palani
26th January 2015, 04:17 AM
We bring with us concepts that our ancestors used to resolve their issues. Several hundred years ago you found courts of law, equity, ecclesiastic and maritime jurisdiction. Each had their own sphere of power and jealously guarded it.
Ecclesiastic courts today remain separate (separation of church and state).
Courts of Law were originally masculine but when issues became too severe they were tempered with female law (Equity). The only powers a court of equity has are contempt and injunction. When Equity couples up with quasi-law their powers are elusive (aka ILLUSION).
Courts emanating from the political system are now politically correct and take on aspects of law and equity (male and female) simultaneously. These courts are HERMAPHRODITE and support gay issues and baby killing as well as breaking up family units (husband/wife/kids). But the political system is functionally bankrupt (irresponsible) and is incapable of supporting any court at all except for these quasi-courts. When you get in front of a hermaphrodite judge now in one of these courts on a good day you can get a judgment that involves splitting babies or families in half and on a PMS day you can get a life sentence. On a really bad PMS day your head will be separated from your shoulders after they discuss it for 20 years.
Maritime law is the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard. This department (part of homeland security now rather than Treasury or Transportation) does not bother itself much with issues that don't involve real water highways (rivers/oceans). Their courts deal with maritime accidents, shipping and disciplining their own servicemen and public contractors called the Merchant Marine. They also regulate the conversion of fish to money and have interests in all things floating on water (including oil). (Be aware that paper floats on water).
None of these courts serve the same function as they did for centuries. We use the same terms to describe them (law, equity, ecclesiastical, maritime) but they have evolved in ways that may only be described as chaotic. That is to say they have changed without explicit direction or authority from the political body they serve.
Ecclesiastic courts today remain separate (separation of church and state).
Courts of Law were originally masculine but when issues became too severe they were tempered with female law (Equity). The only powers a court of equity has are contempt and injunction. When Equity couples up with quasi-law their powers are elusive (aka ILLUSION).
Courts emanating from the political system are now politically correct and take on aspects of law and equity (male and female) simultaneously. These courts are HERMAPHRODITE and support gay issues and baby killing as well as breaking up family units (husband/wife/kids). But the political system is functionally bankrupt (irresponsible) and is incapable of supporting any court at all except for these quasi-courts. When you get in front of a hermaphrodite judge now in one of these courts on a good day you can get a judgment that involves splitting babies or families in half and on a PMS day you can get a life sentence. On a really bad PMS day your head will be separated from your shoulders after they discuss it for 20 years.
Maritime law is the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard. This department (part of homeland security now rather than Treasury or Transportation) does not bother itself much with issues that don't involve real water highways (rivers/oceans). Their courts deal with maritime accidents, shipping and disciplining their own servicemen and public contractors called the Merchant Marine. They also regulate the conversion of fish to money and have interests in all things floating on water (including oil). (Be aware that paper floats on water).
None of these courts serve the same function as they did for centuries. We use the same terms to describe them (law, equity, ecclesiastical, maritime) but they have evolved in ways that may only be described as chaotic. That is to say they have changed without explicit direction or authority from the political body they serve.