PDA

View Full Version : The 2.6 Billion Dollar Welfare Payment That The U.S. Government Gives To Wal-Mart



Serpo
29th December 2014, 08:24 PM
The 2.6 Billion Dollar Welfare Payment That The U.S. Government Gives To Wal-Mart (http://www.activistpost.com/2014/12/the-26-billion-dollar-welfare-payment.html)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xewtUSsI8DE/VKFQ2Lok23I/AAAAAAAAjJ0/djJ0VuERasU/s1600/Wal-Mart-Says-Serious-Inflation-Is-Coming-300x300.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xewtUSsI8DE/VKFQ2Lok23I/AAAAAAAAjJ0/djJ0VuERasU/s1600/Wal-Mart-Says-Serious-Inflation-Is-Coming-300x300.jpg)Michael Snyder
Activist Post (http://www.activistpost.com/2014/12/the-26-billion-dollar-welfare-payment.html)

Should the federal government be spending billions of dollars to pump up Wal-Mart’s profits? I know that question sounds really bizarre, but unfortunately this is essentially what is happening.

Because Wal-Mart does not pay them enough money, hundreds of thousands of Wal-Mart employees enroll in Medicaid, food stamps and other social welfare programs. Even though Wal-Mart makes enormous profits, they refuse to properly take care of their employees, so the federal government has to do it.

And of course this is not just a Wal-Mart problem. There are hundreds of other major corporations doing exactly the same thing. And they will keep on doing it as long as they can because relying on the federal government to take care of their employees allows them to make much larger profits. This gives these companies an enormous competitive advantage and it distorts the marketplace. If you love the free enterprise system, you should be aghast at this. Our big corporations have become the biggest “welfare queens” of all, and Wal-Mart is near the top of that list.

Does your local Wal-Mart store seem like it needs help from the federal government?

Of course not.

Wal-Marts all over the nation were absolutely packed this holiday season, but according to a recent Bloomberg article (http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-12-18/always-low-wages-wal-mart-s-other-choices), the average amount of welfare that Wal-Mart employees receive from the government each year breaks down to about $420,000 per store…

Wal-Mart’s low wages have led to full-time employees seeking public assistance. These are not the 47 percent, lazy, unmotivated bums. Rather, these are people working physical, often difficult jobs. They receive $2.66 billion in government help each year (including $1 billion in healthcare assistance). That works out to about $5,815 per worker. And about $420,000 per store.




Does that make you angry?

It should.

Today, Wal-Mart employs approximately 1.2 million people in the United States, and it makes a yearly profit of about 17 billion dollars.

So why does it need 2.6 billion dollars of help from the U.S. government?

Wal-Mart is a colossal money-making behemoth. Just consider the following numbers (http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-12-18/always-low-wages-wal-mart-s-other-choices)…

The size of Wal-Mart is sometimes difficult to visualize. To put it into some context, consider the following: 100 million U.S. shoppers patronize Wal-Mart stores every week. Wal-Mart has twice the number employees of the U.S. Postal Service, a larger global computer network than the Pentagon, and the world’s largest fleet of trucks. Americans spend about $36 million dollars per hour at the stores. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other company in the world, capturing one of every four dollars spent on food in the U.S. The average American family of four spends over $4,000 a year there. Each week, it has 200 million customers at more than 10,400 stores in 27 countries. If the company were an independent country, it would be the 25th largest economy in the world.Wal-Mart does well enough to be able to pay their workers a livable wage.

And yet they refuse to do it.

Shame on them.

Meanwhile, the six heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton have as much wealth as the poorest one-third of all Americans combined (http://www.businessinsider.com/the-walton-family-has-as-much-money-as-the-bottom-third-of-the-us-2013-1).

This reminds me of something that I read in the fifth chapter of James (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5&version=MEV) the other day…

Come now, you rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be a witness against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have stored up treasures for the last days. Indeed the wages that you kept back by fraud from the laborers who harvested your fields are crying, and the cries of those who harvested have entered into the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have lived in pleasure on the earth and have been wayward. You have nourished your hearts as in a day of slaughter.But we continue to reward this behavior, don’t we?

100 million of us continue to visit Wal-Mart every single week, and we continue to fill up our shopping carts with cheap products that are made outside this country.

