The cross of Thoth

[expat4ever]

I think we can put to rest once and for all the ancient alien theory of how the pyramids were built. I had no idea they had found these artifacts in the late 1800's. Good explanation in the video of how all this worked.

Discalimer for the Christians, you probably wont be happy with this information so best to avoid it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zdl-xe6gJg&list=PLyGWTmKUf1NjbyI5bz6tW2uuFIRfOl2hC&index=16

[Shami-Amourae]

And the image of Jesus is modeled after Cesare Borgia. His father was Pope Alexander VI so don't think this is so far fetched.

http://www.thejesusalien.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cesare-borgia.jpg
http://www.thejesusalien.com/stop-worshipping-cesare-borgia-as-jesus-christ/

Beat Jesus in Assassins Creed 2!
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c74gdP6Yu5A/maxresdefault.jpg
:rolleyes:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8LWIVECH6s

[singular_me]

now watching...

[expat4ever]

You can skip the last 15 minutes. More of an infomercial for the next video I think LOL.

[singular_me]

I dont see how the dixon relics have helped build pyramids other than designing them on paper. also, what where they doing in the shaft where they were found? Thats mainly why I listened to the video. I am always on the look up for original explanations as how they were erected. He dates the pyramids at 2500bc, and I think they are much more older.

But I agree with the origins of the cross, all about astronomic-astrology.
-----------------------------------------------------
on the youtube page, you have "33 Degree Freemason Breaksdown Christianity and Religion " by Manly P Hall who defines the term astrology as a science based upon the supported evidence of nature. Manly being a 33 degree mason, makes it very interesting as he contends that knowledge without ethics is a menace to society, so the best way is to keep it secret, so an Atlantis repeat can be avoided. Misuse of knowledge always ends in tragedy.

[Glass]

so I'm at 19 minutes and so far all speculation, massive ice melts and so on. The world had less standing waer back then because most of it was in a mist surrounding the planet. When the major shift came with Saturn moving away from the Northern star position the water settled out of the mist and became standing water a.k.a. bigger oceans that covered previously dry land in to submerged land.

The celtic cross is not the only cross symbol. It does most effectively fit with this historical narrative but it does not diminish other cross symbols on which men may or may not have been hung upon.

I agree that it does appear to be a seasonal indicator. Certainly the one in St Peters square is clearly for this purpose. But then that's churchianity for you.

[expat4ever]

40-49 minutes in and again from 129-135 min.
The Ancient alien theory was that they couldnt have possible built these because they didnt have to tools to do it, from design to construction.
Also note that one of the relics was made of bronze. The bronze age is dated back to about 3300BC I think so it fits in the timeline they are using. If the Pyramids are older, then that would also move the bronze age back.

Based on the obelisc that was found that was only partially completed because it cracked, I would have to say that it was all done by hand with fairly primitive tools.

One thing that's interesting that Anthony west discovered and Robert Shock agreed with is that there appears to be 2 different constructions in Egypt I believe in the Giza complex. One much older than the present one. As if the present one was built on top of the older one. This could also explain some of the granite work.

The bible talks of the nephilim and giants that roamed the earth. There's other accounts as well. I suspect the 100 ton granite boxes were probably for them back in the day. Those were just discovered a couple years ago. This is my own theory based on curent data and trying to make it all work. The great flood was supposed to have wiped out most of the giants and the great flood was aprox 9700 BC I think. The Sphinx was probably built by them as well as the older structures and after the flood the Egyptions moved in and took over and rebuilt. Based on the glyphs it also looks like some of the hybrid humans survived, King Tut and his dad (Not sure on the spelling but I think its Akinatin)being 2 of them.
In many glyphs there are clearly 2 different sized peoples.
I know this doesnt expain the construction but it does explain design and anyone can build anything with a plan and enough manpower.

[expat4ever]

Oh there was a French architect who had figured out how they were built. If you havent seen that one I will post it.

Oh and I have no idea why the relics were found in that space in the Queens chamber. Maybe they were doing astronimical observations? If they used that shaft as a fixed point to look through it would be much easier to see the stars move across the heavens. The stars on that alignment anyway.

[Glass]

I think it's an interesting video. Worth watching. A lot of good points and the celtic cross is clearly something other than a life/death marker.

information that can be used. A simple way to navigate and construct robust structures such as the stone house we are all going to have to build once it all goes pear shaped.

