PDA

View Full Version : Chicago Fed Now has it's 1st floor windows BRICKED OVER



StreetsOfGold
14th December 2014, 11:37 AM
http://www.brotherjohnf.com/archives/356927

http://www.brotherjohnf.com/wp-content/uploads/fedbrick.jpg

Ares
14th December 2014, 12:28 PM
I thought that was a rumor on GLP. Hadn't seen any actual pics until just now.

Thanks for supplying confirmation. They know shit is going to go down soon.

mick silver
14th December 2014, 01:19 PM
bricking the windows over what that going to do , if people are pissed off enough I just don't see this stopping them . I am with arse here something coming and they know it going to be bad , seen some were that they are order bug out bags for them also

Cebu_4_2
14th December 2014, 01:45 PM
I am with arse here

Your spelling is bad but this is funny...

mick silver
14th December 2014, 02:26 PM
if you can laugh it a good day huh Cebu . pick some wild weed and its not to bad yahooo

old steel
14th December 2014, 02:43 PM
I could chuck a damn good sized rock into the second story windows np.

palani
14th December 2014, 03:03 PM
Someone there watched die hard with a vengeance?

Ares
14th December 2014, 03:03 PM
I could chuck a damn good sized rock into the second story windows np.

Why bother? Bullets are lighter and leave more of a lasting impression. :)

Carbon
14th December 2014, 03:36 PM
I can't confirm, but apparently the flags are missing on Wall Street. No American flags - or seemingly any other flags. Dunno if this has anything to do with anything, but I figured this was a good thread to mention it.

crimethink
14th December 2014, 04:24 PM
Pretty meaningless, actually. Those will stop insane lone wolves who don't think things through, and that's all.

Publico
14th December 2014, 04:25 PM
I could chuck a damn good sized rock into the second story windows np.


Why bother? Bullets are lighter and leave more of a lasting impression. :)

A Molotov cocktail carries more meaning.

7082

EE_
14th December 2014, 04:56 PM
A Molotov cocktail carries more meaning.

7082

Every good prepper should have stormproof matches in his kit - UCO brand

http://www.gardenista.com/files/img/sub/stormproof-matches-two.jpg

http://urbanvelo.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/uco_matches2.jpg

And tape

http://citizenscientistsleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/3M-Scotch-Super-33-Electrical-Tape.jpg

old steel
14th December 2014, 05:30 PM
Why bother? Bullets are lighter and leave more of a lasting impression. :)

Waste of a good bullet.

That bullet could be better used taking out a white collar criminal responsible for the coming apocalypse they are hell bent on creating.

Horn
14th December 2014, 06:35 PM
Actually, that's all there will be left in the end.

FED buildings (as pictured) standing at random points around the planet.

Hitch
14th December 2014, 06:41 PM
If you notice at the bottom of the photo, all those pillar things at the sidewalk. That's so cars can't drive up and plow into the building. Apparently, they think folks really hate them, I wonder why. :confused:

Silver Rocket Bitches!
14th December 2014, 07:31 PM
http://youtu.be/BhAV09awjsE?t=12m25s

midnight rambler
14th December 2014, 07:36 PM
If you notice at the bottom of the photo, all those pillar things at the sidewalk. That's so cars can't drive up and plow into the building. Apparently, they think folks really hate them, I wonder why. :confused:

Those pillar things are called bollards*, and those bollards are much closer together than what you generally see.

*being a boating guy I'm surprised you don't know the term

midnight rambler
14th December 2014, 07:49 PM
Every good prepper should have stormproof matches in his kit - UCO brand

http://www.gardenista.com/files/img/sub/stormproof-matches-two.jpg

http://urbanvelo.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/uco_matches2.jpg

And tape

http://citizenscientistsleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/3M-Scotch-Super-33-Electrical-Tape.jpg

Am unclear about the use of NCO matches and tape, could you elaborate?

Hitch
14th December 2014, 07:49 PM
Those pillar things are called bollards*, and those bollards are much closer together than what you generally see.

