View Full Version : UN Admits it is Coming to Take Our Guns by Force
Ares
23rd June 2015, 08:27 PM
BREAKING: JESUIT CRIMINAL POPE DECLARES ALL CITIZENS MUST NOT HAVE GUNS and NEW WORLD COMMUNIST ORDER:
https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/jesuit-pope-francis-it-is-a-mortal-sin-to-own-a-gun/
https://patriotnewstwo.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/2015-04-05-21_13_24-troops-ordered-to-kill-all-americans-who-do-not-turn-in-guns-youtube.png?w=1000&h=516
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FXSEhgjoE&feature=youtu.be
Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FXSEhgjoE&feature=youtu.be
https://patriotnewstwo.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/2015-04-05-21_17_33-troops-ordered-to-kill-all-americans-who-do-not-turn-in-guns-youtube.png?w=1000&h=514
https://patriotnewstwo.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/2015-04-05-21_19_02-troops-ordered-to-kill-all-americans-who-do-not-turn-in-guns-youtube.png?w=1000&h=550
https://patriotnewstwo.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/2015-04-05-17_26_03-the-treason-documents.png?w=1000&h=731
https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/06/19/shock-un-admits-it-is-coming-to-take-our-guns-by-force/
ximmy
23rd June 2015, 08:35 PM
Since I became a gun owner, I can't believe how many people around me are armed, compared to just 3 years ago.
Maybe they already were, and I was the ignorant one....
Like just about everyone is pro-gun, except for a few stragglers, maybe one out of ninety-nine, calling for gun control.
Glass
23rd June 2015, 08:45 PM
I think given the lack or organisation or coordination, the people of the US will lay down their guns. There will be a few LW's but mostly there will be capitulation and submission.
BrewTech
23rd June 2015, 09:02 PM
The document refers to disarming at the state level. Ya know, nukes?
Glass
23rd June 2015, 09:06 PM
The document refers to disarming at the state level. Ya know, nukes?
Yes but the video does not. It talks about foreign troops operating on US soil. Is there any good reason to do drills in the down town? Which middle east cities resemble downtown Miami? Or Las Vegas or any other high rise US city?
midnight rambler
23rd June 2015, 09:33 PM
CONgress takes up gun control again -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/06/23/manchin-toomey-both-interested-in-reviving-gun-control-push/
This recent shooter brought 'em some early Christmas presents.
Ponce
24th June 2015, 02:49 AM
When the phones and the internet goes out it will be then the time to get worried......
V
Twisted Titan
24th June 2015, 05:50 AM
I just cracked up reading the title of this thread:
UN taking Guns by Force
The very nature of gun ownership is to resist force.
I just got a chuckle out of looking at the issue logically.
I have to use my dangerous guns to take your dangerous guns.
mick silver
24th June 2015, 07:51 AM
I don't know when it will come but they will try . I hope someone hands out the guns they are giving away overseas .
StreetsOfGold
24th June 2015, 10:37 AM
JESUIT CRIMINAL POPE
but ...but...but it supposed to be the "big bad JEWS"
Haven't you gotten the memo??
Where are the GSUS jesuit Pro Roman Catholic "PLANTS"?
Time to show your ugly faces and finger point at those "JEWS" who are behind all this.
BrewTech
24th June 2015, 11:58 PM
I just cracked up reading the title of this thread:
UN taking Guns by Force
The very nature of gun ownership is to resist force.
I just got a chuckle out of looking at the issue logically.
I have to use my dangerous guns to take your dangerous guns.
Exactly. If you're a gun owner, what the fu*k? Why do you have guns except to defend your right to have them?
If you plan on not using them when the time comes, I will gladly accept their donation... ;)
BrewTech
25th June 2015, 12:00 AM
JESUIT CRIMINAL POPE
but ...but...but it supposed to be the "big bad JEWS"
Haven't you gotten the memo??
Where are the GSUS jesuit Pro Roman Catholic "PLANTS"?
Time to show your ugly faces and finger point at those "JEWS" who are behind all this.
Explain further.
In fact, start a thread and fully develop your line of thought on this matter.
Glass
25th June 2015, 12:41 AM
Its pretty obvious he is part of the game. There are many players. Many clubs. Many secret handshakes.
Serpo
25th June 2015, 03:15 AM
The UN ....what a joke.............
Obama uses the UN as a tool to disarm people because.....er...ah..hmmm
Israel .................drops illegal bombs and nothing........
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israelis-rain-phosphorous-bombs-over-gaza/7965
(https://electronicintifada.net/content/israelis-rain-phosphorous-bombs-over-gaza/7965)
Shami-Amourae
25th June 2015, 04:53 AM
JESUIT CRIMINAL POPE
but ...but...but it supposed to be the "big bad JEWS"
Haven't you gotten the memo??
Where are the GSUS jesuit Pro Roman Catholic "PLANTS"?
Time to show your ugly faces and finger point at those "JEWS" who are behind all this.
