Are Australians Already Enslaved?

[Serpo]

Environment Protections & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

The act states in s3, that
1) The objects of this Act are:
(a) to provide for the protection of the environment,
(d) to promote a co‑operative approach to the protection and management of the environment involving governments, the community, land‑holders and indigenous peoples; and
(e) to assist in the co‑operative implementation of Australia's international environemental responsibilities

The act then states in s528 Definitions that
"environment" includes:
(a) ecosystems and their constituent parts, including people and communities


Now the meaning of the word “People” under Australian law is not defined.

The meaning of person is in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 s 22

Meaning of certain words
(1) In any Act, unless the contrary intention appears:
(a) expressions used to denote persons generally (such as " person ", "party", "someone", "anyone", "no‑one", "one", "another" and "whoever"), include a body politic or corporate as well as an individual;
(aa) individual means a natural person ;
(Very important to note the use of the words contrary and includes. Contrary tell us that this meaning applies unless there is a “differing” or “inconsistent” meaning. Includes however is a word that gathers every definition under its meaning. There can be no inconsistency of meaning, because all the contrary intentions have been gathered under that word “includes”. At no time in this Act is the word “exclude” used in any reference to free will, sovereignty, private ownership rights, etc of any kind.)

The legal meaning of “people” as defined in Blacks Law Dictionary No 1
“A state; as the people of the state of New York. A nation of its collective and political capacity. “

So, the only definition of ‘people’ we have is the legal interpretation, & the creators of this International Treaty, have been very careful not to place this over the individual, but over the collective of individuals.

Therefore, to prove you have these rules now enslaving you, you must first identify yourself with the collective.

One interpretation may be found in the Criminal Code Act 1995, where people is always defined as more than one person by implication. (More research will be necessary re this word.)

This means that when the Australian government makes rules about the environment, those rules include YOU (under the collective) in the jurisdiction.

This then allows the Australian Government to apply restrictions, orders, enforcements and the like over YOUR (under the collective) activities as defined in the UN Global Biodiversity Assessment Report.

Hence such imposed activities as Fluoride – being the imposition of a supposedly healthy activity OVER the people and the community, who of course come under the responsibility of govt via the EPBC Act 1999. They are making sure the “environment” is “healthy”.

YOU are NO longer a free will person, because the government have “stolen” your free will and replaced it with their rules.

If we go to the list of unsustainable activities that were listed on the UN The Global Biodiversity Assessment Report - they are ALL human activities.

These activities involve leisure, work, homes and food creation involving land use.

All activities, on land, are defined as unsustainable.

How then are people supposed to remain alive if every activity they perform, on land, is unsustainable.

And if any activity, on land, that sustains the People, is no longer permissible under the “global crisis” as promulgated by Gore – are the People going to be allowed to continue to have children, make personal choices as to the kind of life they wish to have, live and work where they choose, eat the kind of food they choose, etc?

Here is a list of the things that the The Global Biodiversity Assessment Report directed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) considers Unsustainable -
Ski Runs - Grazing of Livestock: cows, sheep, goats, horses - Disturbance of the Soil Surface - Large hoofed animals, compaction of soil, reducing filtration - Fencing of Pastures or Paddocks - Agriculture - Modern Farm Production Systems - Chemical Fertilizers - Herbicides - Building Materials - Industrial Activities - Human-Made caves of brick and mortar, concrete and steel - Paved and Tarred roads, highways, rails - Railroads - Floor and Wall Tiles - Aquaculture - Technology Improvements - Farmlands, Ranglands - Pastures, Ranglands - Pastures - Fish Ponds - Plantations - Modern Hunting - Harvesting of Timber - Logging Activities - Fossil Fuels - Used for driving various kinds of machines - Dams, Reseroirs, Straightening Rivers - Power Line Construction -Economic systems that fail to set a proper value on the environment - Inappropriate Social Structures - Weaknesses in Legal and Institutional Systems - Modern Attitudes toward nature - Judaeo-Christian-Islamic religions - Private Property - Population Growth - Human Population Density - Consumerism - Fragmentation of Habitat - cemeteries, derelict lands, rubbish tips, etc - Sewers, Drain Systems, Pipelines - Land use that serves human needs - Fisheries - Golf Courses - Scuba Diving - Synthetic drugs - Fragmentation - Agricultural development, Forestry Urbanization (impervious surfaces)


