View Full Version : Nuclear Hoax - Nukes Do Not Exist!
StreetsOfGold
3rd May 2015, 11:07 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sULjMjK5lCI
Cebu_4_2
3rd May 2015, 11:11 AM
The following documentary explores the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertized, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately! Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water. He completely blows the lid off the idea of "nuclear meltdown" or "nuclear waste," and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years! His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource. Thanks to Edmund Matthews for compiling the majority of footage and big thanks to Greg Carlwood for releasing the second-hour of our nuke interview. Be sure to give some love and subscribe to his Higherside Chats, check out the documentary, read through the excellent Nuke Lies Forum (NukeLies.org), and leave a comment what you think about this nuclear hoax. Was the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race as big and deceptive as the fake Space Race!?
midnight rambler
3rd May 2015, 12:11 PM
So what sort of person* comes up with this horseshit?
*someone living an alternate reality lol
He completely blows the lid off the idea of "nuclear meltdown" or "nuclear waste,"
So what keeps killing the people AND ROBOTS at Fukushima?? AND what killed the tens of thousands of workers who only worked briefly at Chernobyl?? And if high intensity radiation isn't really such a big deal, then WHY abandon all that productive land around Chernobyl and Fukushima??
I suppose the Soviets faked this in 1961 (windows were broken in Finland and Norway thousands of miles away) -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjnm3V0xYjI
And WHY did the Soviets ABANDON all this equipment at Chernobyl?? To 'keep up the lie about nuke radiation'?? Seems like a VERY expensive propaganda campaign -
http://photorator.com/photos/images/military-vehicles-used-to-clean-up-chernobyl-abandoned-for-some-reason-this-was-in-wtf--30311.jpg
singular_me
3rd May 2015, 12:16 PM
that wouldnt surprise me... but nonetheless, hiroshima bombing did a lot of damage for example.... weaponry potential today in the world could kill billions.
DUI used to bomb iraq seems pretty real too. But honestly I dont think the NWO would want their heirs and main puppets to be contaminated.
midnight rambler
3rd May 2015, 12:18 PM
Indeed, radiation is completely harmless -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium_Girls
Ponce
3rd May 2015, 02:35 PM
Like I said long ago.....this is what the Zionist are doing, using their so called nukes to scare the world....... Nukes do exist and radiation do exist but the state of Israel have none of it......the guy that came up with all those photos of the nuclear plant? nothing more than the "on purpose" fall guy.
V
Cebu_4_2
3rd May 2015, 03:28 PM
Indeed, radiation is completely harmless -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium_Girls
I watched this documentary a long time ago, seemed pretty real to me.
Then again the .gov has been installing fear for decades which is another of their many tools.
If they are not harmless they would be using them much more often in their theaters IMO. If for any reason to remind us of their power and capabilities.
Big subject really, could go either way in my mind.
BarnkleBob
3rd May 2015, 04:04 PM
Indeed, nuke power plants & nuke weapons are a giant HOAX!
An atom is composed of 99.999% space, what do you get when you split 99.999% space? Damn sure not a chain reaction!
Further, "nuke plants" capture the excess energy produced by the grid that is not consumed or used. This excess energy is used to boil water and regenerate energy.... The grid system must ALWAYS produce more electricity than will be used to supply peak power, such as an air conditioner or a motor starting up....
The excess electricity from the grid is diverted to the nuke plant to bleed it out & recycle. Dont believe it??? Then ask yourself WHY is their a fully operational independent power plant built within every nuke plant? A nuke plant CANNOT operate without the grid or some other back-up source, such as very large generators....
DYODD before you begin attacking the OP or me.... you may be very surprised at what you may discover!
Ares
3rd May 2015, 04:14 PM
Quick someone tell the David Hahn guy I was in the Navy with that its all a hoax before he kills himself from nonexistent radiation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn
He hates Zionist and the American government. Seems like a lot of wasted effort and hazards to one health to perpetuate a "lie".