I did not like the musician guy at the end. Very strange hand movements in my opinion.

[Serpo]

Many ideas of why the pyramids built..........one is they help stabilize the earth to prevent too much wobble.

[Glass]

I think they work on harmonics. I'm pretty convinced of that now. Looking at the maps. Listening to this guy talk about that staff they found in one of the shafts... and no one thought much of it. Seems that these Egyptologists don't seem to have much imagination at all and are complete missing the point.

But of course many artifacts were spirited away and buried in museum antiquity archives. I would love to go into the pyramids and look around but with all the tourists wandering around oooing and aahhing and the tour guide sprouting the same old nonsensical explanations I doubt you would be able to determine anything.

And while I think about it, in that other video with the temple entransces and PI and so on, and the guy said that what they did was split the hierogliyphs across several adjacent panels, not side by side panels but one in front of the other. So looking at one would mean little, you needed to be able to see the one behind and the one in front at the same time. Like flicking back and forth between 2 pages to get the information being presented. With a crowd people, no light and no time, no one is going to work out anything.

[expat4ever]

Yes thats the temple of Man. I was just watching Anthony Wests video on that again for the gazillionth time. I decided I am going to book a tour with him this year. I cant make the Feb trip and he doesnt have other dates listed as of yet. Seems a bit pricey for 12 days. 14 days total but day 1 and 14 are travel days.

[singular_me]

lucky you!!!


Yes thats the temple of Man. I was just watching Anthony Wests video on that again for the gazillionth time. I decided I am going to book a tour with him this year. I cant make the Feb trip and he doesnt have other dates listed as of yet. Seems a bit pricey for 12 days. 14 days total but day 1 and 14 are travel days.

ps: I would give this OP vid a 3.5 star rating though, in my view the speaker could do some more digging.

[expat4ever]

Here's the info on the French Architect and the construction of the pyramides.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgxGJfXRQ0

[singular_me]

expat, several months ago, I start a pyramid thread that got 10K hits and was 60 pages or so long. Horn and I showed that it was very unlikely that ancient egyptians built them because the constructions spanned over 100 years, making the construction pace unsustainable. Today we still do not even have the machinery to lift those rocks. The mathematical precision to cut/shape the rocks is also an obstacle as we talk of the bronze age. It also has appeared that none of the pyramids were tombs, the Kufu cartouche is a forgery.


This video speaks of ramps, but there is no evidence of those, ramps would also have to be veryyyy long and in rock too due to weight..... also speaks of a technique requiring 100 men to lift a rock instead of 600 as mainstream explanations suggest...

watching the video, and will throw in my 2 cents when done. Near the end now and the voice over stipulates that what is shown is not a certainty but the best explanation found so far. Says it all :) Building such a pyramid in 3D is much easier than in reality.

------------

so now, since I spoke of being more organized when posting, I am not going to start a new thread. This one fits right in, I believe. right click on img then click on view img for larger size.

got it from FB, its a scanned img from a book
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/10408697_795443057160105_3977005069162380369_n.jpg ?oh=f2811ff6c6471bfdf1c4051dfa1e462a&oe=55620211&__gda__=1428624792_5f7f52249e54f5c8d00f5cb89446a37 6

[aeondaze]

expat, several months ago, I start a pyramid thread that got 10K hits and was 60 pages or so long. Horn and I showed that it was very unlikely that ancient egyptians built them because the constructions spanned over 100 years, making the construction pace unsustainable.

This is complete and utter fabricated bullshit, just like the hypothesis of yours in the thread described.

You never proved one single point in that thread, likely the 10k or so hits were due readers who were thoroughly pleased that someone was finally holding your feet to the fire for this bogus theory.

If anything Neuro and I proved that:

1)The pyramids were roughly hewn, only the outer casing, which is mostly gone and a few other key stones were constructed with any degree of fine accuracy
2) The sphinx is only 4500 to 5000 yo, and accelerated weathering due to a phenomena known as haloclasty is what the crackpots are all misleadingly stirred up by.
3) The pyramids could easily have been constructed in about 150 years.
4) There is non-meteoric iron within the great pyramids construction which leads one to conclude the Egyptians also had access to iron tools.
5) There is a VERY clear cultural continuum in north eastern Africa from the late paleolithic through the neolithic which lead to the Egyptian culture.

