PDA

View Full Version : Neomasculinity: The Male Backlash Against Toxic Women



Shami-Amourae
18th May 2015, 12:34 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qHnIp-WzCI

Men are confused. They're bewildered. They've been lectured that the innate behaviors, feelings and characteristics that defined masculinity for generations are sexist, malevolent, and need to be abandoned if men are to have any success with women.

This has led to the rise of neomasculinity - men reclaiming and re-asserting their masculinity, rejecting toxic women who have been brainwashed by cultural marxism, and working to fix the incredible harm that 3rd wave feminism has wrought on gender relations.

Twisted Titan
18th May 2015, 01:05 PM
You know where feminist stop

Right at the car that has broken down on the side of the road
The pallet of cinder blocks that need to be. Lifed 15 flights
The door that is not opened

I have NEVER seen a zionist trained feminist address how. She will step up to fill those gaps

EE_
18th May 2015, 01:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mXUbDMJVpk

singular_me
18th May 2015, 01:41 PM
dunno, my assessment is that real men are very seldom.... it may be worse now , sure. but 30 years ago, I already was thinking this way....

Mythological Archetypes are a fraud. Left brained patriarchy has done a lot of damages before feminism was "invented"... zero sum game here. Feminism is too a left brain construct.

ximmy
18th May 2015, 02:03 PM
I'm not finding or seeing this toxic feminism everyone is crying about. Yes, every now and we witness a "man-woman" trying to exert her prominence in a male dominated world. But for the most part, most women want a manly man around.

Silver Rocket Bitches!
18th May 2015, 02:34 PM
Watch all these cultural splinters like feminism simply fall apart once the current paradigm ends. This shit is trivial in the grand scheme of things.

Twisted Titan
18th May 2015, 02:44 PM
Watch all these cultural splinters like feminism simply fall apart once the current paradigm ends. This shit is trivial in the grand scheme of things.

Same thing with these LBGT

That are overly flamboyant demanding that they be treated fairly and with respect

Wait till that riflebutt is jammed in their mouth and they start spitting teeth because playtime is over.

Horn
18th May 2015, 02:46 PM
ah I see singular is quick to claim an excuse, and ximmy ignorance.

how conveniently toxic of them, lol!

ximmy
18th May 2015, 02:56 PM
ah I see singular is quick to claim an excuse, and ximmy ignorance.

how conveniently toxic of them, lol!

Come on Horn, this image below, is the real reason women are mad at men; am I right singular_me?

http://giant.gfycat.com/VibrantSimplisticIndianelephant.gif

madfranks
18th May 2015, 02:56 PM
Wait till that riflebutt is jammed in their mouth and they start spitting teeth because playtime is over.

Beautifully put!

Horn
18th May 2015, 03:42 PM
the real reason women are mad at men

Now we're getting constructive...

Alcibiades
18th May 2015, 03:58 PM
I am of the mind that the cheques females have been writing concerning feminism, patriarchy, and general man-hating histrionics should be cashed whenever they need anything from a man.

Heisenberg
18th May 2015, 04:03 PM
Same thing with these LBGT

That are overly flamboyant demanding that they be treated fairly and with respect

Wait till that riflebutt is jammed in their mouth and they start spitting teeth because playtime is over.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLbFbbkfwbM

Dogman
18th May 2015, 04:06 PM
Commonwealth ?

ximmy
18th May 2015, 04:45 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLbFbbkfwbM

Poor beverage... j/k

Horn
18th May 2015, 05:06 PM
That's man,man baby...

Hitch
18th May 2015, 05:19 PM
I hate to say it, but either women support men in what men do, or they distract them and get in the way. The feminists don't get that. Fortunately, there are a lot of women that still do. The mentality should be that both men and women succeed, together, as a team, not fight each other over distractions, and other nonsense.

Jewboo
18th May 2015, 06:23 PM
This has led to the rise of neomasculinity - men reclaiming and re-asserting their masculinity, rejecting toxic women who have been brainwashed by cultural marxism, and working to fix the incredible harm that 3rd wave feminism has wrought on gender relations.




http://gold-silver.us/forum/image.php?u=3317&dateline=1427512775








http://photos.imageevent.com/yonkers_au/bbi/emoticons/BB.gif HEY GOLDI...MAKE ME A SAMMICH

ShortJohnSilver
19th May 2015, 02:29 AM
The reality is, American feminism dies 48 hours after the petrodollar dies.

singular_me
19th May 2015, 09:55 AM
good one ximmy

more seriously the gender race is as old as mankind... there lies the success of feminism, the pendulum swing right and left very easily.

there is no relationship one size fit all model and so far men and women alike have been victims of generational long cliches, darwinian oriented, that only works for cavemen. Civilization is meant to transcend our human instincts.

recommend "the century of the self", a 4 part documentary
https://vimeo.com/75776128



Come on Horn, this image below, is the real reason women are mad at men; am I right singular_me?

http://giant.gfycat.com/VibrantSimplisticIndianelephant.gif

Shami-Amourae
19th May 2015, 10:06 AM
the gender race is as old as mankind... there lies the success of feminism, the pendulum goes right and left very easily.

You're saying you believe society used to be female dominated in a previous civilization?

singular_me
19th May 2015, 10:17 AM
although there have been matriarchal based societies which are not the solution either, I meant that after centuries of patriarchy it was very easy to induce domination of the males in women.



You're saying you believe society used to be female dominated in a previous civilization?

aeondaze
19th May 2015, 10:28 AM
there is no relationship one size fit all model and so far men and women alike have been victims of generational long cliches, darwinian oriented, that only works for cavemen. Civilization is meant to transcend our human instincts.

Heaven forbid, I almost agree with what you said in bold, I would appear on the surface to be the case, but I think a better definition is:

"civilization is the defeat of the natural human instincts of the many, so the instincts of a few can dominate"

A lot of intellectuals reject and resent the image of the "noble savage" but in all honesty honor and integrity is the ONLY thing that is valued in small groups of humans that rely on each other for their mortality. As soon as you scale it up to say above one hundred individuals factions develop, divisions in labor arise, the social fabric begins to stratify and group cohesion suffers.

aeondaze
19th May 2015, 10:32 AM
You're saying you believe society used to be female dominated in a previous civilization?

