San Diego is Suing Monsanto for Poisoning its Marine Life and Polluting its Bay

[Cebu_4_2]

The City of San Diego is Suing Monsanto for Poisoning its Marine Life and Polluting its Bay

By Nick Meyer (http://althealthworks.com/author/nick-meyer/) On March 17, 2015 · Add Comment (http://althealthworks.com/5440/the-city-of-san-diego-is-suing-monsanto-for-poisoning-its-marine-life-and-polluting-its-bay/#wp-comments)

The Monsanto Company produces a large volume of different chemicals, and many of them are also manufactured by competitors.

But when it comes to the dangerously carcinogenic PCBs that have wreaked havoc on towns and waterways across the country, Monsanto stands (virtually) alone: 99 percent of PCB production in the United States was done by the agricultural giant according to this report (http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/reports/monsanto-a-corporate-profile/) from the Food & Water Watch.

The chemicals are still being found in places they shouldn’t be, however, and many towns are still dealing with the aftermath of their toxic legacy (see photos here (http://althealthworks.com/3951/man-travels-across-u-s-documents-destruction-for-monsanto-a-photographic-investigation/)).

On Monday, more allegations of immense harm were revealed as a lawsuit was filed against Monsanto in federal court by San Diego authorities over the alleged polluting of the city’s bay with the carcinogenic chemicals, which were banned over 30 years ago but are still said to be showing up in sediment samples.

The PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) have also been identified in water samples and the tissues of fish, lobsters and other marine life according to the complaint.

http://althealthworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/san.jpg (http://althealthworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/san.jpg)

“PCB contamination in and around the Bay affects all San Diegans and visitors who enjoy the Bay, who reasonably would be disturbed by the presence of a hazardous, banned substance in the sediment, water, and wildlife,” the lawsuit reads.

According to the EPA, PCBs have been shown to cause cancer, immune, reproductive and nervous system health problems while also damaging the endocrine system.

The city wants Monsanto to pay for cleanup costs and to cover the loss of natural resources as well.

Photo via Flickr. Click here (http://althealthworks.com/5440/the-city-of-san-diego-is-suing-monsanto-for-poisoning-its-marine-life-and-polluting-its-bay/www.althealthworks.com/ebook-submit%C2%A0) to subscribe for updates from AltHealthWORKS.com.

[mick silver]

what I have heard no one person won shit from Monsanto , been one are two here try to sue them like the farmer all over this country ... way above the laws

[Cebu_4_2]

Monsanto Ordered to Pay $93 Million to Small Town for Poisoning Citizens
August 20, 2014
http://earthweareone.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/148.jpg (http://earthweareone.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/148.jpg)

Big wins can happen in small places.

The West Virginia State Supreme Court finalized a big blow to the biotech giant Monsanto this month, finishing a settlement causing Monsanto to pay $93 million to the tiny town of Nitro, West Virginia for poisoning citizens with Agent Orange chemicals.

The settlement was approved last year, but details were worked out only weeks ago as to how the funds were to be spent.

The settlement (http://rt.com/usa/171312-monsanto-nitro-settlement-office/) will require Monsanto to do the following:



-$9 million will be spent to clean dioxin contaminated dust from 4500 homes.
-$21 million will be spent to test to see if people have been poisoned with dioxin.
-Citizens will be monitored for such poisoning for 30 years, not just a few months.
-An additional $63 million is to be allotted if additional tests for dioxin contamination testing is necessary.
-Anyone who lived in the Nitro area between Jan. 1, 1948, and Sept. 3, 2010 will be tested for dioxin. Although they must show proof they lived in the area, they will be eligible for testing even if they no longer live in Nitro.
-Former or present employees of Monsanto are not eligible for any of these benefits.
-An office will be set up to organize testing for Nitro citizens. The registration of participants is to be overlooked by Charleston attorney Thomas Flaherty, who was appointed by the court.


Residents have a right to file individual suits against Monsanto if medical tests show they suffered physical harm due to dioxin exposure.
MONSANTO PRODUCED TOXIC CHEMICALS IN NITRO

Just how were Nitro citizens exposed to dioxin? Monsanto was producing the toxic herbicide Agent Orange in Nitro, and dioxin is a chemical byproduct of the substance. It is known to cause serious health conditions (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/). The factory which produced Agent Orange was opened in Nitro in 1948 and remained in operation until 2004, even though usage of this herbicide in the past (in Vietnam and other Asian countries) was fatal to millions of citizens and the war veterans who were exposed to it.

“There is no doubt that during and after the war, many Vietnamese absorbed this very toxic material [dioxin]. It is our belief from toxicological research and epidemiologicalstudies from many countries that this dioxin probably resulted in significant health effects in Vietnam.” – Arnold Schecter and John Constable (http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/35/5/1230)

“It’s been a real long haul,” attorney Stuart Calwell told The Charleston Gazette. Calwell represented Nitro area residents in a class action suit that prompted Monsanto to make the settlement.

“The politics of dioxin has been bitterly debated since the Vietnam War, but … we know that there is a health issue there and hopefully people will get their houses cleaned and the risk will come to an end and those exposed in the past will have the benefit of keeping an eye on their health.”

The people of Nitro still need to fill out a register to receive the benefits outlined in the settlement. Due to the pivotal nature of this landmark settlement, Nitro citizens need to participate as fully as possible to set a precedent for other class action suits that farmers and consumers of GMO foods around the world might wage against Monsanto in the future to finally take them down. If enough of us do it at once, then even their bloated coffers will finally be depleted, and we can enjoy a world without being poisoned to death.

While this case did not involve glyphosate (http://naturalsociety.com/still-eating-agent-orange/), another deadly toxin used in Monsanto herbicides such as RoundUp, its time will come soon.
Credits: Written by Christina Sarich (http://naturalsociety.com/author/christina/) of naturalsociety.com (http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-ordered-pay-93-million-small-town-poisoned-herbicide/#ixzz38ZTuFLvq), Guest contributor.

[mick silver]

they may have won there but how many years will the fight this and how high will there pay hit men take it . at the end of the day how low will the pay out be