You never proved a single point but why should anyone be surprised that you misrepresent the past in this instance as that seems to be habitual with you.

[singular_me]

that thread was a real status quo, but I think Horn and I were making more sense... because mainstream theories that you and neuro supported have serious flaws, not to mention ignoring that mainstream history is total BS. Today the planet is being engulfed by lies but history REwritten by the winners is all true. :)

even in expat video, they say "it is the best so far theory"... but no certainty... modern archeologists still have little clues as how they were build. Fact that you obviously still wont look into.

I think theories saying that pyramids and sphinx are at least 10K year old, are not only more compelling (pre flood civilization) but rational, also based on the fact they perfectly match Orion alignment and that this knowledge must have been predating the bronze age.



This is complete and utter fabricated bullshit, just like the hypothesis of yours in the thread described.

You never proved one single point in that thread, likely the 10k or so hits were due readers who were thoroughly pleased that someone was finally holding your feet to the fire for this bogus theory..

[expat4ever]

If anything Neuro and I proved that:

1)The pyramids were roughly hewn, only the outer casing, which is mostly gone and a few other key stones were constructed with any degree of fine accuracy
2) The sphinx is only 4500 to 5000 yo, and accelerated weathering due to a phenomena known as haloclasty is what the crackpots are all misleadingly stirred up by.
3) The pyramids could easily have been constructed in about 150 years.
4) There is non-meteoric iron within the great pyramids construction which leads one to conclude the Egyptians also had access to iron tools.
5) There is a VERY clear cultural continuum in north eastern Africa from the late paleolithic through the neolithic which lead to the Egyptian culture.

Bullshit. Your theories are no more valid than anyone elses.

1) May be true yet you leave out the very important granite located on the interior of the pyramid which were not carved with any iron, copper or bronze tools. In addition there are the 20 or so 100 ton granite sarcophagi that they found a couple years ago. Nor the 60'000 stone vases and bowls that were manufatured to a high degree of accuracy and a myriad of other things you opted to not comment on.

2) Your Haloclsty theory holds no water. I'll go with Shicks theory over your own. Since 180 other geologists agree with him I would say his theory holds more water than yours. In recent years his theory is gaining traction whereas the haloclaty theory is not.

3)134 pyramids in 150 years? The great pyramid was documented to have been built in 22 years. Seems fast to me for a primitive society but thats what the documents say. However the documents also say that Eygyption society goes back 34,000 years which is ignored by Eygyptologists. The temple of man took 500 years to build and the amount of knowldge contained blows away any theory the Eygyptologists try to spew forth. The left and right hemipheres of the brain, the pineal gland, sperm cell glyphs ect ect.. Thats evidence of a more advanced society than we give them credit for.

4)I can agree with this point.

5) Perhaps, but it doesnt explain the advanced knowledge.


also based on the fact they perfectly match Orion alignment and that this knowledge must have been predating the bronze age. I have seen this theory as well and have also seen it debunked. It actually more closely resembles Cignus IIRC.

[Horn]

Ibeinadaze is busy re-constructing the 10k pyramid thread,

in the same way mainstream masonic archaeology is busy reconstructing our past.

A "roughly shorn" Ramses lol.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7234&stc=1

[Horn]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJcp13hAO3U

[singular_me]

interesting to see how imaginative humans can be, just watched part 1... but how does it come that there isnt any archeological remains of theses corridors containing the water in which floated the rocks ?

[Horn]

http://www.catchpenny.org/images/ikonos.gif

Corridors would've been filled, you can see apparent concave shape running up.

"Roughly Shorn" does not account for in any way shape or form what is needed to achieve level in such a situation.

Those block would need to be cut truer on two sides than anything since around Notre Dame's time.

[aeondaze]

More hollow assertions and name calling, doesn't make for a very good argument.

I don't know who you guys are trying to convince, it just looks like a circle jerk for the three of you.

NONE of your arguments have EVER held any weight and certainly won't into the future.

:)

[singular_me]

any link, expat. Always am interested in other views and ready to stretch it.






I have seen this theory as well and have also seen it debunked. It actually more closely resembles Cignus IIRC.

