PDA

View Full Version : George Lucas to build affordable housing in one of the richest parts of America



mick silver
20th April 2015, 07:59 AM
After residents living near George Lucas' Grady Ranch protested his planned studio into nonexistence, the film magnate made different plans for the land.
http://www.cnet.com/news/george-lucas-to-build-affordable-housing-in-one-of-the-richest-parts-of-america/#ftag=YHF65cbda0

Dogman
20th April 2015, 08:21 AM
The comments are interesting!

It's his land and money, so screw the neighbors that stopped the studio but will reap in their eyes a bigger nightmare!

Revenge can be sweet!

;)

mick silver
20th April 2015, 10:16 AM
I like how he ficks people with his paper money ,just because you want to be left alone to live in a place without company's and parking lots around you what next will he buy a walmart and build it there also for the poor folks because he pissed and didn't get his way . the more i see of they's men i know we are ficked they can buy there way around about anything because there no one to say no to them

mick silver
20th April 2015, 10:25 AM
http://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/05/22/us/LUCAS-1/LUCAS-1-articleLarge.jpgSAN RAFAEL, Calif. — In 1978, a year after “Star Wars” was released, George Lucas (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/l/george_lucas/index.html?inline=nyt-per) began building his movie production company far from Hollywood, in the quiet hills and valley of Marin County here just north of San Francisco. Starting with Skywalker Ranch, the various pieces of Lucasfilm (http://lucasfilm.com/) came together over the decades behind the large trees on his 6,100-acre property, invisible from the single two-lane road that snakes through the area.
And even as his fame grew, Mr. Lucas earned his neighbors’ respect through his discretion. Marin, one of America’s richest counties, liked it that way.
But after spending years and millions of dollars, Mr. Lucas abruptly canceled plans recently for the third, and most likely last, major expansion, citing community opposition. An emotional statement posted online (http://gradyranch.com/pdf/Grady_Ranch_4_10.pdf) said Lucasfilm would build instead in a place “that sees us as a creative asset, not as an evil empire.”
If the announcement took Marin by surprise, it was nothing compared with what came next. Mr. Lucas said he would sell the land to a developer to bring “low income housing” here.
Photo http://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/05/22/us/22lucas-map/22lucas-map-articleInline.jpg

Plans to develop Grady Ranch had been stalled for years. Credit The New York Times “It’s inciting class warfare,” said Carolyn Lenert, head of the North San Rafael Coalition of Residents.
Mr. Lucas said in an e-mail that he only wanted “to do something good for Marin,” waving away accusations of ulterior motives.
“I’ve been surprised to see some people characterize this as vindictive,” he said, adding that there was a “real need” for affordable housing here. “I wouldn’t waste my time or money just to try and upset the neighbors.”
Whatever Mr. Lucas’s intentions, his announcement has unsettled a county whose famously liberal politics often sits uncomfortably with the issue of low-cost housing and where battles have been fought over such construction before. His proposal has pitted neighbor against neighbor, who, after failed peacemaking efforts over local artisanal cheese and wine, traded accusations in the local newspaper.
The staunchest opponents of Lucasfilm’s expansion are now being accused of driving away the filmmaker and opening the door to a low-income housing development. That has created an atmosphere that one opponent, who asked not to be identified, saying she feared for her safety, described as “sheer terror” and likened to “Syria.”
Continue reading the main story (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/us/george-lucas-retreats-from-battle-with-neighbors.html?_r=1#story-continues-3)
Carl Fricke, a board member of the Lucas Valley Estates Homeowners Association, which represents houses nearest to the Lucas property, said: “We got letters saying, ‘You guys are going to get what you deserve. You’re going to bring drug dealers, all this crime and lowlife in here.’ ”
Mr. Lucas, 68, first bought land here about 30 years ago, after scouring the area for more than a year, said Catherine Munson, the real estate broker who sold him the land that became Skywalker Ranch (http://www.lucasfilm.com/inside/campuses/?page=1). Over many hikes through the valley, Mr. Lucas explained his vision for setting up his movie production company here, Ms. Munson said.
“What he told us is exactly what he built at Skywalker Ranch,” she said. Lucasfilm said about 5,000 acres were permanently preserved with an 11-mile hiking trail. It later expanded its operations on adjoining land called Big Rock Ranch (http://www.lucasfilm.com/inside/campuses/?page=2) but eventually moved parts of its operations outside Marin County, opening facilities in San Francisco and Singapore. Still, the company pressed ahead with plans to build a 269,701-square-foot digital studio on a third ranch here called Grady (http://www.gradyranch.com/planning_process/index.html). It submitted a so-called precise development plan (http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/comdev/current/pdf/major_projects/Grady_Ranch_webpage_upload-1-20-2012.pdf) for Grady in 2009, which the authorities had already endorsed as part of a master plan in 1996.
Photo http://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/05/22/us/LUCAS-2/LUCAS-2-popup.jpg

