The Coming Cold Crisis

[singular_me]

this is what it costs ignoring astrological/cosmic cycles... or allowing the elites to withhold information
----------------------
jan 12, 2015
‘Hundreds of people have died in a major cold snap that has struck the Indian capital, New Delhi, as thousands of homeless people struggle to overcome the extreme cold without adequate shelter, Press TV reports.

The development came as northern India has been facing one of its coldest winters in decades, which has claimed lives of nearly 330 homeless folks in New Delhi alone.

Activists say most of the deaths have taken place in northern and central New Delhi while the figure continues to climb due to insufficient night shelters.’

Over 150,000 homeless are braving the harsh cold on the streets, pavements, and under flyovers in the city, according to reports.
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/01/12/392817/India-cold-snap-kills-100s-of-homeless


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-527-587x325.jpg

‘If you think the last few days of record setting snow and cold in Parts of upstate New york is just a freak event, than your not going to like what I am about to tell you. According To NASA Scientist/Climatologist John Casey that is just the beginning of what is to come during this next 30 yr cycle of Extreme cold which will be caused by a historic decline in the Suns energy output that will impact the entire world.

If Casey Is right, than not only will a mass number of the worlds people die by freezing and starving to death due to the extreme cold killing 50 percent of the worlds food supply, but you can also expect Super earthquakes, and more powerful volcanic eruptions across the globe.

Former NASA consultant, climatologist John L. Casey: ‘a radical shift in global climate is underway, 30-year cold spell will strike Earth.’

Read more: NASA Scientist Predicts Food Riots, Mass Deaths And Super Earthquakes Beginning 2015 Due To Extreme Cold 30 Yr Period.

patriotdaily.com


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQanWtkSDHE


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctY6tbyEUkE

[mick silver]

what wrong with this NASA not going to let this out , if anyone did they would not live to tell the tell again ... I am not saying it's not true but we all know what this would do to someone breaking the rules...Former NASA consultant, climatologist John L. Casey: ‘a radical shift in global climate is underway, 30-year cold spell will strike Earth.’

[Ares]

What???? You mean the sun which accounts for 99.86% of the solar systems mass determines climate? I'll be damned.. /Sarcasm

[Ponce]

Your main concern should be what you carry in your car in case you get stuck somewhere away from home......I for one carry all that I need and really don't need in the back of my car......better to have and don't need it that to need it and don't have it.

V

[Spectrism]

Don't worry. "Scientists" and population engineers have been working hard for many years to help us out. They have run thousands of atmospheric chemical injection flights on the taxpayers' dollars to cover the skies with sun-reflecting particulate. This will keep the earth from getting too warm.

Huh?
Getting colder? 30 years?

Uh-oh.

[madfranks]

Your main concern should be what you carry in your car in case you get stuck somewhere away from home......I for one carry all that I need and really don't need in the back of my car......better to have and don't need it that to need it and don't have it.

V

This is smart. I also keep an emergency bag of supplies in my vehicle. I got stranded in a snow storm once, and although I wasn't stuck long enough to have to bust out the supplies, I felt way better that I had them.

[mick silver]

mad I make a few coffee can up with cat liter and a big candle for heat if something like stuck in a snow storm was to ever happen plus if one of us broke down in cold weather

[singular_me]

and the worst is that I think this article may be absolutely true
==============================

Geoengineering being used to deliberately melt the Polar Ice Caps?
Geoengineering is defined as the deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate systems.

JAN 2015

By Michael J. Murphy

As the climate change debate heats up in the world’s most dominating countries, so does the politics in those respective nations. Many powerful governments and corporations are referencing the controversial issue of melting ice in the Arctic as proof that CO2 is the primary cause of global warming. They are also staking claim on the valuable resources below the ice (13% of the World’s oil reserves, shipping lanes and other resources) that can be obtained if a sufficient amount of ice is melted.

Because of this and the current ability through geoengineering and other methods to manipulate climate and melt the ice in certain regions, we must ask if the Arctic ice has been melting and, if so, is corporate/governmental interventions responsible for what can be attributed to the potential multi-trillion-dollar industry of global warming.


