PDA

View Full Version : It is all International Law


palani
9th January 2015, 05:07 PM
From THE HISTORY OF THE COMMON LAW by Hale

http://i62.tinypic.com/2whgq3n.jpg
Ponce
9th January 2015, 05:15 PM
The law (when done right) is what makes everyone equal.......but many don't follow it, and that creates their own law.


v
palani
9th January 2015, 05:32 PM
From the same book .. just to let court worshipers know that courts don't have anything to do with law

http://i57.tinypic.com/2vte3hv.jpg
palani
9th January 2015, 05:34 PM
many don't follow it, and that creates their own law.


v

So what if the legislature passed a law that every man must marry five women and three other men? This violates my law on many fronts but society now views a home as consisting of four men (including yourself) and five women.

The law that is important is your own law. Society doesn't come up with laws. They come up with 'stuff'. Best to stuff it then.
crimethink
9th January 2015, 06:25 PM
Modern "law" is not based on agreement, but on deadly force. You are made subject to it because if you disobey, you will be killed.
palani
9th January 2015, 06:46 PM
Modern "law" is not based on agreement, but on deadly force. You are made subject to it because if you disobey, you will be killed.

No. Public law is based upon persons. You might mistake yourself as a person and others might mistake you as a person and it is the person who gets damaged, educated, corrected and buried. Stone city is full of persons.
Publico
9th January 2015, 10:02 PM
You never want to use the term "person" while in court because it's too easy for the court to recognize you as an artificial person with "rights" (read: privileges) of an artificial person and not the natural rights of a free man or woman or child.
midnight rambler
9th January 2015, 11:53 PM
You never want to use the term "person" while in court because it's too easy for the court to recognize you as an artificial person with "rights" (read: privileges) of an artificial person and not the natural rights of a free man or woman or child.

That's why the (public policy) statutes always refer to 'persons' as opposed to men and women.
palani
10th January 2015, 05:48 AM
You never want to use the term "person" while in court because it's too easy for the court to recognize you as an artificial person with "rights" (read: privileges) of an artificial person and not the natural rights of a free man or woman or child.
Believe it or not ... man voluntarily gives up natural rights in exchange for civil privileges when he joins the political community.

I don't know what quantum level of contracting with society must be done before they recognize the loss of these natural rights. It might be as trivial as obeying a stop sign.