Who is Barrack Hussein Obama???

[midnight rambler]

The one listed on Dunn & Bradstreet with two r's and an address at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, D.C.

D&B doesn't do typos.

Here's a clue: it's not a living soul it's the name of a business.

But why two r's?? ???

[Cebu_4_2]

Corrected spelling?

[Uncle Salty]

That is actually quite interesting.

BHO is a fiction for sure.

[Glass]

you will generally find judges and lawyers trading as registered companies under their names. Most politicians are lawyers by trade so they will do the same. Not sure what the US law says about lawyers sitting in Government. It is illegal here in Australia, however most sitting politicians are lawyers.

[BrewTech]

I've always found it interesting that the "GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES" is listed in many places like DnB as a business listing. This is a good thing to show people that doubt that they live on a human farm, and they are considered nothing but working capital on that farm, not a human being. There is still the belief on many folks' part that somehow their "government" considers them important as a living soul, and cares about their individual needs, and not a unit of livestock with a brand in the form of "XXX-XX-XXXX". Once that reality is understood, everything else makes sense. Sad, but true.

[Glass]

yes. The Freeman movement make out it is a big discovery that the government is a company. To be honest it probably is to many people. Fact of the matter is that they mostly always have been. The Virginia Company was the settlor of many of the colonies the USA. Probably the founder too. And conquerers too. Not only against the natives but against the Netherlands and...someone. Was it Spain?

As another example, the East India company was responsible for many major trading hubs through out India and also Hong Kong.

The company received a Royal Charter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Charter) from Queen Elizabeth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I_of_England) on 31 December 1600,[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#cite_note-3) making it the oldest among several similarly formed European East India Companies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company_%28disambiguation%29). Wealthy merchants and aristocrats (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy) owned the Company's shares.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#cite_note-4) The government owned no shares and had only indirect control.

The company eventually came to rule large areas of India with its own private armies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_armies), exercising military power and assuming administrative functions.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#cite_note-5) Company rule in India (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_rule_in_India) effectively began in 1757 after the Battle of Plassey (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Plassey) and lasted until 1858 when, following the Indian Rebellion of 1857 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Rebellion_of_1857), the Government of India Act 1858 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1858) led to the British Crown (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Crown) assuming direct control of India in the form of the new British Raj (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Raj).

[Shami-Amourae]

This guy:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/President_Barack_Obama.jpg/800px-President_Barack_Obama.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

:rolleyes:

[Glass]

This guy:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

:rolleyes:

well no. Apparently?
Barack (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama)

[7th trump]

I've always found it interesting that the "GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES" is listed in many places like DnB as a business listing. This is a good thing to show people that doubt that they live on a human farm, and they are considered nothing but working capital on that farm, not a human being. There is still the belief on many folks' part that somehow their "government" considers them important as a living soul, and cares about their individual needs, and not a unit of livestock with a brand in the form of "XXX-XX-XXXX". Once that reality is understood, everything else makes sense. Sad, but true.

Lets not go into conclusions too fast here.
Prior 1868 the US covernment never had citizens of its own.
The south revolted with the Civil War when they didnt want to give up their property (slaves). And when the south lost that war the slave was no longer property. However, none of the northern states would accept these newly freed colored people as an equal to the white people.....and they still are not to this day.
A "us citizen" is subject to the US government....via the 14th amendment. Around this time frame the federal government wrote a different US constitution as the original constitution addressed white people.
Theres a lot of conspiracy nutjobs out there who will tend to make you beleive tales and fables as to what happened, but they forget to considered the whole picture.

[palani]

This guy

bar·rack ˈberək/
verb
verb: barrack; 3rd person present: barracks; past tense: barracked; past participle: barracked; gerund or present participle: barracking

provide (soldiers) with accommodations in a building or set of buildings.
"the granary in which the platoons were barracked"

[palani]

Prior 1868 the US covernment never had citizens of its own.

Really? How would you explain this clause of the Louisiana Purchase then?


Article III

The inhabitants of the ceded territory shall be incorporated in the Union of the United States and admitted as soon as possible according to the principles of the federal Constitution to the enjoyment of all these rights, advantages and immunities of citizens of the United States, and in the mean time they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property and the Religion which they profess.



Theres a lot of conspiracy nutjobs out there who will tend to make you beleive tales and fables as to what happened, but they forget to considered the whole picture. Seems YOUR 'whole picture' started in 1868.

[7th trump]

Really? How would you explain this clause of the Louisiana Purchase then?




Seems YOUR 'whole picture' started in 1868.

Your conspiracy minded mentality is really a crutch for your intellect.
I have another case somewhere that gives a full understanding that there wasnt any federal citizens until after the civil war was over.


"The term 'Citizen of the United States' must be understood to mean those who were citizens of the State as such after the Union had commenced and the several States had assumed their sovereignty. Before that period there were no citizens of the United States."
Inhabitants of Manchester v. Inhabitants of Boston, 16 Mass. 230, 235

[ximmy]

His name was made up from enemy names of the United States During that time. A big Fuc# you from the powers-that-be to the citizens of America.

Barack

Hussein = Saddam Hussein

Obama = Osama bin Laden

[palani]

I have another case somewhere that gives a full understanding that there wasnt any federal citizens until after the civil war was over.