[singular_me]

name calling? where? so far I see nothing...



More hollow assertions and name calling, doesn't make for a very good argument.

[singular_me]

I would give this one some respect but still wouldnt go for it. Good find though, Horn


http://www.catchpenny.org/images/ikonos.gif

Corridors would've been filled, you can see apparent concave shape running up.

"Roughly Shorn" does not account for in any way shape or form what is needed to achieve level in such a situation.

Those block would need to be cut truer on two sides than anything since around Notre Dame's time.

[expat4ever]

These boxes werent made with chisels and hammers.......SM i will look for the cignus video. Its been awhile since I saw it. Might take me some time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6O7TjogutM&index=1&list=WL

[Horn]

More hollow assertions and name calling,

Notice the Ibdazed substitutes hollow for baseless..

He doesn't want to get into how true to North it actually is.

[Horn]

I would give this one some respect but still wouldnt go for it. Good find though, Horn

The architecture points directly towards it, I'm not an archaeologist so wouldn't know that end.

[expat4ever]

Its an interesting theory but I think it fails in getting the job done in 22 years. IIRC in the other thread it was determined that 1 block needed to be placed every 4 1/2minutes If they are waiting for the rainy season to float the blocks then they arent setting one every 4 minutes. Thats one block every 4 minutes, 24/7/365 for 22 years.

[expat4ever]

The actual dating of the pyramids should be easy. Seems to me there should be mention of the construction of them by other travelers. I know Randall Carlson did an interview on Joe Rogans podcast and while he was discussing his theoryof a meteor crashing down about 12,000 years ago he also mentioned reading a text of some travelers in iirc 100 or 1200 AD. They mentioned then that the casings were inscribed on all sides with heiroglyphs. Sadly all of that is lost now and probably would have explained many things about the them.

[Horn]

I didn't see anyone trying to prove a timeline, just the method of lifting and placing.

[Cebu_4_2]

I didn't see anyone trying to prove a timeline, just the method of lifting and placing.

I can do that but it would be a bit smaller and shorter. Kinda like a parking curb, I can do half but not the whole thing.

[Horn]

I can do that but it would be a bit smaller and shorter. Kinda like a parking curb, I can do half but not the whole thing.

How long it would take you to do half would be your end sum then,

unless you pull it back over to the curb manually by yourself or with friends after you've finished.

22 or 44 minutes your call,

I'll place a bet you could do it in a little under 8 minutes average when you're rolling.

[expat4ever]

I didn't see anyone trying to prove a timeline, just the method of lifting and placing. Your right, in that video there was no timeline but there is a written account of the great pyramid being built in 22 years so I was using what we know to be true to compare with the techniques being offered.

Here's the video with Randall Carlson. The whole podcast is great but the part that pertains to the Shpinx and where he mentions the casing stones being inscribed is at the 2 hr 20 minute mark to about 2:37. The rest of the video is about the great cataclysm that occured 12-13k years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R31SXuFeX0A&index=25&list=WL

[Horn]

Your right, in that video there was no timeline but there is a written account of the great pyramid being built in 22 years so I was using what we know to be true to compare with the techniques being offered.

If you believe the pyramid was built in 22 years that would be a gross error, imo.

Anyone documenting a timeline would've have described in detail the process also, all records would still be available.

Is like me walking up to Notre Dame and stating I built it in 2 and not mentioning anything else.

[expat4ever]

I dont disagree with you and in fact I find it hard to believe that it was done in 22 years but there is a tablet that states that. As i stated earlier there must be writings from travelers somewhere that saw the construction taking place. Today it still stands as one of the 7 wonders of the world so certainly the construction must have been witnessed my 1000's. At the time the nile was also close by and its a major waterway so there must have been loads of people who saw this getting buiilt.

[Horn]

Unless all humans, records, and machinations were swept away in some type cataclysmic flood. Then some Sven character showed up a few years later and carved a tablet laying claim stating how long it took him to build, and nothing else.

That video of the water pump process to lift is made to appear as B.C. and its technology. If it were in all actuality it would be closer to A.D. in the B.C. than anything other.

Also to do that many blocks as true 2 sided cuts in any single lifetime, would certainly take A.D. techs. in the minimum, if not well after.