Some Australian aborignal tribes have this secret mens saying or belief. "Many years ago woman ruled but men rose up and took control, they don't want the woman to know about it just in case they might try and take it back" True.

Horn
19th May 2015, 01:12 PM
You're saying you believe society used to be female dominated in a previous civilization?


If both parents are Jewish, their child will also be considered Jewish, and the child ... Accordingly, if the mother is Jewish, so is her child, and if she is not Jewish, neither is her child considered Jewish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew%3F

osoab
20th May 2015, 05:56 PM
I skipped a few parts of the article, but I never sawwhere the wife said she was sorry for her behavior.

Woman Realizes That She’s Been Accidentally Abusing Her Husband This Whole Time... Wow. (http://brando.tickld.com/x/woman-realizes-that-shes-been-accidentally-abusing-her-husband-this-whole-time)

osoab
20th May 2015, 05:59 PM
This is a good thread for this.


Comments from Married Men (http://www.mgtow.com/comments-from-married-men/)

Heisenberg
20th May 2015, 06:55 PM
although there have been matriarchal based societies which are not the solution either, I meant that after centuries of patriarchy it was very easy to induce domination of the males in women.
That's funny. Women don't dominate, they fuck it up by getting in the way when they try. I have seen too many women who have "stood up" to their husbands, and after having their divorce and custody, been completely dominated by their male sons.

Alcibiades
20th May 2015, 07:05 PM
That is a false dichotomy as there exists a third option - a man can mind his own business and have a life free of females and their interference. That is not to say to avoid check-out lines with female cashiers. Rather, one does well to avoid dating, marriage, and to minimise his white market economic activity so as to avoid propping up "society" i.e. females.


I hate to say it, but either women support men in what men do, or they distract them and get in the way. The feminists don't get that. Fortunately, there are a lot of women that still do. The mentality should be that both men and women succeed, together, as a team, not fight each other over distractions, and other nonsense.

Serpo
20th May 2015, 07:10 PM
Some Australian aborignal tribes have this secret mens saying or belief. "Many years ago woman ruled but men rose up and took control, they don't want the woman to know about it just in case they might try and take it back" True.

The women are still in control ............

Shami-Amourae
20th May 2015, 07:12 PM
That is a false dichotomy as there exists a third option - a man can mind his own business and have a life free of females and their interference. That is not to say to avoid check-out lines with female cashiers. Rather, one does well to avoid dating, marriage, and to minimise his white market economic activity so as to avoid propping up "society" i.e. females.

That's the path I've taken. Sometimes I doubt myself, but then I look at all the men around me in my personal life, and think I'm making the right decision. I've taken the easy path, but I'm not sure if it is the right one.

I do feel guilty though since I feel I should be having kids since of White genocide, but at the same time I'm not a very warm/empathetic person. I'm against vaccines, circumcision, and openly a racial realist so the CPS would probably take my kids right away.

Horn
20th May 2015, 07:47 PM
I'm sorry did someone post something about empathy?

I was busy watching Beyonce' videos. :)

Hitch
20th May 2015, 08:12 PM
This is a good thread for this.


Comments from Married Men (http://www.mgtow.com/comments-from-married-men/)

What a painful thing to read. What gets me, is how easy it is to make men happy. Yet, none of the women in this article get it.

All men need really is, 1) No Drama, period. 2) A warm smile at the end of a hard workday (yes we think you are beautiful). 3) Sex, lot's of it. 4) A good meal. We will cook it even, we will fire up the grill with a beer in hand, we're happy.

That is it really.

I'm glad I'm single, because those 4 things are not much to ask for, imo, and if a gal can't figure that out, she's better off with a different guy than me.

Shami-Amourae
20th May 2015, 08:14 PM
I'm sorry did someone post something about empathy?

I was busy watching Beyonce' videos. :)

What's a beyonce?

Dogman
20th May 2015, 08:19 PM
What a painful thing to read. What gets me, is how easy it is to make men happy. Yet, none of the women in this article get it.

All men need really is, 1) No Drama, period. 2) A warm smile at the end of a hard workday (yes we think you are beautiful). 3) Sex, lot's of it. 4) A good meal. We will cook it even, we will fire up the grill with a beer in hand, we're happy.

That is it really.

I'm glad I'm single, because those 4 things are not much to ask for, imo, and if a gal can't figure that out, she's better off with a different guy than me.

Add to the list is for the wife or Gf to admit "gasp" that they are wrong sometimes and not right all the time and they DO make mistakes! Some are always "right" even when they know they are wrong!

Cebu_4_2
20th May 2015, 08:25 PM
What a painful thing to read. What gets me, is how easy it is to make men happy. Yet, none of the women in this article get it.

All men need really is, 1) No Drama, period. 2) A warm smile at the end of a hard workday (yes we think you are beautiful). 3) Sex, lot's of it. 4) A good meal. We will cook it even, we will fire up the grill with a beer in hand, we're happy.

That is it really.

I'm glad I'm single, because those 4 things are not much to ask for, imo, and if a gal can't figure that out, she's better off with a different guy than me.

When you first meet there is sex, lots. As time goes on you gotta purge yourself. If you don't you die.

Alcibiades
20th May 2015, 08:28 PM
I submit that our path is the hard one as it goes against biological and social programming.

As for guilt - what is the last time the "white race" ever did anything for you? So far as I see it, said race, minus myself, did a fine job of screwing itself over on multiple occasions, most notably the world wars, so why should I concern myself with its affairs?


That's the path I've taken. Sometimes I doubt myself, but then I look at all the men around me in my personal life, and think I'm making the right decision. I've taken the easy path, but I'm not sure if it is the right one.

I do feel guilty though since I feel I should be having kids since of White genocide, but at the same time I'm not a very warm/empathetic person. I'm against vaccines, circumcision, and openly a racial realist so the CPS would probably take my kids right away.