Mr. Lucas said Marin needs affordable housing. A resident called his plan “class warfare.” Credit Patrick Fallon/Bloomberg News Continue reading the main story (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/us/george-lucas-retreats-from-battle-with-neighbors.html?_r=1#story-continues-4) Continue reading the main story (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/us/george-lucas-retreats-from-battle-with-neighbors.html?_r=1#story-continues-4)
Continue reading the main story (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/us/george-lucas-retreats-from-battle-with-neighbors.html?_r=1#story-continues-4)
With the project seemingly winding its way toward approval, a group of residents in Lucas Valley resurrected a defunct homeowners’ association last summer. In November, the association and others sent a letter to Mr. Lucas requesting that he find a “far more appropriate location for the development.”
The project, the letter said, would “pose a serious and alarming threat to the nature of our valley and our community,” “dwarf the average Costco warehouse” and generate light

mick silver
20th April 2015, 10:26 AM
The project, the letter said, would “pose a serious and alarming threat to the nature of our valley and our community,” “dwarf the average Costco warehouse” and generate light pollution so that “our dark starry skies would be destroyed.” The association hired an environmental consultant and a lawyer, then alerted the county to questions that state and federal authorities had raised about Lucasfilm’s plan to restore a creek. Last month, the county’s Board of Supervisors decided to postpone a final vote on the project.
Neal Osborne, a county planner, described the pending issues as minor and said that approval for Grady Ranch was nearing “the finish line.”
But a few days later, Lucasfilm pulled the project. Tom Forster, head of community relations at Lucasfilm, said the company feared that a possible lawsuit by the residents would delay construction indefinitely.
Not all of Lucasfilm’s neighbors were against the development.
Jeffrey Tanenbaum and Catherine Tripp, a couple who moved here from San Francisco last fall, became strong supporters, saying that Lucasfilm was just the kind of company Marin needed. Mr. Tanenbaum, a lawyer, challenged the legitimacy of the homeowners’ association, arguing that they did not follow bylaws in reorganizing last year.
“That’s why I refer to them as the de facto board,” he said.
After Mr. Tanenbaum sent board members an 18-point letter questioning their authority, some of them asked to come over for a chat one evening. After some red wine and cheese from neighboring Nicasio, Mr. Tanenbaum asked them to step down. (Board members said their association was legitimate, but said one member had resigned and a second one was preparing to do so.)
Photo http://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/05/22/us/jp-LUCAS/jp-LUCAS-articleLarge.jpg

Lucasfilm facilities at the nearby Big Rock Ranch. Opponents are being accused of opening the door to "crime and lowlife." Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times Supporters have asked Mr. Lucas to reconsider his decision. Instead, he has moved forward with his new idea, choosing a philanthropic group, the Marin Community Foundation (http://www.marincf.org/news/press-releases/mcf_to_explore_development_of_affordable_housing_g rady_ranch), to develop affordable housing at Grady Ranch.
“George, being the great guy that he is, doesn’t want to build more housing for rich people since Marin is loaded with them,” Mr. Forster said.
Thomas Peters, president of the foundation, said that while some of the nation’s wealthiest people live here — Mr. Lucas is believed to be Marin’s richest resident — the county is also home to other people struggling to live in an inflated real estate market.
In a telling fact, a family of four with an annual income of $88,800 can qualify for housing assistance in Marin (http://www.marinhousing.org/HUD%20Income%20Limits.pdf), which has about 6,500 income-restricted housing units, according to the county (http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/cd/main/housing/publications/pdf/Marin_County_Affordable_Housing_Inventory_Study200 8.pdf).
Supporters and opponents of Mr. Lucas have resigned themselves to having low-income housing next door.
“If the Grady Ranch had gone forward, it would have increased property value,” Mr. Tanenbaum said. “It’s likely that if affordable housing were to be built in the neighborhood, it would have a negative impact on property value. But that’s not a major factor for me. Affordable housing has to go somewhere.”
Tom Taylor, a member of the homeowners’ association board, said that responding to Mr. Lucas’s housing proposal was a delicate matter.
“I would say probably everybody has reservations about it, but nobody’s going to come out and say they don’t want it,” Mr. Taylor said.
“Everybody probably felt that he did it just for spite,” Mr. Taylor said. “But after thinking about it for a while, I guess I’d have to say that probably the site’s better suited for affordable housing than it was for the project he was intending to put there.”