Your 'case' is moot.


moot (adj.)
"debatable; not worth considering" from moot case, earlier simply moot (n.) "discussion of a hypothetical law case" (1530s), in law student jargon. The reference is to students gathering to test their skills in mock cases.

[7th trump]

Your 'case' is moot.

Any factual evidence that deems that case moot?
Or are you just pulling it out of your ass to justify your ignorance of subject matter?

A territory is not a "state".
A territory belongs to the country that claims said lands.
So "NO".......there wouldnt be any "US citizen" but those people who are subject to the country that claims the territory.
And as your cite refers...those people (foreigners to the US) in said territory would
"enjoyment of all these rights, advantages and immunities of citizens of the United States, and in the mean time they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property and the Religion which they profess" until they became members of said union state the territory would form.

This isnt illogical palani, nor rocket science, a third grader can comprehend this easily (why cant you?)....your trying to make a conspiracy where none exists to justify your delusions.

[EE_]

Who is Barrack Hussein Obama?

BHO is going down as one of the greatest presidents of our time. He brought us back from the greatest (Bush) recession/depression of our lives, to the strongest economy of our lives!
Facts:
NASDAQ today = all time high!
Stock markets = all time highs
homes = all time highs
# of millionaires/billionaires = all time high
IRS taxes collected = all time high
collectables/art prices = all time high
guns/ammo sales = all time high
welfare benefits paid = all time high
legal/illegal immigrants allowed in the US = all time high
war spending = all time high
strong employment
low gasoline prices
lowest interest/mortgage rates

It's pretty hard to dispute the above. If you do please tell me what he's done wrong?

[palani]

Any factual evidence that deems that case moot?
A BAD decision was made in 1861. More BAD decisions were made defending the 'original' decision. Even to this day TERRIBLE decisions are made based upon BAD decisions made in the past. Anyone who uses dicta from BAD cases base their current and future results upon a bad foundation.


...those people (foreigners to the US) in said territory would until they became members of said union state the territory would form. And that hasn't happened yet. Bait and switch doesn't count.

Actually the Louisiana Purchase and the Treaty of Gualeloupe Hidalgo create a class called 'denizen'. Not quite a citizen but still having the rights. I'm sure you can find a case that states that the concept of 'denizen' does not exist in U.S. law but that is the most descriptive term available for someone whose rights are established without corresponding duties.

[EE_]

You're going to miss BHO in 2016...mark my words!

The next Commander in Chief!
http://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2015/04/22/bd5a65c2-dbb8-4a78-b0ff-b8a3037f0eec/thumbnail/620x350/a2dffb6242dff8d94f47afdc23df53fd/gettyimages-470698958.jpg

[palani]

The next Commander in Chief!

A woman can't be Commander *** it's a male thing ****. Have to create a new title? Is Wicked Witch of the East appropriate?

[7th trump]

A BAD decision was made in 1861. More BAD decisions were made defending the 'original' decision. Even to this day TERRIBLE decisions are made based upon BAD decisions made in the past. Anyone who uses dicta from BAD cases base their current and future results upon a bad foundation.
Again..........please provide the factual evidence. Not your typical bullshit hearsay interpretation.
What bad decision are you referring too?
1861 really means nothing and has no significants.

And that hasn't happened yet. Bait and switch doesn't count.
Really?...it hasn't happened yet!
The union states aren't union states after all....but just one big territory.
Bahahahahahahaha.........get back on your meds palani and get a check up by a professional.
So the union state Iowa has never existed.

Actually the Louisiana Purchase and the Treaty of Gualeloupe Hidalgo create a class called 'denizen'. Not quite a citizen but still having the rights. I'm sure you can find a case that states that the concept of 'denizen' does not exist in U.S. law but that is the most descriptive term available for someone whose rights are established without corresponding duties.

You just proved my point palani with this denizen.
Denizens aren't US citizens are they grasshopper?
Nope they are not.
Please show me one shred of evidence that there was federal citizenship that was subject to the same of that established in the 14th amendment.
There aren't any and if there was there would be no need for the 14th amendment in the first place as the authority of the government would have already been established to do so in the US Constitution.

The state citizens of the union states did not want the freed negro to be an equal with the white man and hence why the federal government had to step in and give the negro the protection of federal "citizenship" and shortly afterwards "rights" from the Civil Rights Act of 1866.


"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. . ."
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.

"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship."
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.


You wouldn't make such an ass of yourself Palani if you'd stop with the conspiracy bullshit and just accept the truth for what it is.
Stop looking for a conspiracy in every nook and crevasse.

Why would the government give the habitants of territories (obviously none negro) access to rights when they wouldn't give the negro any?

"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. . ."
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.

"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship."
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.

[EE_]

A woman can't be Commander *** it's a male thing ****. Have to create a new title? Is Wicked Witch of the East appropriate?

Her penis is pretty big I heard

http://comm439sp10.csulb.wikispaces.net/file/view/hillary20urinal.jpg/125097869/hillary20urinal.jpg

[palani]

Her penis is pretty big I heard

I didn't know you could hear those things. Guess I will have to listen closer.

[Ponce]

Every one is talking, and no one is saying anything......... glad to be a poor ignorant dunm Cuban refugee...... my world is now a very simple one.

V

[Dogman]

Every one is talking, and no one is saying anything......... glad to be a poor ignorant dunm Cuban refugee...... my world is now a very simple one.

V

Simple is good!

The more crap to deal with in life , also may shorten it.