*being a boating guy I'm surprised you don't know the term

Calling those things bollards is wrong terminology. Bollards is a maritime term. Bollards are on a dock, or quay wall. That's not a dock, nor a quay wall, that is technically a street. Bollards are used for lines to tie up ships/boats. If those same things were actually on a boat or ship, they would be called bits. Bits = on the boat/barge/ship itself. Bollards = on the dock for securing boats/barges/ship, fixed not moving. Those fucking FED things should be called something else.

I don't know why you think there's anything maritime about the Fed Reserve, other than it's sinking.

However I give you points for the analogy of the FED being a sinking dock, perhaps? Definitely a sinking ship. Call them bits, if you must. Docks rarely sink, but ships do.

midnight rambler
14th December 2014, 07:56 PM
Calling those things bollards is wrong terminology. Bollards is a maritime term. Bollards are on a dock. That's not a dock, that's a street. Bollards are used to for lines to tie up ships/boats.

However I give you points for the analogy of the FED being a sinking dock, perhaps? Definitely a sinking ship.

Really?

https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=819&q=bollards&oq=bollards&gs_l=img.3..0l10.1222.2307.0.2850.8.8.0.0.0.0.167. 855.5j3.8.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.60.img..0.8.847.5IEt X91kQJw

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollard#Traffic_bollards (https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=819&q=bollards&oq=bollards&gs_l=img.3..0l10.1222.2307.0.2850.8.8.0.0.0.0.167. 855.5j3.8.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.60.img..0.8.847.5IEt X91kQJw)

Dogman
14th December 2014, 07:56 PM
Calling those things bollards is wrong terminology. Bollards is a maritime term. Bollards are on a dock. That's not a dock, that's a street. Bollards are used to for lines to tie up ships/boats.

However I give you points for the analogy of the FED being a sinking dock, perhaps? Definitely a sinking ship..

The term has expanded!



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollard

Hitch
14th December 2014, 08:24 PM
.

The term has expanded!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollard

Damnit man. This is Bullshit though. They always screw us by mixing maritime terms with other meanings.

If I tied up a line from a boat on one of those piece of shit traffic bollards I'd rip it right out. Maybe that's the solution to the fed, 3000 horsepower engine pulling on their stupid "bollards".

Hitch
14th December 2014, 08:40 PM
I'm doing some research right now, it seems there's a force rating for something to be technically called a "bollard".

It seems a bollard, by term, must be able to withstand between 200-500 kips of pull force. One kip, equals 1000 lbs of pull force. So, these traffic "bollards" as you false claim them to be, must be able to withstand a pull force of between 200,000 lbs to 500,000 lbs.

I hope those traffic BS bollards have been tested for this, or else they may not live up to the term, bollard.

Neuro
14th December 2014, 11:07 PM
It's the Feds new transparency policy put too practical use.

Serpo
15th December 2014, 01:40 AM
It's the Feds new transparency policy put too practical use.

transparency

midnight rambler
15th December 2014, 02:49 AM
as you false claim them to be

lol I didn't come up with the term, it's just what they're called. Get a grip.

Neuro
15th December 2014, 02:55 AM
transparency
It's newspeak... :)

Neuro
15th December 2014, 03:28 AM
http://www.brotherjohnf.com/archives/356927

http://www.brotherjohnf.com/wp-content/uploads/fedbrick.jpg
There are some strange distortions in that Google earth photo. Look at the longitudinal distortion on the second window to the left. It doesn't affect the horizontal brick line... Without any other photos confirming, I would assume it's faked!

Dogman
15th December 2014, 03:37 AM
Or the way the photos are "stitched" together. See it all the time using google earth/street view.

?

Neuro
15th December 2014, 03:43 AM
Or the way the photos are "stitched" together. See it all the time using google earth/street view.

?
Sure I get that. But there is a huge distortion at the ledger between 1st and 2nd floor but nothing at the brick wall line. Another photo or it didn't happen!

Dogman
15th December 2014, 04:41 AM
Here is another shot!

Looks like it is only on the back of the building that the first floor is covered. All other sides the windows have security bars.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7084&stc=1

Neuro
15th December 2014, 05:05 AM
Here is another shot!

