Suing Judges

[palani]

A topic for the more suicidal perhaps?

In case there might be some interest in this topic below are some images from in interesting book Suing Judges: A Study of Judicial Immunity by Abimbola A. Olowofoyeku . If you view a partial image perhaps if you do a right mouse click on it and select VIEW IMAGE your vision will be improved?

My guess is that all 'judges' act in ministerial capacity rather than judicial. Since they hide behind this 'corporate veil' then why not ask them up front if they are operating ministerially or judicially?

http://i58.tinypic.com/104hzdh.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/j9bio0.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/11rg9ja.jpg

[Glass]

Interesting. What are the differences between them. What makes something ministerial?

[midnight rambler]

Interesting. What are the differences between them. What makes something ministerial?

An administrative venue rather than judicial.

[Glass]

An administrative venue rather than judicial.

Well that would be my assumption as well. I was going to make some comments about not needing to sue persay, but to move with an administrative procedure. A 3 step process. It is a process that I have used with some success. One that I would not hesitate to use against an "actor" in the future. It is very powerful and we know it works because that is the process they use against us. Traffic tickets, speeding fines, parking fines are all 3 step Administrative process.

[palani]

AmJur 2d calls administrative law the 4th branch of government and one that encompasses executive, judicial and legislative branches in one entity. Ministrative functions my guess are entirely administrative. In the U.S. by constitution bills of attainder are forbidden. These bills of attainder (and less fatal bills of pains and punishments) are ONLY about separation of powers and in administrative law there are no separation of powers.

Seems a valid question for a court "Are you a court of RECORD? Are you seated judicially or ministratively?" I suppose I would tend to ask the court how it gets compensated as well to see if it participates in any insurgent activities against the People (using federal reserve notes) but that question is intended to make 'em squirm a little.

[Glass]

Seems a valid question for a court "Are you a court of RECORD? Are you seated judicially or ministratively?" I suppose I would tend to ask the court how it gets compensated as well to see if it participates in any insurgent activities against the People (using federal reserve notes) but that question is intended to make 'em squirm a little.

Our Magistrates courts are not courts of record. A transcript can be obtained but it is not court record. We can confirm this. Purely administrative. In my experience, Administration is a bankruptcy or estate action.

We have currency limitations for settlement of debts, in that only coins are considered legal tender and the maximum that can be paid with coinage is $20. There are even limitations on how much of each denomination can be used. I have used this in my procedures. It will be part of all of future ones as well.

[palani]

Administration is a bankruptcy or estate action. And when people bring up the constitution of a bunch of dead people a probate court is what they are requesting admittance to.


We have currency limitations for settlement of debts, in that only coins are considered legal tender and the maximum that can be paid with coinage is $20. There are even limitations on how much of each denomination can be used. I have used this in my procedures. It will be part of all of future ones as well.
So the maximum you could get by suing a judge would be $20 in coin ... most people won't find it worth the effort and in the meantime any judicial actor can accomplish much more damage than anyone could possibly hope to recover. Sort of like bringing your pet bull with you to the china shop.

[Glass]

So the maximum you could get by suing a judge would be $20 in coin ... most people won't find it worth the effort and in the meantime any judicial actor can accomplish much more damage than anyone could possibly hope to recover. Sort of like bringing your pet bull with you to the china shop.

I was also indicating that we too have money issues with limitations of the currency. Everyone is breaking that law daily so I see no reason why successful process couldn't be discharged by breaking the law as well.


You might secure rights to property as part of the process. I don't think you would ever get a judge to stump up and pay you. You would need to lien on them a little.... or a lot.