Geopolitical interests in the Arctic

The predicted ice melting in the Arctic brings with it many economic and financial, geopolitical and military implications. Therefore, both government and corporate interests have been raging all around this highly consequential issue. As a matter of fact, approximately 13% of the World’s oil reserves and other resources are under the ice in the arctic region.

The melting of the Arctic, as stated by various governments, would also create the opening of new shipping lanes in those regions. The opening up of these iced waters would save massive amounts of time, money and fuel for shipping companies, creating opportunities for economic growth. Because of this, there are major plans afoot by all the concerned nations to take control of their piece of the Arctic pie.

Governments and corporations alike are now fighting a silent war to determine who will take control of the whole region. As a matter of fact, Russia, Canada and the United States have the biggest stake and have all deployed their militaries in the region in what appears to be a quest for establishing themselves as the Arctic region’s superpower......

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=10271


-------------------------------------

Apr 16, 2012
(AP) YOKOSUKA, Japan - To the world's military leaders, the debate over climate change is long over. They are preparing for a new kind of Cold War in the Arctic, anticipating that rising temperatures there will open up a treasure trove of resources, long-dreamed-of sea lanes and a slew of potential conflicts.

By Arctic standards, the region is already buzzing with military activity, and experts believe that will increase significantly in the years ahead.

Last month, Norway wrapped up one of the largest Arctic maneuvers ever - Exercise Cold Response - with 16,300 troops from 14 countries training on the ice for everything from high intensity warfare to terror threats. Attesting to the harsh conditions, five Norwegian troops were killed when their C-130 Hercules aircraft crashed near the summit of Kebnekaise, Sweden's highest mountain.

The U.S., Canada and Denmark held major exercises two months ago, and in an unprecedented move, the military chiefs of the seven main Arctic powers - Canada, the U.S., Russia, Iceland, Denmark, Sweden and Finland - are to gather at a Canadian military base in May to specifically discuss regional security issues.

None of this means a shooting war is likely at the North Pole any time soon. But as the number of workers and ships increases in the High North to exploit oil and gas reserves, so will the need for policing, border patrols and - if push comes to shove - military muscle to enforce rival claims.

............................

Russia, Canada and the United States have the biggest stakes in the Arctic. With its military budget stretched thin by Iraq, Afghanistan and more pressing issues elsewhere, the United States has been something of a reluctant northern power, though its nuclear-powered submarine fleet, which can navigate for months underwater and below the ice cap, remains second to none.

Russia - one-third of which lies within the Arctic Circle - has been the most aggressive in establishing itself as the emerging region's superpower.

Rob Huebert, an associate political science professor at the University of Calgary in Canada, said Russia has recovered enough from its economic troubles of the 1990s to significantly rebuild its Arctic military capabilities, which were a key to the overall Cold War strategy of the Soviet Union, and has increased its bomber patrols and submarine activity.

He said that has in turn led other Arctic countries - Norway, Denmark and Canada - to resume regional military exercises that they had abandoned or cut back on after the Soviet collapse. Even non-Arctic nations such as France have expressed interest in deploying their militaries to the Arctic................

http://origin.wtsp.com/news/article/251047/81/As-Arctic-ice-cap-melts-a-new-Cold-War

[Serpo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miIEAOAOgyI

[Neuro]

mad I make a few coffee can up with cat liter and a big candle for heat if something like stuck in a snow storm was to ever happen plus if one of us broke down in cold weather
Cat litter? Why the hell would you bring cat litter for an emergency?

[Spectrism]

Cat litter? Why the hell would you bring cat litter for an emergency?

I think that is to set the candle.

[singular_me]

Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record … but we’re only 38% sure we were right

The Nasa climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38 per cent sure this was true.

In a press release on Friday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed its analysis of world temperatures showed ‘2014 was the warmest year on record’.

The claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS’s analysis – based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide – is subject to a margin of error. Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.

Yet the Nasa press release failed to mention this, as well as the fact that the alleged ‘record’ amounted to an increase over 2010, the previous ‘warmest year’, of just two-hundredths of a degree – or 0.02C. The margin of error is said by scientists to be approximately 0.1C – several times as much.