Looks like it is only on the back of the building that the first floor is covered. All other sides the windows have security bars.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7084&stc=1
Even weirder the shot has two different angles, but the 'stitching' together is identical...

Dogman
15th December 2014, 05:08 AM
Even weirder the shot has two different angles, but the 'stitching' together is identical...
Think when the camera passed the steel beam it caused a gap that needed to be stitched.

?

Or it is a extra dimensional gateway!

Hitch
15th December 2014, 05:52 AM
lol I didn't come up with the term, it's just what they're called. Get a grip.

No, it's all good, if you hadn't pointed it out, I would have never took the time to learn that bollards had kip ratings.

Horn
15th December 2014, 07:01 AM
In all probability they are faux bollards, and a brick face stucco.

As there is nothing requiring them to be bollards, and the "windows" have to be the breakaway type in case for fire dept. egress.

crimethink
15th December 2014, 05:31 PM
I don't know why you think there's anything maritime about the Fed Reserve, other than it's sinking.

The official "Federal" Reserve flag is always a gold-fringed Admiralty flag:

http://www.dailyherald.com/storyimage/DA/20140203/business/702039858/AR/0/AR-702039858.jpg&maxw=554&maxh=370&Q=70&&updated=201402031454

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Flag_of_the_United_States_Federal_Reserve.png

Bollard is, indeed, a maritime term, but it has been adopted by landlubbers, just as "port" was adopted for "airports."

http://www.reliance-foundry.com/bollard

crimethink
15th December 2014, 05:33 PM
I wonder if these facilities are secure against air attack?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Austin_suicide_attack

Hitch
15th December 2014, 05:39 PM
Bollard is, indeed, a maritime term, but it has been adopted by landlubbers, just as "port" was adopted for "airports."

http://www.reliance-foundry.com/bollard

Yeah, I stand corrected, but it still bugs me they call those things bollards. Maritime folks can be picky about terms, because if you don't know them and pass on the wrong information, bad things can happen.

"Port" is most often used to relate to one specific side of the boat, the left side if you are facing forward. Starboard is referred to the right, as most of you know. It's interesting how those terms came about however. They go back to England, and how sailing south, they always had a port of safety on the left side of the boat, and all they saw was stars and open sea on the right "starboard."

Calling the bathroom the "head" is pretty funny. Most ships back then only sailed downwind, or near that, so they had the toilet at the bow or "head" of the boat, so the rest of the crew couldn't smell it.

crimethink
15th December 2014, 06:28 PM
Yeah, I stand corrected, but it still bugs me they call those things bollards. Maritime folks can be picky about terms, because if you don't know them and pass on the wrong information, bad things can happen.

"Port" is most often used to relate to one specific side of the boat, the left side if you are facing forward. Starboard is referred to the right, as most of you know. It's interesting how those terms came about however. They go back to England, and how sailing south, they always had a port of safety on the left side of the boat, and all they saw was stars and open sea on the right "starboard."

Calling the bathroom the "head" is pretty funny. Most ships back then only sailed downwind, or near that, so they had the toilet at the bow or "head" of the boat, so the rest of the crew couldn't smell it.

All I care about on your boat is the galley. Make me a sandwich, Pete. LOL

Hitch
15th December 2014, 06:42 PM
All I care about on your boat is the galley. Make me a sandwich, Pete. LOL

I wouldn't leave the helm with you on board. The galley has plenty of food. Help yourself. :)

Neuro
16th December 2014, 06:15 AM
I wouldn't leave the helm with you on board. The galley has plenty of food. Help yourself. :)
Precious cargo aye?

Horn
16th December 2014, 05:00 PM
As is typical from a stowaway, dodge the thread into some Portuguese definition of a bollard...

govcheetos
16th December 2014, 09:36 PM
"Port" is most often used to relate to one specific side of the boat, the left side if you are facing forward. Starboard is referred to the right, as most of you know. It's interesting how those terms came about however. They go back to England, and how sailing south, they always had a port of safety on the left side of the boat, and all they saw was stars and open sea on the right "starboard."