We refuse to support American workers and American businesses, and this is a recipe for utter disaster. For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled "National Economic Suicide: The U.S. Trade Deficit With China Just Hit A New Record High (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/national-economic-suicide-the-u-s-trade-deficit-with-china-sets-a-new-record-high)".

The truth is that we cannot consume our way to prosperity. When we consume far more wealth than we produce, we pile up debt and we become poorer as a nation.

And as a country we have become exceedingly cold-hearted toward our workers. If you truly love free markets and capitalism, you should be encouraging big companies to pay their workers properly. Instead, we are moving closer and closer to the slave labor model employed by China and other communist nations with each passing day. Sadly, I am becoming increasingly convinced that many prominent “pro-business” voices in America today are actually closet communists. They seem to want everything to be made in China and for American workers to be paid just like Chinese workers.

At this point, the U.S. middle class is well on the way to being destroyed. As I have written about previously, 40 percent of all American workers now make less than what a minimum wage worker made back in 1968 (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/40-percent-of-u-s-workers-make-less-than-what-a-full-time-minimum-wage-worker-made-in-1968) after you account for inflation.

How is the middle class supposed to survive in such an environment?

And for any “pro-business” people that want to defend Wal-Mart, do you actually like paying suffocating taxes to support all of the people that are being forced on to the safety net?

What is our society going to look like as millions more Americans become dependent on the federal government each year? Government dependence is already at an all-time record high (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/21-facts-that-prove-that-dependence-on-the-government-is-out-of-control-in-america). How much worse do things have to get before we admit that we have a real problem?

Unfortunately, it looks like our problems are only going to accelerate in 2015. Thanks to the stunning decline in the price of oil (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/anyone-believes-collapsing-oil-prices-good-economy-crazy), we are starting to lose good paying jobs in the energy industry (http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2014/12/here-come-oil-sector-layoffs.html)…

One company caught in the industry downturn is Hercules Offshore Inc. The Houston-based firm is laying off 324 employees, roughly 15% of its workforce, because oil companies aren’t renewing contracts for its offshore drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico while crude prices are depressed.

“It’s been breathtaking,” said Jim Noe, executive vice president of Hercules, which was founded in 2004. “We’ve never seen this glut of supply and dislocation in oil markets. So we’re not surprised to see a significant decline in demand for our services.”These are jobs that we cannot afford to lose.

Since the end of the last recession, the energy industry has been the leading creator of good paying jobs in America.

But now as the U.S. energy boom goes bust, it might lead the way in job losses.

In order to have a middle class, we have got to have middle class jobs.

Unfortunately, those kinds of jobs are disappearing and the entire U.S. economy is moving toward the Wal-Mart model.

In the end, we will all pay a great price for such foolishness.

This article first appeared here at the Economic Collapse Blog (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/2-6-billion-dollar-welfare-payment-u-s-government-gives-wal-mart).
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/12/the-26-billion-dollar-welfare-payment.html#more

crimethink
29th December 2014, 08:46 PM
Capitalist Wal-Mart loves so-called "socialized" medicine. Privatized profits, socialized liabilities.

Wal-Mart is proof that "voluntaryism" simply does not work. A rich man will almost never do his duty willingly.

Hitch
29th December 2014, 09:43 PM
The solution to this problem is simple. Boycott Walmart. I haven't set foot in one in years. I am doing just fine, in fact, you don't need Walmart to live a good and healthy, happy life.

Wish the masses understand that? doubt it.

Will you be part of the solution or the problem? Seriously, ask yourself this.

Easy answer, if you go to Walmart, YOU, yes sir, are part of the problem.

Millions of stupid sheep created this. Not Walmart. We allowed this to happen, every dollar you spend there feeds the beast.

I'm thinking of relocating overseas because of this. I will not live in a country owned by Walmart. Give me fresh fish tacos off the beach.

ShortJohnSilver
29th December 2014, 11:20 PM
How much does WMT make off the EBT program? And how much does JP Morgan Chase, who runs the backend processing, make from the debit card fees? My guess, a lot more than $2B each year, apiece.

crimethink
30th December 2014, 01:13 AM
Easy answer, if you go to Walmart, YOU, yes sir, are part of the problem.

You think most other employers, including so-called "mom and pop" outfits, are not using the same technique of paying workers nothing, and then expecting them to get health insurance from Medicaid? They sell the same Chinese-made shit, only at higher prices, but with no actual increased benefit to workers.