As a result, GISS’s director Gavin Schmidt has now admitted Nasa thinks the likelihood that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880 is just 38 per cent. However, when asked by this newspaper whether he regretted that the news release did not mention this, he did not respond. Another analysis, from the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) project, drawn from ten times as many measuring stations as GISS, concluded that if 2014 was a record year, it was by an even tinier amount.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915061/Nasa-climate-scientists-said-2014-warmest-year-record-38-sure-right.html#ixzz3PBArT96m




Global Warming Drops Feet of Snow Across Middle East

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InreNy6PV-4


23 photos of the Middle East’s first snowy winter in decades
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/12/12/23-photos-of-the-middle-east-blanketed-in-snow/

[Neuro]

I think that is to set the candle.
I thought of that too, but it seems like a waste of space and weight, unless it has some dual purpose, like can you use it too clean water out of radiation and other toxins?

[mick silver]

if your get struck in snow are ice it help to put some cat liter around your tires also

[Serpo]

Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record … but we’re only 38% sure we were right

The Nasa climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38 per cent sure this was true.

In a press release on Friday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed its analysis of world temperatures showed ‘2014 was the warmest year on record’.

The claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS’s analysis – based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide – is subject to a margin of error. Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.

Yet the Nasa press release failed to mention this, as well as the fact that the alleged ‘record’ amounted to an increase over 2010, the previous ‘warmest year’, of just two-hundredths of a degree – or 0.02C. The margin of error is said by scientists to be approximately 0.1C – several times as much.

As a result, GISS’s director Gavin Schmidt has now admitted Nasa thinks the likelihood that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880 is just 38 per cent. However, when asked by this newspaper whether he regretted that the news release did not mention this, he did not respond. Another analysis, from the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) project, drawn from ten times as many measuring stations as GISS, concluded that if 2014 was a record year, it was by an even tinier amount.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915061/Nasa-climate-scientists-said-2014-warmest-year-record-38-sure-right.html#ixzz3PBArT96m




Global Warming Drops Feet of Snow Across Middle East

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InreNy6PV-4


23 photos of the Middle East’s first snowy winter in decades
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/12/12/23-photos-of-the-middle-east-blanketed-in-snow/

The warmest year thing is a lie..............


These freaks have been twisting economic numbers for years and now its the weather to suit their agenda......

[mick silver]

yep we had a cooler summer the past year with the right amount of rain but you will not hear that

[Serpo]

same here mick...

[Cebu_4_2]

Now it all comes together... http://www.goes.noaa.gov/GSSLOOPS/alwv.html

They have been pumping warm weather north past Alaska which expands and carries the cold south throughout the USi. I have noticed this for quite a while and thought it was just to freeze out the USi, But melting the ice seems to make much better sense.

[mick silver]

Cebu you think they could be going after the oil that's under the ice , still don't know why we need more ice breaker ships

[Cebu_4_2]

Cebu you think they could be going after the oil that's under the ice , still don't know why we need more ice breaker ships

I think it has multiple goals with probably shipping being the biggest thing. Not sure of the logistics but this might make invasions easier.

[old steel]

yep we had a cooler summer the past year with the right amount of rain but you will not hear that

Same here mick

[Serpo]

13% of worlds oil reserves lie under the northern ice.

[Serpo]

My wife said it was the hottest year because it was on TV and when I questioned that she didnt want to listen............(normal)


Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues


Update January 18, 2015: Update: ‘Conning the Public’: Scientists Accuse NASA/NOAA of ‘Misleading’ & ‘Lying’ About ‘Hottest Year’ Claim (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/18/update-feds-conning-the-public-scientists-accuse-nasa-of-misleading-lying-about-hottest-year-claim/)
NASA climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record… but we’re only 38% sure we were right -

(thats ok nasa ,we know you are 100% wrong , in most things)

‘NASA press release failed to mention this’
Breaking: NOAA, NASA quietly conceded: 2014 was probably not the warmest year on record (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/18/breaking-noaa-nasa-quietly-conceded-2014-was-probably-not-the-warmest-year-on-record/)
#
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.'
Astrophysicist (http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=c920274f2a364603849bbb505&id=c8bbc1ccfe&e=f4e33fdd1e) Dr. Dr David Whitehouse (http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=c920274f2a364603849bbb505&id=c8bbc1ccfe&e=f4e33fdd1e): 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.'
Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/21/climatologist-dr-roy-spencer-why-2014-wont-be-the-warmest-year-on-record-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree/)
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/11/23/climatologist-dr-pat-michaels-debunks-2014-hottest-year-claim-is-58-46-then-distinguishable-from-58-45-in-a-word-no/)
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/03/no-record-temperatures-according-to-satellites/)
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/03/physicist-analyzes-satellite-temperature-data-please-laugh-out-loud-when-someone-will-be-telling-you-that-it-was-the-warmest-year/)
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'