Shami-Amourae
20th May 2015, 09:12 PM
I submit that our path is the hard one as it goes against biological and social programming.

As for guilt - what is the last time the "white race" ever did anything for you? So far as I see it, said race, minus myself, did a fine job of screwing itself over on multiple occasions, most notably the world wars, so why should I concern myself with its affairs?

Whites built modern civilization. We invented the technology you type to respond. We invented automobiles you go to work in. We invented practically all of modern civilization. Jewry has perverted our people and caused the decline of our civilization. We have a disease.

The Civil Rights Act was passed into law on 1964. Whites have been paying for mud people ever since. We work, they receive. We toil, they play and fuck. Muds have been multiplying like rabbits ever since. This system will destroy civilization as we know it.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5aAsxFJOeMw/TP_AXaVowpI/AAAAAAAADtE/vyePqUud_Z8/s1600/a-us-annual-gdp-national-debt-1791-2010.png



most notably the world wars
Jews were behind those. You should know that.

Please educate yourself on what really happened during the World Wars:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g

Jewboo
20th May 2015, 09:35 PM
Jews were behind those. You should know that.



"Alcibiades" does know that but so far hasn't mentioned the jews.


:rolleyes:

Alcibiades
20th May 2015, 11:10 PM
Whites built modern civilization. We invented the technology you type to respond. We invented automobiles you go to work in. We invented practically all of modern civilization. Jewry has perverted our people and caused the decline of our civilization. We have a disease.

The Civil Rights Act was passed into law on 1964. Whites have been paying for mud people ever since. We work, they receive. We toil, they play and fuck. Muds have been multiplying like rabbits ever since. This system will destroy civilization as we know it.

(emphasis mine)

We have a disease? Speak for yourself.

It is absurd to allege that a group who at their peak numbered 15,3 million could manipulate hundreds of millions. Either what you allege is false, or it is an attribute of white civilisation to be so maladaptive to this alleged perversion or diminution. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is part of this "white civilisation" as it was passed by your white representative in Congress, yet you admit that it backfired and that in over fifty years, it has not been repealed. A decade is reasonable as a trial run, two decades maybe. For any damage beyond twenty years, you only have yourselves to blame for that.


Jews were behind those. You should know that.

Please educate yourself on what really happened during the World Wars:


I did not see any primary sources cited in the video, nor on the video's website. YouTube videos are not primary or even secondary sources. However, I have seem plenty of footage of white people shooting each other in the most grisly warfare to have ever disgraced the European peoples. It was white people that voluntarily went to the trenches; if they had said "no", there would have been no war since there would have been no soldiers. If they were manipulated by someone else, that is no excuse; one is responsible for one's actions.

You know what? Bugger excuses, yours especially. Either one has agency, or one does not. When did those evil, wicked Jews ever manipulate the Chinese, or the Latin peoples, or anyone other peoples except white people? Get your business together and stop making excuses.

aeondaze
20th May 2015, 11:33 PM
I dunno man, maybe you've been asleep for the last decade, meanwhile a lot of good folks have noticed the disproportionate representation Jews have in congress and the senate, how man have been FED chairpersons, the unholy grip they have over the media and entertainment industry and the social engineering programs they seem to pour money into and control like feminist ideology and multiCULTurism, not to mention historic anomalies like this which show who the true antagonists of WWII were,

http://www.biblestudysite.com/judea%20declares%20war%20-800px.jpg

Gee, when you put these FACTS together it makes your straw man arguments look rather lame...:(

Horn
20th May 2015, 11:54 PM
Either one has agency, or one does not. When did those evil, wicked Jews ever manipulate the Chinese, or the Latin peoples, or anyone other peoples except white people?


Praise for Henry Kissinger 's On China .In On China , statesman Henry Kissinger draws on historical records and 40 years of direct interaction with four generations of Chinese leaders to analyze the link between China ’s ancient past and its present day trajectory. In doing so, the man who helped shape modern East-West relations presents an often unsettling, occasionally hopeful and always compelling accounting of what we’re up against.”—The Chicago Sun-Times.



The Argentinean prosecutor Alberto Nisman - jew investigating the 1994 bombing of a Jewish center in Buenos Aires was found dead in his apartment on Sunday night with a gunshot wound to the head, hours before he was set to testify before lawmakers on his accusations of a cover-up by his country’s president in the case. Argentinian media reported early Monday that Alberto Nisman, 51, was found in a pool of blood in the bathroom of his home in the capital’s Puerto Madero district.

...

Alcibiades
21st May 2015, 12:23 AM
...

Go pick some more cherries.


I dunno man, maybe you've been asleep for the last decade, meanwhile a lot of good folks have noticed the disproportionate representation Jews have in congress and the senate, how man have been FED chairpersons, the unholy grip they have over the media and entertainment industry and the social engineering programs they seem to pour money into and control like feminist ideology and multiCULTurism, not to mention historic anomalies like this which show who the true antagonists of WWII were,

http://www.biblestudysite.com/judea%20declares%20war%20-800px.jpg

Gee, when you put these FACTS together it makes your straw man arguments look rather lame...:(

First of all, "mass demonstrations" and a "boycott of German goods" can hardly be considered acts of war.

If you had bothered to read the image you quoted, it stated:

"All Israel is uniting in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on the Jews in Germany"

Which onslaught? The article continues:

"Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists....to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-semitism, and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority."

In conclusion
A - No war was ever declared as protests and boycotts are not acti belli.
B - Assuming such a loose definition of war, it was the Nazis that declared war first by acts of violence and suppression.

And no, one is not allowed to un-cite the article; I quoted the URL.

Thatcher famously said that power is like being a lady... if you have to tell people you are, you aren't. You demonstrated something similar: if you have to tell people certain things are FACTS in ALL CAPS, they probably aren't if the disingenuous use of that newspaper article is any indication.

Horn
21st May 2015, 01:01 AM
Go pick some more cherries.


You'd make a better argument if you might suggest Zionist jews are a manipulation scapegoat race for the Anglo Saxons.