[singular_me]

while looking for some good stuff when i came across this one. will start listening to the podcast in a bit...

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/1966861_1559498180971321_6775581123363333455_n.jpg ?oh=915f44a61adde17b18d95a1c613a14ae&oe=55271FE4&__gda__=1432637906_f191c77f8c79a6539e1b67c17bdced6 3

[singular_me]

hard facts from video with rogan:

the oldest sapiens sapiens skeletons are 150K years old.... see what we have achieved in 4000 years already... There obviously is a black hole in human history!!!

great interview, lot of insightful data. I have always liked rogan.

more later.

[osoab]

Bullshit. Your theories are no more valid than anyone elses.

2) Your Haloclsty theory holds no water. I'll go with Shicks theory over your own. Since 180 other geologists agree with him I would say his theory holds more water than yours. In recent years his theory is gaining traction whereas the haloclaty theory is not.



Is this the guy you are talking about?

http://www.robertschoch.com/sphinxcontent.html

[expat4ever]

yep, thats him. Sorry spelled his name wrong

[expat4ever]

hard facts from video with rogan:

the oldest sapiens sapiens skeletons are 150K years old.... see what we have achieved in 4000 years already... There obviously is a black hole in human history!!!

great interview, lot of insightful data. I have always liked rogan.

more later.

He does get some great guests on his podcasts. I like the fact that hes waking people up as well, just by throwing the info at em. I liked this interview a lot. Guy has done some serious research. I didnt know about the Indian ocean comet until this interview either.

I'm sure civiliazation has been devaststed in the part. Not sure how advanced they were though. Ancient Egypt seems to be the best evidence for being somewhat advanced. The evidence is pretty convinving that there were 2 stages of civilization there as well.

If something were to happen to US now what would be left of our civilization in 4000 years? 10,000? As they said, not much. Be like we were never here. mankind could have done this 10 times already and we would never know.

[Dogman]

He does get some great guests on his podcasts. I like the fact that hes waking people up as well, just by throwing the info at em. I liked this interview a lot. Guy has done some serious research. I didnt know about the Indian ocean comet until this interview either.

I'm sure civiliazation has been devaststed in the part. Not sure how advanced they were though. Ancient Egypt seems to be the best evidence for being somewhat advanced. The evidence is pretty convinving that there were 2 stages of civilization there as well.

If something were to happen to US now what would be left of our civilization in 4000 years? 10,000? As they said, not much. Be like we were never here. mankind could have done this 10 times already and we would never know.

Depending on the environment, some metals would oxidize and go poof, some will last for 10s of thousands of years, some plastics will hold on and still exist. some electronic chips would survive because of encapsulation.

But everything also depends on environment.

Our time historically as in written is what, written 4-5 thousand years and the farther back the more sketchy it becomes?

There are two ways to look at it, if just civilization goes poof but people still exists or poof and we are gone. If we go by the die hard bible thumpers the earth has existed maybe 6000 years. But modern thought thinks much longer,

Our traces will last, homes made of wood will go poof, concrete will also go poof unless it is mixed like the old Romans did it, some of their works are a good 2500 years old now.

Going by current geological time thought of the earths existence, there has been enough time for civilizations more advanced than ours to grow and kill themselves off and by the time we come along they are just myths with only hints that they existed or not.

Good question,

I for one question current thought that our civilization is the first and the ones before us were crawling to our state of technology we have now. Yes the stone work in Egypt and for dam sure that hard granite sarcophagus that has perfect 90° angles and finish.

Then there is the south american stone work that modern tools would be hard pressed to make, most historians conveniently over look that crap.

Today if we blow ourself off the face ot the earth, traces of us would exist for thousands of years, but only the things that will not corrode with time, even rock will wear down unless protected.

Real time as related to earth time not counting mans (some that are nuts)(imo) compared to mans time walking and living is not even a blip on the chart that is being recorded by universal time at in billions of years.

[Horn]

If you simply go back 200 years from now things were very much different, it wouldn't be too far fetched an assumption that periods in the past fell along the same lines in certain areas of needs for mankind as far as technology goes.

If it were as necessary now, as it was then, we might have relearned their methods.

[Dogman]

If you simply go back 200 years from now things were very much different, it wouldn't be too far fetched an assumption that periods in the past fell along the same lines in certain areas of needs for mankind as far as technology goes.