By: Marc Morano (http://www.climatedepot.com/author/marcmorano/) - Climate Depot (http://www.climatedepot.com)January 16, 2015 11:48 AM with 2471 comments (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/#the-comments)
The global warming establishment and the media are crowing about 2010 being in a tie for the “hottest year” ever. The UK Guardian headline sums up the media’s promotion:
UK Guardian: ‘Hottest Year’ Claim: 2014 officially the ‘hottest year’ on record US government scientists say (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/16/2014-hottest-year-on-record-scientists-noaa-nasa?CMP=share_btn_tw) - ‘Nasa and Noaa scientists report 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than previous records…The global average temperatures over land and sea surface for the year was 1.24F (0.69C) above the 20th century average, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) and Nasa (http://www.theguardian.com/science/nasa) reported. The scientists said 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than the previous records set in 2005 and 2010.’
But scientists and climate skeptics are countering that the claims of “hottest year” are based on immeasurable temperature differences that are based on hundredths of a degree differences.
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano issued this statement: “There are dueling global datasets — surface temperature records and satellite records — and they disagree. The satellites show an 18 year plus global warming ‘standstill and the satellite was set up to be “more accurate” than the surface records. See: Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/20/flashabck-1990-nasa-report-satellite-analysis-of-upper-atmosphere-is-more-accurate-should-be-adopted-as-the-standard-way-to-monitor-temp-change/)
Any temperature claim of “hottest year” based on surface data is based on hundredths of a degree hotter than previous “hottest years”. This immeasurable difference is not even within the margin of error of temperature gauges. The claim of the “hottest year” is simply a political statement not based on temperature facts. “Hottest year” claims are based on minute fractions of a degree while ignoring satellite data showing Earth is continuing the 18 plus year ‘pause’ or ‘standstill’. See: The Great Pause lengthens again: Global temperature update: The Pause is now 18 years 3 months (219 months) (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/03/the-great-pause-lengthens-again-global-temperature-update-the-pause-is-now-18-years-3-months/)
http://www.climatedepot.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Monckton-jan-2014-300x168.png
Claiming 2014 is the “hottest year” on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming ‘pause’ is continuing.”
End Morano statement. (Morano was former staff of U.S. Senate Environment & Public Works Committee and producer of upcoming documentary Climate Hustle (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/www.climatehustle.org). He also testified in West VA (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/15/morano-testifies-in-wva-on-climate-school-curriculum-we-must-not-tell-kids-there-is-no-debate-and-no-dissent-is-allowed/) on the climate school curriculum. )
#
Even former NASA global warming chief scientist James Hansen, the leading proponent of man-made global warming in the U.S., conceded in 2011 that the “hottest year” rankings are essentially meaningless. Hansen explained (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/13/green-journalists-lament-the-lack-of-overwhelming-coverage-of-global-warming-in-the-liberal-media/) that 2010 differed from 2005 by less than 2 hundredths of a degree F (that’s 0.018F). “It’s not particularly important whether 2010, 2005, or 1998 was the hottest year on record,” Hansen admitted on January 13.
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry, former chair of the school of earth and atmospheric sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology, had this to say about 2014 being the ‘hottest year’: “The ‘warmest year’ is noticeably missing in the satellite data sets of lower atmospheric temperatures,” Curry wrote on January 16 (http://judithcurry.com/2015/01/16/warmest-year-pause-and-all-that/).
Curry predicts another decade of a global warming ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’. “I’ve made my projection – global surface temperatures will remain mostly flat for at least another decade,” she eexplained
“With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade. This ‘almost’ record year does not help the growing discrepancy between the climate model projections and the surface temperature observations,” Curry told the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/scientists-human-activity-has-pushed-earth-beyond-four-of-nine-planetary-boundaries/2015/01/15/f52b61b6-9b5e-11e4-a7ee-526210d665b4_story.html?hpid=z1).