The solution is single-payer, using the premiums Americans already pay which can fund universal care, but do not get, since most of that money goes to executives & shareholders.

crimethink
30th December 2014, 01:14 AM
How much does WMT make off the EBT program? And how much does JP Morgan Chase, who runs the backend processing, make from the debit card fees? My guess, a lot more than $2B each year, apiece.

Eliminating the unnecessary parasites - middle-men, superfluous administrators, and money-changers - would free up hundreds of billions, or more, for useful purposes.

mick silver
30th December 2014, 05:15 AM
Come now, you rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be a witness against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have stored up treasures for the last days. Indeed the wages that you kept back by fraud from the laborers who harvested your fields are crying, and the cries of those who harvested have entered into the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have lived in pleasure on the earth and have been wayward. You have nourished your hearts as in a day of slaughter.

Ares
30th December 2014, 07:10 AM
Capitalist Wal-Mart loves so-called "socialized" medicine. Privatized profits, socialized liabilities.

Wal-Mart is proof that "voluntaryism" simply does not work. A rich man will almost never do his duty willingly.

Please, Wal-mart couldn't skirt the liabilities if there wasn't a government safety net. They would LOSE workers to other employers who paid better wages in a free market environment. Which we all know the U.S. hasn't been since at least the 70's and probably earlier.

Twisted Titan
30th December 2014, 07:34 AM
This is Corporatisim at its finest.

The incestous relationship between gubbermint and private companies.

Ares
30th December 2014, 07:53 AM
The is corporatisim at its finest.

The incestous relationship between gubbermint and private companies

Quoted for truth

Spectrism
30th December 2014, 09:58 AM
This article only looks at one side. It totally misses something enormous. The customers. In my local Walmart, about half the sales / purchases are made with EBT cards. This is government welfare providing the market for Walmart. I think this far and away dwarfs the employee welfare numbers.

crimethink
30th December 2014, 03:45 PM
Please, Wal-mart couldn't skirt the liabilities if there wasn't a government safety net. They would LOSE workers to other employers who paid better wages in a free market environment.

You really assume people are incredibly dumb to swallow such horseshit. No corporation is going to pay any more than they have to. And your so-called "free market" would pay people 50 cents/hour if it could. The corporations run the government, not vice-versa. It's why they imposed "Obamacare," which offloaded their responsibilities to the public.

The little people have been promised endless "better quality at lower cost" by the capitalists for generations. It never materializes.

Ares
30th December 2014, 05:32 PM
You really assume people are incredibly dumb to swallow such horseshit. No corporation is going to pay any more than they have to. And your so-called "free market" would pay people 50 cents/hour if it could. The corporations run the government, not vice-versa. It's why they imposed "Obamacare," which offloaded their responsibilities to the public.

The little people have been promised endless "better quality at lower cost" by the capitalists for generations. It never materializes.

You're stupid enough to believe the government is going to make employers pay them more? Really?

The free market dictates wages. This is a non-discussion. In all honesty you shouldn't have people dependent on wal-mart to make a living. But since our government in its infinite "wisdom" has gutted our manufacturing sector and allowed via tax breaks to send all of those jobs overseas. People are left working meanial jobs that kids were working a generation ago. Benefits, high wages are not to be had for aisle stockers, cheakouts or door greeters,

ShortJohnSilver
30th December 2014, 10:21 PM
BTW Costco pays their employees decently, has hardly any employee turnover (less overall training costs since people stick around for years), and for the most part delivers good value for the price.

crimethink
31st December 2014, 12:24 AM
You're stupid enough to believe the government is going to make employers pay them more? Really?

The free market dictates wages. This is a non-discussion.


Try again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_law

Yes, we know people like you would prefer the so-called "free market" to dictate wages down to 50 cents an hour. With no overtime. No weekends. No sick leave. No vacation. No benefits whatsoever. "Don't like it? Go find another job somewhere, HA HA HA HA!"




But since our government in its infinite "wisdom" has gutted our manufacturing sector and allowed via tax breaks to send all of those jobs overseas.


Bullshit. Corporations stabbed America in the back, and simply purchased the legislation & policies necessary to make their treason possible. Corporations that "offshored" production should suffer the death penalty (permanent cancellation of their charters).