History is replete with jews meddling thru manipulation in all races.

Shami-Amourae
21st May 2015, 01:06 AM
I did not see any primary sources cited in the video, nor on the video's website.

It's at the end of the documentary, but here's a quick link:
http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/portfolio/part-26-credits-thanks/

Alcibiades
21st May 2015, 01:17 AM
You'd make a better argument if you might suggest Zionist jews are a manipulation scapegoat race for the Anglo Saxons.

History is replete with jews meddling thru manipulation in all races.

I will give you an opportunity to redact that as I doubt that someone who writes like a McDonalds franchise (using "thru" in lieu of "through") could ever prove that statement. I took the liberty of defining some of those big that you used:

replete (adj.) - Filled or well-supplied with something
meddle (verb) - Interfere in something that is not one’s concern
manipulation (noun) - The action of manipulating someone in a clever or unscrupulous way
manipulate (verb) - Control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly or unscrupulously

madfranks
21st May 2015, 03:12 AM
B - Assuming such a lose definition of war, it was the Nazis that declared war first by acts of violence and suppression.

Don't you mean "loose" definition of war?

madfranks
21st May 2015, 03:16 AM
I took the liberty of defining some of those big that you used

Some of the big that he used? You mean big words?

Just saying, if you're going to start calling others out on what you perceive as bad grammar, try to make sure your own posts don't have the same thing.

EE_
21st May 2015, 03:45 AM
Some of the big that he used? You mean big words?

Just saying, if you're going to start calling others out on what you perceive as bad grammar, try to make sure your own posts don't have the same thing.

Some of the worst offenders of grammar are the most highly educated, Harvard Grad's etc.
Listen to how the political leaders and billionaires speak.
tuh/ta = to
fir = for
gunna = going to
woulda = would have
shoulda = should have
coulda = could have



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Sf5PzR1_xyQ/VCk0domRz-I/AAAAAAAACyo/iTILrCJrOOk/s1600/grammar.gif

EE_
21st May 2015, 03:50 AM
You'd make a better argument if you might suggest Zionist jews are a manipulation scapegoat race for the Anglo Saxons.

History is replete with jews meddling thru manipulation in all races.

Someone needs to get an education. They can start here, "Jewry 101" http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

singular_me
21st May 2015, 07:09 AM
sexuality is the mother of all illusions if there is no minds connection to start with. yet many people bank on sex to fix everything. then the purge happens as you say... generally it takes 2 or 3 years to see WHO the partner truly is. Lets call this the Reality Shock.

also most people are not monogamous. The cheating rate tells this very clearly. Centuries of data... NWO or not

enforcing the monogamy fairy tale as a social model is wrong, it always will be a conscious choice requiring to know one' self first. Most people settle down much too fast, then have kids... which are all screwed up because parents fell for an illusion.

Sexuality is a Dual Force. Getting to know one another for 2-3 years is a must before considering any bedtime if the goal is to settle down and have a *true* monogamous relationship... or deal with a painful readjustment.


When you first meet there is sex, lots. As time goes on you gotta purge yourself. If you don't you die.

EE_
21st May 2015, 07:43 AM
sexuality is the mother of all illusions if there is no minds connection to start with. yet many people bank on sex to fix everything. then the purge happens as you say... generally it takes 2 or 3 years to see WHO the partner truly is. Lets call this the Reality Shock.

also most people are not monogamous. The cheating rate tells this very clearly. Centuries of data... NWO or not

enforcing the monogamy fairy tale as a social model is wrong, it always will be a conscious choice requiring to know one' self first. Most people settle down much too fast, then have kids... which are all screwed up because parents fell for an illusion.

Sexuality is a Dual Force. Getting to know one another for 2-3 years is a must before considering any bedtime if the goal is to settle down and have a *true* monogamous relationship... or deal with a painful readjustment.

I'm inclined to agree with you Miss Singular.
Your last paragraph is good advice...as long as the women is giving great oral during the 2-3 year waiting period. :p

Horn
21st May 2015, 08:27 AM
generally it takes 2 or 3 years to see WHO the partner truly is. Lets call this the Reality Shock.

This of course depends on age,

Years turn into months when you're in yur 30s, and days when you're in yur 40s, hours and so on... :)

Hitch
21st May 2015, 09:05 AM
Sexuality is a Dual Force. Getting to know one another for 2-3 years is a must before considering any bedtime if the goal is to settle down and have a *true* monogamous relationship... or deal with a painful readjustment.

So, stay friends for 2-3 years first? In the meantime, date and have bedtime with other people? The problem with your approach, is that without sex, there is no monogamy. Furthermore, building a relationship with no sex for years, then add sex into the mix, changes everything. It is the same in reverse, which according to that one article, is why all these marriages fail. A couple have a healthy sex life, then get married, then sex disappears. It's that disruption of what was built up in that relationship over the years, that does it in.

Neuro
21st May 2015, 09:11 AM
You'd make a better argument if you might suggest Zionist jews are a manipulation scapegoat race for the Anglo Saxons.

