PDA

View Full Version : Sandy Hook Advisory Commission Calls For Confiscation Of Modern Firearms Posted by Bo



Cebu_4_2
22nd January 2015, 01:44 PM
Sandy Hook Advisory Commission Calls For Confiscation Of Modern Firearms
Posted by Bob Owens on January 22, 2015 at 10:53 am

Share on Facebook

Reason’s Jacob Sullum has taken a hard look at the gun control proposal of the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, and finds their conclusions to be blatantly unconstitutional.

Last Friday, the Associated Press reports, the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, appointed by Gov. Dannel Malloy, decided to recommend a ban on “the sale and possession of any gun that can fire more than 10 rounds without reloading.” You may recall that Connecticut’s legislature already responded to the Sandy Hook massacre by passing a raft of new gun restrictions, including a 10-round limit on magazines and an expanded definition of “assault weapons,” back in April 2013. The new definition of prohibited guns covers any rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has any of five “military-style” features. The advisory commission, which is expected to issue its final report next month, apparently wants to expand the category of banned weapons to include any rifle or handgun that accepts a detachable magazine, period. And unlike the legislature, which allowed continued possession of prohibited guns and magazines as long as they were registered, the commission wants to confiscate all weapons capable of firing more than 10 rounds without reloading.

Let’s be very, very blunt.

The commission is calling for a course that not only eviscerates the Second Amendment to the Constitution, but would also destroy the Fourth Amendment as the state government would attempt to confiscate hundreds of thousands to millions of firearms from law-abiding citizens.

A man named General Gage attempted a similarly audacious plan on April 19, 1775 in nearby Massachusetts.

It didn’t turn out well for him.

While Governor Malloy would no doubt like to implement the commission’s recommendations, he must be acutely aware of the fact that otherwise law-abiding citizens would view an attempt to force these draconian restrictions as an act of war… and no, I’m not overstating the case in the slightest. While grossly and intentionally under-reported in the mainstream media, the state only averted a potential shooting war last March by choosing to not enforce the state’s laws mandating the registration of many semi-automatic firearms and standard capacity magazines.

An estimated 80,00-100,000 Constitution State gun owners flatly refused to comply with a law that turned them into felons overnight for merely owning personal property that it is there constitutional right to own. The State Police issued harsh rhetoric asserting that they would attempt to come after these gun owners… until saner heads in the state government crunched the numbers and came to the realization that they would fare poorly in the conflict that would arise from their actions, especially when they were alerted to the fact that American citizens from around the nation would flood the state with ill intent if the government did indeed attempt to wage war against the citizenry.

The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission seems to be little more than an attempt to protect the mental health care community in Connecticut from their failure to correctly diagnose and treat the mass killer* that took the life of his own mother before murdering 26 others and wounding two more. It’s a shameful display of cowardice and blame-shifting from so-called professionals, and the citizens of the state of Connecticut deserve better.

It’s also an assault on the Constitution that will lead to violence if implemented.

Let’s hope that Connecticut’s rabidly anti-gun governor is intelligent enough to refuse to listen to the commission.



* Bearing Arms does not publish the names of mass or spree killers.

Cebu_4_2
22nd January 2015, 01:56 PM
Sandy Hook Commission Says F^%k the Constitution

Posted on January 21, 2015 (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/01/21/sandy-hook-commission-says-fk-constitution/) by Steven Ahle (http://www.dcclothesline.com/author/steven-ahle/)
http://redstatements.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/sandy.jpg (http://redstatements.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/sandy.jpg)

The Sandy Hook Commission has finished finding their results and made their recommendations. Lest you think they dissed the Constitution only by their actions, you’d be wrong. They freely admit their recommendations are unconstitutional (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/12/14/part-shall-not-infringed-not-understand/). Not only do they want to enact these new laws in Connecticut (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/04/19/65-year-old-connecticut-man-first-arrested-new-gun-registration-laws/) but all the way across the United States. Remember, even though the law is unconstitutional, it could take years to be struck down, just like gun laws in D.C., California and Illinois.

The first demand they have is to ban any gun that can shoot more than ten rounds without reloading. This is a nonstarter with the NRA and gun owners. It is a clear violation of the Second Amendment (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/08/15/federal-judge-rules-ar-ak-style-rifles-protected-second-amendment/), which commission members openly admit. The commission members said that recreational shooters and competitive shooters would just have to live with it.

Bernard Sullivan, a member of the commission said:
“Whether or not this law would stand the test of constitutionality is not for this commission to decide.”
In other words, he is saying that the commission isn’t even considering the constitutionality of the law, because quite frankly, he doesn’t care. He added:
“The commission has expressed very strongly that this is a statement that is needed regarding the lethality of weapons.”

There is another onerous recommendation made by the commission. Strict limitations on home schooling (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/11/23/home-school-parents-tasered-pepper-sprayed-handcuffed-messy-house-kids-watched/), that would allow a school bureaucrat to end home schooling for any family, simply by saying the student has not progressed enough. That would include multicultural studies. They could force you to teach your child to learn the customs of and beliefs of Muslims in the name of diversity and multiculturalism.

Parents would have to submit their lesson plans to a school bureaucrat and your child could have to undergo mental health testing, which is subjective at best. They can also use that testing to deny you the right to home school your kids. What home schooling has to do with gun control can best be explained by the Law of Emanuel. “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”

There will be more recommendations made public when the report is completed in February. There will be a myriad of new laws every bit as onerous or possibly more so than the draconian laws they have already passed and enacted. Gun confiscation will be a large part of the report. We know this because liberals are totally predictable.

Liberalism is a disease and your vote is the cure.

Courtesy of Red Statements (http://redstatements.co/sandy-hook-commission-says-fk-the-constitution/).
Editor’s Note: For those who do not know, I wanted to point out that the Sandy Hook Commission is a group that was hand picked by Governor Dannel Malloy (http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/03/07/town-hall-ct-gov-malloy-references-constitution-patriot-shouts-dont-read-time/). In fact, the governor’s website (http://www.governor.ct.gov/malloy/cwp/view.asp?a=3997&q=516496) freely admits this, “The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission is a 16-member panel of experts created by Governor Malloy to review current policy and make specific recommendations in the areas of public safety, with particular attention paid to school safety, mental health, and gun violence prevention.” This is not a nonpartisan group and their recommendations should be viewed in the proper light. -Dean Garrison

osoab
22nd January 2015, 03:22 PM
chad posted this a couple of days ago

MC Slave
22nd January 2015, 05:03 PM
hold on! What about the exception for jews!? Remem:confused:ber the eternal persecution they suffer!o)(~