Free Speech on Trial: IRS v. Hendrickson [Archive]

Cebu_4_2

14th June 2015, 10:30 AM

Published on Jun 10, 2015
THE SHOCKING TRUTH THE IRS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW: The limited nature of the 'income' tax...

Buried in Supreme Court rulings, legal minutia, tax code jargon, and the minutes from Congressional hearings is the truth that the what is commonly referred to as the income tax is meant to be a simple excise tax levied on those benefiting in some way from a federal privilege.

This means that government workers and office-holders, federal reserve bankers, subsidy recipients, investors in federal corporations, and any other person benefiting from the profitable exercise of federal privilege were meant to pay the tax, NOT independent hard-working American citizens.

RELEVANT COURT HEARINGS:

"...in Spinger v. U. S., 102 W.U. 568 (1880), it was held that [the] tax upon gains, profits, and income was an excise tax or duty, and not a direct tax, within the meaning of the constitution, and that its imposition was not, therefore, unconstitutional." - United States Supreme Court, Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust, 158 U.S. 601 (1895)

"...taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to be enforces as such," United States Supreme Court, Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), quoting and reiterating language used in its ruling in Pollock v. Farmer's Loan and Trust

IT DID NOT CHANGE AFTER 16TH AMENDMENT:

"The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation..." - Stanton vs. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916)

"The Sixteenth Amendment, although referred to in argument, has no real bearing and may be put out of view. As pointed out in recent decisions, it does not extend the taxing power to new or excepted subjects..." - Peck vs. Lowe, 247 U.S. 165 (1918)

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax.”
–F. Morse Hubbard, Treasury Dept legislative draftsman. House Congressional Record, March 27, 1943

These findings, along with other research meticulously gathered by Pete Hendrickson and presented in Cracking the Code, outline the limited nature of the income tax. This information, if truly understood and effectuated by the American public, could limit government faster than any electoral result or any half-baked reform scheme coming out of Washington D.C.

In 'Free Speech on Trial,' you will see the lengths to which the minions of the corrupt federal system will stoop to tread upon the rights of freedom-loving Americans and keep their illicit scam under wraps.

Buy the book 'Cracking the Code' and learn how to get your rightful earnings back from the federal criminals - http://www.losthorizons.com/cc.htm

Support Doreen Hendrickson financially as her family appeals the terrible injustice that has been perpetrated upon her - http://www.gofundme.com/DoreenRelief

expat4ever

14th June 2015, 12:03 PM

Lots of people have cracked the code. The video says billions have been returned from the IRS. My guess is its more like 100 million. Some returns took years to process but in the end they got their money back. Lots of back and forth with the IRS and very few were prosecuted thus the reason they go after Pete and his wife for supplying the information.

My conclusions after watching, reading, buying the books from both him and Dave Champion is it was easier to just give them a few k a year rather than take all the time and effort to fight fight fight. I applaud them for standing up to the system and taking on the nastiest beast of all but they have more or less made it a lifes work.
With her case, she wasnt ever charged with fraud, failure to file or any other IRS frivilous charge. Contempt of court is what this is all about. The judge ordered both of them to change their income on their irs forms. They both refused. They filed what they think and believe is income. Noone has tried to explain any different in the court system. They just order them to change it under penalty of purjury and they are standing up to it as they should.
IMO the judge cant order anyone under penalty of perjury to change a tax filing.