old steel
13th December 2014, 01:23 PM
SUCKERS!
Courtesy of the Cronybus(sic) last minute passage, government was provided a quid-pro-quo $1.1 trillion spending allowance with Wall Street's blessing in exchange for assuring banks that taxpayers would be on the hook for yet another bailout, as a result of the swaps push-out provision, after incorporating explicit Citigroup language that allows financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, explicitly putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by these contracts. Recall (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-07/wall-street-moves-put-taxpayers-hook-derivatives-trades):
Five years after the Wall Street coup of 2008, it appears the U.S. House of Representatives is as bought and paid for as ever. We heard about the Citigroup crafted legislation currently being pushed through Congress back in May when Mother Jones reported on it. Fortunately, they included the following image in their article:
http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Screen-Shot-2014-12-05-at-3.32.12-PM-1024x755.jpg
Unsurprisingly, the main backer of the bill is notorious Wall Street lackey Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a former Goldman Sachs employee who has discovered lobbyist payoffs can be just as lucrative as a career in financial services.
We say explicitly, of course, because taxpayers have always been on the hook implicitly for the next Wall Street meltdown.
Why?
Exhibit A: US banks are the proud owners of $303 trillion in derivatives (and spare us the whole "but.. but... net exposure" cluelessness - read here (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/how-us-banks-are-lying-about-their-european-exposure-or-how-bilateral-netting-ends-bang-not-whi)why that is absolutely irrelevant when even one counterpaty fails):
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/bank%20derivatives_1_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/bank%20derivatives_1.jpg)
Exhibit B: Here are the four banks that are in complete control of the US "republic."
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204%20table_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204%20table.jpg)
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204_1_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204_1.jpg)
At least we now know with certainty that to a clear majority in Congress - one consisting of republicans and democrats - the future viability of Wall Street is far more important than the well-being of their constituents. Which also, implicitly, was made clear when Hank Paulson was waving a three-page "blank check" term sheet, and when Congress voted through the biggest bailout of banks in US history back in 2008.
The only question is when the next multi-trillion (or perhaps quadrillion now that all global central banks are all in?) bailout takes place.
Source: OCC (http://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq214.pdf)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-12/presenting-303-trillion-derivatives-us-taxpayers-are-now-hook
Courtesy of the Cronybus(sic) last minute passage, government was provided a quid-pro-quo $1.1 trillion spending allowance with Wall Street's blessing in exchange for assuring banks that taxpayers would be on the hook for yet another bailout, as a result of the swaps push-out provision, after incorporating explicit Citigroup language that allows financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, explicitly putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by these contracts. Recall (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-07/wall-street-moves-put-taxpayers-hook-derivatives-trades):
Five years after the Wall Street coup of 2008, it appears the U.S. House of Representatives is as bought and paid for as ever. We heard about the Citigroup crafted legislation currently being pushed through Congress back in May when Mother Jones reported on it. Fortunately, they included the following image in their article:
http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Screen-Shot-2014-12-05-at-3.32.12-PM-1024x755.jpg
Unsurprisingly, the main backer of the bill is notorious Wall Street lackey Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a former Goldman Sachs employee who has discovered lobbyist payoffs can be just as lucrative as a career in financial services.
We say explicitly, of course, because taxpayers have always been on the hook implicitly for the next Wall Street meltdown.
Why?
Exhibit A: US banks are the proud owners of $303 trillion in derivatives (and spare us the whole "but.. but... net exposure" cluelessness - read here (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/how-us-banks-are-lying-about-their-european-exposure-or-how-bilateral-netting-ends-bang-not-whi)why that is absolutely irrelevant when even one counterpaty fails):
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/bank%20derivatives_1_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/bank%20derivatives_1.jpg)
Exhibit B: Here are the four banks that are in complete control of the US "republic."
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204%20table_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204%20table.jpg)
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204_1_0.jpg (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/12/top%204_1.jpg)
At least we now know with certainty that to a clear majority in Congress - one consisting of republicans and democrats - the future viability of Wall Street is far more important than the well-being of their constituents. Which also, implicitly, was made clear when Hank Paulson was waving a three-page "blank check" term sheet, and when Congress voted through the biggest bailout of banks in US history back in 2008.
The only question is when the next multi-trillion (or perhaps quadrillion now that all global central banks are all in?) bailout takes place.
Source: OCC (http://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq214.pdf)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-12/presenting-303-trillion-derivatives-us-taxpayers-are-now-hook