Cebu_4_2
3rd May 2015, 04:58 PM
Quick someone tell the David Hahn guy I was in the Navy with that its all a hoax before he kills himself from nonexistent radiation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn
I saw this documentary also, I think. He the guy that went around to pawn shops buying all kinds of 'radioactive' pieces?
Ares
3rd May 2015, 05:31 PM
I saw this documentary also, I think. He the guy that went around to pawn shops buying all kinds of 'radioactive' pieces?
Yep back when he was a kid. As an adult he was caught stealing smoke detectors so that he could harvest their americium. His mugshot as an adult shows the effects of radiation poisoning.
Glass
3rd May 2015, 07:25 PM
is polonium a radioactive material or is it some other kind of material?
my earlier programming makes it difficult to take this tale seriously. I did watch that presentation a couple years ago. where he drinks heavy water? says he swam in it at the plant.
I did take on, from the man is space is fake theory, that ICBM's are/might not possible. If that were true than Nuke ICBM's would not be possible either, but that the war heads them selves are not possible. Will need some more info I think.
The Chernobyl question is a good one.
monty
3rd May 2015, 07:49 PM
Nukes exist. I have watched the above ground tests during the 1950's. I saw the fireball light up the predawn sky brighter than day. I saw the mushroom cloud form and rise in the sky.
Then later during 1972 I worked several months at Nevada Test Site. I have driven by the site of some of the atmospheric tests. The only plant life growing in a circle about 1/4 mile in diameter was tumbleweeds, Russian Thistle.
I have seen the craters from the underground shots. I have watched the drilling of 120" diameter holes drilled to a depth of close to 6000 feet.
I have seen mustangs with their entire backs scarred from radiation burns.
I know families who lost livestock and human life to leukemia
Nukes do exist.
Shami-Amourae
3rd May 2015, 08:10 PM
What is the benefit of the government lying about nukes?
Ares
3rd May 2015, 08:26 PM
What is the benefit of the government lying about nukes?
Supposedly to steal more money. :rolleyes: As if they need such an elaborate excuse when the IRS can just steal it with accusing you of structuring your bank deposits..
osoab
3rd May 2015, 08:51 PM
is polonium a radioactive material or is it some other kind of material?
Ask Litvinenko and Arafat.
PatColo
3rd May 2015, 09:18 PM
started this thread last summer
Thread: The Realist Report - Are nuclear weapons a hoax? (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?78716-The-Realist-Report-Are-nuclear-weapons-a-hoax)
the take home msg for me was, Hiro/Naga were **probably** fire-bombed not "nuked", with the JP PTB at the time and since, complicit in hoaxing it up as having been hit by the Allies' invincible new super weapon, as a way to "save face" (a little, I guess?) given their total surrender which followed.
Allies already had lots of experience with fire bombing cities of no strategic value & full of innocent civilian non-combatants (the REAL holocaust (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?54461-Introduction-to-the-Holocaust%99-Hoax), or "burnt offering" of ww2...); but above-ground nuke detonations? Supposedly Hiro/Naga were the first??
this OP video has 5 comments at Mami's which posted it a few days ago,
Nuclear Hoax - Nukes Do Not Exist (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/05/nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html)
monty
3rd May 2015, 09:29 PM
The first above ground nuclear detonation was in New Mexico
http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7535&stc=1http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7535&stc=1
Glass
3rd May 2015, 09:32 PM
I've been you tubeing nuke splosions
This one is interesting from my observation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdy1Yp1h5A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdy1Yp1h5A
At second 50 there appears to be a skip in the film and suddenly the smoke and dust surrounding the cannon and which is drifting to the right of screen disappears completely and you have a 100% clear view of the cannon. It would seem as if the explosion is added to the first segment of film.
Cant be sure of all of the following blast segments are from that blast. Have to assume so. The last segment looks like very high quality footage compared to all the previous footage. As if it was filmed with something else or with more advanced/newer film tech.