Curry continued: “Berkeley Earth (temperature analysis) sums it up well with this statement: ‘That is, of course, an indication that the Earth’s average temperature for the last decade has changed very little.’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels, mocked the notion of the “hottest year.” “Whether or not a given year is a hundredth of a degree or so above a previous record is not the issue. What IS the issue is how observed temperatures compare to what has been forecast to happen,” Michaels said.
Michaels continued: “John Christy and Richard McNider, from University of Alabama (Huntsville) recently compared climate model projections to observed lower atmospheric temperatures as measured by two independent sources: satellites and weather balloons. They found that the average warming predicted to have occurred since 1979 (when the satellite data starts) is approximately three times larger than what is being observed.”
Climatologist Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric sciences, University of Alabama-Huntsville, noted satellites do not agree with “warmest year” claims. “The satellite and balloon data of the deep atmosphere have 2014 in a cluster of warmish years well below the hottest two of 1998 and 2010″, Christy said.
Christy continued: “With the government agencies reporting that the surface temperature as highest ever, we have a puzzle. The puzzle is even more puzzling because theory (i.e. models) indicate the opposite should be occurring – greater warmth in the deep atmosphere than the surface. So, there are just many very basic and fundamental aspects of the global climate we have yet to comprehend.”
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr., professor of atmospheric science, Colorado State University, downplayed the accuracy of the surface temperature record. “There remain significant uncertainties in the accuracy of the land portion of the surface temperature data, where we have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.”
“More generally, we need to move beyond just assessing global warming, but examine how (and if) key atmospheric and ocean circulations, such as El Nino, La Nina, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, etc. are changing in their intensity, structure and frequency. These are the climate features that determine if a region has drought, floods, and so forth, not a global average surface temperature anomaly,” Pielke added.
Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse declared “talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.’ “The addition of 2014 global temperature data confirms that the post-1997 standstill seen in global annual average surface temperature has continued,” Whitehouse wrote on January 16 (http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=c920274f2a364603849bbb505&id=c8bbc1ccfe&e=f4e33fdd1e).
“According to the Nasa global temperature database 2014 was technically a record ‘beating’ 2010 by the small margin of 0.02 deg C. The NASA press release is highly misleading saying that 2014 is a record without giving the actual 2014 figure, or any other year, or its associated error.”
“In reality of course it is no record at all as the error of the measurements is about +/- 0.1 deg C showing NasaGiss’ statement to go against the normal treatment of observational data and its errors. Talk of a record is therefore scientifically and statistically meaningless,” Whitehouse added.
“It is clear beyond doubt by now that there is a growing discrepancy between computer climate projections and real-world data that questions their ability to produce meaningful projections about future climatic conditions,” Whitehouse concluded.
Another analysis noted: NASA Hottest Year Claims Not Supported By The Data (https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/giss-hottest-year-claims-not-supported-by-the-data/): NASA admitted in 2011 that “hottest year” differences were “smaller than the uncertainty in comparing the temperatures of recent years.”
Via (https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/giss-hottest-year-claims-not-supported-by-the-data/) the website ‘Not A Lot Of People Know That (https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/giss-hottest-year-claims-not-supported-by-the-data/): “Nowhere does their (NASA 2015) press release tell us that it only beat the previous record by a tiny, effectively unmeasurable 0.02C. Nor do they mention that the error bars are many times greater, or even tell us what they are. This is all very strange because in their (NASA) report on 2010 Global Temperatures, NASA said:
“Global surface temperatures in 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest on record, according to an analysis released Wednesday by researchers at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. The two years differed by less than 0.018 degrees Fahrenheit. The difference is smaller than the uncertainty in comparing the temperatures of recent years, putting them into a statistical tie.”
Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue of Florida State University ridiculed the same “hottest year” rankings in 2010 and NASA’s Hansen’s admission that it “was not particularly important” which year was declared the “hottest.” “Well, then stop issuing press releases which tout the rankings, which are subject to change ex post facto,” Maue demanded in a January 14, 2011 commentary at WattsUpWithThat.com (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/13/green-journalists-lament-the-lack-of-overwhelming-coverage-of-global-warming-in-the-liberal-media/).
Other prominent scientists have said that temperature rise since 1850 has been very small.
See: Top Swedish Climate Scientist Says Warming Not Noticeable: ‘The warming we have had last a 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/02/03/top-swedish-climate-scientist-says-warming-not-noticeable-the-warming-we-have-had-last-a-100-years-is-so-small-that-if-we-didnt-have-climatologists-to-measure-it-we-wouldnt-have-noticed-it-at-all/) – Award-Winning Dr. Lennart Bengtsson, formerly of UN IPCC: ‘We Are Creating Great Anxiety Without It Being Justified’. Dr. Bengtsson announced his skeptical climate views in 2014.
Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever (http://www.climatedepot.com/2011/09/14/exclusive-nobel-prizewinning-physicist-who-endorsed-obama-dissents-resigns-from-american-physical-society-over-groups-promotion-of-manmade-global-warming/), declared his dissent on global warming and noted that the temperature rise over the 20th century was “so little. It is not even fever.” Giaever won a Nobel Prize for physics.
“.8 degrees we will be discussing in global warming. .8 degrees if you ask people in general they will think it is 4 or 5 degrees they don’t know it is so little. It is not even fever,” Giaever said.
“I am amazed that the temperature can be so stable,” Giaever explained. ‘The temperature (of the Earth) has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this ‘warming’ period.’
“I don’t see that co2 is the cause of all this problem,” he added.
Related Links:
It’s Official – There are now 66 excuses for Temp ‘pause’ – Updated list of 66 excuses for the 18-26 year ‘pause’ in global warming (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/11/20/its-official-there-are-now-66-excuses-for-temp-pause-updated-list-of-66-excuses-for-the-18-26-year-pause-in-global-warming/) Eco-Activists Warn 2014 Could Be Hottest Year On Record – Satellites Disagree (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/11/21/after-arctic-blast-eco-activists-warn-2014-could-be-hottest-year-on-record-satellites-disagree/)
‘Hottest Year’ Update: NASA & NOAA ignore satellite data which reveal 2014 ‘well below’ hottest claims (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/11/16/hottest-year-update-nasa-noaa-ignore-satellite-data-reveals-2014-well-below-hottest-claims/)
Even ignoring satellite data Year-to-date ‘record’ temps are 0.21C *below* climate model projections (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/20/even-ignoring-satellite-data-year-to-date-record-temps-are-0-21c-below-climate-model-projections/)
New paper finds excuse #66 for the ‘pause’: There’s no pause if you look at only at the warmest & coldest day of the year – Published in Environmental Research Letters (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/11/20/new-paper-finds-excuse-66-for-the-pause-theres-no-pause-if-you-look-at-only-at-the-warmest-coldest-day-of-the-year-published-in-environmental-research-letters/)
2014 might be 0.01C warmer than 2010! (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/03/2014-might-be-0-01c-warmer-than-2010/)
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/03/no-record-temperatures-according-to-satellites/) – BBC put up a deliberately apocalyptic picture while telling us the world is on course for the warmest year on record. What they failed to tell us was that the more accurate satellites, which monitor atmospheric temperatures over nearly all of the globe, say no such thing. Figures from UAH are out for November, and these show a drop from the October anomaly of 0.27C to 0.33C. This means that at the end of November, this year is only in a tie for 3rd with 2005, and well below the record year of 1998, and 2010.
Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/20/flashabck-1990-nasa-report-satellite-analysis-of-upper-atmosphere-is-more-accurate-should-be-adopted-as-the-standard-way-to-monitor-temp-change/)