History is replete with jews meddling thru manipulation in all races.
Yes, here is another one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Voitinsky
Grigori Naumovich Voitinsky, born Zarkhin(Russian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_language): Григорий Наумович Войтинский; 1893-1953) was Russian Jew [1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Voitinsky#cite_note-1)and a Comintern (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comintern) official during its creation, and was sent to China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China) in 1920 as an advisor to contact the prominent Chinese radicals such as Chen Duxiu (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_Duxiu), just before the formation of the Communist Party of China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_China). The actual process of forming the infant Party can be mostly attributed to his influence, although his successor advisors had more influence about the official Party line itself, such as allying with the Guomindang (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guomindang).
Born on 17 April, 1893 in Nevel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevel_(town)). In 1918, he joined The Communist Party of the Soviet Union (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union) (CPSU). He took an active part in the Far Eastern Front in the Russian Civil War (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_Eastern_Front_in_the_Russian_Civil_War). [2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Voitinsky#cite_note-2)
In 1920, the Soviet Union (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union) established the Far Eastern Bureau in Siberia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia), a branch of the Third Communist International, or the Comintern. It was responsible for managing the establishment of a Communist party in China and other countries. Soon after its establishment, the bureau's deputy manager Voitinsky arrived in Beijing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing) and contacted the Communist vanguard Li Dazhao (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Dazhao). Li arranged for Voitinsky to meet with another Communist leader, Chen Duxiu (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_Duxiu), in Shanghai (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai). In August 1920, Voitinsky, Chen Duxiu, Li Hanjun (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Hanjun), Shen Xuanlu (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shen_Xuanlu&action=edit&redlink=1), Yu Xiusong (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yu_Xiusong&action=edit&redlink=1), Shi Cuntong (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shi_Cuntong&action=edit&redlink=1), and others began to established the Comintern China Branch.
The Shanghai Chronicle (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shanghai_Chronicle&action=edit&redlink=1) was set up in 1919 in Shanghai by Shemeshko (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shemeshko&action=edit&redlink=1)and other Russians with socialist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism) leanings, and received financial aid from the Soviet-Russian government in early 1920. In the spring of 1920, Voitinsky and his colleagues came to China on a mission to establish the Communist Party in China. They not only came to China in the guise of editors and reporters for the newspaper, but also set up the Comintern's East Asia Secretariat in the newspaper office. From then on, the Shanghai Chronicle became both a propaganda vehicle for the East Asia Secretariat and a cover for Bolshevik (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik) activity in China. Because the newspaper staff assisted Soviet Russian and Comintern personnel stationed under cover at the newspaper in activities to establish a communist organization in China, the newspaper as a whole played a special role in the early communist movement in China. Although the Shanghai Chronicle stopped publication at the end of 1922 because Russian aid came to an end, many staff members continued to work for Bolshevism.[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Voitinsky#cite_note-3)

singular_me
21st May 2015, 12:36 PM
not especially... sex might be okay after a few months if clear about n-o-t to get committed so quickly... leaving room for exploration leading to a conscious choice and the right mate. But moving in because sex is great and fixes everything is 95% failure guaranteed.

there is also an upside with telling first about one's own emotional challenges than rather presenting a rosy and seductive picture

the problem with lust is that it makes one blind... or is just about possession/power: you are mine and I am yours, which is coercive in the long run.

Sexuality is the most powerful Dual Force in the Universe without which nothing could be created. Female and male is in everything.

I have become very cautious... sex craze, no thanks, deep mind connection first ;D


So, stay friends for 2-3 years first? In the meantime, date and have bedtime with other people? The problem with your approach, is that without sex, there is no monogamy. Furthermore, building a relationship with no sex for years, then add sex into the mix, changes everything. It is the same in reverse, which according to that one article, is why all these marriages fail. A couple have a healthy sex life, then get married, then sex disappears. It's that disruption of what was built up in that relationship over the years, that does it in.

Hitch
21st May 2015, 01:07 PM
not especially... sex might be okay if clear about n-o-t to get committed so quickly... leaving room for exploration leading to a conscious choice and the right mate. But moving in because sex is great and fixes everything is 95% failure guaranteed.

there is also an upside with telling first about one's own emotional challenges than rather presenting a rosy and seductive picture

the problem with lust is that it makes one blind... or is just about possession/power: you are mine and I am yours, which is coercive in the long run.

Sexuality is the most powerful Dual Force in the Universe without which nothing could be created. Female and male is in everything.

I have now become very cautious... sex craze, no thanks ;D

The way I see it, sex is basically the barometer of the relationship. No monogamous relationship is fulfilling without a healthy sex life.

I was mostly commenting on your point on waiting 2-3 years to get to know each other first. That is not wise for men to do. I think if a man wants to make a commitment, and really likes a gal, he needs to sleep with her as soon as possible. Not for lust reasons, or power and control, but as a way of investing your time and energy into a woman who has a higher probability of staying with you.

Think about it this way. If a man has sex in the beginning with a gal and is in a happy monogamous relationship, 2-3 years later, they really start to know each other. They find their compatibility as time goes on.

Take that same man and woman, without sexual involvement. 2-3 years go by the man waits patiently. During that time, she is window shopping for a better deal. She meets another man as well. He's patiently waiting. Now there's two guys investing years into this woman. She picks the guy she likes best, has sex with him, and poof disappears from the other guy. That guy just lost 2-3 years he could have spent with someone who liked him the best.

Bottom line. Women you are not having sex with go poof, in an instant. Women you are having sex with, rarely do that.

Horn
21st May 2015, 01:43 PM
The way I see it, sex is basically the barometer of the relationship. No monogamous relationship is fulfilling without a healthy sex life.

Hetero or homo? :)

Unfortunate if yur hetero and a man, women only see sex as a thermometer....not bow-o-meter.

Horn
21st May 2015, 08:04 PM
I have become very cautious... sex craze, no thanks, deep mind connection first ;D

Wild child, full grace, savior of the human race...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjRQxRREIqk

singular_me
22nd May 2015, 07:27 AM
sure, experience matters... still... but often the entrapment still lurks.


This of course depends on age,

Years turn into months when you're in yur 30s, and days when you're in yur 40s, hours and so on... :)

singular_me
22nd May 2015, 07:45 AM
The way I see it, sex is basically the barometer of the relationship. No monogamous relationship is fulfilling without a healthy sex life. .

thats where is become tricky... defining a healthy sex life? as soon as one uses quotas, boredom will eventually be ensuing because nothing is more elusive than sexual bliss.

what strikes me as odd is that 90% of the people around me are complaining about their sex life or gave up. emotions which are electromagnetic constantly seek for rest/union and imbalance at once. One cannot fight Nature. More self control is the answer.

madfranks
22nd May 2015, 08:16 AM
I'm completely 100% monogamous. My wife and I never had sex with anyone else before we got married. We've been married for over 10 years and both of us are 100% satisfied with our sex lives. At this point in my life many of my friends have now slept with dozens of girls over the years, and a few of them have told me they wish they did it my way. One friend has an STD and his girlfriend just broke up with him, and another friend got a girl he sort of liked pregnant, and they aborted the baby, then broke up because it was too much stress. I have a loving wife and two kids.