PatColo
3rd May 2015, 09:41 PM
Mami's also posted this one,
The Nuclear Scare Scam Galen Winsor (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-nuclear-scare-scam-galen-winsor.html)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROAO1saHEvs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROAO1saHEvs
Galen Winsor was a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage. Read the rest here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROAO1saHEvs)
Dogman
3rd May 2015, 09:48 PM
I've been you tubeing nuke splosions
This one is interesting from my observation:
YouTube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdy1Yp1h5A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdy1Yp1h5A)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdy1Yp1h5A
At second 50 there appears to be a skip in the film and suddenly the smoke and dust surrounding the cannon and which is drifting to the right of screen disappears completely and you have a 100% clear view of the cannon. It would seem as if the explosion is added to the first segment of film.
I would think that the flash and light from the blast would overwhelm some of the smaller details, dust can still be seen drifting, not much but considering the contrasts of the brighter fireball vs the foreground and being a film (old school camera) I can see some details missing!
Nukes are real, my first and last base were SAC bases, they wanted me to go into missiles, but sinus problems washed me out!
It amazes me sometimes when it comes to nay sayers, ignorance is not bliss!
Glass
3rd May 2015, 09:51 PM
yes Dogman. I'm not buying into it. Think its a bit of a silly discussion at this point. And that is saying something for me.
As to the video, the dust etc disappears just before the flash whites out the footage. It looks like a splice or something happened. It could be minutes missing or a split second. No way of telling.
I look at the height these plumes go to and I just don't feel that conventional explosions could achieve that kind of altitude.
monty
3rd May 2015, 10:05 PM
I was 11 years old when they were testing that atomic cannon. I remember reading about it in the newspaper and listening to the news on the radio. We didn't have TV in that part of the world back then. This is the first video,I have seen.
My former father in law, recently deceased was Range Manager for Sandia National Laboratories central Nevada test site in the early 1960's. Later he was involved in some nuclear testing at Nevada Test Site north of Las Vegas. I cannot elaborate, other than to say nukes are definitely not a hoax.
Glass
4th May 2015, 12:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k34EwY8nuwo
pacific testing
Neuro
4th May 2015, 01:59 AM
There should be plenty of eyewitness accounts from Hiroshima and Nagasaki claiming they were indeed flattened by carpet/fire-bombing. I've never heard of such accounts. Ergo, they were nuked, and anyone claiming otherwise, is a disinformant... Hi Barnkle! :)
StreetsOfGold
4th May 2015, 02:05 AM
Interesting ideas put forth, I figured the people here would have a say.
One thing cannot be denied, the pretense of Nuclear weapons is a primary excuse to invade other countries and keep people in "fear" and those earlier videos (before special effects became better) of the house blowing apart are so fake it's laughable.
Why fake it, if it's real?
Spectrism
4th May 2015, 04:52 AM
Here is a great example of a moron trying to spark thoughts between 2 non-functional brain cells.
Indeed, nuke power plants & nuke weapons are a giant HOAX!
An atom is composed of 99.999% space, what do you get when you split 99.999% space? Damn sure not a chain reaction!
Brilliant. And when I split a log, I am only splitting empty space and it cannot burn to produce heat in my house or cook my food. Fire is a hoax. You dope!
Further,
As if he already proved something! LOL! Somebody get him a brain transplant.
"nuke plants" capture the excess energy produced by the grid that is not consumed or used. This excess energy is used to boil water and regenerate energy.... The grid system must ALWAYS produce more electricity than will be used to supply peak power, such as an air conditioner or a motor starting up....
Yes- all those power lines connected to nuke plants are to bring electricity INTO the plants to boil water. No power goes out. Boiling water from "excess energy" (wtf is that?) is good for tea and queer bath houses.
The excess electricity from the grid is diverted to the nuke plant to bleed it out & recycle. Dont believe it??? Then ask yourself WHY is their a fully operational independent power plant built within every nuke plant? A nuke plant CANNOT operate without the grid or some other back-up source, such as very large generators....
You really got that one figured out Chumley. We need a good detective like you since Colombo went off the air.
DYODD before you begin attacking the OP or me.... you may be very surprised at what you may discover!
Sure thing Bubba. I already am surprised and entertained beyond my imagination.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.