They both suck. They both have the same interests.
ximmy
25th June 2015, 03:31 PM
lookie... a many much folks quietly have weapons...
Vast Majority of NY Gun Owners Refuse to Comply with SAFE Act - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/vast-majority-of-ny-gun-owners-refuse-to-comply-with-safe-act_062015#sthash.eiVtNLDb.dpuf
Not long after the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, the gun grabbers crawled out of the woodwork, demanding new legislation to hinder gun ownership for millions of law-abiding Americans (as they are wont to do after every mass shooting). One of the measures that managed to be signed into law as a result of these bleating cries, was the NY SAFE Act, which restricts magazine capacities, demands background checks for ammunition, and forces gun owners to register their “assault rifles,” which are broadly defined. These are a just a few of the draconian demands (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE_Act) found in the SAFE Act.
But more than two years after the SAFE Act was established, the residents of New York have largely failed to comply on a massive scale. Apparently, the State Police have been reluctant to disclose the number of registrations, despite numerous Freedom of Information requests, and understandably so. Earlier this week they finally fessed (http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/New-York-SAFE-Act-gun-registration-numbers-are-6343080.php) up to their dismal numbers.
Since New York’s SAFE Act gun control law went into effect in January 2013, a total of 23,847 people have applied to register their newly defined assault-style weapons with the State Police (http://www.timesunion.com/search/?action=search&channel=news&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=%22State+Police%22).
Those individuals have registered a total of 44,485 weapons.
The statistics, hidden from the public for more than a year by state officials, were given to Rochester-area lawyer Paloma Capanna (http://www.timesunion.com/search/?action=search&channel=news&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=%22Paloma+Capanna%22) on Monday in response to a lawsuit she filed on behalf of radio host Bill Robinson (http://www.timesunion.com/search/?action=search&channel=news&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=%22Bill+Robinson%22).
Sounds like a lot, but this is a state with nearly 20 million residents. So how many guns have gone unregistered?
People who already owned assault style weapons were allowed to keep them but were supposed to register them with the State Police by an April 2014 deadline.
Second Amendment advocates called it an intrusion into their privacy, and as the logistics of tracking the registration became clear, many predicted that only a handful of people would actually register their guns.
Capanna called the state’s tally of fewer than 45,000 weapons a sign that the law was being ignored by many.
While there is no firm count, observers have estimated there could have been hundreds of thousands or even a million assault-style weapons in New York when the law passed.
So basically, almost every New Yorker with an “assault rifle” refused to comply. And according to an Infowars report by Kit Daniels, most of those who did comply were police officers. (http://www.infowars.com/revolt-millions-of-n-y-gun-owners-refuse-to-register-firearms/)But not all members of law enforcement, are going along with this law. There’s been outright rebellion against the SAFE Act, that includes everyone from private citizens to public servants.
Protestors against the law marked the April 15 registration deadline by destroying state registration cards.
“They have been shredding the Constitution for years,” gun owner Rus Thompson said (http://www.infowars.com/mass-civil-disobedience-in-new-york-against-safe-act/). “You shred the Constitution, we’ll shred any form you want us to fill out.”
“They can’t arrest a million people. What are they going to do?”
Erie Co. Sheriff Timothy B. Howard publicly said he wouldn’t enforce the SAFE Act.
“The Constitution is the law of the land,” he stated (http://www.buffalonews.com/20130516/sheriff_howard_on_safe_act_x2018_i_won_x2019_t_enf orce_it_x2019.html). “If you know it’s a violation of the Constitution, how can you enforce it?”
It just goes to show you that what’s on paper and what is reality, are two very different things.
There’s an indisputable fact that the elites don’t want you to know. When enough people refuse to comply with a law (and especially if law enforcement joins the resistance) it is effectively null and void. You don’t need to spend years trying to convince legislators to repeal a law, or convince the courts to overturn it. If everyone that matters simply ignores a law, it ceases to be; and it looks like the NY SAFE Act is destined for this kind of irrelevance.
aeondaze
25th June 2015, 06:06 PM
It just goes to show you that what’s on paper and what is reality, are two very different things.
There’s an indisputable fact that the elites don’t want you to know. When enough people refuse to comply with a law (and especially if law enforcement joins the resistance) it is effectively null and void. You don’t need to spend years trying to convince legislators to repeal a law, or convince the courts to overturn it. If everyone that matters simply ignores a law, it ceases to be; and it looks like the NY SAFE Act is destined for this kind of irrelevance.
They'll keep the law on the books because its their foot in the door. It might not have any impact today, but tomorrow they'll use it as a justification to charge someone. Slowly but surely the law will begin to take effect when people realise that its a liability, get pulled over for a routine traffic violation then wham, they hit you with felony charges. Over time some of the objectors will die off while others have their asses handed to them by law enforcement. Slowly but surely more and more or cave in, then one day the number of objectors is small enough for them to really start cracking down, its just a matter of time and they know it...:rolleyes:
You either get the law repealed or tick tock, its just a matter of time...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.