Horn
22nd May 2015, 09:14 AM
sure, experience matters... still... but often the entrapment still lurks.

Just turned 46 a week ago, there just ain't enough life left to try and entrap someone else. I spend enough time trying to pin myself down. lol!

Yes, I am married a second time, and only spent the earlier part of my life as a "single" person. Those short periods in between mates only got shorter as I got older. I do need a mate, life is a miss without one, and do believe and know of certain fate when it comes to a love union. Like great friendships they just happen, you can't force it to connect or deepen.

I have no problem with American women any more, I've left them to play that role on their own. I admire their dedication to whatever that may be.

Wish they knew, and quit forcing blind will on others. :)

singular_me
22nd May 2015, 02:17 PM
great minds connection.... congrats!


I'm completely 100% monogamous. My wife and I never had sex with anyone else before we got married. We've been married for over 10 years and both of us are 100% satisfied with our sex lives. At this point in my life many of my friends have now slept with dozens of girls over the years, and a few of them have told me they wish they did it my way. One friend has an STD and his girlfriend just broke up with him, and another friend got a girl he sort of liked pregnant, and they aborted the baby, then broke up because it was too much stress. I have a loving wife and two kids.

singular_me
22nd May 2015, 02:34 PM
I am fine either ways, as a single or with a (right) mate

the other day I was chatting with a man, 50s', successful... but telling me that he was going to live in the wilderness by himself... find the peace of aloneness. Then I said: alone, I thought you had a solid relationship (his reputation in the area) ... well she left him after 8 years, 3 of which completely platonic.... those couples abound. I witness that every day.


Just turned 46 a week ago, there just ain't enough life left to try and entrap someone else. I spend enough time trying to pin myself down. lol!

Yes, I am married a second time, and only spent the earlier part of my life as a "single" person. Those short periods in between mates only got shorter as I got older. I do need a mate, life is a miss without one, and do believe and know of certain fate when it comes to a love union. Like great friendships they just happen, you can't force it to connect or deepen.

I have no problem with American women any more, I've left them to play that role on their own. I admire their dedication to whatever that may be.

Wish they knew, and quit forcing blind will on others. :)

ximmy
22nd May 2015, 05:29 PM
Having intimacy, someone you can trust with your life, your secrets, your dreams, ideas, plans. Someone you can encourage and who encourages you. Someone you can be quiet with,laugh with, cry with. Someone who makes you a better person. These things are more important than sex.

Horn
22nd May 2015, 05:50 PM
Having intimacy

Barriers to intimacy are not easily explained or keys created to.

If a woman tells you she is having intimacy issues, its best to just turn and walk away. Forget the relationship ever occurred.

Do Not even try to fix that! :)

Hitch
22nd May 2015, 06:06 PM
Having intimacy, someone you can trust with your life, your secrets, your dreams, ideas, plans. Someone you can encourage and who encourages you. Someone you can be quiet with,laugh with, cry with. Someone who makes you a better person. These things are more important than sex.

I agree, more important than sex. Finding both though, in one gal, I'd marry her on the spot. Seems like they are mutually exclusive though.

midnight rambler
22nd May 2015, 06:11 PM
Having intimacy, someone you can trust with your life, your secrets, your dreams, ideas, plans. Someone you can encourage and who encourages you. Someone you can be quiet with,laugh with, cry with. Someone who makes you a better person. These things are more important than sex.

Double plus good post.

Cebu_4_2
22nd May 2015, 06:31 PM
I agree, more important than sex. Finding both though, in one gal, I'd marry her on the spot. Seems like they are mutually exclusive though.

Dude your on the left coast and have a rowboat, perhaps you need to explore more options than you currently do. Look into other styles (shunned by this board regarding multiculturalism), not speaking of a drastic change but maybe someone more adaptive of real life. American chicks have been at the bottom of my resources for many years. Got stung in every way trying to make that amerikan shit work.

Hitch
22nd May 2015, 07:19 PM
Dude your on the left coast and have a rowboat, perhaps you need to explore more options than you currently do. Look into other styles (shunned by this board regarding multiculturalism), not speaking of a drastic change but maybe someone more adaptive of real life. American chicks have been at the bottom of my resources for many years. Got stung in every way trying to make that amerikan shit work.

I'll never claim to be some great catch, but I've been dating a gal from Cyprus. She was there for the big banking collapse, haircut, etc.

She seems like the real deal. We agree on a lot of things, she's the first gal that I've met who is vocally anti fluoride. She doesn't seem materialistic like most gals, so that's good.

Like you, I'm tired of getting "stung" by women. I've been taking my time and savoring the moment though! :)

osoab
22nd May 2015, 07:29 PM
I'll never claim to be some great catch, but I've been dating a gal from Cyprus. She was there for the big banking collapse, haircut, etc.

She seems like the real deal. We agree on a lot of things, she's the first gal that I've met who is vocally anti fluoride. She doesn't seem materialistic like most gals, so that's good.

Like you, I'm tired of getting "stung" by women. I've been taking my time and savoring the moment though! :)

Don't get married.

Cebu_4_2
22nd May 2015, 07:58 PM
Don't get married.

Getting married is a hoax in the USi. Getting married by the church is different. The USi churches require a marriage certificate from the USi. Other countries will marry under the church and God. Of course not recognized in the west. If in the west you will never recognize the basic help of the .gov.

StreetsOfGold
22nd May 2015, 08:14 PM
I'm completely 100% monogamous. My wife and I never had sex with anyone else before we got married. We've been married for over 10 years and both of us are 100% satisfied with our sex lives. At this point in my life many of my friends have now slept with dozens of girls over the years, and a few of them have told me they wish they did it my way. One friend has an STD and his girlfriend just broke up with him, and another friend got a girl he sort of liked pregnant, and they aborted the baby, then broke up because it was too much stress. I have a loving wife and two kids.