People are left working meanial jobs that kids were working a generation ago. Benefits, high wages are not to be had for aisle stockers, cheakouts or door greeters,

You are in eternal denial that capitalism is focused only on one thing: amassing ever-more capital. People are "human resources" to be used & discarded as necessary. "The government" is only a problem when the government is a purchased instrument of capitalists.

crimethink
31st December 2014, 12:26 AM
BTW Costco pays their employees decently, has hardly any employee turnover (less overall training costs since people stick around for years), and for the most part delivers good value for the price.

A very exceptional exception to the rule. Similar to Henry Ford's practices decades ago. Unfortunately, nowhere near the norm.

Ares
31st December 2014, 05:06 AM
Try again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_law

Yes, we know people like you would prefer the so-called "free market" to dictate wages down to 50 cents an hour. With no overtime. No weekends. No sick leave. No vacation. No benefits whatsoever. "Don't like it? Go find another job somewhere, HA HA HA HA!"

I never figured you for a socialist / communist. With that same token of thought, can you show me anytime in history that price controls (don't kid yourself, minimum wage is a price control) has been successful? Also Mr. I just want the original Constitutional Republic, where is the governments authority in the Constitution to mandate minimum wages?





Bullshit. Corporations stabbed America in the back, and simply purchased the legislation & policies necessary to make their treason possible. Corporations that "offshored" production should suffer the death penalty (permanent cancellation of their charters).

What was bullshit about that? You're all over the place here. You want government to price control peoples wages, then accuse that same government through bought and paid for politicians of letting corporations offshore the labor. So which way do you want it Mr. Workers paradise?



You are in eternal denial that capitalism is focused only on one thing: amassing ever-more capital. People are "human resources" to be used & discarded as necessary. "The government" is only a problem when the government is a purchased instrument of capitalists.

Denial? Hardly, I know I am as well as any worker is disposable. I have no illusion about that. Neither should you. When you VOLUNTEER to go to work you are agreeing to certain terms and conditions on employment. The hand that gives is above the hand that receives. But I can also leave to go find somewhere else to work if I don't like the terms, or if the terms change. Or I can choose to start up my own business. But with those very same price controls you advocate for, I won't be hiring anyone for quiet a while.

So while in a non-government mandated price control world I could hire a kid still in high school and show him or her how to troubleshoot diagnose hardware / software and work on customer relations. But since this is a government mandated price control world, I can't afford to hire anyone for quite a while until I grow my business to the point where further growth requires additional help.

You're never going to get rid of Governments being bought and paid for. Monied interest in government have been a time tested endeavor since mankind has allowed government to exist. That is the risk you take by having a government in the first place. Now lay in your bed that you so very much advocate for.

mick silver
31st December 2014, 09:58 AM
all one needs to do is look around and ask what's not price control by the government then let me know , make a list for us to see

crimethink
31st December 2014, 10:57 AM
I never figured you for a socialist / communist.


I should have expected such a low-brow response from you.

Of course, the "opposite" of Jewish capitalism is Jewish communism. :rolleyes:

Ares
31st December 2014, 11:06 AM
I should have expected such a low-brow response from you.

Of course, the "opposite" of Jewish capitalism is Jewish communism. :rolleyes:

LOL low-brow? How so? You advocate government price controls on labor. I don't. I'm for limited or nonexistent government. You said you are for limited government, but I find that hard to believe.

I'll ask you again, where does the government in your ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC have the authority to mandate minimum wages?

I'll just keep expecting a non-answer, accusing me of being a jew and or a jew supporter. :rolleyes:

crimethink
31st December 2014, 11:37 AM
I'll just keep expecting a non-answer, accusing me of being a jew and or a jew supporter.

I don't intend to "debate" anything with someone who is not sincere.

Ares
31st December 2014, 11:46 AM
I don't intend to "debate" anything with someone who is not sincere.

I expected nothing less.


I'll ask you again, where does the government in your ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC have the authority to mandate minimum wages?

The answer is that the federal government DOES NOT have authority to set minimum wages. If it wants that authority the Constitution needs to be amended.

But since you are a "limited Constitutional Republican form of government advocate" (LMAO HA! HA! HA! HA!) you can't let anything like the law of the land get in the way of personal belief now can we?

StreetsOfGold
31st December 2014, 12:22 PM
Give me fresh fish tacos off the beach.

Just make sure those are not from beaches near Japan ;)

Dogman
31st December 2014, 12:36 PM
Just make sure those are not from beaches near Japan ;)

A few degrees either side of the equator would do nicely!