2014 ‘Warmest ever’? ‘Conflicting Reports’ – Surface temps show it may be warmer by ‘a couple hundredths of a degree Celsius’ — A Fancy Ways of Saying Temp Standstill Continues! (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/10/2014-warmest-ever-conflicting-reports-surface-temps-show-it-may-be-warmer-by-a-couple-hundredths-of-a-degree-celsius-a-fancy-ways-of-saying-temp-standstill-continues/) - ‘As a result of data and computational uncertainty, none of the surface compilations will 2014 be statistically different from 2010′ – ‘The three major groups calculating the average surface temperature of the earth (land and ocean combined) all are currently indicating that 2014 will likely nudge out 2010 (by a couple hundredths of a degree Celsius) to become the warmest year in each dataset (which begin in mid-to-late 1800s).’ – ‘The two satellite datasets ‘show that 2014 is nowhere near the warmest (in data which starts in 1979), trailing 1998 by several tenths of a degree Celsius. This difference is so great that it statistically clear that 2014 will not be a record year…The super El Niño of 1998 set a high temperature mark that will likely stand for many years to come, or at least until another huge El Niño occurs.’ – ‘If you want 2014 to be the “warmest year ever recorded” you can find data to back you up, and if you prefer it not be, well, you can find data to back up that position as well. In all cases, the former will make headlines.’
Study using dozens of models Claims: ‘Warming Climate Can Be Slowed in a Decade’ by cutting CO2 (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/03/study-using-dozens-of-models-claims-warming-climate-can-be-slowed-in-a-decade-by-cutting-co2/)
Climate Depot Note: If future temps continue to flatline or even cool, warmists can claim climate policy is responsible. They are already doing it! See: It’s Official — Temperature ‘Pause’ Caused By Climate Policies?! Medieval witchcraft lives! UK Energy Minister: Government policies ‘may have slowed down global warming’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/27/its-official-temperature-pause-caused-by-climate-policies-uk-energy-minister-government-policies-may-have-slowed-down-global-warming/)
AP’s Seth Borenstein publishes pure propaganda: Climate change has made Earth ‘hotter, weirder…downright wilder’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/02/aps-seth-borenstein-publishes-pure-propaganda-climate-change-has-made-earth-hotter-weirder-downright-wilder/)
Climate Depot’s Morano comment: ‘AP’s Borenstein can be trusted to shill for UN’s climate summit in Lima Peru, which I will be attending and speaking at. Borenstein relies on Michael Oppenheimer (who is the UN scientists on the payroll of Hollywood stars (http://tinyurl.com/agz7sux)) and Climategate’s Michael Mann. Borenstein ignores tide gauges on sea level showing deceleration of sea level rise and ignores satellite temperatures which show the Earth in an 18 year ‘pause’ or ‘standstill’ of global warming. Borenstein tortures data in order to claim more weather extremes. We are currently at or near historic lows in tornadoes and hurricanes. Even droughts are on long term declines and floods show no trend. We know not to expect more from Borenstein.’ See: ‘Long sad history of AP reporter Seth Borenstein’s woeful global warming reporting’ (http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/08/21/long-sad-history-of-ap-reporter-seth-borensteins-woeful-global-warming-reporting/)
Sea level claims debunked here (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/15/warmist-new-claim-recent-sea-level-rise-is-highest-in-6000-years-debunked/):
Extreme weather claims debunked here (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/01/extreme-weather-failing-to-follow-global-warming-predictions-hurricanes-tornadoes-droughts-floods-wildfires-see-no-trend-or-declining-trends/):
Greenland ice claims debunked here (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/03/16/analysis-media-claims-that-greenlands-ice-loss-has-tripled-in-a-decade-are-propaganda/):
Antarctica ice claims debunked here (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/08/28/mit-scientists-confirm-antarctica-is-cooling-antarctica-has-cooled-and-has-gained-some-ice-recently/):
Overpopulation claims debunked here (http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/01/10/paging-ehrlich-slate-mag-about-that-overpopulation-problem-research-suggests-we-may-actually-face-a-declining-world-population-in-the-coming-years/):
Analysis: Why ’90% of the missing heat’ cannot be hiding in the oceans (http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/02/analysis-why-90-of-the-missing-heat-cannot-be-hiding-in-the-oceans/)

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/

[expat4ever]

definitely colder than normal summer here last year and very wet.. Garden still did ok but it was one of those years where you should have started plants later and they would have done better. I did notice my compost tomatos didnt come up until very late and they did great late in the year but the tomatos I started early and got out on the last frost date didnt do so well. I think mother nature knows best.

Now for this winter, seems about average so far with only 2 weeks so far of very bitter cold. The forcast for the next 10 days seems pretty tame as well so going into Feb it appears winter will be winding down. I'm predicting a normal spring this year so will set plants out on the last frost date again and hope for the best. I think I will also do multiple plantings this year just to test that theory.

[Serpo]

middle of summer in OZ....................so far freken cold............