How dare you do things God's way! :rolleyes:

singular_me
23rd May 2015, 06:47 AM
yep, that is The Greater Reality. But for centuries long sexuality has been an elite preoccupation to distract the masses.

control people emotions and one controls the world. Global peace will be the result of understanding this.

https://scontent-lax1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/s640x640/10805570_795331970508849_1663368468143849002_n.jpg ?oh=37eb7f2d00a11e826c9ae678d8e21ada&oe=55C323E9

the is no NWO to go after... lets just go after our own self instead. Many dont realize how POWERFUL this/their knowledge really is.


Having intimacy, someone you can trust with your life, your secrets, your dreams, ideas, plans. Someone you can encourage and who encourages you. Someone you can be quiet with,laugh with, cry with. Someone who makes you a better person. These things are more important than sex.

Hitch
23rd May 2015, 08:49 AM
thats where is become tricky... defining a healthy sex life? as soon as one uses quotas, boredom will eventually be ensuing because nothing is more elusive than sexual bliss.

Healthy sex life means just that, healthy. Folks who have lots of sex are in fact, healthier than those who don't. An orgasm a day, keeps the doctor away. :)

Healthy men accept that God created us with a strong sex drive, and the fact that the media and social agenda tells us it's evil, etc, won't change that.

Healthy women accept their healthy men for who they are, and want their men to live longer and healthier lives. If you don't like your husband, the best way to kill him slowly is to shut him off.

http://www.hitchedmag.com/article.php?id=968

Horn
23rd May 2015, 09:44 AM
Healthy women accept their healthy men for who they are, and want their men to live longer and healthier lives. If you don't like your husband, the best way to kill him slowly is to shut him off.

http://www.hitchedmag.com/article.php?id=968

That's probably how many relationships die.

Men feel the sex is still blissful every day for a thousand days, while women are bored to death with it and afraid to tell anything is different, cause he's so stupidly blissful over it.

Hitch
23rd May 2015, 09:54 AM
That's probably how many relationships die.

Men feel the sex is still blissful every day for a thousand days, while women are bored to death with it and afraid to tell anything is different, cause he's so stupidly blissful over it.

I am reminded of a Churchill quote. ;D

Lady Astor: “Winston, if I were your wife I’d put poison in your coffee.”

Winston Churchill: “Nancy, if I were your husband I’d drink it.”

EE_
23rd May 2015, 10:44 AM
Men and women have completely different views/needs when it comes to sex.

In general...
Men see sex as pleasure, sex as a need for health and well being.

In general...
Women see sex 1st as a tool to attract and use men to get what they need, secondly for pleasure and to get their emotional needs met.

Healthy men are only attracted to women for sex.

Today it is considered healthy for women to be attracted to/have sex with both women and men...so women have many more options to have their sexual and emotional needs met. Women can get these needs met without men at all.
This gives them more power to only use/save sex to get their financial needs met...benefits, security, jobs, to attract wealthy men, etc.

The point is, there are two completely different discussions regarding sex depending whom you're talking to, a man or a women.

osoab
23rd May 2015, 03:32 PM
I listened to this awhile back. A retelling of a story by Tom Leykis? Basically, A dude is dating this chick. He had a vasectomy and never told her. She tells him she's pregnant. He puts the hammer down on the free shit army wannabe.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg-I8tLm3_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg-I8tLm3_E

Hitch
23rd May 2015, 04:07 PM
Basically, A dude is dating this chick. He had a vasectomy and never told her. She tells him she's pregnant. He puts the hammer down on the free shit army wannabe.

That's pretty funny. I could never take pleasure in making a gal cry though, no matter how wrong she was. I would have let her down easy, then wished her the best and bailed.

Reminds me of another story. Guy has sex with a gal then goes to the bathroom to throw the condom in the trash. The gal goes to the bathroom after him, and while in there, starts wailing in pain.

The guy, had put Tabasco sauce in the used condom. She was trying to, well, it's a story with a point. Take caution on how you choose to dispose of used condoms.

Horn
24th May 2015, 01:25 AM
You must've heard that story from one of those guys who used to peel the lead paint off the bleachers in elementary school, then eat it.

Hitch
24th May 2015, 09:27 AM
You must've heard that story from one of those guys who used to peel the lead paint off the bleachers in elementary school, then eat it.

Hmmm...I detect an accusation there. For the record, that was not me, and furthermore I never ate lead paint chips either. You will have to find another explanation why I'm a bit "off". :)

singular_me
25th May 2015, 01:23 PM
faithfulness has to be spontaneous... and many make it a duty... the duty surfaces when the sex craze fades away... then it is back to earth or crashing into a wall.

Seduction and misrepresentation of one self is a real cliche, and often works both ways. Many wake up several months/years later facing a lover/spouse which they have nothing in common with.

I dont believe in psychoanalysis, all life stories although different, have the same bottom line: the fear of being which only can be resolved by "knowing one self". And sexuality, the most creative Force in the entire Universe, is going to highlight this... it is the mirror of the soul.

The masonic elite knows this and that is why they want to control that very field since ever. they know that sexuality is metaphysical.


I agree, more important than sex. Finding both though, in one gal, I'd marry her on the spot. Seems like they are mutually exclusive though.

Horn
25th May 2015, 05:45 PM
then it is back to earth or crashing into a wall

Sadism should be seen as a last resort,

to salvage some form of battered respect in endurance from your mate...

Cebu_4_2
25th May 2015, 06:17 PM
My wife told me once that you can learn to love anyone as long as there is an attraction. Seems to hold true.

Hitch
25th May 2015, 06:29 PM
faithfulness has to be spontaneous... and many make it a duty... the duty surfaces when the sex craze fades away... then it is back to earth or crashing into a wall.

Seduction and misrepresentation of one self is a real cliche, and often works both ways. Many wake up several months/years later facing a lover/spouse which they have nothing in common with.