If it were as necessary now, as it was then, we might have relearned their methods.

Thing is the ancients did things that we today would be hard pressed to do. If ever with our equipment today.

Stones can not lie, only people!

[Horn]

Thing is the ancients did things that we today would be hard pressed to do. If ever with our equipment today.

Stones can not lie, only people!

I think, I said that, only my writing technology was far more advanced then yours. :)

[singular_me]

due to a DNS server issues (slow or down time) , I wasnt able to watch all yet... so far half way through

another hard fact:
impossible to explain flash-frozen mammoths and other animals without a cataclysm theory.

this interview is sooo dense that even trying to summarize it much too difficult.




hard facts from video with rogan:

the oldest sapiens sapiens skeletons are 150K years old.... see what we have achieved in 4000 years already... There obviously is a black hole in human history!!!

great interview, lot of insightful data. I have always liked rogan.

more later.

[Cebu_4_2]

Your right, in that video there was no timeline but there is a written account of the great pyramid being built in 22 years so I was using what we know to be true to compare with the techniques being offered.

Here's the video with Randall Carlson. The whole podcast is great but the part that pertains to the Shpinx and where he mentions the casing stones being inscribed is at the 2 hr 20 minute mark to about 2:37. The rest of the video is about the great cataclysm that occured 12-13k years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R31SXuFeX0A&index=25&list=WL

This has learned me much in a short time and I lost my grammar skills! Amazing information in a short time, kinda like a movie intrigues me.

[Horn]

Sounds like you're out there on your own singular_me, I have no idea what you're listening to.

[Dogman]

Sounds like you're out there on your own singular_me, I have no idea what you're listening to.

Usually it's the other way around !

;)

[Horn]

This is the video Dogman, where they are receiving info. that plastics or silicone based fabrication have a limited lifespan. There is some if exposed to uv, but is just a breakdown not a complete return to the natural. If no U.V. many more than multi-millennial as far as I know.

Though again, my communication may have come from a far more technologically advanced sub-specie... ._.

[singular_me]

if we only had history teachers like him in elementary and high schools, IF.... IF... IF

I think I need to listen to it one more time, so much information that my brain didnt record it all.


This has learned me much in a short time and I lost my grammar skills! Amazing information in a short time, kinda like a movie intrigues me.

[singular_me]

just curious, have you resolved your *Viktor Schauberger* new age dilemma* ???

Did you make a search? Just asking because you never responded all the links I provided showing that he has absolutely nothing to do with new age?





Usually it's the other way around !

;)

[expat4ever]

Glad you liked it. Its definitely a good one packed with info. I've watched it a few times myself.

[singular_me]

Glad you liked it. Its definitely a good one packed with info. I've watched it a few times myself.

meaning that earth had been either depleted or through a major mayhem

Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said to them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and **replenish** the earth, and subdue it...


Randall Carlson sez that considering the weight of each rock and our current machinery, it would take 600 years to build the great pyramid. Only 1 pyramid while mainsteam academa claims the 3 were erected over a 120 year time frame. LOL

[Horn]

The part about the massive weight of ice cap flexing the Atlantic ridge is fascinating.

I remember reading elsewhere I forget where, but it was stated that that during such a time with such great ice pack mounted at the poles the Earth actually rotated faster, much the same way a pirouetting ice skater does.

and her skirt also raises.

Uniformitarianism be damned, Palani's seashells at Rocky's peaks still would not occur in under 10 hours...

[expat4ever]

Ready for Randall Carlson part2? LOL.. I'm only 20 minutes in and its already getting good. So much for global warming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0Cp7DrvNLQ

[singular_me]

Randall Carlson is a master builder and architectural designer, teacher, geometrician, geomythologist, geological explorer and renegade scholar.


as a geometrician I am sure he would love this:
https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t31.0-8/p720x720/10860867_10153568713932977_3046127182450916332_o.j pg

by Scott Onstott who made "the secrets in plain sight"
The combined diagonals of the boxes bounding Earth and Moon compared to their average distance from the Sun are proportioned as the foot is to the mile (99.3%).