Starboard came about from the term steer board which was mounted on the right side facing forward, opposite of port to prevent damage when docking. The helmsman steered from the right hand or steer board side and often could not see over the cargo thus calling for a uniform right of way. If a vessel is approaching from the starboard bow position (say "2 o'clock") they have the right of way because in days of old you'd be able to see them approaching and be able to manuver your vessel while they wouldn't necessarily be able to see you. This also is the reason for the green starboard light and red port light giving vessels the "green light" to proceed.

For the admiralty/maritime watchdog folks it is also fitting that there are "bollards" around the edges of a "bank".

Hitch
16th December 2014, 10:17 PM
Starboard came about from the term steer board which was mounted on the right side facing forward, opposite of port to prevent damage when docking. The helmsman steered from the right hand or steer board side and often could not see over the cargo thus calling for a uniform right of way. If a vessel is approaching from the starboard bow position (say "2 o'clock") they have the right of way because in days of old you'd be able to see them approaching and be able to manuver your vessel while they wouldn't necessarily be able to see you. This also is the reason for the green starboard light and red port light giving vessels the "green light" to proceed.

For the admiralty/maritime watchdog folks it is also fitting that there are "bollards" around the edges of a "bank".

A "bank" is a broad term and has nothing at all to do with securing ships alongside a dock. Bollards are dockside, built to tie ships up and secure them. Placing them around a "bank" to sit there and do nothing, really is an insult to the term. Bollards are working equipment, much like the lines that are there to the ship. Bollards have a job to do. They are working equipment.

Regarding the definition of port and starboard, we'll have to respectfully disagree.

govcheetos
16th December 2014, 10:25 PM
A "bank" is a broad term and has nothing at all to do with securing ships alongside a dock. Bollards are dockside, built to tie ships up and secure them. Placing them around a "bank" to sit there and do nothing, really is an insult to the term. Bollards are working equipment, much like the lines that are there to the ship. Bollards have a job to do. They are working equipment.

Regarding the definition of port and starboard, we'll have to respectfully disagree.

I'll keep a lookout then. :p

All symbolic maritime stuff.

A dock is usually on a bank, where you would "birth" a "vessel".

Hitch
16th December 2014, 10:34 PM
A dock is usually on a bank, where you would "birth" a "vessel".

A dock is not on a bank, a dock extends outward. The closest thing to a bank, would be a quay wall. A bank is usually avoided by vessels because it's a navigational hazard, a place to run aground, or find the winds and tides to deliver breaking waves.

The four fathoms bank off of San Francisco, aka the "potato patch" Many vessels, hauling potatoes, hence the name have been lost there. The seas build up on that bank and sink vessels.

govcheetos
16th December 2014, 10:37 PM
Think river bank.

Hitch
16th December 2014, 10:43 PM
Think river bank.

;D I know that, just that I'd probably argue this until the day I die.

Serpo
16th December 2014, 11:10 PM
http://www.exohuman.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/titanic_fed.jpg

Glass
17th December 2014, 01:09 AM
no the term bank is symbolic to the flow of current(cy). It flows between banks. All the worlds commerce is lex mercatoria, founded on ocean going traders, the law of admiralty, sailing under the protection of a flag, you must pay homage to that "privilege".

All people are born vassals (vessels), birthed in a delivery room on a ward (of the state). Registered under a flag. When they reach the age of "Consent to Contract" of 18 then they can enter in to commerce.

If someone cannot operate their vessel correctly they may find them selves run aground or "Bankrupt" on the sea of commerce. It is all symbolic, just like the other symbols, eyes, pyramids, obelisks, stars, goats, badges and so on.

Horn
17th December 2014, 07:28 AM
Gotta luv this place,

anytime I feel alone in my strangeness, I am sanctified when docking here.

Neuro
17th December 2014, 08:11 AM
Gotta luv this place,

anytime I feel alone in my strangeness, I am sanctified when docking here.
You should get a room!

Hitch
17th December 2014, 10:26 AM
no the term bank is symbolic to the flow of current(cy). It flows between banks. All the worlds commerce is lex mercatoria, founded on ocean going traders, the law of admiralty, sailing under the protection of a flag, you must pay homage to that "privilege".

