Biden steals pacifier while playing with Bloomberg baby

[EE_]

Seems natural for him to be sucking something Jewish...

http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/U.S./876/493/bidenfbinternal61.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

[madfranks]

Such a creepy guy. He's like the guy who comes up behind you and starts massaging your shoulders without notice. A few years ago at an old office where I worked, the owner of the building would do this, and it makes me shudder just thinking about it.

[ximmy]

HE'S JUST SAYING, See baby, this is how you suck tits.

[Hitch]

HE'S JUST SAYING,

That's the beauty of it. He can't say anything with a pacifier in his mouth. I say keep it in, it will shut him up for awhile.

[EE_]

HE'S JUST SAYING, See baby, this is how you suck tits.

I don't think that's how he flies.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/03/23/t1larg.joe-biden-mouth-open.t1larg.jpghttp://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31%2BnHNMQWnL._AA160_.jpg

[midnight rambler]

Seems natural for him to be sucking something Jewish...

http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/U.S./876/493/bidenfbinternal61.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

Kid looks on with disgust and says, "That's okay, you can keep it."

[mick silver]

And this is why, if I were Joe Biden, and if I still harbored designs on the Oval Office down the hall, I’d be inclined to ignore what the insiders were saying. I’d run, and I’d run now.
I wrote a few weeks ago about the concerted effort (http://news.yahoo.com/my-problem-with-the-clinton-death-star-220134299.html) to make Clinton her party’s nominee by acclamation and why I found it disturbing. As I said then, she might well be a good president, and possibly even an inspiring one, but there’s just something unseemly about the liberal reformers of the ’60s generation, men and women who fought to create a more democratic nominating process back in the day, now trying to back down anyone who would challenge the establishment’s candidate.
The question you hear most often from skeptics, though, is who that would be. There’s Martin O’Malley, the former Maryland governor, who apparently went after Clinton (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/01/us/politics/martin-omalley-in-veiled-jab-at-hillary-clinton-derides-politics-of-triangulation.html) with a jab at “triangulation” last week, but who hasn’t yet introduced himself to most voters or offered any real argument of his own. There’s Jim Webb (http://news.yahoo.com/is-jim-webb-for-real-184608862.html), who would probably have a better shot running as an independent. There’s Bernie Sanders, who’s an avowed socialist, and Elizabeth Warren, who sounds more like a Jacobin.
And then there’s the 72-year-old Biden, who is mostly left out of this conversation — not because he hasn’t repeatedly signaled an interest in running, but because the handicapping crowd has never taken him all that seriously as a foil to Hillary. Biden has a well-known tendency to get caught up in the moment and say things (http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1895156_1894977_1846609,00.html) that are impolitic or even partly untrue, which in Washington tends to make you a figure of ridicule, though in most other places it’s known as having a pulse.
The accepted wisdom where Biden is concerned is that you can’t have two establishment candidates representing continuity from the same administration, so the best he can do is to wait on the sidelines, keep his options open and hope that maybe Hillary decides to do something else in the twilight of her life, like bring a football team to Los Angeles, or anchor the “Nightly News” on NBC.
Biden’s instincts have to tell him something different, though. After 40-plus years in Washington, he has to know that no one ever really gets plucked off the sidelines when the opening arrives; you have to create the opening yourself. He has to know, too, that the insiders are almost always wrong, and the further out from an actual election you are, the more wrong they tend to be.
Biden is a better candidate than most pundits have ever given him credit for. Yeah, he’s sloppy and meandering and says some nutty stuff. But that’s all part of being genuine and three-dimensional, which may be the most valuable trait in modern politics and not a bad contrast to Clinton’s robotic discipline.
Not incidentally, Biden is especially popular (http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/joe-biden-briefly/) in Iowa, where he first campaigned for president in 1988, and where he retains unusually strong ties. (The Clintons, you may recall, have never met with great affection there.) I remember being struck, in 2008, by the regularity with which Iowa Democrats told me that Biden was their second choice and would have been first if they thought he could actually win.
Biden’s a middle-class champion who makes the case for economic fairness with more conviction than Clinton and less vitriol than Warren. He’s a serious thinker on foreign policy who opposes rampant interventionism without sounding like a pacifist. He more than holds his own as a debater

[osoab]

Unfortunately, Uncle Joe was imagining something else.

[Cebu_4_2]

So who you guess is running? Hillarious wont get it, jewrand wont get it, who else are the contenders? I vote Ramsey Paul. It is another "RP" deal.

[Uncle Salty]

He's a creepy fucking luciferian pedophile sodomite.

[osoab]

He's a creepy fucking luciferian pedophile sodomite.

nuff said.