The average distance of the Earth-Moon system to the Sun compared to the distance light travels in one revolution of the system around the Sun are proportioned as the inch is to the mile (99.9%).


https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10686678_10153568726507977_7318617021395766663_n.j pg?oh=dc58f83d664dd544452612a41a5b2766&oe=55647F64&__gda__=1432870705_e7d8adfbb8bc05382972f4577f12159 f

sacred math isnt BS

listening to the show, tnx for sharing

[singular_me]

bingo ... that is his website
http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/randall-carlson

he even teaches and it seems that classes are free, what I didnt know
http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/sacred-geometry-classes-level-1-class-1


*Editors note: For an succinct overview of Randall’s research regarding “climate change” you can view the video of his interview with RealitySandwich.com entitled,“Climate Change: A Catastrophist’s
http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/climate-change-a-catastrophists-perspective

http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/ask-randall-climate-change



I am going to create a library with his stuff only.

[singular_me]

Randall comments on this paper as I type this, he urges humans to recognize that they are part of a bigger picture, whether they like it or not

wow, now he admits to being a high ranked mason, but says that if one wants to understand masonry one has to understand sacred geometry as we find the same symbolism everywhere
-----------------------------------------------------------
Multiple lines of evidence for possible Human population decline/settlement reorganization during the early Younger Dryas
http://pidba.org/anderson/cv/Anderson%20et%20al%202011%20QI.pdf

[expat4ever]

He's a smart guy. Says he reads 2-3 scientific papers daily. One interesting thing is I have come to similar conclusions and shared my ideas with my friends. I reach my conclusions because of my interests and the fact that I watch so much different stuff. I have often said we need someone looking at the big picture and that all of these sciences are great but noone knows whats going on outside of what they specialize in.
If you watch or read enough you start to see the overlaps in things and are better able to put it all together. Thats why he has done so well with his research.. I also said if we want to find lost civilizations we have to look 50 miles off the coasts, he also mentions that in this video.
I watch a lot of Joes podcasts and this guy is definitely in the top 5 guests he has had on. I look forward to his next show. :).

[Horn]

What he indicates as "black mat layer" could most certainly indicate plasma strike from Zeus.

It would be interesting to see if in fact it is diamond layer for real, or glass...

My guess is you have some Einstein appraisers calling it diamond, or maybe something "other" which plasma from space is capable of creating.

[Horn]

The Real Impact of Victoria Crater


One of the key arguments used to support the impact origin of craters in the solar system is that they seem similar to terrestrial explosion craters. However, superficial appearances can be deceptive. There are many unresolved problems with the impact-cratering model, which led the Irish astronomer, Firsoff, to express his dislike of the theory. However, no one has considered a better theory, electrical cratering, because of the current dogma in astrophysics that yes, “there is electricity in space, but it doesn’t do anything.”

Joseph Priestley, in 1766, was the first to observe cathode cratering and to compare the craters to those on the Moon. He noted their circular, ringed patterns. Robert Dietz, in 1963, suggested that the explosion from a lightning bolt might create shocked minerals near craters in a manner similar to that thought to occur from meteorite impacts. However, he was unwilling to flout convention and contemplate lightning bolts in space. The Englishman, Brian Ford, proposed in 1965 to the British Interplanetary Society that plasma discharge effects early in the Moon’s history formed its many craters. He suggested that the Moon may have been more closely coupled electrically to the Earth’s magnetosphere in that early epoch. Like Priestley, he used a spark-machining apparatus and demonstrated parallels between the laboratory craters and lunar craters. He reproduced the crater circularity—some, but not all, with central peaks—and the tendency for small craters to impinge on the rims of larger craters, but not the reverse.... .

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7256&stc=1

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7257&stc=1

http://www.holoscience.com/wp/the-real-impact-of-victoria-crater/

[expat4ever]

Robert Schoch would tend to agree with you. Not sure about the dates on the black mat layer but Robert says there is evidence of an asteroid strike but that would ause the cooling that we see in the ice cores before the end of the last ice age. He then shows evidence of plasma dischares through vitrification he has found. Skip to the 1 hr 2 minute mark in this video. He explains it starting there.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-d40V_NYBJ8
What he indicates as "black mat layer" could most certainly indicate plasma strike from Zeus.

It would be interesting to see if in fact it is diamond layer for real, or glass...

My guess is you have some Einstein appraisers calling it diamond, or maybe something "other" which plasma from space is capable of creating.