Climate Change Will Turn Women Into Prostitutes

[Jewboo]

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/03/barbara_lee-Reuters-Jason-Reed-640x480.jpg

Climate Change Will Turn Women Into Prostitutes
On Wednesday, California Democrat Barbara Lee proposed a resolution in the House of Representatives that claims women will eventually be forced into prostitution in order to obtain life-sustaining food and water for their families.


Lee introduced House Concurrent Resolution 29 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/29), warning that women will be forced into “transactional sex” to get enough food and clean water — all because global warming will create “conflict and instability” in the world.

“Women will disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change,” Lee’s resolution reads. It continues claiming, “Food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health.”

Lee’s document goes on to urge Congress to agree on the “disparate impacts of climate change on women,” and goes on to demand that Congress use “gender-sensitive frameworks in developing policies to address climate change.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/26/congresswoman-claims-climate-change-will-turn-women-into-prostitutes/


:rolleyes:

[Hitch]

I'm confused now, isn't transactional sex a woman's right under feminism? If she can't trade her body for food and other resources, does she really 'own' her body?

These feminists are confusing me.

[Cebu_4_2]

I am all for it, this will be more awakening that's all... and make azain prostitution legal. Which will cut back on the time and money spent policing non violent "johns".

[Shami-Amourae]

I wouldn't laugh. Most Leftists would nod to this.
http://cdn.overclock.net/b/ba/200x200px-ZC-ba2f75b0_Lemmings_Walker_by_Iamrecognized.gif

[Shami-Amourae]

I'm confused now, isn't transactional sex a woman's right under feminism? If she can't trade her body for food and other resources, does she really 'own' her body?

These feminists are confusing me.

Don't question the narrative you sexist male chauvinist pig!
http://cdn.redalertpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/war-on-women-stop-sign.jpg

[osoab]

posted in daily stupid.

[Hitch]

Don't question the narrative you sexist male chauvinist pig!

I just want some clarity at this point.

Abortion = control over her body = good. Prostitution = control over her body = bad.

Using sex to secure resources through divorce and legal rape of men = good.

Using sex to get a meal through prostitution = bad.

Can they make up their minds already? They need to be consistent, does a woman 'own' her own body? That's the bottom line. If so, she can trade it for a can of Dinty Moore same as she can go gold digging for a millionaire.

[Jewboo]

I wouldn't laugh.




Hooker Tries To Eat Man’s Penis And Testicles (http://www.thenewsburner.com/2013/03/25/florida-zombie-hooker-tries-to-eat-mans-penis-and-testicles/)
Hunger in our vulnerable female population is becoming a real problem now.







:(?? we need more legislation

[EE_]

I just want some clarity at this point.
Let me try to help...

-Abortion = control over her body = good.
Good, because men are powerless and have no say in the decision.

-Prostitution = control over her body = bad.
Bad, because man has power over the women and is in control.

-Using sex to secure resources through divorce and legal rape of men = good.
Good, because man is powerless and has no say. Courts and women decide man's fate.

-Using sex to get a meal through prostitution = bad.
Bad, because man has power/control over women and how the deal is structured.

Hope this helps.
Maybe try to apply this formula in future feminist arguements?

[Horn]

Snow covers streets and palm trees in Baljurashi, Saudi Arabia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDzCjVWP06A

2 Feet of Hail on the Equator in Colombia and Ecuador



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BqKlUYQfns#t=12

[Hitch]

Hope this helps.
Maybe try to apply this formula in future feminist arguements?

That helps. Maybe you can help me with this one.

Man gives a woman money for sex = prostitution = bad.

Man gives a woman money for sex (but video tapes it) = porn = good.

What the heck? A pornstar is an aspiring liberated artist, but a prostitute isn't?

[Cebu_4_2]

Matters where you are. I view prostitution as sex, if you want it, there it is. If not then no.. Why is that a difficult subject?

Why is this illegal (for theivery and monetary enhancement)

Need to purge every day or two anyways, why not enjoy the ride?

Almost every stripper/escort/dancer asks to have anal sex and when denied uses their nails to pop the condom don't matter what hole.

Hookers/dancers/escorts rule! I would never change this part, they make money and really enjoy their job.

A squirting escort is a happy escort.

[EE_]

That helps. Maybe you can help me with this one.

Man gives a woman money for sex = prostitution = bad.

Man gives a woman money for sex (but video tapes it) = porn = good.

What the heck? A pornstar is an aspiring liberated artist, but a prostitute isn't?

I wasn't aware a woman employed as a Bukaki girl on video, was acceptable to the feminist agenda?

[EE_]

Snow covers streets and palm trees in Baljurashi, Saudi Arabia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDzCjVWP06A

2 Feet of Hail on the Equator in Colombia and Ecuador



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BqKlUYQfns#t=12

Does this mean Saudi Arabia, Colombia and Ecuador are teaming with prostitutes now?

[Dogman]

Women have it hard, they have at least half the money but also own all the pussy in the world, some in a direct way and the other indirectly.

It is like a commodity they own that men want and desire almost all their life's from the earliest times to the present! They (Women) own it so they should also be the ones that decides on how they use their resources.