The other issue to understand is that an International Treaty such as the EPBC Act 1999, is a “contractural” arrangement between two or more different parties.

If this act has effectively “enslaved” the people by removing their free will & their sovereignty, who are the other parties outside the Aust Federal Govt who now have certain as yet undetermined rights of foreign sovereignty in Australia and over the people?

http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2009/12/are-australians-already-enslaved.html

[Glass]

yes person is a difficult one to define from statute based on my research.

UN, Agenda 21, Eclie or what ever it is called. Human existence is basically the problem. I hope this one won't become a directive when sky net becomes self aware otherwise we are in trouble.

Question: Can a Government enter into a Treaty with another party who is not an actual Government? The UN is not an actual government and is supposed to be an arbitration organisations to deal with disputes between countries, not create directives and issue edicts. It seems they have expanded their list of responsibilities and authorities.

UN Treaties would be the first ones I tore up. Then immunity for pharmaceutical companies would go next.

[crimethink]

Australia lost most of its freedom when the White Australia policy was abandoned, and lost the rest when the National Firearms Agreement was imposed.

[Serpo]

yes person is a difficult one to define from statute based on my research.

UN, Agenda 21, Eclie or what ever it is called. Human existence is basically the problem. I hope this one won't become a directive when sky net becomes self aware otherwise we are in trouble.

Question: Can a Government enter into a Treaty with another party who is not an actual Government? The UN is not an actual government and is supposed to be an arbitration organisations to deal with disputes between countries, not create directives and issue edicts. It seems they have expanded their list of responsibilities and authorities.

UN Treaties would be the first ones I tore up. Then immunity for pharmaceutical companies would go next.

but what does "people"mean.............

[Serpo]

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



























The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) is an Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute) of the Parliament of Australia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Australia) that provides a framework for protection of the Australian environment, including its biodiversity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodiversity) and its natural and culturally significant places. Enacted on 17 July 2000, it established a range of processes to help protect and promote the recovery of threatened species and ecological communities, and preserve significant places from decline.
The EPBC Act established the use of Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations, which have provided for the issuing of approvals and permits for a range of activities on Commonwealth land and land affecting the Commonwealth. For example, commercial picking of wildflowers is regulated under the EPBC Act, and cannot be undertaken without an appropriate permit. Failure to comply with the Act can result in penalties including remediation of damage, court injunctions, and criminal and civil penalties.
The Act is administered by the Department of the Environment.[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#cite_note-1) On 16 October 2013 the Environment Minister announced that the Government had approved a framework for a "one stop shop" environmental approval process to accredit state planning systems under national environmental law, to create a single environmental assessment and approval process for nationally protected matters.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#cite_note-2)

The Act identifies seven matters of national environmental significance:


World Heritage properties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_Site)
National heritage places (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_National_Heritage_List) including overseas places of historic significance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Overseas_Places_of_Historic_Significance_t o_Australia)
Wetlands (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetlands) of international importance (Ramsar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsar_Convention) wetlands)
Threatened species (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatened_species) and ecological communities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_%28ecology%29)
Migratory species (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Migration)
Commonwealth marine areas
Nuclear actions (including uranium mining (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining) & building of nuclear waste (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_waste) repositories)[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#cite_note-3)

Lists of threatened species are drawn up under the act, for instance Threatened fauna of Australia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatened_fauna_of_Australia), and these lists are the primary reference to threatened species in Australia.
Contents




1 Treaties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#Treaties)
2 2007 review (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#2007_review)
3 The Hawke Report (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#The_Hawke_Report)
4 Related acts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#Related_acts)

4.1 State acts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#State_acts)


5 See also (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#See_also)
6 Notes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#Notes)
7 References (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#References)
8 External links (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999#External_links)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Protection_and_Biodiversity_Conservati on_Act_1999

[Glass]

just reading through that blog. It seems to have stopped 3 years ago. Maybe something happened to the author.

