. It probabaly depneds on the amount of heat, pressure and shear (energy input) the grains are subjected to. Pasta is basically extruded grain.

http://www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/2009/06/extrusion-processing-new-whole-grain-opportunities.aspx

"Twin screw extrusion gives processors a flexible tool to create a new palette of healthy whole-grain foods that taste great…crispy, expanded products with open cell structure; much different than traditional whole-grain formulations that exhibit heavier texture and denser mouthfeel. A good example of a healthy whole-grain product with high consumer appeal is the multigrain chip. The unique processing technology of the twin screw extruder provides a production environment not possible in the single screw extruder; the intermeshing screws create necessary micro-mixing, combined with intricate regulation of temperature and pressure within individual barrel modules, to successfully produce market-quality multigrain chips that are a hit with consumers. Up to 100% whole-grain formulas are transformed into palatable foods using twin screw technology. This is accomplished by varying the ingredient mix and the processing parameters including temperature, pressure, screw speed and configuration, which are different for each product."

"Whole-grain possibilities
Extrusion processing can lead to an array of whole-grain products.

Expanded snacks and breakfast cereals: Using twin screw extrusion, processors can create a variety of healthy expanded snacks and breakfast cereals. Extrusion makes it possible to produce crispy, expanded products with an open cell structure that is much different than traditional whole-grain formulations that exhibit a heavier texture and denser mouthfeel. This is accomplished by varying the ingredient mix and the processing parameters. In this area, improvements in technology are literally reshaping these products. Advances in die and cutter designs are giving processors an entirely new set of templates for creating innovative product shapes. Plus, recent developments in extruder design and control allow more textures and density combinations; for example, light texture with visible inclusions.


Filled snacks: Filled (co-extruded) snacks have crisp cereal shells and soft fillings that delight consumers of all ages. Processors can incorporate whole-grain flour into the cereal shell of sweet or savory coextruded products, adding a healthy benefit to these consumer favorites. Pre-engineered dies let processors create many shapes, such as bars, pillows, nuts, balls and triangles. Fillings range from fruit purée, jelly or creams for sweetened snacks, to cheese and meat for savory products. "


EXPANSION OF THE WHOLE WHEAT FLOUR EXTRUSION (http://orgprints.org/19729/2/19729.pdf)

Temperatures 100-150 Deg. C (baking temperatures)
Not sure what the resultant pressure was, but probably into the 100's of psi (polymers go into the 1000's of psi).

27-225 inverse second shear rates: http://www.foodtech-portal.eu/index.php?title=Special:PdfPrint&page=Twin+screw+extrusion

This is an informative document: http://www.foodtech-portal.eu/index.php?title=Special:PdfPrint&page=Twin+screw+extrusion

This indicates pressures form 17-44 bar (250-650psi) and torques of 25-30 Nm (applied, shear rate is more important): http://www.slideshare.net/lazybass/a-general-extrudate-bulk-density-model-for-both-twin-screw-and-single-screw-extruder-extrusion-cooking-process

(http://www.slideshare.net/lazybass/a-general-extrudate-bulk-density-model-for-both-twin-screw-and-single-screw-extruder-extrusion-cooking-process)

crimethink
12th December 2014, 06:36 PM
I did not realize they extruded cereals. I have worked in polymer extrusion. Not sure it necassarily needs to be damaging. It probabaly depneds on the amount of heat, pressure and shear (energy input) the grains are subjected to. Pasta is basically extruded grain.

I worked for six weeks in a cereals plant back in the early 1990s. You really don't want to know what I saw. There was significant denaturing in all aspects of production.

JohnQPublic
12th December 2014, 07:07 PM
I worked for six weeks in a cereals plant back in the early 1990s. You really don't want to know what I saw. There was significant denaturing in all aspects of production.

I imagine most oatmeals are ok. The best is steel cut, but it takes too long to prepare. I have been eating Coach's cracked and toasted oats, but I suspect it may be somewhat processed.

JohnQPublic
12th December 2014, 08:16 PM
Here is a patent on extruding cereals ("Bran Extrusion Process", USP 4,756,921; Calandro et. al., Nabisco). A lot of details are discussed.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4756921.pdf

JohnQPublic
12th December 2014, 08:42 PM
I used to joke (half seriously) that our food is the product of chemical companies. This shows it is. Too much tech for a meal or snack. I prefer food.

Food labelling means nothing anymore. "Ingredients" are used well beyond the normal consideration in a recipe. This is about process and conversion of raw materials to new forms. I realize this happens in everyday cooking to some degree.

These guys are adding proteins and other raw materials, not for health (though this is touted as a by-product) or taste or texture, but rather so it can cross-link or be used to control microscopic morphology (structure) of the resulting product. This is why ingredient lists are so long. Half the stuff on the "ingredient" list has been previously processed. If you took a typical "snack" food and traced the "ingredients" back to the farm and summarized the process used to transform it, a typical snack would require a book to summarize.

I suppose this could be utilized to produce healthy edible stuff, but I also suspect it is used mainly to produce consistent, appealing (not to me), and most important cheap stuff.

http://www.grains.k-state.edu/extrusion/doc/publications/alavi-et-al-1999-food-res-int.pdf