All people are born vassals (vessels), birthed in a delivery room on a ward (of the state). Registered under a flag. When they reach the age of "Consent to Contract" of 18 then they can enter in to commerce.

If someone cannot operate their vessel correctly they may find them selves run aground or "Bankrupt" on the sea of commerce. It is all symbolic, just like the other symbols, eyes, pyramids, obelisks, stars, goats, badges and so on.

OK, I'm getting it now, not sure why it took long enough other than I'm an asshole in this thread. Sorry folks for being so hard headed.

Dogman
17th December 2014, 10:29 AM
OK, I'm getting it now, not sure why it took long enough other than I'm an asshole in this thread. Sorry folks for being so hard headed.

Sometimes that can be a virtue.

Standing for what one believes in, right or wrong, but willing to learn!

Horn
17th December 2014, 12:32 PM
Sometimes that can be a virtue.

More faux bollards please!

Next they'll be telling us batteries are heavier when fully charged.

Neuro
17th December 2014, 12:38 PM
More faux bollards please!

Next they'll be telling us batteries are heavier when fully charged.
Shouldn't they be? According to Einstein E=mc2, or m=E/c2. If you take energy from the battery to generate photones or electromagnetic fields, shouldn't mass go down, ever so little?

Dogman
17th December 2014, 12:40 PM
More faux bollards please!

Next they'll be telling us batteries are heavier when fully charged. Naw!

They are a tad lighter in two ways!

At least lead/acid types!

;D

Truly!

Horn
17th December 2014, 12:54 PM
Shouldn't they be? According to Einstein E=mc2, or m=E/c2. If you take energy from the battery to generate photones or electromagnetic fields, shouldn't mass go down, ever so little?

If your basing your entire world on a sensation, yes.

The sensation ( or feely effect ) we call weight or graveity.

Dogman
17th December 2014, 12:58 PM
If your basing your entire world on a sensation, yes.

The sensation ( or feely effect ) we call weight or graveity.

Not to mention the gravity of the electrolyte which is also related to weight/density!

Neuro
17th December 2014, 12:58 PM
If your basing your entire world on a sensation, yes.

The sensation ( or feely effect ) we call weight or graveity.
Isn't weight related somehow to mass and heavyness?

Horn
17th December 2014, 02:31 PM
Isn't weight related somehow to mass and heavyness?

With a stick.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDs8bw34ivM

Brain = Cellulite

govcheetos
18th December 2014, 07:49 AM
All people are born vassals (vessels), birthed in a delivery room on a ward (of the state). Registered under a flag. When they reach the age of "Consent to Contract" of 18 then they can enter in to commerce.



Before the age of consent they lack "capacity".

mick silver
18th December 2014, 01:01 PM
Stage 1: Financial collapse. Faith in “business as usual” is lost.

Stage 2: Commercial collapse. Faith that “the market shall provide” is lost.

Stage 3: Political collapse. Faith that “the government will take care of you” is lost.

Stage 4: Social collapse. Faith that “your people will take care of you” is lost.

Stage 5: Cultural collapse. Faith in “the goodness of humanity” is lost.

Neuro
19th December 2014, 03:47 AM
Stage 1: Financial collapse. Faith in “business as usual” is lost.

Stage 2: Commercial collapse. Faith that “the market shall provide” is lost.

Stage 3: Political collapse. Faith that “the government will take care of you” is lost.

Stage 4: Social collapse. Faith that “your people will take care of you” is lost.

Stage 5: Cultural collapse. Faith in “the goodness of humanity” is lost.
Good list but doesn't it go in the opposite direction generally. Like the Cultural collapse occurred years ago 60's-70's. Social collapse has occurred. Political collapse somewhere around 2000. Commercial collapse 2007-8, just averted a financial collapse at that point, and we still have that to look forward too!

Horn
19th December 2014, 07:14 AM
Correct Neuro, That is the hope list, the faith list is inverted and proceeds it.

http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/pPecorino/PHIL_of_RELIGION_TEXT/CHAPTER_10_DEFINITION/Faith-Hope.htm