Found this:

It appears that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900, ratified on 1 January 1901 is an act of the heads of the independent colonies of the Australian dominion, which means that the Constitution of the People is still a draft document.

As the people had formally agreed to this document, all state and federal government in Australia are in fact, a foreign entity to the rights of the people of the Commonwealth.

As our land ownership is a Deed in Trust and Equity with the Queen of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900, a foreign government has no lawful right to step inside that Deed and remove rights inherent in it.

In order to do so, government have created registration processes that manipulate our agreement. They have also created a new jurisdiction known as the Environment, with which they have enslaved the People as a plural, thereby creating legislation which enforces the People as an individual.

link (http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2010_01_01_archive.html)

Never considered it like that before but that is a succinct description.

[Serpo]

Sunday, January 10, 2010

An Overview of the Brigalow Corp Takeover of Australia
The Queensland Constitution 2001 / The Brigalow Corporation /
The Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD & all other states of Australia.

GOVERNOR OF QUEENSLAND

1. Queensland Constitution 1867 was reframed with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
2. January 1998, QLD National Party documented a move to place the QLD Governor in the Government as a Parliamentary Secretary under the QLD Constitution 1867 / Constitution (Parliamentary Secretaries) Act ©The State of QLD 1996.
3. This became official January 29 1999, the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 was reprinted.
4. Thus the Governor was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but a Public Servant of the QLD Government.
5. He was still using the Public Seal of the State on behalf of the Premier and Parliament of QLD and maintained the appearance of the Governor to the Sovereign People of the State.

CROWN IN QUEENSLAND (& AUSTRALIA)

1. In 1973, Gough Whitlam brought in the Queen of Australia through the adoption of the Royal & Parliamentary Titles Act 1927
2. This removed Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Assigns as enshrined in the Commonwealth of Australian Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and replaced the Crown with the Queen of Australia.
3. On the 19 December 1973, the Whitlam Government also removed the Great Seal of Britain from use and replaced it with the Great Seal of Australia.
4. In 1986, Bob Hawke brought in the Australia Act.
5. This is the Constitution of the new Parliament of Australia.
6. This is not the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 of the People.
7. This act removed the ability of the UK Parliament to make laws for Australia, making Britain a foreign country. This was defined by the High Court in the case Sue v Hill 1999.