Some go pro, some use their resource to get by or get their way in life, but the majority use it to rule the roost and keep hubby or boyfriend chasing it while they do the the nest and the family thing!

Nothing new in that.

[Horn]

Does this mean Saudi Arabia, Colombia and Ecuador are teaming with prostitutes now?

Colombian prostitutes? No never....lol

Its probably only 12% of their GDP.


Are Colombian Prostitutes Part of Some Sort of Government Benefit Plan? (http://gawker.com/are-colombian-prostitutes-part-of-some-sort-of-governme-1693956630)

http://gawker.com/are-colombian-prostitutes-part-of-some-sort-of-governme-1693956630

[madfranks]

They need to be consistent, does a woman 'own' her own body? That's the bottom line. If so, she can trade it for a can of Dinty Moore same as she can go gold digging for a millionaire.

Nominated for post of the year. That's friggin hilarious!

[singular_me]

Maybe I should reconsider my trip to ecuador as I would hate to resort to prostitution. LOL




2 Feet of Hail on the Equator in Colombia and Ecuador



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BqKlUYQfns#t=12

[EE_]

Women have it hard, they have at least half the money but also own all the pussy in the world, some in a direct way and the other indirectly.

It is like a commodity they own that men want and desire almost all their life's from the earliest times to the present! They (Women) own it so they should also be the ones that decides on how they use their resources.

Some go pro, some use their resource to get by or get their way in life, but the majority use it to rule the roost and keep hubby or boyfriend chasing it while they do the the nest and the family thing!

Nothing new in that.

Men like the chase. If there is no chase, their commodity loses value

http://www.singleblackmale.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/man-chasing-woman.jpg
http://img.youtube.com/vi/0965PDh9HX0/0.jpg

[Ponce]

Well, I do have food for seven the eight years.......if I was younger I then would have food for one to two years what with the trading that will be going on.....I think that I will keep two or three as company.

V

[Jewboo]

Maybe I should reconsider my trip to ecuador as I would hate to resort to prostitution. LOL




http://kaitlynfaebarrett.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/img_8856.jpg?w=652
The Pailon del Diablo translates as Devil’s Cauldron, so named because of the shape of the
pool where the water falls and also because of the devil’s face in the rock. Can you see it?


http://kaitlynfaebarrett.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/img_8752.jpg?w=652
Nicole’s water bottle was our best view of the Cotopaxi summit


:rolleyes: probably had to trade her body for that bottle of precious water...lol



Linky (http://kaitlynfaebarrett.com/tag/ecuador/)

[singular_me]

where you once a sex worker.... or a happy regular consumer ??? ;D

just curious as my book also addresses emotions associated with prostitution


Matters where you are. I view prostitution as sex, if you want it, there it is. If not then no.. Why is that a difficult subject?

Why is this illegal (for theivery and monetary enhancement)

Need to purge every day or two anyways, why not enjoy the ride?

Almost every stripper/escort/dancer asks to have anal sex and when denied uses their nails to pop the condom don't matter what hole.

Hookers/dancers/escorts rule! I would never change this part, they make money and really enjoy their job.

A squirting escort is a happy escort.

[Cebu_4_2]

where you once a sex worker.... or a happy regular consumer ??? ;D

Correct term would be dancer.

[Spectrism]

The history of this topic.

1997 Global warming will destroy the earth but first it will get so hot that women will take off their clothes and become prostitutes.

2013 Climate change will destroy the earth but first it will reduce food supplies so that women will be forced to get food by becoming prostitutes.

2015 Spectrism just realized he has no supply of DintyMoore.



http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Hitch http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?p=766426#post766426)
They need to be consistent, does a woman 'own' her own body? That's the bottom line. If so, she can trade it for a can of Dinty Moore same as she can go gold digging for a millionaire.



http://media.shopwell.com/product/3760029532_full.jpg

[Horn]

And Governors too!

Don’t believe in global warming at the state level? FEMA will yank your Federal disaster money



The Federal Emergency Management Agency is making it tougher for governors to deny man-made climate change. Starting next year, the agency will approve disaster preparedness funds only for states whose governors approve hazard mitigation plans that address climate change.

This may put several Republican governors who maintain the earth isn’t warming due to human activities, or prefer to do nothing about it, into a political bind. Their position may block their states’ access to hundreds of millions of dollars in FEMA funds. Over the past five years, the agency has awarded an average $1 billion a year in grants to states and territories for taking steps to mitigate the effects of disasters.


“If a state has a climate denier governor that doesn’t want to accept a plan, that would risk mitigation work not getting done because of politics,” said Becky Hammer, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council’s water program. “The governor would be increasing the risk to citizens in that state” because of his climate beliefs.



The policy doesn’t affect federal money for relief after a hurricane, flood or other disaster. Specifically, beginning in March 2016, states seeking preparedness money will have to assess how climate change threatens their communities. Governors will have to sign off on hazard mitigation plans. While some states, including New York, have already started incorporating climate risks in their plans, most haven’t because FEMA’s old 2008 guidelines didn’t require it.

Full story: http://insideclimatenews.org/news/18032015/fema-states-no-climate-planning-no-money