I dont believe in psychoanalysis, all life stories although different, have the same bottom line: the fear of being which only can be resolved by "knowing one self". And sexuality, the most creative Force in the entire Universe, is going to highlight this... it is the mirror of the soul.

The masonic elite knows this and that is why they want to control that very field since ever. they know that sexuality is metaphysical.

The elite want to use their own agenda to push and/or crush their opponents.

Faithfulness is not spontaneous, it just doesn't "pop" into our character one day and say that sounds great. It's a conscious decision. It's who we are, our values, that ultimately decided where faithfulness is placed inside us.

I really think the only difference you and I have, is in regards to men's sex drive. You don't seem to understand that men are different, from women.

God gave me a strong sex drive. I'm not apologizing for that. Society can shame people because of that, but since I live a life of honor (to me), I can see right through that BS.

Neuro
25th May 2015, 10:12 PM
The elite want to use their own agenda to push and/or crush their opponents.

Faithfulness is not spontaneous, it just doesn't "pop" into our character one day and say that sounds great. It's a conscious decision. It's who we are, our values, that ultimately decided where faithfulness is placed inside us.

I really think the only difference you and I have, is in regards to men's sex drive. You don't seem to understand that men are different, from women.

God gave me a strong sex drive. I'm not apologizing for that. Society can shame people because of that, but since I live a life of honor (to me), I can see right through that BS.
Exactly, people doesn't stay faithful because it is a natural instinct, they do it because it is a principle they have adopted, holding back their natural instincts...

singular_me
26th May 2015, 12:59 PM
I said several posts ago that there is no model because most are not wired monogamous. Spontaneous monogamy is the best position to raise kids though, at least until they are young adolescents. Kids dont deserve to go through the often painful divorce of their parents.

anything that we force onto ourselves or is pushed down our throats will always translate into frustration or bitterness over time - and is projected into the kids which carry it on... and so on. Of course the gov melding into our personal choices and influencing them is utterly wrong. Religions cannot fix this either.

Maybe for you being polyamory might be a solution, not talking of serial dating here but the conscious choice of being with an open minded partner ... as long as one is honest and dont try to change a partner at all costs to suit one's needs... there is no problem. IMHO.





The elite want to use their own agenda to push and/or crush their opponents.

Faithfulness is not spontaneous, it just doesn't "pop" into our character one day and say that sounds great. It's a conscious decision. It's who we are, our values, that ultimately decided where faithfulness is placed inside us.

I really think the only difference you and I have, is in regards to men's sex drive. You don't seem to understand that men are different, from women.

God gave me a strong sex drive. I'm not apologizing for that. Society can shame people because of that, but since I live a life of honor (to me), I can see right through that BS.

Horn
26th May 2015, 01:45 PM
Maybe for you being polyamory might be a solution,

That's ok, just don't go springin it on me 2 years down the road, "singular"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftjEcrrf7r0

Horn
26th May 2015, 01:57 PM
I don't prescribe this "neo-masculinity" bologna, its just a constant.

Hitch
26th May 2015, 04:56 PM
Maybe for you being polyamory might be a solution, not talking of serial dating here but the conscious choice of being with an open minded partner ... as long as one is honest and dont try to change a partner at all costs to suit one's needs... there is no problem. IMHO.

Nope, I'm a monogamous person. I never date more than one gal at a time, and any gal I make a commitment to, my word is in stone. Never have cheated against my word, and I never will. I'm a better match with a gal who feels the same way.

I agree though, what two adults agree to in a relationship, is fine as long as they don't try to change each other. There shouldn't ever be a problem if everything is out in the open and there's good communication.

Horn
26th May 2015, 08:15 PM
Quit calling them gals Hitch,

dont you know they hate that? lol

Dogman
26th May 2015, 10:01 PM
Quit calling them gals Hitch,

dont you know they hate that? lol

Calling them Mam, also twists their twinkles !

;)

singular_me
27th May 2015, 06:36 AM
the fact is that I have too often seen people confusing the "sexual endorphin shot" with love... those are chasing an illusion as a the few seconds of bliss can never be satiated. It is a supreme natural law. Sexuality, the most powerful creative Force in the Universe is dual. A Force responsible for Live and Death.

the sexual endorphin shot is needed to ease inner fears. Resolve the fears and the need for sex balances itself automatically, whatever one's personal choice is.

Being at peace with oneself FIRST is key... no inner peace, sexuality become a senseless quest ruining lives. when there is inner peace, it becomes really fulfilling.

Why to you think all ascendented masters speak so highly about self-control? It cannot be self-imposed... but self evident.

psychoanalysis is absolute BS.



I don't prescribe this "neo-masculinity" bologna, its just a constant.

EE_
27th May 2015, 06:41 AM
the fact is that I have too often seen people confusing the "sexual endorphin shot" with love... those are chasing an illusion as a strong drive can never be satiated. It is a supreme natural law.

the sexual endorphin shot is needed to ease inner fears. Resolve the fears and sexuality balances itself, whatever one's personal choice is.

We have many men today that have damaged their ability to release sexual endorphins, thanks to good ol Jewish porn.

I've read enough studies how many young men addicted to porn, are unable to have sex, or get erections.

They used up all their "endorphin shots" sitting in front of their computer.

osoab
29th May 2015, 06:14 PM
Why a wife bonus makes complete sense (http://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-why-a-wife-bonus-makes-complete-sense-2015-5)

osoab
31st May 2015, 12:55 PM
RIP Kid from Brooklyn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddqx_cWUN-g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddqx_cWUN-g

Jewboo
25th June 2015, 08:48 PM
https://i.imgur.com/wzVFO06.jpg
FIFTY SHADES OF XIMMY






:D just kidding...lulz

ximmy
25th June 2015, 09:04 PM
FIFTY SHADES OF XIMMY






:D just kidding...lulz



Books meets ximmy at the store...

http://i.imgur.com/1lVdhKJ.gif lulz

Jewboo
25th June 2015, 09:37 PM
Book meets ximmy at the store... lulz





https://i.imgur.com/s0tJKQy.gif
Catch meeeeeeeeee Ximmy!








:) lulz