THE BRIGALOW CORPORATION & PRIVATE LAND OWNERSHIP

1. During the early 1990’s all important and relevant Acts were changed and framed, but were adjourned without a definite date of reprinting.
2. On 3 December 2001, the Queensland Constitution 2001 came into being.
3. On this day, this ACT became the “Fundamental Law of QLD”.
4. 7 June 2002, all the framed Acts were reprinted and became law.
5. QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in that state.
6. 15 July 2002, The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3 created in QLD a Corporate Government.
The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commissions under No. 0001244818.
7. The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555.
8. The old crowns lands act (Qld) was converted to the Land Act 1994 (Qld), and at section 4(1) the Land Administration Commission was renamed Brigalow Corporation.
9. The Land Act 1994 – Reprint No 10c, Part 7A, Section 506C states that the Corporation (Brigalow Corp) represents the Crown.
10. Culminating in the Beattie Govt introduction of the QLD Constitution 2001, QLD government administrations had reworked backward every piece of Federal and state legislation, removing any connection to and mention of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, British law and the Royal Seal of England.
11. These acts were then reworked forward, replacing the removed elements with the Queen of Australia (as created by the Whitlam Govt in 1973) and the Great Seal of both Australia and QLD.
12. This means that the legislation contained in those acts are now “governed” by the government of those Seals, not the government of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900.
13. The Australia Waste Lands Act 1855 was reprinted in 1996 under the Seal of QLD, and because the Queen of Australia was also now sealed with the Seal of QLD, this effectively created a QLD “ownership” of all Crown land in Australia.
14. And as the introduction of the Corporations (Q) Act 1900 (Q) Reprint No 3 had created a Corporate Govt, this effectively meant all Crown land “ownership” was now under the control of the Qld Corporation, known as the Brigalow Corp.
15. All Crown land, assets and infrastructure in Australia including schools, hospitals, roads, etc are subject to and responsible to the Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the QLD Constitution 2001.
16. All Sovereign People are now persons under the Corporation, All persons are chattel ( a piece of property that is moveable).
17. Their land, bank accounts and all items of ownership are now assets under the Brigalow Corporation.
18. The Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Magistrate’s Courts are now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD, and as such must obey the QLD Constitution 2001.
19. The Australian Constitution, the Common Law & Equity, the High Court and the Federal Government no longer have any superior governance over the State of QLD.
20. The State of QLD and the Sovereign People of QLD have only Civil and Statute Law in this state.
21. As private ownership can not exist under Civil and Statute Law, all private equity and inheritance in the State is now the property of “the State”.

LEGAL STRUCTURE

1. Under the civil law system, which is now subject to the Uniform Civil Procedures Rules of the Supreme Court Act 1991(Qld), every person is guilty until they prove their innocence.
2. The Common Law has been repealed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Q), Reprint No. 2, reprinted as in force 2 March 2001 © State of Q 2001
3. This states that the Governor in Council may make rules of court under this act for the Supreme Court, District court, Magistrates Court, registries and other matters mentioned in Schedule 1
4. Schedule 1 has jurisdiction over the civil, criminal and appellate courts, Parties & Proceedings, Defence, Service of Documents, Pleadings, Disclosure, Preservation of Rights & Property, Ending Proceedings Early, Court Supervision, Evidence, Jurisdiction of Judicial Registrars, Trails & Other Hearings, Particular Proceedings, probate, Contempt of Court, Vexatious Proceedings, Trusts, Costs, Appeals etc, Money Orders Enforcement, Foreign Judgment Enforcements, Corporations, Miscellaneous.
5. Therefore the Governor in Council now makes all the Rules of the Court for these matters.
6. The Queensland Constitution 2001 Chapters 1 & 2 refer to the Legislative Assembly and the Governor. In Chapter 3, Part 1, sect 27 – “The Governor in Council is the Governor acting with the advice of Executive Council.”
7. Sect 30 – “The Constitution Act 1867 contains provisions about the office of Governor. At Chapter 3, Part 4, sect 48, those “appointed as members…by the Governor…..”
8. This Executive council is given separate law makings Powers of the State at Chapter 3, Part 5, Sect 51, where is states, the Executive Government of the State of QLD (the “State) = The State may exercise its powers……
9. In Chapter 3, Part 5, Sect 55 (1) – “A minister may delegate a power of the State to an appropriately qualified officer of the State.” (“officer of the state” means – a chief executive………………….)
10. Therefore the Premier of QLD must always be the leader of the Executive Body and is now the Executive Leader of the Parliament of QLD.
11. Simply put – the Premier is delegated the power through his role as Chief Executive. This power controls the Executive Government of QLD. The Governor acts on the advice of the Executive Government.
12. Therefore the Premier is now the “Crown” in Queensland.

QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION

1. All government tiers, including Local Council are now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD.
2. The public officials are not public officials of “the Crown” but public officials of “the State” of QLD

THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH

1. The British colonies in Australia were all independent, under military law.
2. In 1885, the independent states had interstate agreements for trade, etc under the Federal Councils of Australasia Act 1855.
3. As free settlers began to grow, the People decided to unite under 1 form of government.
4. 10 years of conventions and referendums culminated in the Draft Constitution of the People which went to England for ratification.
5. On July 9 1900, Queen Victoria signed the amended draft Constitution and returned it to Australia.
6. At this point a final referendum was required to acquire the agreement of the people to this amended Constitution.
7. This was not done, the heads of each independent colony instead agreed FOR AND ON BEHALF of the People.
8. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was the result, brought into Australian law on 1 January 1901.
9. The first 8 clauses are British law.
10. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution starts at clause 9.
11. The Constitution lays out the rules and regulations under which Parliament may administer government to the People.
12. There are no entities known as a Prime Minister or a Premier to be found in the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK).
13. As the Preamble states, the People agreed to be united under one indissoluble Commonwealth.
14. Therefore the people are the Commonwealth.
15. The Commonwealth is defined in the Constitution as a State.
16. Therefore the People of the Commonwealth are their “own” state.
17. Section 117 states, verbatim, that the People governed by the Queen (of the Constitution), and members of a state (of the Commonwealth), cannot have their rights removed by another state (that perhaps being the state they physically live in), WITHOUT
18. Section 128 – A REFERENDUM
19. There has been no Referendum of the Sovereign People to approve any of these moves. This means they are Ultra vires, an act beyond the powers or authority of the government.

It appears that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900, ratified on 1 January 1901 is an act of the heads of the independent colonies of the Australian dominion, which means that the Constitution of the People is still a draft document.

As the people had formally agreed to this document, all state and federal government in Australia are in fact, a foreign entity to the rights of the people of the Commonwealth.

As our land ownership is a Deed in Trust and Equity with the Queen of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900, a foreign government has no lawful right to step inside that Deed and remove rights inherent in it.

In order to do so, government have created registration processes that manipulate our agreement. They have also created a new jurisdiction known as the Environment, with which they have enslaved the People as a plural, thereby creating legislation which enforces the People as an individual.

However, they have not asked our permission to create the form of government under which they now legislate OVER the People.

http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2010/01/overview-of-brigalow-corp-takeover-of.html

[Glass]

There are a couple of letters on that web site from the Governor of Queensland and from someone else. Premiers office or something. Answering questions about these "New" constitutions which have illegally been bought in.

QLD got a new constitution in 2001, without a referendum to the people or anything, completely in breach of the constitution in effect at the time. The replies go onto say how they are supporting and abiding by "THE CONSTITUTION" then go on to state they are abiding by the illegal and unlawful one. So it's completely in your face and the people who send these letters either do not understand what they are looking at OR they fully understand and think people won't work it out.

If a law is created or changed illegally or unlawfully it is void so abiding by it is a crime and they completely ignore the point that the current constitution is invalid and that the inquiry was regarding the original, real and still lawfully in effect constitution.

I've heard politicians here in Western Australia claim in the media that a) WA does not have a constitution or b) WA does not have a written one and we should write one and c) A constitution is not needed because "The State" is sovereign.

All of which are complete lies. We have recently been told they are now going to sell off our highways and make them tollways. Things are getting bad.

[Serpo]

http://www.fnq.cc/brigalow_corporation.html

[Glass]

http://www.fnq.cc/brigalow_corporation.html

Very interesting Serpo. I can hear Ponces words in my mind. Land Patent. I wonder how that would fair.

Certainly Brigalow Corporation is deregistered now.

I don't think the "state" has sovereignty or the authority to dictate land use for a land patent parcel. Could be wrong but I don't think so.

This is good reading on Fee Simple and land ownership.
http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2009/12/grant-in-fee-simple.html

I thought that patent and fee simple are different.

[palani]

Seeking to reduce pollution is an environmental issue. Right?

pollution (n.)
mid-14c., "discharge of semen other than during sex,"